yes, but putin doesn't care an more grip? yes, but putin doesn't care any more what — grip?t care any more what the west - grip? yes, but putin doesn't care any more what the west things l grip? yes, but putin doesn't care - any more what the west things about him, he's long discarded any international legitimacy when he started the war in ukraine. nor at this point does he care that the russian people love him, he won't win the hearts and minds of the russians. so what this does is a very high—profile assassination, it sends shivers down the spine of anybody who has any feeling that they want to challenge putin, because the consequences of challenging putin is death. the same way that the consequence for a soldier for mutiny, way that the consequence for a soldierfor mutiny, like prigozhin — this is the act of a dictatorjust trying as best he can do absolutely terrify his people into submission. you mentioned ukraine and took me to a place i wanted to go, in america we've seen republicans blocking aid to ukraine, so many people worried about the consequence of that, it help

new putin? we are now witnessing reckless emotional. i don't know, but we do know that the russian president has not stayed the same over his extraordinary reign. it is first years he courted the west seductively, convincing president george bush that he was a spiritual man, telling the german bundestag that russia's destiny lay in the west. a speech he made in germany, deutschland, but in those early days, putin desperately needed help from the west russia had big debts and its he had crashed. then came almost a decade of high oil prices. and the russian economy rebounded with vigor. who this petro state was rich. and with that change came greater confidence, ambition, and even expansion putin began to do what perhaps he'd always wanted to do retrieve those russian-speaking lands that were part not of the soviet union. but the older russian empire couldn't sees himself not as a soviet commissar, but as a russian tsar in the tradition of his hero, peter the great, perhaps what changed was not pu

of president vladimir putin. , , _ ,. ., putin.ur very busy schedule of poland's foreign minister, - putin. in your very busy schedule of poland's foreign minister, you - putin. in your very busy schedule of| poland's foreign minister, you were to meet the wife of alexei navalny. i was important for you to have that on your agenda, now she is a widow? we in poland were once dissidents under— we in poland were once dissidents under an— we in poland were once dissidents under an autocracy and we needed the solidarity— under an autocracy and we needed the solidarity of _ under an autocracy and we needed the solidarity of our friends in the free _ solidarity of our friends in the free world and we therefore feel solidarity — free world and we therefore feel solidarity for those who are battling _ solidarity for those who are battling for freedom and democracy in countries that are less fortunate than ours— in countries that are less fortunate than ours now is. and it is particularly difficult to be a democrat in putin's russia. there a

says that putin is smart, who says he believes that he can trust putin and wants to work with putin.hat's your new reality. well, i have to remind you that, for example, in 2008, everyone in the world admired putin and medvedev much bigger than now. do you remember the so—called reset strategy declared by the 0bama administration? they were just nice friends with mr putin, they are kissing each other, etc, etc. yes, we have momentum... let's be specific. when donald trump says, and this is a tweet from just the other day, when he says, quote, "we should be ready "to trust vladimir putin," what is your feeling? well, it sounds disappointing for me and, you know, it's bothering me because i have no idea why mr trump is so kind to mr putin because their views on politics, on particular issues, they 100% differ. from migration to the economy, they are 100% different politicians. but they like each other and it's strange, but, well, i would say that international relationships between the kremlin and foreign countries, they wasn't the hot issue inside of russia. so, well, someone is good

applause putin must _ them, with us. applause putin must answer- them, with us.nswer for - them, with us. applause. putin must answer for what them, with us. applause - putin must answer for what he has done with my country. putin must answer for what he has done to a neighbouring, peaceful country. and putin must answer for everything neighbouring, peaceful country. and putin must answerfor everything he has done to alexei. putin must answer for everything he has done to alexei.— has done to alexei. applause my husband — has done to alexei. applause my husband will _ has done to alexei. applause my husband will never - has done to alexei. applause my husband will never see - has done to alexei. applause. my husband will never see what has done to alexei. applause - my husband will never see what the beautiful russia of the future will look like. but we must see it. and i will do... �* �* , will do... applause and i will do. . . applause and i will _ will do. . . applause and i will do - will do. . . applause and i will do my - will do... applause | and i will do

