he might disagree with quattlebaum's judicial philosophy.oppose every nominee trump makes to the courts, that's fine. schumer didn't pick any of those reasons for opposing quattlebaum. instead he opposing the nomination because quattlebaum is the wrong color. >> the nomination of marvin quattlebaum speaks to the overall lack of diversity in president trump's selections for the federal judiciary. mr. quattlebaum replaces not one but two scuttled obama nominees who were african-american. the trump administration like in so many other areas is taking a giant step backward, this time when it comes to diversity of their nominations. i will be voting no on the quattlebaum nomination. >> tucker: so he shouldn't have the job because he is the wrong color? you know, you thought this principle was settled 50 years ago but on the left it isn't. never has been. treating people differently just because of their skin color is wrong and reducing people to members of their race is wrong. it's a culled sack by the way and leads to the worst most divisive and

schumer i believe, the nominee was named marvin quattlebaum, unqualified for the job.disagree with the judicial philosophy, he could oppose every nominee that trump makesmi to . he didid not choose any of those reasons. instead, he said he's opposing the nomination because he is the wrong color. watch. >> the nomination speaks to the overall lack of diversity in president trump selections for the federal judiciary. mr. quattlebaum replaces not one, but two scuttled obama nominations who were african-american. the trump administration, like in so many other areas, is taking a giant step backwards. this time, when it comes to diversity of their nominations. i'll be voting no on the quattlebaum nomination. >> tucker: so he shouldn't have a job because he is the wrong color? you thought this was settled 50 years ago but on the left, it isn't, and it never has been pretreating people differentlyin because of their skin color is wrong and reducing people to members of a race is wrong. it's a cul-de-sac, by the way, and leads to the worst, most devices and violent type of pol

quattlebaum would replace, you know, the seat has been long vacant.arolina. ainsley: that president obama appointed? steve: exactly. here's the thing. guy, nominee, highly qualified. so why would chuck schumer stand in the way of it? lindsey graham tweeted. this i judge nominees on the content of their character. not the color of their skin. chuck schumer should do the same. ainsley: wrong to deny someone because of their skin color. and then tim scott also from south carolina, he writes or tweets: perhaps senate democrats should be more worried about the lack of diversity on their own staff than attacking an extremely well qualified judicial nominee from the great state of south carolina. brian: trey gowdy who defines the word justice says i hate to interrupt senator schumer with facts one nominee was withdrawn because of a significant bond issue while other became the chief justice of the south carolina supreme court. i'm going to add to this. is there a difference in the condemnation that came at president trump when he looked at a judge and says h

the question has -- has occurred on the quattlebaum nomination. there is a sufficient second? there appears to be. the clerk shall call the roll. vote: vote: vote: