i have a question for _ questions? mr president,. i have a question for the _ questions?. _ questions? mr president,. i have a question for the desk. senator- questions? mr president,. i have a| question for the desk. senator from geora ia. question for the desk. senator from georgia- send _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to the _ question for the desk. senator from georgia. send it to the desk. - the senator from georgia, senator warnock. — the senator from georgia, senator warnock. has— the senator from georgia, senator warnock. has a _ the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question _ the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question for - the senator from georgia, senator warnock, has a question for the i warnock, has a question for the house _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, the _ warnock, has a question for the house managers, the clerk- warnock, has

for the market the questions alternate the opposing questions for as long as both sides have questions. >> without objection so ordered. schumer: i have a question for the desk. >> the senator will submit it. >> question from senator schumer and feinstein, instructed to the house managers in the carpool read it. >> is not the case that the violent attack and siege on the capitol on january 6 would not have happened if not for the conduct of president trump. >> you have up to five minutes. >> to answer your question directly, he assembled the mob any of the flame, president trump did. everything that followed was because of his doing. and although he could've immediately and forcefully intervened to stop the violence, he never did. in other words, this violent bloodied insurrection that occurred on january 6, would not have occurred but for president trump. the evidence we presented at trial makes this absolutely clear. this attack as we have said, did not come from one random speech . did not happen by accident. the mob did not come out of thin air. before the election, donald trump sp

my question follows up on kristen's first question. what is the cdc doing to communicate its guidance to governors and other officials, discouraging them from taking some of these steps, or ultimately is this largely a state and local matter where the administration's powers limited? >> i just wanted to confirm not that the question was asked that long ago -- i just wanted confirm -- not that that question was asked that long ago -- conversations with governors about those that are taking steps to relax mitigation standards? is that your question? >> right. if you could say more about what the administration is doing to provide counsel and instructions on issues like mast mandates, -- like mask mandates, dining restrictions, especially in light of the spread of these variants. >> across government, we talk to the states incredibly frequently, so maybe we will go around and see, dr. walensky, if there is anything you want to add. >> i think our stand on this is pretty well-established. we have a weekly governor's call and i have been in

the clerk will read the question. at 6:01 eastern time on january 6 president trump tweeted these are the things that happens when the sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously and viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly unfairly treated for so long. adding for rioters to go home with love, what is the relevance of this tweet to president trump gilkes? at the house >> the house managers are recognized for up to five minutes. >> senators, this was a key quote and the key statement by the president that day, that horrific day. remember the capital had been storms, it had been attacked, people had yelled hanging mike pence, people had gone after speaker pelosi, people brought baseball bats and other weapons. many members of congress, the senate and house were fearful for their own lives. the president didn't call the national guard. his own administration didn't list him as somebody they had spoken with to activate the guard. he said remember this day forever. if he was not guilty of

consider this question. what do you think is the greatest single cause of misunderstanding between the nations of the world, both great and small? eleanor had a one-word answer. fear. the next era begins early in the 1950s after dwight eisenhower is elected president and eleanor roosevelt has returned to private life. the increasing prosperity of the 1950s eased american's financial worries while at the same time heightening their social woes. marriage rates had risen before and after world war ii as young people hurried to exchange vows before shipping off to combat or married as soon as they returned. these young couples also had more children. the nation's birth rate rose from fewer than 20 births per thousand in the 1930s to more than 25 births per thousand in 1947. the increased birthrates and the rise of a youth culture characterized by discontent and rebelliousness and concerns about juvenile delinquency made childrearing questions more urgent. at the same time divorce rates spiked, leading to uncerta