he is putin, he is not khrystyna yatskiv, why does putin have to carry around someone with a written bag, he wants to demonstrate that he is the master of the situation, he does what he wants, the main task... putin to show everyone around him that he is, that there are no red lines that he could not cross, and that he does not count for anything at all, and by the way, i have to tell you that i now perceive putin as this, zmiya horynich, remember, there was one with three heads, this russian folklore character, there is one head of putin that i know well, that i have seen many times since the end of the 90s, it is... the head of this st. petersburg gopnik, ugh, yes, let's wet in the toilets, kill everyone, restore order, this putin ee he seemed completely unfit for any serious political activity, he reacted completely abnormally to challenges, did not go er to the residence when there was an accident with the kursk submarine, treated with contempt towards... these unfortunate women who lost their husbands, submariners, behaved completely inappropriate, not some person in sweatpants,

— president putin? he has been s-ueakin president putin? he has been speaking to — president putin?utin? he has been speaking to workers at - president putin? he has been speaking to workers at a - president putin? he has been l speaking to workers at a factory president putin? he has been - speaking to workers at a factory and unsurprisingly he wasn't asked about this. you don't volunteer any comments about it, that is how he handles this kind of news. he might say something in the future but that is frankly unlikely. his spokesman will be asked about this tomorrow or next week rather at his regular daily briefings with the media. i wouldn't expect him to be completely frank and honest about alexei navalny�*s death given the fact that he had been a thorn in the kremlin's side for so long. we heard... we heard from _ side for so long. we heard... we heard from his wife earlier and she said before she spoke that she had met with us secretary of state antony blinken i think we're going be able to play you some of that speech that she gave. she had a standing ovation. we are going to p

, and he monitors the results of the elections, even if you imagine that 90% are against putin, putinould not give up power, he secured the result with bayonets and defended it, he would write , that he has 90%, and would not allow people to come out and be outraged by this violation, substitution or falsity'. that is, that in no case should a serious, irreconcilable contradiction arise. the real picture cannot be replaced only by virtual, invented elections and their results. can not. people still have maintain loyalty. he watches over it. war is definitely a stimulant. people began to live worse, someone is sent to the front. someone is in the army, someone got scared and left, relocated outside of russia and wants to return, etc., i.e. a lot of problems related to the war, and how else? putin cannot take a break, he is now, as forbes writes, i read this article, preparing for an offensive in the kharkiv region, it is possible that this is an attack and a pso, perhaps the actions of the russian army of the kremlin, precisely such as to provoke expectations of an invasion from belgor

92% do not trust putin. the highest negative rating pew research has ever recorded for a world leader what is putin doing? what is he thinking? >> finding the >> answers could be a matter of life and death the story begins at the moment he first rose to power december 31, 1999 minute until the 21st century begins one minute until vladimir putin becomes president of russia it's a moment of high drama russia reeling over putin's sudden ascendance. >> a lot of things happened very quickly outside the halls of the kremlin. many know nothing about him >> it had all >> started just hours earlier suddenly yeltsin appeared on television >> but again, i don't will again bucha now, boris yeltsin, the first president of democratic russia, abruptly resigned >> but surprise announcement from boris yeltsin that he is resigning as president and turning over power to as prime minister. vladimir putin. >> it was clear. >> yeltsin had >> been struggling >> drinking and he's barely being propped up and physically propped up, d

putin killed navalny, and why did he? because putin is weak.. putin killed navalny because navalny was the one opposition leader in russia that putin feared the most. so this is a really tragic day for me and it should be a tragic day for anybody who cares about democracy. navalny in my view, was the -- put him in the category of brave, courageous leaders that, you know, remember. he went back to russia. he didn't have to go back. he within the back for his country because he was a patriot that believed that his country could be different. i put him in the same pranks as the navalny, mandela, but with one tragic difference now. navalny is dead. >> ambassador, i'm so sorry. i know he was a close friend of yours, and gosh, i didn't know you were with his wife last night. can you remind our viewers, because sometimes it's lost. they know the name, but they don't know the full story about the lengths to which alexei navalny went to fight the corrupt government, the authoritarianism of vladimir putin? as you said, even after he was poisoned, he volu

