semyon geichenko, a pushkinist writer, who devoted almost 50 years of his life to the museum of the mikhailovskayareserve, in the pskov region, recreated it from the ruins after the war. valentin kurbatov - literary critic and prose writer, who wrote many times about the famous russian poet. the exhibition brings together literary texts by two monumental figures. and photographs by st. petersburg reporter belinsky.

culture, presented to the minsk ablasnaya library in the name of pushkin, syamyon geychanka , writer, pushkinists a 50-year -old from his life of dedication... to the museum of the mikhailovskaya nature reserve near the pskov region, learning from the ruins of the war. valentsin kurbatau, literary and poetic writers, like a lot of times pіsaў pra vyadomaga ruskaga paeta. the exhibition includes the most comprehensive literary texts of two monumental works, and the photographs of the petsyarburg rapper, yury byalinsk. geichenka is the simple soul of pushkin mountains. as a critic, for his part, he made an invaluable contribution, the cultures are very close to pskov - this is generally a borderland, there are a lot of overlaps of destinies, families with belarusians, the russian museum-reserves of the minsk library are explained not only by the famous name of the writer, but also by his own projects, documents and documents dagavor ab supratsoўnіstve, creative inіtsyyativy podhoplіva іh pratsu daksama denote, so captivated ўzaemadzeyannaya, holy zeinastsі bіblіyakі name of pushkin, padzyaka, kvet

i would be happy, and the same thing was written by shchogalev, pavel elsech, such a wonderful pushkinistn should have married not goncharova, but shchogolev, all of us in further pushkin's work and then he would have lived to this day, then he would have written five sequels to eugene onegin, then he would have written another poltava, but pasternak goes on to say that he would not have understood such a pushkin, namely. nikolaevna, for whom she was a wonderful wife, this is pushkin , the real pushkin, the genuine one, we continue, this is a podcast about the life of the wonderful, i am with you, writer alexey varlamov, and we are talking today about pushkin. it is well known that exile to mikhailovskaya, which could have resulted in permanent exile for pushkin, it ended, as we remember, with. that tsar nicholas ii wished to meet with pushkin. and after this meeting, which took place in moscow in september 1826, the tsar said that today he spoke with the smartest man in russia and pushkin really was such, and it seems to me, with exactly this seriousness, with this thoroughness, with wit

remember for sure that i put them in exactly this pocket, a double, and now the most famous russian pushkinistoh, how you got stuck because of the classics, heal your nerves, that’s later, but now the public, the public is waiting, the public is waiting, here, there, there, there, yes, yes, yes, what, i don’t understand myself, crazy house, everyone went crazy, who was it, and there were two guys there and, pushkin, quickly there. quickly, dad, the problem is not pushkin, not egor, calm, calm, i don’t know where to look for them, they were here, they saw yegor’s grandfather, they are looking for a watch, it means that soon i will definitely have to return to the lyceum, there is nowhere else to go, so, sorry, you didn’t find any connections here, listen, it was you, forgive me, they told me here, how could i suggest that he lives, where, how did he get here? alexander sergeevich, dear, forgive me, great, complete nonsense, my dear, i dropped my watch somewhere while we were with you, i really need it, about the watch, honestly, i don’t know anything, i’m ready not to give it back to you, it's

dealership from a tatar or from a greek, he’s in the crimea, when i traveled there, well, many, pushkinistsnow, so to speak, they are trying to guess, so to speak, the answer to marya nikolaevna’s relationship with pushkin, whether they had love, they didn’t, well, in fact, raevskaya herself, so to speak, at that time wrote in her memoirs that he always loved only his muse and no one else, gave a clear answer, the appearance of this ring, it is not at all romantic, at maria nikolaevna’s, it means they spent it in different ways, so to speak, not, not in drunkenness at cards, but sometimes they played different games, so to speak, lotteries and so on, and pushkin gave this ring to the lottery, and maria nikolaevna won it, this is not a romantic story at all, well, anyone, so to speak, who was there could win, but at the same time, she soon married prince volkonsky, sergei grivich and, who participated in the speech at the senate. year, then boldly one of the first went to siberia for him, with this ring, this ring passed through siberia, returned from there, inherited it to his son, mikhailu

bought it from a tatar or a greek, he was in the crimea when he was traveling there, well, many pushkinists fighting, we know, they are trying, so to speak. so to speak, there was no clue to marya nikolaevna’s relationship with pushkin, whether they had love, but , in fact, raevskaya herself, so to speak, over time wrote in her memoirs that he always loved only his muse and no one else, gave a clear answer, the appearance of this ring, it is not at all romantic for maria nikolaevna, which means they spent time in different ways, so to say, not not drunk at cards, but sometimes played different games. so to speak, to the lottery and so on, and pushkin gave this ring to the lottery and maria nikolaevna won it, this is such a completely unromantic story, well, anyone, so to speak, who was there could win, but at the same time she soon married prince volkonsky , sergeyevich, and who took part in a speech on senate square in '25, then boldly one of the first went to siberia for him and... with this ring, this ring passed through siberia, returned from there, was inherited by his son, mikhail ser

from a tatar or... from a greek, he was traveling in the crimea when he was there , well, many pushkiniststo guess, so to speak, the solution to marya nikolaevna’s relationship with pushkin, whether they had love, or not, so, well, in fact, raevskaya herself has already, so to speak, well with time in her memoirs she wrote that he always loved only his muse and no one else, gave a clear the answer, the appearance of this ring, it is not at all romantic, maria nikolaevna. this means that they spent their time in different ways, so to speak, not just drunkenly playing cards, but sometimes they played different games, so to speak, lotteries and so on , and pushkin gave this ring to the lottery, and maria nikolaevna won it, completely unromantic such a story, well, just like that, anyone could have won, so to speak, but at the same time, she soon married prince volkonsky, sergeyevich, and who participated in the speech at the senate square in the year twenty-fifth, then boldly one of the first went to siberia for him, and with this ring, this ring passed through siberia, returned from there, w

semyon geichenko, a pushkinist writer who devoted almost 50 years of his life to the museum of the mikhailovskoyeure reserve in the pskov region, recreated it from the ruins after the war. valentin kurbatov is a literary critic and prose writer who has written many times about the famous russian poet. you. the exhibition brings together literary texts two monumental personalities and photographs by st. petersburg reporter yuri belinsky. i wanted to not just show photographs, because they are telling, you will see different states of mind of these people, you will see how beautiful they are and how human this beauty is, but plus everything, they also have absolutely wonderful texts, which, combined with images, with images, are very they talk a lot about time, about these. geichenko is simply the soul of pushkin hills, kurbatov, well, as a writer, as a critic, for his part, made an invaluable contribution, did a lot for in order for as many people as possible to learn about russian culture, about pushkin and tolstoy, and we are very close to culture, pskov is generally a border region, there are a