many of the questions revolve around this question of inter marriage. would you like your granddaughter married marry a person of other race? or would you like one of your granddaughters go to a racially mixed school? why are we talking about the south, when the schools in new york are full of puerto ricans? so there is definitely that bias that eleanor is speaking into. if you are asking me is she making any conference to her cause, i would say not necessarily, because those at that time those things were not really done. you didn't extend yourself. even now, i think it's hard for some people to move out of their comfort zone. she was certainly always talking about it, and she was talking about it for the entire time she was in the white house, but i can't say she had good success with that. >> a couple of questions about the media. why did she go from the journal to mccaul's? what kind of magazine was my calls, what kind of demographic did it appeal to? who was reading that particular magazine? third question was was there any competition to have her

our first question comes from just outside new york city. michael, your question please. hello, julia and minouche. it's an honour. how resilient are young children? can three— and four—year—olds who have spent so much - |of their lives in covid be expected| to recover as quickly as older kids, and how can we help parentsi and teachers to prepare now? lots of questions there. how resilient are children, julia gillard? i think children are inherently pretty resilient, but the onus is on us as the adults to make sure we are giving them the best enabling conditions even in these very difficult times. in many countries, we're doing a good job with educational continuity, with play—baseed lessons online for children at that very young age. what we have to do is make sure that is available that is available right around the well, that there isn't a differential system, where children in richer countries are getting so much more than children in poorer countries. but you're right that we have to be thoughtful, that when children are able to get back together again that there is

she wrote this question to us.for our vaccination slot, will we have had to delay our health care for a year and a half? where can we go for the vaccine now? and this question i think really has two important parts to it. first it's about vaccine access, but also what to do if you have been delaying care, but you're not eligible for the vaccine yet, or maybe you won't be able to get it until march. so i want to pose this question to our panel. and let's start with you, dr. brown. what would you say to rose? >> i think that's a great yes, rose, and it's something my patients ask me all the time. i tell them do not delay care. if you need care, you should get it. it's really important to recognize that we now have many, many ways to access care in addition to in-person care. so there are times when you need to come into the office, but our offices are now so much safer than they ever were. and we're taking incredile precautions, hand-washing, social distancing, wearing masks, and in some cases -- i think it's importa

the questions. >> mr. president. >> for it the former president's counsel, sorry about that. >> thank you mr. president. the house manager said yesterday that due process is discretionary, meaning the house is not required to provide and indeed did not provide in the impeachment and a constitutional protections to a defendant in a house impeachment proceeding. what are the applications for a constitutional order as new house precedent combined with senate power to disqualify from public office at private citizen in an impeachment trial? the counsel has five minutes. >> that is a complicated question. may i have that read again please? >> the house managers said yesterday that due process is discretionary, meaning the house is not required to provide and indeed did not provide in the impeachment and a constitutional protections to a defendant in house impeachment proceedings. what are the implications for our constitutional order of this new house precedent combined with the senate's power to disqualify fro

questions. covid—19 slammed the brakes on global tourism. but with vaccines now being rolled out around the world, there is optimism that international travel may soon take—off again. hello and welcome to global questions with me, zeinab badawi. covid—19 lockdowns have wreaked havoc on our economies and one area that's been knocked sideways is the travel and tourism industry. one in ten people around the world work in the sector and it accounts for $9 trillion of global gdp. has the travel industry been transformed for ever? and could some of the changes actually be good for us? and the planet? that's global questions, travel in a post—global world. travel in a post—covid world. well, to bring you this edition of global questions, our two panellists and our questioners join us live via video link. let me tell you who is in the hot seat this week giving the answers. paul theroux is an internationally acclaimed american author and explorer who has been described as the world's most perceptive trav

good question. and the answer is yes. _ good question. and the answer is yes, of— good question.ery smart men. and they went over draught after draught after draught on that document. and they reviewed all the other draughts of all the _ they reviewed all the other draughts of all the state constitutions, all of all the state constitutions, all of them — of all the state constitutions, all of them. and they picked and choose to what— of them. and they picked and choose to what they wanted and they discarded what they did not. and what _ discarded what they did not. and what they— discarded what they did not. and what they discarded was the option for ali— what they discarded was the option for all of— what they discarded was the option for all of you to impeach a former elected _ for all of you to impeach a former elected official. i hope that's answering your question, thank you. -- draft _ answering your question, thank you. -- draft after— answering your question, thank you. —— draft after draught. mr -- draft after draught. mr president. _ -- draft after draught. mr president