. , , ., to freely criticise the kremlin and mr putin? , ., . , , mr putin?o freely criticise the _ mr putin? there has been no ability to freely criticise the kremlin - mr putin? there has been no ability to freely criticise the kremlin for . to freely criticise the kremlin for quite some time.— to freely criticise the kremlin for quite some time. certainly not since the invasion — quite some time. certainly not since the invasion in _ quite some time. certainly not since the invasion in 2022. _ quite some time. certainly not since the invasion in 2022. we _ quite some time. certainly not since the invasion in 2022. we have - quite some time. certainly not since the invasion in 2022. we have seenl the invasion in 2022. we have seen so many— the invasion in 2022. we have seen so many people arrested for anti—war sentiments— so many people arrested for anti—war sentiments and even seen schoolchildren targeted for drawings that express a preference for peace. there _ that express a preference for peace. there is— that express a preference for peace. there is no

and in düsseldorf , the figure of vladimir putin tried swallow ukraine.artists also depicted sexual intercourse between the kremlin dictator and patriarch kirill and added the inscription: from russia with love, painted in lgbt colors. that's the news for now, you can read more on our website espresso tv, also follow us on social media and watch us on youtube. our team is working to ensure that you see the updated issue already at 6 p.m. tired of heavy and bulky saws, then the strong saw from rozpak tv, just for you, was the way to go. cut the trees and bushes, it is so convenient to use it for carpentry, it is an ideal tool for your home or garden, and the price is only from uah 1,499, also a reliable battery is included, call now and order, free delivery is possible, check with consultants, cut branches, cut timber, chop firewood, you can do all this in one movement with the strong saw, just look how quickly it copes with even thick branches. once and done, and unlike standard saws, it is so convenient to use in difficult situations available places. th

putin's brutality.obal capitals — we'll also talk to our bbc editors and corrospondents about the man who took on putin. hello, i'm matthew amroliwala. welcome to verified live, three hours of breaking stories, and checking out the truth behind them. hello and welcome to verified live — our programme today — dominated by that news from russia — that the jailed politcial activist,

ukraine is there the kremlin's official position, which putin would like the west to hear.has nothing good to agree on. there will be no compromise, of course, he does not want any peace in ukraine, but he wants the west to believe that he is ready for such a compromise. to whom are all these words and this entire interview addressed, only one person, trump. that's all for him, because now putin has, well, to be honest, the geopolitical situation, well , to put it mildly, not very well, because let's not talk about the mobilization potential of russia, about the fact that it will rise. pitched the economy on military rails, this is all true, but geopolitically, russia is losing a lot, because remember that before the great war in ukraine, russia claimed to be the third or even second in the world, that is, it was a respectable country, with how in principle it was possible to have a business that was perceived as one of the world leaders, and now it has turned into some kind of iran, some kind of regional power, which is powerful, but prevents everyone from living. this is

., ., ., , ., _ putin? you have to start by saying that russian _ putin?ou have to start by saying that russian media _ putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space - putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space and - putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space and the| putin? you have to start by saying - that russian media space and the way that russian media space and the way that russian media space and the way that russian politics operates has been very restrictive for years, so for mr navalny it has all always been an uphill struggle to gain support within russia. he was denied access to the media. it was difficult for him to campaign and rally. despite all that, the investigative videos he reported on line received millions of views and he and his team, known as the anti—corruption foundation, anti—corru ption foundation, investigated official corruption anti—corruption foundation, investigated official corruption by president putin himself and his key officials, and even though vladimir putin and his s

will definitely deepen them, and probably about this is also what putin should say. you arrested ourour currency there, that means the one you have in europe, mostly, because we haven't arrested it yet in yours, we suffer twice, you arrested us, we can't use our currency, and in that while we can seize your property, but until now, you don't let it out either, well, we don't let it out, but they weren't arrested, it doesn't work in the economy, it works for them, we're foreigners, it doesn't go anywhere, but it doesn't reflect. taken out, but not arrested, it works in our country, as it lies there, and the profit, what is the same plane there, you see, you can talk about propaganda, but if the plane is shot down in five hundred today, then how many how long will it take for a rocket to reach us, and how long will it take for you to reach america, should we to take some measures, will he intimidate the americans, but this is not intimidation, what you are leading fellow americans to do , he should say simply.' in order to, rather, show that the biden administration is not coping with

