. >> and the department and the r.d. a.t. with six major rescissions and with the scrutiny that the appellants have been giving us and we should have another full disclosed process here. i just wanted to show you the documentation of the timeline in the board package and numerous meetings and outreach we did to the community. i wanted to share quickly the numerous changes that resulted in the six major revisions that we have done to accommodate not only the appellants but also working with the rdat to get this to be an appropriate and approvable project. the appellants say this is the curious thing. the appellants say due to their own building, force modifications to our proposed project, versus recognizing their building is the anomaly. this front absolutely -- this runs contrary to the base extenants of the planning code which is to encourage conformity. their request that we should shorten the building by 15 feet would result in the loss of minimally three bedrooms. two on the lower unit and one on the upper unit. and we d