qadeh hashemi is an experienced representative himself, we should really have these things, mr. hashemi . it's up to 10 15 permanent laws of this law are damaged by this law , the so-called law prohibiting the labor of prisoners, the law of transfer of legal insurance constants, which we are portraying , the organizing plan of employees of the state of law. let me tell you, the labor law is the law itself, the social security law is easy to pass many laws, so we should have a two-urgent plan with the existing priorities in this law , regardless of who was involved. who did not play a role? today, the general issue of workers and employees in the government system is considered to be acquired rights. now, who was guilty and who was not guilty? maybe if i want to criticize, i have many criticisms . i have criticisms from the honorable government of some dear ones . why send the layer at all? well, it is not possible to erase the problem, or say the speaker of the parliament or nahid, the speaker of the parliament , why are you insisting that this law be passed. well, it can't be d

qadeh, he himself said that, in fact , he said that, in the end, this opposition to agreeing to thisn is absolutely meaningless in my opinion. we have a drive. for example, in the social commission this year, we approved the law on transfer of disease records, so this law must be implemented in order to collect insurance records so that a person who is insured has one fund. whether or not the law on the organization of employees and the government, which is on the agenda in the parliament, should be determined in the whole country, then it should be approved and the employment duties of a direct employee of the administrative department are completely clear. yes, no, a person came to an office today . it is not at all clear at first whether he is a government employee or not. who are you talking to? i have you. who are we talking to with this law? i mean, we have not known our audience yet, we are only looking at one side of the game. when you want to deal with these comprehensive authors in relation to the issue of insurance funds , you want to look at one dimension only and picture

qadeh hashemi, now you agree with the model that mr. abbasi refers to, that is, somewhere, for example, like ardonan, we should also pay attention to the producers of our friends , and also to my people regarding we are for basic goods and products. many other goods and our other products when we don't create that transparency in full, you, for example, now about profit. we are giving subsidies, we are importing gasoline right now and we are explaining the gasoline at a cheap rate . can we now say that the price of gasoline should be calculated as a free rate? what will happen, who is even willing to accept the responsibility regarding there are many topics, you can now compare the price of gasoline with the price of mineral water, compare the price of diesel, like the same discussion about removing the width of 42, removing the width of the square, it was supposed to be only about basic hats or in the field of food. it has an effect, saying its effect in a specific way, but you can see that it has an effect on other goods , it has an e

qadeh, he himself said that, in fact , he said that, in the end, this opposition to agreeing to thisn is absolutely meaningless in my opinion. for example, in the social commission this year, we passed the law on the transfer of medical records, so this law must be implemented so that the insurance records can be compiled so that a person who is insured is a fund that can be determined in the whole country, or one or nine planning laws. kakanan and the government, which is on the agenda in the parliament, so this should be approved and the task of hiring a direct employee of the agency. it is not clear at all that a person came to your office today . it is not at all clear whether he is a government employee or not . who are you talking to? who are we talking to? with this law, we do not know our audience yet . we are only playing one side of the game. we are looking, when you want to deal with these comprehensive authors in relation to the issue of insurance funds , you just want to look at one dimension and picture a rule , say yes or no, in my opinion, in this part of the version.