if putin wins in ukraine, he will not stop there. autocrats everywhere will feel emboldened to change the status quo by fours. in the u.s., the price of defending the free and open international border we depend on will go up exponentially. democracies everywhere will be imperiled. support for ukraine is not simply a nice to have, but a vital, strategic investment in our own future. thanks, max. i look forward to our conversation. [applause] max: thank you, undersecretary nuland. let me start by asking how you see the state of the war right now with usaid essentially having dried up and ukraine facing a russian offensive, having seized territory and running low on ammunitions. if we are not able to provide aid, what is the outlook for ukraine? undersecretary nuland: tremendously difficult, as i made clear and as we see on the battlefield. in the last three, 4, 5 months, ukraine has had significant successes, most have been in the asymmetric realm, what they have done to the do and surprise attacks where the russians were not expectin

putin's brutality.ello, i'm matthew amroliwala. welcome to verified live, three hours of breaking stories, and checking out the truth behind them. hello and welcome to verified live — our programme today — dominated by that news from russia — that the jailed politcial activist, alexei navalny, has died. the putin critic — was being held in a penal colony, close to the arctic circle — serving a 19—year sentence for extremism and fraud charges — charges widely considered to be politically motivated. there's been an avalanche of international reaction. the us vice—president, kamala harris saying, "russia is responsible for navalny�*s death". the uk prime minister said, it was "terrible news" and nato�*s secretary general says, "russia has serious questions to answer." in 2020 — navalny was poisoned with the nerve agent novichok — russia's fsb security service was blamed. today, russia's prison service said navalny felt "unwell after a walk and almost immediately lost consciousness". in a moment, our diplom

putin is responsible for navalny's death. putin is responsible. what has happened to navalny is yet nor proof of putin's brutality. no one should be fooled, not in russia, not at home, not anywhere in the world. putin does not only target citizens of other countries as we've seen what's going on in ukraine, he also inflicts terrible crimes on his own people, and people across russia and around the world are mowshing navalny today because he was so many things putin was not. he was brave. he was principled. he was dedicated to building a russia where the rule of law existed. and where it applied to everybody. navalny believed in that russia. that russia. he knew it was a cause worth fighting for. and obviously even dying for. this tragedy reminds us of the stakes of this moment. we have to provide the funding so ukraine can keep defending itself. against putin's vicious onslaughts and war crimes. there was bipartisan senate vote that passed overwhelmingly in the united states senate to fund ukraine. now as i've said before and i mean this in a lite

. ,, ., the future as opposition to putin. ., the future as opposition to putin, ., ., putin.putin. so, at the moment, | there's no other opposition leader in russia. it's a british subject who is in prison for 25 years but he didn't quite have the organisational following that alexei navalny had and all of the officials who worked for him have left the country. putin's other opposition are in jail. we even saw tonight how people who were silently in putting flowers out at memorials to alexei navalny in different cities in russia, some of those were detained. there is no one on the horizon who could fulfil the role that alexei navalny fulfilled and i doubt that they will be all the while putin remains in power. we've heard international outcry from many world leaders, russia is a ready subject to sanctions. there is a warrant out for the president's arrest. what impact does it have on president putin? it what impact does it have on president putin?— president putin? it has very little impact. _ president putin? it has very little impact. he's - president putin? it has very lit