it's a two-part question. so please bear with me in the senate the question. if the briefing say that regarding the benefit of the individual with prior infections with sar-cov-2, limited cases of. covid-19 there are regarding the infection status of a line. it without benefit of individuals with prior sar-cov-2 infections. so part of the question that i have is are there enough data to look at whether those who are covid-19 positive baseline has more robust immune response. so that is my first half of the question. and i want to bring up the concern or point again, people are possibly testing the subject for evidence of infection at the time of inviting her on blinding before administering the vaccine. so that second part of the question. raise part of that question so that second part of the question is, in the single-dose ad 26, immunity booster for covid-19. this would be relevant for 19 million or so adults who have tested positive and might be candidates for a windows vaccine. >> can you hear me. [inaudible]. >> in the blood sample would be taken. so tha

big question. idea of how you might limit this exhaust itself after a certain amount of time. or it would be very carefully tied to a gene variant that only in this population. is a very difficult technical problems. so i don't know when or if those are ever going to be solved. what i want to pause for just a moment to remind folks at the end of my q&a with elizabeth will be taking questions from attendees. in the q&a box at the bottom of their screen go ahead and drop your questions and their. i sow if arty had some really great ones coming in for just want to remind everybody of that. thank you elizabeth for that summary. like i said that chapter amazing for somebody different reasons. i want to talk about another project that you visited. one that i thought was a little less terrifying, little more uplifting. but still definitely had the edges of despair to it. the reason it exists is because what humans have done to the planets. it is the coral project you visited in hawaii. in hawaii there sci

here is final question. if i were a democrat, what does the poll tell me about how i might take some of the voters who supported trump in 2020 and add them to the democratic tally in 2022 or 2024? who wants to take a crack at that first? kristen: i think the economic issues are the most fertile ground. there is no way for the democratic on this and making overtures considering where the center of gravity is the democratic party is. but you can see it around debate around covid relief. mitt romney saying i want to give $3000 for every child in america and facing backlash in his own party. that is the kind of thing where you can see democrats -- again, i am not sure democrats embracing mitt romney means anything for a variety of reasons. but this economic, stimulus quality-of-life type issues where there is the greatest opportunity for democrats to peel some folks away. karlyn: anyone else, very quickly? henry: i have long said joe biden was the only one who would beat trump of the group, because he was able t

next question. we have time for one more question. >> thanks so much for taking my question. i have two questions. the first is a black of pharmacies and hospitals providers and transportation have emerged as a concern in the communities hardest hit at the virus so what is the plan and the timeline for getting more vaccination sites for areas with inadequate health of destruction has the government found that is a problem, an increasing problem while looking at vaccine distribution the second question i have is on life expectancy but i wonder how lasting this change of efficacy is and could have bounce back? and what will it take for this spread to go back up? >> let me take the first question in dr. walensky can get the second question on life expectancy. there are a number of issues that you point out that our access barriers including transportation, including the clinical and the structure and then including i think it's important to point out that even when there is a local availability of a vaccine people from outside of these communities, outside of the hard-hit commun

thanks for that - question. the truth is in the uk, we have _ question.h is in the uk, we have never mandated vaccines. it isn't _ have never mandated vaccines. it isn't something we've ever done nick and i isn't something we've ever done nick and i don't _ isn't something we've ever done nick and i don't think we have a culture of it _ and i don't think we have a culture of it but — and i don't think we have a culture of it. but your question is about travel— of it. but your question is about travel and — of it. but your question is about travel and covid—19 vaccines and, whilst _ travel and covid—19 vaccines and, whilst i _ travel and covid—19 vaccines and, whilst i think i've laid out the british— whilst i think i've laid out the british position that we normally take with — british position that we normally take with vaccines, i can't tell you how take with vaccines, ican't tell you how other— take with vaccines, i can't tell you how other countries will react to us, reect— how other countries will react to us, react to _ how other countries will reac

