r. s. however, uh uh, one of the stablish thought he might go to jail since the information was confidential and the rest just lacked interest so that that letter was never acted on. i gotta tell you the, the wrong, what was the blow. it was pretty much right. even after the passage of the iris legislation. yeah. o w legislation. where's the boys get treated like he's gone to the picnic? and that the truth after the iris appear to just dismiss you in 2013, you sought to bring claims. first, on behalf of new york state and then in 2016 on behalf of new york city. this was a complex accusation of tax fraud. but the new york appellate court without permitting any discovery, or the introduction of expert testimony, just through the case out and we're talking about $75000000.00 of the tax payer's money. what exactly happened there? the court of which you speak 1st, department of new york state's appellate division is one of the finest in the country. but i have to express them disappointment in a family

r. s. agents discussed above. however, when i met with them, i did not have any excitement about a large case against major institutions. i will never forget showing some documents the one agent who made a joke in reference to another wall street transaction that closed in the cayman islands. and later on, that agent basically started screeching. i knew that i had no evidence of fraud either in the cayman islands example, or my transaction. after the meeting, the agent just sent me a rejection letters i discussed above. and i want to call, the agent says, why didn't you just give me a form of direction? they said they needed more information. i provided to them random a year they passed the all the w legislation and uh, i called up, i was told that there was no but uh, no reward. why asked newly instead of had to be opposite possibly. busy or what happened uh uh you said, well, the denial was valid reason which i considered to be uh, just to uh, sort of a blow off and unexcused for them to keep all the money and not givin

we are now able to s better, feel a bit safer knowing that she knows that this is the r thing to do. howeverwe still have a lot of work as neighbors, some of which might be working together to design and build. a fence or other permits, but we've learned a lot. we learn. we hope beth miles and her team feel the same way. thank you for listening. okay. thank you. did the planning department want to weigh in? good evening, president lopez. commissioners. corey teague, zoning administrator for the planning department specific question of the rehearing request, i would just note one thing that was already raised which is on theat wasn't discussed or presented at the last heari and that really is the business and tax code prohibition for one year. if a permit is denied, you permit appeal is before the board more or less have three optionseny the appeal, you can grant the appeal and modify the project or add conditions to it, or you can grant the appeal and deny the permit the distinction with the denial is that it does come with this essentially a one year, prohibition on kind of essentially reap