., p, he was such a problem to vladimir putin? ., ., ., , ., _ putin?to start by saying that russian media _ putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space - putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space and - putin? you have to start by saying that russian media space and the| putin? you have to start by saying - that russian media space and the way that russian media space and the way that russian media space and the way that russian politics operates has been very restrictive for years, so for mr navalny it has all always been an uphill struggle to gain support within russia. he was denied access to the media. it was difficult for him to campaign and rally. despite all that, the investigative videos he reported on line received millions of views

guess what putin will say. and among the proposed answers, that... ukraine is not a real country and other statements from putin's usual rhetoric. and about the conversation itself , the politician writes that, in particular, that it was a victory for the kremlin propagandists, because there were no issues that were inconvenient for the kremlin. and more the publication notes that carlson's interview with putin is longer than the conversation with hungarian prime minister orban and former us president trump. and the washington post writes that putin barely gave carlson a word in the conversation. the british guardian at the same time quotes putin, who at the beginning. asked: is this a talk show or a serious conversation? viewers believe that neither of these succeeded, putin was talking about the history and justification of the war. the financial times publishes a column with the headline how carlson became putin's useful idiot. carlson claimed that he is the first western journalist who is interested in an interview with the russian president, whi

so there is no resistance to putin? and do you see coming from business elites any so so i tried to touch this. most of them would bribed. some of them were intimidated and all of them were intimidated and bribed. so so the the that is where you stand. yes, indeed. he he was again, he was very clever about this. yes. the coterie around him, the enforcers are all the kgb officers that that were him in leningrad in the mid late seventies. patrician patricia must him they all of them are actually are are quite in in the top echelon. i think he trusts them the most others as i mentioned after khodorkovsky. i mean you want to rebel and go to through two trials and spend years in jail be my guest. no that is not going to happen. the leap itself, i think the most plausible scenario, i would think would be some catastrophic defeat in ukraine where where they decide that this is something in other words, their coming after us that that not only we sanctioned we're sanctioned by the west but but the regime will change and. we wil

putin will use nuclear weapons, even musk poked putin, his tweet recently appeared in which he said thatprince oleg , by all accounts, was a good guy, er, that is , in principle, he laughed at him, but in general we must understand another point, that in contrast to this historical delusion of vladimir putin, on unfortunately, we do not give our true version of history, and here, if... it didn't sound paradoxical, there is a kind of vacuum from our side, which is filled with all this delusion that ukrainians do not exist and so on and so forth. well, from my point of view, at least at the level of senior management it would be worthwhile for ukraine to hold a lecture on the history of ukraine in one of the european universities, it would probably be very good if volodymyr zelenskyi would do it, who would simply ridicule on the one hand the criticism that putin spoke and give our version of our ukrainian history , because i will repeat once again, the information vacuum on our side is being filled with vladimir putin's malaise, and no matter how much someone laughs that the conditional re

putin is responsible for navalny�*s death. putin is responsible.s happened to navalny is more proof of the brutality of putin. no one should be fooled in russia, at home or anyone in the world. putin does not only target citizens of other countries as we have seen is what is going on in ukraine, he also inflicts terrible crimes on his own people. as people across russia and around the world are morning navalny today because he was so many things that putin was not. he was brave, principled, dedicated to building a russia where the rule of law existed and where it apply to everybody. navalny believed in that russia. that russia. he knew it was a cause worth fighting for. and obviously, even dying for. this tragedy reminds us of the stakes of this moment. providing funding so ukraine can keep defending itself against the putin onslaughts in war crimes. there was bipartisan senate vote that passed overwhelmingly in the united states senate to fund ukraine. as i have said before, i mean this in a literal sense, history is watching. history is watching,

, and putin is putin , he is not khrystyna yatskiva, why should putin treat someone like a sack, he wantsmonstrate that he is the master of the situation, he does what he wants, the main task of putin is to show everyone around that he is, that there are no red lines, that he couldn't cross, and that he... nothing at all counts, and by the way, i have to say that now i perceive putin as this, the horynich snake, ugh, do you remember, there was one with three heads, this russian folklore character, there is one head of putin that i know well, which i have seen repeatedly, since the end of the 90s, this is the head of this st. petersburg gopnyak, who will urinate in the toilets, we will kill everyone... let's put things in order, this putin seemed completely unsuitable for any serious political activity, he is completely abnormal responded to calls, no went to the residence when there was an accident with the kursk submarine, treated these unfortunate women who lost their husbands, submariners, with contempt, behaved completely inappropriately, like some person in sweatpants, came to the co