and then the question because question then, about the fbi. what was the role of the fbi?he summit meeting, between garbage of and reagan. where they had the documents there for a long time now, and we see how corporate have was actually backing rain at all possible occasions to give up on the idea of the fbi and reagan said no. >> thank you appreciate it, >> next question, i have a brief question please. >> i have read a book, so i want to ask you a little bit more about the relations between reagan strategy and reagan's doctrine. and and the us economic situation, in the 19 eighties, for the reagan administration to carry out--. >> thank you and finally we go to the last question. please and the itself. >> yes, i and american foreign policy council, and diplomacy george shots in his memo, said the day that purging twos arrived in germany, was the equivalent of d-day for the reagan administration. one of reagan's iconic moments, was when he said in berlin, mr. gore which have tell down tear down this wall. this was really not a message to mr. gore which have, but it was t

with a question regarding facebook's trump ban. this is coming at a heightened political moment. it's having -- happening as the second impeachment is occurring, coming at a very early stage in the establishment. i was hoping you could enlighten us and provide something that needs consideration and they have taken on such a controversial case for the oversight board. >> first of all, fantastic to be here. really welcome this kind of discussion. i look forward to a lively debate. i think i'm going to back up because there's somebody people who are not completely clear about how we're going to work with these cases. and the idea is if a user is not happy with a decision that facebook has taken on their content on facebook or instagram , if they are not happy with that, they can appeal to the oversight board. we are not able to look at all the cases that go out. we will take the cases for the last number of people, and also the most difficult cases. a couple weeks ago, the first five cases -- and it's a good example of what we'll do.

my question to _ for answering the questions. my question to you _ for answering the questions. the jobs _ question to you is, how can students entering the jobs market _ question to you is, how can students entering the jobs market be - entering the jobs market be supported, _ entering the jobs market be supported, and _ entering the jobs market be supported, and our- entering the jobs market be . supported, and our universities preparing — supported, and our universities preparing students _ supported, and our universities preparing students with - supported, and our universities preparing students with the - preparing students with the necessary— preparing students with the necessary skills? _ preparing students with the necessary skills? many - preparing students with the necessary skills? many of l preparing students with the i necessary skills? many of us preparing students with the - necessary skills? many of us suffer from _ necessary skills? many of us suffer from impostor— necessary skills? many of us suffer from impostor syndrome _ necessary skills? many of us suffer

next question. >> new york times go ahead. >> thank you for taking my question. the first is statistical. you told us how many doses were administered in the long-termm care program what are the number that were set aside for the program what is the denominator? and second with a new pharmacy program with their be a separate registration system for that? if so what does that mean for the peopleine? who already signd up at the local health department and waiting in line? do they start over? is there an integration between the different systems now? >> thank you for the question. i thought i was off the hook when you said statistical it would go to the experts. there are a lot of numbers moving around so it's important to emphasize from what i talked about earlier four.8 million doses to more thanod three.7 million people that we don't have today is a breakdown of how many doses are first and second and likewise what percentage of the population in nursing homes or long-term care facilities are fully vaccinated. i want to make sure i'm saying this precisely as poss

