it fired kwen norton before firing her and if you were to fire two of them, sarah jeong or quinn norton in terms of the merit of who they should have kept and clearly it was norton and clearly they're defending sarah jeong and threw quinn norton overboard. >> i thought through the business ramifications and the way it would impact their brand and play into the hands of those who denigrate the times which i disagree with. >> thanks for being here. >> thanks for having me. >>> what are your thoughts? go to smerconish and i will read your responses throughout the course of the program. what have we got? here is a person who is so overtly biased and eshg mobilely disordered in her thinking that the only job "the new york times" should ever give her is selling papers on the street corner. i want to be fair and see the totality of the record and i can get a weak attempt at humor. watching that ridiculous animated film about big bald raccoon. i mean, are you blanking me? maybe she watches it today, "f" the police and then the ferguson tweet and all of the others and i can't put those in contex

i think when you play this game very often innocent people get shot down the way quinn norton was. so i would draw a bright line i don't think people should be fired from media organizations, unless it's based on something they are saying when they are currently employed. i think twitter is a medium where its context are possible people are trolg. very much tongue in cheek and based on that line would not preclude firing her from the "times." . again the "time's" standard is indefensible. it hired her. if you balance the two of them, in terms of which one they should have kept. on the merits clearly it should have been kim norton. in some way they're defending sarah jeong and threw quinn norton overboard. >> i thought it would play into the hands of those two want to den great the "time's" as being a left wing rag not worthy of attention. i disagree with. thank you, i appreciate you. i will read responses throughout the course of the program. what do we got? here's a person who is so overtly biased and probably emotionally disordered in her thinking the only job the "new york times

was really crazy to me is they seem to be changing their tune looking back to when they fired quinn nortoneeks there were i thought offensive but these are offensive to pay canceled late people? can you imagine if someone tweeted canceled black people what they'd be calling for? is it really that crazy? another tweet oh man it's sick how -- being cool to old white men. it's unacceptable and there's no reason why she should be on "the news york times" editorial board. charles: what is this thing on the left anti-way people going on with the left? >> has been a sentiment for a while. it's something to fall back on especially when you tell people that nothing is ever their fault that it's someone else's. let's take a step back to twitter and social media make it very easy for us to be mean. it's semi-anonymous, is quick and it's fast. maybe you think you are being funny but really you are not and in the end what happens after that when someone is nasty no one wants to forgive them. no one wants to allow them to move on and no one wants to allow them to grow because why would you remove that w