i navalny was such a thorn in vladimir putin's side-— putin's side.ss alexei navalny is a most prominent, _ putin's side. i guess alexei navalny is a most prominent, the _ putin's side. i guess alexei navalny is a most prominent, the most - putin's side. i guess alexei navalny is a most prominent, the most well known and probably one of the brightest critics of vladimir putin and the kremlin in the past 15 years or 20 years. we have seen that one by one those people who dared to openly criticise the kremlin, to challenge the kremlin narrative by disappearing one by one, some killed, some ended up injail, some poisoned with unknown substances, some of them were even poisoned several times. alexei navalny�*s friend and ally was poisoned twice before he was put in prison and each time he decided to return. so alexei navalny with very bright politician, very intelligent but also very talented in presenting himself. his youtube channel was incredibly popular, films and youtube videos he produced gathered millions and millions, certain videos got 20 or 30 m

putin _ outrage. make no mistake, make no mistake, putin is _ outrage.e, putin is responsible - outrage. make no mistake, make no mistake, putin is responsible for- mistake, putin is responsible for navalny�*s death. putin is responsible. what has happened to navalny is yet more proof of putin's brutality. we navalny is yet more proof of putin's brutali . ~ , ., , . ., navalny is yet more proof of putin's brutali .~ , ., , . ., brutality. we should be clear about what has happened _ brutality. we should be clear about what has happened here. _ brutality. we should be clear about what has happened here. poutine's russia _ what has happened here. poutine's russia imprisoned him, trumped up charges _ russia imprisoned him, trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent him _ charges against him, poisoned him, sent him to — charges against him, poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony and now_ sent him to an arctic penal colony and now he — sent him to an arctic penal colony and now he has tragically died and we should — and now he has tragically

putin is the leader of an organised criminal gang. putin is the leader... sorry.oisoners and assassins. they are just puppets. the most important thing is the people close to putin. his friends, his associates, keepers of money. you and all of us must fight the criminal gang and the political innovation here is fighting organised crime, not political competition. no diplomatic notes, but investigations into the financial machinations, not statements but the source of associates in your country for discrete laws and financers who are helping putin and his friends to hide money. in this fight you have reliable allies. there are tens of millions of russians who are against war, against putin, against the evil he brings. we must not persecute them. on the contrary you must work with them, with us. applause putin must answer for what he has done with my country. putin must answer for what he has done to a neighbouring, peaceful country. and putin must answer for everything neighbouring, peaceful country. and putin must answerfor everything he has done to alexei. applau

putin, well, this is my version already, so putin guarantees that he will really make some concessionsl, in order for it not to be a peaceful negotiation, yes, trump becomes president and he comes to moscow, or he comes to helsinki or wherever, meets with putin, and comes out, says that there is nothing to negotiate with him, because he, well, it's not the best situation, right? they , he comes out, says, we talked with putin, as i promised, we agreed on everything within 24 hours, there, i don't know what putin is ready to do, that's another question, yes, and here, here it will be caught in this interview , it is possible, in principle, that putin does not want to communicate with biden, does not see the sense in this, he says this frankly, he has time, as he believes, he will wait until november, there will be a change of government, and he will wait. more favorable conditions for him than trump could offer him today, but this is in the case that he, trump, fulfills his part of the agreement, yes, that is, he will not give help, and trump will simply use ukraine in two or three mont

that's ri . ht, against president putin. that's right. she _ against president putin. that's right, she started first of - against president putin. that's right, she started first of all i against president putin. that's| right, she started first of all by talking about the impact on her as the wife of alexei navalny, saying she used to come to strasbourg with the children in happier times and now she was returning to pick up the mantle, to continue the work that her late husband was doing. she gave us an insight into what the past 12 days have been like, battling to try and retrieve her husband's body for the russian authorities and trying to make plans for the funeral, which she confirmed would take place in moscow on friday afternoon. but she was saying that she's not sure whether it will be peaceful or whether it will be peaceful or whether people would be arrested as they come and try to say goodbye to her husband and i think that is something we will be monitoring, whether the authorities to impose restrictions or what happens to people who come to pay tribute on