[inaudible] i have no questions.e angotti: with respect to what are the testing procedures for av's? they have to get a permit in order to operate on public roads, in order to test on public roads and have a cpc permit if they want to take passengers. so with respect to testing procedures, that's notsomething that companies share with us . because they are not required to. they do need ... we see them driving so we know they're drivingaround the city, their collecting data . there mapping the streets . we are not privy to the details of their testing programs but they do they have a collision, they have to report the collision to the dmv. very quickly after they have to fill out a report that gets published on the dmv website and we look at those. they also have to providewhat are called disengagement reports . and disengagement are when the car, so there's usually a safety driver behind thewheel. right now , for most companies. so disengagement is when the car goes from autonomous mode to manual load. and it's usual

i know director hinze has a question. why don't we have her ask a question now?> director hinze: it doesn't matter, but my question is actually -- well i have two questions. one for julie and one for tom. so i'll start with julie since that was in the order she presented. so my question for julie is, as we sort of -- i know our current budget situation necessitates that we don't bring back any new routes at the moment, but when we do, can you talk a little bit about your prioritization for which routes to bring back? and also resolution -- [indiscernible] passed by the board of supervisors last week, your thoughts on that. >> thank you for that question. and that's a conversation that we're going to have throughout the next two days. and a lot of what the board lays out in terms of how much we continue the current austerity measures, i think is really going to influence that discussion. we believe that as we move towards herd immunity this summer into fall, and we have the opportunity to lift the current covid capacity restrictions, that we will have, even in our

that's a great question. we have tried, and i believe succeeded for the most part in getting representation in the major trials to get people of color as well as those who have underlying conditions. it was not easy for a number of reasons. in fact, we spent about 10 saturdays in a row working with the leaders of the company that was doing the trial to try and help them because of the experience that we've had over the years in making sure there's proper representation of minority groups in the clinical trial. in fact, we did succeed in the moderna trial it was over 10% where african-american. it was about 20 to 21% in latina. in the novax trial it was 1% african-american and well over 20% were latinx. we made a special effort to make sure that you are represented so when we say vaccine is safe and effective, it's safe and effective for every one, including you and your community. >> thank you. we have two questions about people who might be hsitant to get the vaccine. first comes from swan, a high school art

in the question and answer period, what did you think of the questions asked and the answers given? diana and kentucky a democratic color we will go to you. >> caller: i agree sandra. i want to know -- i want to know the answers to her questions. i also would like to hear from penn's. i think penn's should be a witness tomorrow. he has been silent in all of this. they wanted to hang him, they had a noose for him. they were hunting for him. what would you ask the former vice president? >> caller: i would like to ask him to tell us how fearful you were and do you think that trump incited the riots? he has been quiet. i think he is afraid. i think he is afraid of the trump supporters and trump himself. someone okay diana, justin of cnn sense of this tweet, when asked whether he was satisfied with answers from the trump legal team today, about whether president trump knew the vice president was in danger, senator bill cassidy tells cnn, not really pretty asked that he is undecided in his vote tomorrow. and nags head north carolina, hey jerry. >> caller: hello how are you. >> host: jerry

>> great question, katie. some of that is what secretary majorca's newly confirmed secretary majorca and the new task force will have to assess. and it will be case by case. there are estimates between 600 and 700 kids. part of what we need to do in the early stages, or what the tachk force needs to do, is term what the accurate number is and where these kids are and determine case by case what the best process and approach is for reuniting them with their family members. so there's a great deal of work ahead. there's time that is very committed to that work and part of what i'm sure will be in the report around 120 days is what progress they've made on that effort. go ahead. >> does the president think cutting off aid from myanmar's government goes far enough or are you looking at additional steps, and what might those be? >> well, i think the state department may have put a statement out, if i'm correct here, on the assessment made in the legal review that is calling the events in burma a coup. so -- as you

the previous question is ordered. the question is on the adoption of the resolution. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. mr. cole: mr. speaker, on that i would request the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3-f. of house resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? -- will kildee -- mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. lawrence, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on h.res. 91. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts seek recognition? mr. mcgovern: as the

