judge quentin copp got very upset with that and change to the present method of responding. the only thing i would like to call the commission's attention to -- the second paragraph. basically, the grand jury report focuses on their parkmerced development agreement. it in no way in first the commission did anything to process their actions. there is no criticism whatsoever of the planning department or the planning commission. i think this is very, very telling. commissioner moore: i have two questions. this was sent to us as a body, as the planning commission. should our response be as one? that is the way it is currently being proposed if i understood the comments. he is nodding as if that is implied. my second question is, i personally believe the language does not at all reflect the commissioner speak. it was a legal row bottled definitely written by a lawyer with the phraseology and the expressions used, and i do not believe if we agree or do not agree if fully represents the voice this commission has. i would also like to say that while in principle i do not have signi