putin responded. you. renew.mpletely confused, but quickly came to his senses. he answered, i was definitely busy, september 26, 1922, is the day of the alibi explosion. putin smiled in response, but spoke about the role of the united states in great detail and very seriously. in russia there is no doubt who is the beneficiary of our destruction. germany suffered the most from the terrorist attack, which not only has to feed the entire european union, but now, in fact, only one. sponsor zelensky's war machine, the prospect is dubious in all relationships. the refusal of russian gas, which even now can flow freely through the surviving line of nord stream 2, indicates the incompetence of those who make such decisions, that is, putin indirectly called scholz not entirely competent. did this, you know, i won’t go into details, but in such cases they always say: look for someone who is interested, but in this case you need to look not only for someone who is interested, but also for someone who can do it, because tha

make no mistake, make no mistake, putin is responsible for navalny�*s death. putin is responsible.s yet more proof of putin's brutality. reporter: are you looking at increasing sanctions on russia right now? we're looking at a whole number of options, that's all i'll say right now. we should be clear about what has happened here. putin's russia imprisoned him, trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony, and now he's tragically died, and we should hold putin accountable for this, and no—one should be in any doubt about the dreadful nature of putin's regime in russia. the suspicions around navalny�*s death are fuelled by the fate of other putin critics. last august, evgeny prigozhin died — the mercenary who'd led an armed mutiny in russia. he was killed in a plane crash. it was, the kremlin said, an accident. in 2015, leading opposition politician boris nemtsov was killed, shot on a bridge in the shadow of red square. again, the kremlin denied any role. and it's notjust inside russia that opponents of vladimir putin have been targeted. in 2018, s

putin's russia. but that sort of decency evidently was above the moral reach of the prominent leaders of what used to be the conservative movement. newt gingrich saw a parallel that many others highlighted. navalny's, quote, death in prison is a brutal reminder that jailing your political opponents is inhumane and violation of a free society," he tweeted. mr. biden isn't vladimir putin. newt compared vladimir putin to joe biden, which is grotesque. i wait for newt to grow out of this. i really do. i really do. he's incapable. he compares biden to vladimir putin, to which gerard baker writes, "mr. biden isn't vladimir putin. mr. biden doesn't invade neighbors under false pretext. killing indiscriminately. he doesn't make people who have fallen into disfavor fall from the windows of tall buildings," has he, newt? has he, newt? why do you lie? why do you keep lying for donald trump? baker goes on, "if you condition can't see the difference, i say respectfully, you've lost or discarded your capacity for

so what does putin want now?ieve that he simply wants a repetition, a reproduction of the situation that was not at the end of the cold war, at the beginning, or eventually before the beginning, when he is ready to negotiate, negotiate new rules of the game in the world, that is, this is his understanding, this is him wants a new format. distribution of influences, which is conventionally called yalta-2, well, we understand that after the second, at the end of the second world war, it was yalta-1 that formed a new world order in yalta, which actually existed until today, until recently before the russian invasion of the russian federation into ukraine. now putin wants to show that we can, that he is ready to sit down at the negotiating table, where the bargaining chip will be several geopolitical positions in the united states of america, and the question is only with whom the united states of america negotiates. yes, and in the european union there is a new format of the world order under the conditional name of

putin.remlin walls and the cathedral of christ the savior. the appearance of perhaps the most famous journalist in america, tucker carlson, against this background caused quite a stir. just a promise to record an interview with vladimir putin in the first hour from the moment the video was posted on the former twitter, now social network x, to which it was renamed by the current owner elon musk has 10 million views, and the hashtags are tucker putin, vladimir putin and moscow. soared to the top of global news trends. nearly 3 years ago, the biden administration illegally spied on our communications and then leaked the contents to its cronies in the news media. they did this to prevent the interview we were planning with putin. last month, they definitely did the same thing again, but this time we still came to moscow. elon musk, this is his great merit, promised not to provide pressure and not block this interview after it was posted on the x platform, and we appreciate it for that. western