that's the question.iteful to violence or riot. now, what's important to understand here is the house managers have completely, from the beginning of this case to right now, done everything except answer that question. the question they brought before you. the question they want my client to be punished by. that's the questions that should be getting asked. and the answer is, he advocated for peaceful, patriotic protest. those are his words. the house managers have showed zero, zero evidence that his words did anything else. remember, all the evidence is this was premeditated. the attack on the capitol was preplanned. it didn't have anything to do with mr. trump in any way what he said on that day on january 6th at that ellipse. and that's the issue before the senate. now on the issue of contesting elections and the results, the democrats have a long, long history of just doing that. i hope everybody was able to see the video earlier today. over and over again, it's been contested. when mr. trump was elec

we are question. -- have a question. can more be done to help the people of the dnr and lnr in terms of reducing poverty? hanna: that is the question of who is responsible? it can always be done more, but at the same time that is the question of the legal issues as well. it is the obligation of the occupied power for the state executing effective control of the territory to fulfill obligations of human rights, social protections of people, and all others. we already have quite a number of legal decisions by the international bodies that confirmed russia has effective control over those territories. if we think about those, those people -- they have the right protections. the question is, can they receive them only in the territory of ukraine or the government who controls the territory? just for security. in the very beginning, there was a chance to deliver some of the money for sanctions or for all the subsidies. should they deliver something to the occupied territory while securingultimately now no one cn guarantee suc

>> thank you for the question. so you're aware, there was a murder that occurred in the tenderloin area in december of 2019. that occurred before i took office. the police were investigating the case for a number of months. they did ultimately arrest four men who were believed to have been in the car that the shooter was in at the time of the murder. we filed murder charges against two men in that case and they both remain in custody pending those murder charges today. those two men were the men we believe we can prove are the shooter and the driver. the other two men were arrested really because they were in the same time, in the same location at the same time. there was not nearly enough evidence for us to be able to file charges. we are continuing to work with the police in investigation and in prosecuting the murder charges that we have filed. it's not uncommon for arrests to occur as part of the investigative process and those areas cannot always result in criminal charges being filed. i want to commend the sa

one key question relating one question. _ one key question relating one question. very— one key questionelating one question, very simple, - one key question relating one question, very simple, when. one key question relating one i question, very simple, when she presented — question, very simple, when she presented the _ question, very simple, when she presented the allegations - question, very simple, when she presented the allegations to - question, very simple, when she presented the allegations to you| question, very simple, when she . presented the allegations to you in november— presented the allegations to you in november 2017, _ presented the allegations to you in november2017, did— presented the allegations to you in november 2017, did you _ presented the allegations to you in november 2017, did you threaten i presented the allegations to you inl november 2017, did you threaten to resign— november 2017, did you threaten to resign from — november 2017, did you threaten to resign from the _ november 2017, did you threaten to resign from the snp _ november 2017, did you threaten t

question. you're not using the word legitimate. >> there are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections and ensuring the principle of one person, one vote. >> i agree with tens of millions of americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on electronic voting machine that there is no paper trail to record that vote. >> constantly shifting vote tallies in ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. this is their only opportunity to have this debate while the country is listening. it is a appropriate to do so. >> house manager castro no longer has to try to imagine it thanks to the distinguished senator and others. it didn't have to be this way. the democrats promised unity. they promised to deliver the covid relief in the form of $2,000 stimulus checks that president trump called for. they should have listened to their own words of the past. i leave you with the wise words

done everything except answer athat question. the question they brought before you . a question that they want my client to be punished by. that is the question that should be getting past. and the answer is, he advocated for peace, patriotic protests. those are his words . the house manager showed zero, zero evidence that his words did anythingan else. remember, all of the evidence is that this was premeditated. the attack on the capital was preplanned. he didn't have anything to do with mr. trump. anyway. when he said on the day on january 6th. at that •-ellipsis. that's the issue before the senate. now in the issue of contesting elections in a result, the democrats how long long history of just doing that. i hope everybody is able to see the video earlier today. over and over again, it is been contested. when mr. trump was elected president, we were told - >> the counsel to half minutes have expired. >> the senate from wisconsin . >> sorry, cannot see. i send a question to the desk for both parties. >> senator from wisconsin sends a question for both counsel for th

