will get rid of him in the same way and about him who he is a long time ago wrote, our pushkin alexander sergeevich truenow him yet, so he thought that he was writing a brake in poltava in his own, but in reality. he wrote about zelensky because. the only difference between them is that he was an old man, and this good fellow is evil. he is just as cynical, absolutely unprincipled, without any values, a scoundrel and a traitor, like a giraffe with our money and having earned everything in the world. he ran like this when we waved such a carrot under him in front of him. and if you want to be president, that's cool. see this role, you haven't played yet. and this will still be for the truth, and he forgot everything and left, just as he did not worry about the ukrainian people, so he does not worry about them now, when they are dying in huge numbers on the fronts in huge numbers, their victims are those victims who are called publicly on west, and then delete this tweet. it's actually less that's for all the information i have guys out there that's less than it actually is. it doesn't please me. i don’t

get rid of him in the same way and about him who he wrote such a long time ago, our pushkin alexander sergeevich trueyet, so he thought that he was writing a parasite in poltava in his but with really. he wrote about zelensky because. mazepa they only differ in that he was an old man, and this good fellow is evil. he is just as cynical, absolutely unprincipled, without any values, a bastard and a traitor, like a giraffe, having earned everything in the world with our money. he ran like this when we wave such a carrot under him in front of him. and if you want to be president, that's cool. see this role, you haven't played yet. and this will still be for the truth, and he forgot everything and left, just as he did not worry about the ukrainian people, so he does not worry about them now, when they are dying in huge numbers on the fronts in huge numbers, their victims are those victims who are called publicly on west, and then delete this tweet. it's actually less that's for all the info i have guys that it's less than it actually is. it doesn't please me. i don't want young people to die there, many o

look at the screen. correct answer seventh question is it true that the belogorsk fortress, where the action of alexander sergeevich pushkin's unfolded, has survived to this day? svyatoslav, what do you think about this issue? i don’t know the exact answer, but i decided that it didn’t survive, i can only guess that an earthquake, for example, or something else, weathering, in the end , denudation and other joy could happen to him during all this time. nikita what do you think? i believe that yes, it is possible that it survived. well, basically, what could happen to him. there is also no weathering there, of course, nikita answers incorrectly. it's a pity, but he still speaks well. i like ok. and where geographically it is located, that is, on the map in russia, i have it well. in what part do not immediately answer arina a. what do you think, to be honest, i do not know the answer to this question, but i answered yes. just because it seems so to me, the belogorsk fortress is a fictitious toponym. well , that is, in general, in principle, it does not exist. it 's just that pushkin came up with it, just in case, so it was in

look at screen. correct answer seventh question is it true that the belogorsk fortress, where the action of the work of alexander sergeevich pushkinday? svyatoslav, what do you think about this issue? i do not know the exact answer, but i decided that it did not survive. one can only guess what could have happened to him during all this time in an earthquake, for example, or something else , weathering, in the end, and other joys. nikita what do you think? i think yes it is possible she survived, in principle, what could happen to him. there is not. as if there is no weathering, of course, it's a pity, but still he reasons well. i like it, that is, on the map of russia, i have it well. in what part so immediately do not answer. what do you think, yes? simply because it seems to me that the belogorsk fortress is a fictitious toponym. well , that is, in general, in principle, it does not exist. it 's just pushkin came up with, so just in case let's go. i was interested in talking with you. well, at least you smile. you just have to know that the belogorsk fortress did not exist. it 's just that pushkin's imagination during the orenb

is it true that the phrase and peasant women know how to love belongs to peru alexander sergeevich pushkin'sf i'm not mistaken, then this is nekrasov's phrase. so, uh, the version is understandable. while i'm not saying anything, i want to ask, uh, victoria to be honest, i don't know the exact answer. and which one did you choose? in the end i chose yes, i decided that, perhaps, this is from the work of a young peasant lady. ugh guess. clear. at least they are based on something. that's good, but ksenia i didn't have an exact answer, so i had to choose, at random alexander chose what this time. well , i chose no, because it seems like the wife was such a work, poor lisa was just talking about the fact that the christians were killed. that is, iza, not even the former options, still knew how to kill her, as if this is a phrase from the story karamzin poor liza, who became the embodiment of russian sentimentalism. the correct answer to this question is no. the twelfth question, is it true that the word canned is of latin origin time? we have latin lovers here. eh, according to the motto. alevt

true growth, slavic streams will merge into the russian sea. here is the question. leave us, you have not read these bloody tablets, you do not understand alien family citizenship. alexander sergeevich pushkin time will tell under the fire of the ukrainian army, residential, quarters of the city, hospitals, a kindergarten, meanwhile, russia inflicts massive strikes on the position of the ukrainian army in touch alexander voskoboynikov greetings, how other cities? once again, good afternoon. yes, so it is they take revenge for what they can not at the front, but again they use this information in the style of cities. and also for their own purposes, that is, they strike, intimidate the place of the population, they try to take revenge in such a way, and in their media they show an example of the shelling of donetsk, they say that you see, - he says, a terrible russian is bombing, donetsk is already the ninth year in a row. we need weapons, we need help, because if we don't help, they will die and say. no, we are with you, that is, they just twist, uh, information, and you need to show something to your population, and speak already nothing, not even lusya arrestovich. and uh, she already say