rachel camp rach rachel, and gary, what do you make of the uranium one revelations? >> it adds to the inconsistence that we've been hearing about on this deal and

rachel camp rach rachel, and gary, what do you make of the uranium one revelations? >> it adds to the inconsistence that we've been hearing about on this deal and look, the left is going to defend this to the end of time. the right wants to put people in jail. for me, it's all about what they should be doing that's following the money. $145 million into the coffers of the clinton foundation from players in this deal before, during and after, add in the fact that the clintons did not disclose it and what you have is simple definition of the potential of pay to play and influence peddling and the fact that there is no big investigation is an absolute sin. one thing we do not want from government people is to make decisions on this country based on them lining their pockets. trish: i've got to say it's really bizarre, rachel. you keep in mind not only was the clinton foundation accepting all of this money, but there was a fbi investigation going on at the time. that's what we've learned. 5,000 new pages have been revealed, information that the informant was providing the fbi and so, if you've got an investigation going on into vladimir putin, russia and their attempt to gain access to the world's uranium supply, including in the united states of america, why on earth do you approve the sale of a company that controls 20% of the united states' uranium? >> it's mind-boggling. i'll say this, it wasn't just that the informant was raising red flags, there were very prominent members of the u.s. house of representatives, representative king, representative ross-layton, both experts on and seasoned in national security and foreign policy issues, raising red flags, writing letters and yet, this was approved. remember, 500 million-- half a million, i'm sorry, $500,000. half a million for bill clinton's speech. tha