pavle, so let's start with carlson, the one who tucker and the one who interviewed putin, because putin through tucker said, that americans should not support ukraine, and called to do so, it is in the interview of carlos, tucker carson, let's listen to what the kremlin dictator said. you have nothing to do, you have a lot of border problems, migration problems, national debt problems, over $33 trillion, nothing to do, you have to fight in wouldn't it be better for ukraine to come to an agreement with russia, come to an agreement, understanding the current situation, understanding that russia will fight for its interests to the end, return to common sense, start treating ours with respect. the country and its interests and look for some solutions. that is, putin publicly invited biden to negotiations regarding ukraine, do i understand correctly, mr. pavle? well, it's not the first time he's done this, but he 's not inviting biden personally, he's inviting republicans as well, and actually, if you hear. look at his arguments, these are arguments that are heard in the part of the republic

direct threat to putin's power, but at the _ direct threat to putin's power, but at the same — direct to putin's power, but at the same time, he was - direct threat to putin's power, but at the same time, he was his- direct threat to putin's power, buti at the same time, he was his most vocal— at the same time, he was his most vocal critic. — at the same time, he was his most vocal critic, still— at the same time, he was his most vocal critic, still able _ at the same time, he was his most vocal critic, still able to _ at the same time, he was his most vocal critic, still able to function i vocal critic, still able to function and to— vocal critic, still able to function and to communicate _ vocal critic, still able to function and to communicate with - vocal critic, still able to function and to communicate with the i vocal critic, still able to function - and to communicate with the audience of russians— and to communicate with the audience of russians as — and to communicate with the audience of russians as well. _ and to communicate with the audience of russians as well. that _ an

putin just gave a lecture on hundreds of years of history. what he had for lunch. from the first day of work, german chancellor olaf scholz has been clearly moving in whose direction, hesitating exclusively with the general line of washington, where he arrived. about an hour was allocated for communication with biden, that is, half of the time that scholz apparently spent the day before watching putin’s interview. when we saw this funny interview that... left add about the evil empire, the head of the good empire, who was sluggishly nodding his head on the other side of the fireplace, would definitely have supported. kissinger was right when he said: since napoleon, europe has not looked over his shoulder or worried about russia until now. biden got it all wrong here. kissinger, in his book world order, just wrote that the people of russia surpassed napoleon's army and after the victory, russia - quote, found itself in a possible position. apply his famous shuttle diplomacy, like boris johnson did, only not a peaceful shuttle, but an underwat

we assume it's putin. then she finished her speech with a blast at putin and trying to reaffirm u.s. support for ukraine, which i know is your passion. and then just walking out on the stage to our surprise was his wife. >> extraordinary. >> what was your reaction? >> an extraordinary moment. her speech was short and to the point. vladimir putin murdered my husband. there's no doubt about that. he has to pay a price. this conference in which the world is really deciding whether we are going to stay with ukraine or whether we are going to allow putin to march into ukraine and perhaps into europe, the stakes just got raised because you have seen the clear sickness and brutality of vladimir putin who is so insecure about his hold on power that he needed to murder one of his last remaining political opponents on the brink of his election, that he was sure to win 98-2. that's not good enough for him. my hope -- i think her hope is this puts steel in the spine of the united states that maybe some of the republic

in the case of putin, i think it is both.the effectiveness of the russian in a social media and for the leaders. it really impacts more people than tv shows, weekly shows. to a point, exactly of the day they were coming back to moscow, on thursday to go live again. that is the most effective tool. he was trying to come back on thursday to go live because it was an effective tool against putin's propaganda. social media is also a mistake, we can make it, to the encouragement of the ukrainians. it has been censored. still, the work has done well with expectations. he also has his own army which is cut off and demoralized. that was a mistake, again, we need to give more weapons to ukraine and more money to ukraine during this war if you want russia to be democratic and peaceful, if you want to kick out putin, ukraine aid should win. i think this is something which has nothing to do with the book. this is something which we see a war of this entry going on in europe today. these other wars which are not only won in the informatio