i don't have any real questions. i just feel like the questions never get answered. i don't know why, but on our end, it never get answered. our concerns never get addressed. i think it's something you all should think about as you press forward with progress to really think about talking to the people on the ground, and really seeing what's going on. because right now what you guys are talking about, listening to this whole thing, it seems like you guys are completely out of touch, and we're going to be the ones that suffer. thank you. >> clerk: thank you. next speaker, please. >> you have seven questions remaining. >> clerk: next speaker. >> okay. you've been talking a lot through this session about outreach. and to me, there's glaring neglect! you're not looking about in-reach. you're talking staff. but you're neglecting the paratransit council and the -- committee. the most egregious is the market street changes you voted on. mac and the p.c.c. did not give presentation on the recent changes proposed until after you madier decision. they were left out of the loop

next question? >> and last question. reporter: can you hear me? thank you. my question is for dr. fauci principally but for any of you. first, can you tell me how frequently you on the team are in contact with president biden and vice president harris and how responsive do you think they've been to your policy recommendations? my second question was, are you looking for or have you seen evidence of the impact of president biden's mask orders? andy: dr. fauci? i would never dream of taking a question that was intended for you. dr. fauci: thank you, andy. yes, the interaction with the president is frequent. we've only been at this now for just a couple of weeks and i've already had two, i think three interactions with the president in a direct briefing situation, either virtually or twice at the white house, once in the state's dining room and once in the oval office just last week. so he's very much involved, literally on a daily basis, because you have jeff zients briefing him repeatedly but as a member of the team together with dr. walensky and other members on the team, we have

this is again an ideological question. again, big split based on party switchers. 46%. 46% agree with supply-side economics. party loyalists, 58%. talking specifics about the small government agenda divides the trump coalition rather than unites it. let's see a little more about what might unite it on the next slide. oddly enough, climate change is one of those issues. for all of the beliefs and statements that the trump coalition are filled with climate deniers, when we ask people a three-point question, do you believe that climate change is real and government action is needed to deal with it immediately, whether it is real but that science and technology can make its effect less severe, or whether climate change is not real and nothing should be done to combat it, a clear majority takes the second option. another 9.5% take the first option, which is basically the climate alarmist position. that means that two thirds of trump voters believe that climate change is real and something should be done about it. a plurality of

he also took questions from the audience in a question moderated by randolph may. >> he also holds degrees from the university of rochester and lawrence university.r commis he grew up in canada. i don't recall another commissioner who is a native canadian. he became a u.s. citizen, of course. and after commissioner simintton, i think we may have time for a few questions and you will be able to use the chat function to put questions in the chat. so with that we're delighted ton have you here. we're honored that you're givino your maiden address at the foundation, and i'm glad that we're able to see you now so with that we're going to turn im over to you. long >> it is a pleasure to be here.r the e.free-state foundation is honor. this month marks the 25th o anniversary of the telecom act. it's a great model for consensut going forward. it lead to a sustainable broadbased consensus to support the growth and common good for c quarter century of rapid changes it's worth taking a moment to reflect on how much of the governance is owed to the principals and the advocacy efforts of the free-state

great questions. and i encourage all the members of the committee to -- last year i went over and visited the cybersecurity offices over there in house administration and i just -- it's a neat place to go, but it's that essential work that mr. case just brought up. and we've got to make sure because i think moving forward it's a very important point. we're talking about being aware of all the threats and being prepared for all the threats. we saw with the pipe bombs at the rnc and the dnc, how that was coordinated in addition to, you know, what else was going on as a distraction. so, i think mr. case rightly brings that point up about the issues around a coordinated effort around cyber. so, we appreciate that. mrs. wexton. >> thank you plrks chairman, and thank you to the witnesses, again, for all your great answers and to my colleagues for asking a lot of the questions that i had. so, thanks for that. you know, i still am so in ah that i get to work in this place, the amazing history that it has. and

