of truth polluted, which, as we know from the history of fake news, this is what the original putin doctrinet trump wants. he does not want you to believe this rubbish he pumps out. he wants you to believe nothing. and yet, i know that people watching this on bbc or listening to this via a bbc podcast will think that, "actually, the bbc is part of the problem". that there is, you know — these days, if you want to go viral, you say, "there is a conspiracy of silence at the bbc". whether or not there is one or not, why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about a cover—up byjournalists? in other words, why is trust injournalism so low? well, i mean, we have not distinguished ourselves over past 20 years! you know, the phone hacking thing was not good. the levison enquiry was not marvellous. so, i mean — i mean, there is a reason for people to be slightly sceptical about journalism. but it is in much the same way as the, you know, the expenses scandal made people very sceptical about politicians. what i believe — and i have said this before — but that being sceptical is not the sam

the idea of truth polluted, which we know from the history of fake news is what the original putin doctrine what trump wants, he does not want you do believe this rubbish he pumps out, he wants you to believe nothing. people watching this on bbc or listening to this via bbc podcast will think that actually the bbc is part of the problem. but there is these days if you want to go viral you say there is a conspiracy at the bbc. why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about journalists? why is trust in journalism so low? we have not distinguished ourselves in the past 30 years. the phone hacking thing was not good and the leveson inquiry was not marvellous. i mean there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical about journalism. it is not much the same way as the expenses scandal made us very sceptical about politicians. but i believe and i have said this before that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing but you assess or value. there is really good journalism going on. the alternative is literally sitting at home thinking i

the idea of truth polluted, which we know from the history of fake news is what the original putin doctrineas what donald trump wants, he does not want you do believe this rubbish he pumps out, he wants you to believe nothing. people watching this on bbc or listening to this via bbc podcast will think that actually the bbc is part of the problem. but there is these days if you want to go viral you say there is a conspiracy at the bbc. why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about journalists? why is trust in journalism so low? we have not distinguished ourselves the past 30 years. the phone hacking thing was not good and the enquirer was not marvellous. i mean there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical. about journalism. it is not much the same way as the expenses scandal made us very sceptical about politicians. but i believe and i have said this before that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing but you assess value. there is really good journalism going on. the alternative is literally sitting at home thinking i won

the idea of truth polluted, which we know from the history of fake news is what the original putin doctrinenot want you do believe this rubbish he pumps out, he wants you to believe nothing. people watching this on bbc or listening to this via bbc podcast will think that actually the bbc is part of the problem. but there is these days if you want to go viral you say there is a conspiracy at the bbc. why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about journalists? why is trust in journalism so low? we have not distinguished ourselves the past 30 years. the phone hacking thing was not good and the enquirer was not marvellous. i mean there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical. about journalism. it is not much the same way as the expenses scandal made us very sceptical about politicians. but i believe and i have said this before that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing but you assess value. there is really good journalism going on. the alternative is literally sitting at home thinking i wonder what i believe. is it really str

the idea of truth polluted, which we know from the history of fake news is what the original putin doctrinetening to this via bbc podcast will think that actually the bbc is part of the problem. but there is these days if you want to go viral you say there is a conspiracy at the bbc. why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about journalists? why is trust in journalism so low? we have not distinguished ourselves the past 30 years. the phone hacking thing was not good and the enquirer was not marvellous. i mean there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical. about journalism. it is not much the same way as the expenses scandal made us very sceptical about politicians. but i believe and i have said this before that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing but you assess value. there is really good journalism going on. the alternative is literally sitting at home thinking i wonder what i believe. is it really striking about the election campaign that we saw at the end of 2019 that a lot of the fake news was actually pumped out b

of truth polluted, which, as we know from the history of fake news, this is what the original putin doctrineople watching this on bbc or listening to this via a bbc podcast will think that, "actually, the bbc is part of the problem". that there is, you know — these days, if you want to go viral, you say, "there is a conspiracy of silence at the bbc". whether or not there is one or not, why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about a cover—up by journalists? in other words, why is trust injournalism so low? well, i mean, we have not distinguished ourselves over past 20 years! you know, the phone hacking thing was not good. the levison enquiry was not marvellous. so, i mean — i mean, there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical slightly sceptical about journalism. but it is in much the same way as the, you know, sceptical about politicians. but i believe that — and i have said this before — but that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing, you try and assess and evaluate. there is really good journalism going on. the alterna

the idea of truth polluted, which we know from the history of fake news is what the original putin doctrineieve this rubbish he pumps out, he wants you to believe nothing. people watching this on bbc or listening to this via bbc podcast will think that actually the bbc is part of the problem. but there is these days if you want to go viral you say there is a conspiracy at the bbc. why are people so keen to believe conspiracy theories about journalists? why is trust in journalism so low? we have not distinguished ourselves the past 30 years. the phone hacking thing was not good and the enquirer was not marvellous. i mean there is a reason for people to be fully sceptical. about journalism. it is not much the same way as the expenses scandal made us very sceptical about politicians. but i believe and i have said this before that being sceptical is not the same as being cynical. it does not mean you believe in nothing but you assess value. there is really good journalism going on. the alternative is literally sitting at home thinking i wonder what i believe. you said in the past that you do no

putin over our intel. he keeps saying he does all of these things. one has really happened to america is the fairness doctrineas taken away from the people. any kind of story can be told now and there are facts being told. news is what this president speaks. what was the stock market when obama came to office? 7500. when he left it was in the 21,000 range. it is at 27,000 now. crazy that what general patton said would happen to the united states of america -- the russians would be all the way up into our white house, supreme court, congress, senate. why won't they release all the information and who took all this money from the russian oligarchs to the american people? signsa video there of the that will be part of it. kyle cheney of politico catching that as well. he tweets the tradition of gop placards as impeachment backdrop. richard is next, san diego, california. caller: thank you for taking my call. i don't think the president has done anything to be impeached. i think the biden thing and hunter, we all know what happened there. a guy helping his son out. we know that. the thing i don't understand is ho