if david, give a response to that question. david: yes, that's a really big question. and pointing to different points from trent to helle thorning. the way i see this and i think the seriousness so far the oversight board is taking his decision making is that i think it is to suggest that it sees itself as a way of a court like board. whether we want to call it a court or not, all these things that have said by it might panelists have been emphasizing credible of independence, of expertise. i think all of that is really quite uncertain freighted we also need to reflect on the fact that there are limitations. in the oversight board is not the panacea from all of the online speech. it is very specific and uses court like term, it is a jurisdiction. that is by law, it is rules. it's kind of basically allowing for certain kind of decisions to be taken. i think it is very interesting as helle thorning mentioned, the board is making recommendations on policy as well. it's very useful and important and again only they don't apply for to any other platform . think that is int

question. the question is from senator markey. duckworth the. house of representatives the kirk read the question exactly when did the president learn of the breach at the capitol and what steps did he take to address the violence please be as detailed as possible. to respond. to president senators this attack was on live t.v. on all major networks in real time the president as president has access to intelligence information including reports from inside the capitol he knew the violence that was under way he knew the severity of the threats and most importantly he knew the capitol police were overwhelmingly outnumbered and in a fight for their lives against thousands of insurgents with weapons we know he knew that we know that he did not send any individuals we did not hear any tweets we did not hear him tell those individuals stop this is wrong you must go back. we did not hear that so what else do the president do we are unclear but we believe it was a dereliction of his duty and that was because he was the one who had caused them to come to

my question is, what reassurance can. question is, what reassurance can you give _ question is, whatthat the vaccine is safe in the long term? thank you.- patients that the vaccine is safe in the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't _ the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't think - the long term? thank you. thank you for the question. i don't think bame i for the question. i don't think bame cancer— for the question. i don't think bame cancer patients are any different to any other— cancer patients are any different to any other cancer patients. sadly, cancer— any other cancer patients. sadly, cancer doesn't discriminate in that way either~ — cancer doesn't discriminate in that way either. i am sorry to hear you have _ way either. i am sorry to hear you have had — way either. i am sorry to hear you have had such an experience. what i can say— have had such an experience. what i can say is— have had such an experience. what i can

and i think my question is -- not too sure who can answer this question specifically. it is about capacity. i do understand the limitation of supplies that we've been facing, so it's kind of why we're in this pickle. i heard you. i know that the message is that we have the infrastructure there, it's ready to go, but it's really the supplies. so just in the spirits of trying to understand based on this legislation that we are trying to figure out, especially on page 7, lanes 15, talking about, you know, informations about the public that has been put forward and expectant dates that each community can expect to be vaccinated. according to your dashboard, you're thinking about 753,000 people, roughly, right, to be vaccinated in san francisco, but to date, you know, 75,000 have received the first dose, and only about 25,000 have received the two doses. so the question would be if we -- if our -- if our -- if our goal is, by june, that all these people will be vaccinated, at which point -- and we're going to pace that as we currently exist, and i'm just showing what you cu

my question goes as follows.n what - constitutes hate speech? - kara? we don't have any for the most part. yes, absolutely. i think what agnes was talking about the same thing — we have left it to these companies to make the decisions. it is sort of like someone who owns a city that has no stop signs, has no sewer systems, has no water system, has no police and things happen just the way they happen. so i think getting some laws in place that are stronger and have some teeth to them is really what we have to do. i think there is no question that our regulators have let us down for the most part, in dealing with these big tech companies over the decades that they have become so powerful. agnes, do we need tougher international laws on hate speech? the key word here is �*international�* because at national level, there is plenty of laws on hate speech, incitement to violence and so on. the problem at international level, there is no agreement as to what constitutes hate speech. we have an article under the internat