now and cross live to ortiz, contribute to rachel moss then rachel, thanks for joining us here. could you just tell me a little bit more about the reasons for these process? because it's more than just about that fuel tax. the 1st it was dutch farmers who revolted against you, climate policies demanding that they reduce the number of belching and delegating houses under threat of land confiscation. now its german farmers and their tractors that rolled into berlin to protest against german chancellor, olaf schultz is treating them like cows, cash cows to be precise because schultz is desperate to rummage up some change and decided that it's farmers who he's going to shake down to plug a part of a massive 6 feet 1000000000 hole that he blew in the countries budget. when he quietly took cash from a pandemic recovery fund and used it to pay for the green energy transition, which the court ruled last month to be totally illegal. so team schultz had to take that cash back out of the green industry fund and put it back where he took it from leaving a big deficit about as nice as the wh

nice as it was based on what the outlet, who's his an aptitude to do his job or a contributor. rachel moss and as i look among politicos, european recipients of its 2023 back handed awards, described as the accolades that no one is lining up to receive. we find the european union's chief diplomat use a burrell is price the for a award for diplomacy in reference to the fictional hollywood character, played by comedian sasha baron cohen, who prop cal's around the world making mockumentary. he's in the role of a fake cadillac journalist who just can't stop insulting everyone including himself . so how exactly does burrell make benefit glorious european union to the point of winning the bore out award? sometimes referred to as jungle joseph burrell. he got up in front of your very own diplomatic academy, so people for whom he supposed to represent the absolute appear to me of tactfulness sensitivity for nasa sophistication in europe's dealings with the rest of the world. and he threw down this bit of wisdom. buick, he said boston, we have built a golden habit if he works is the best combinatio

rachel goodwin. one of the attorneys the represented shaye moss and ruby freeman in their defamation case. i know you're happy about this verdict. how are you clients feeling about this truly staggering $148 million verdict against giuliani for defaming them? >> as lady ruby put it, it's a good day. it's one step on a long journey for them toward accountability and toward trying to rebuild their lives. but today was a good day for them. >> what do you make of giuliani sticking by his awful lies and comments about your two clients? >> for me, it really highlights the importance of this kind of accountability. we're quite hopeful that this verdict will make a difference there and we're going to continue to pursue that verdict. >> you know what surprised me, the verdict was, what, about $100 million more than your clients had originally asked for, right? >> the total was $148 million across the three categories of damages. some of which we had put numbers on for the jury and some of which we leave the jury to come up with numbers on their own. i think they were moved by the clients' testimony

rachel ruble. you're watching r t international. the un security council has adopted a resolution requiring as well and have mosse to allow deliveries of humanitarian aid in 2 guys, the united states blocked a proposed amendment for an immediate cease fire versus and bassett, or to the un says us pressure stripped, important provisions from the final text of the resolution, a singular study which is new to some of those of luxury smoothly us has once again exposed itself in front of the world. by blocking even the councils extremely, we can call for a cessation of hostilities in gaza instead, washington playing dirty, sold a text, actually a license for israel to killed palestinian civilians in gaza under the pretext of quote, creating conditions for a cessation of hostilities under pressure from the us, which effectively took over the authorship and you served the work on the text behind the scenes at various levels, twisting the hands of regional representatives, the text lost more and more important provisions with each new revision. colleagues, this is a tragic moment for the security council, not a moment of triumph for multila

moss. michael gottlieb is one of the attorneys representing them. thanks for your time. >> thanks for having me on, rachel. >> what would this new lawsuit do that the first one didn't? >> so, the first suit was a suit for both damages and some other forms of relief like declaratory relief. this is a suit in which we are seeking a permanent injunction to prevent mr. giuliani from saying the same false statements about our clients that he has been making since december of 2020 and which he had a full opportunity to prove to be true if he chose so. he opted out. he defaulted and so after a finding by a jury awarding him damages we don't believe he should be able to continue telling the same lies out on the street that he has been unable to defend and prove in court. >> the massive damages that your clients obtained was not enough to stop him. how would a permanent injunction have more teeth in it than the huge financial penalty he's facing? >> well, it subjects him to the supervision of a federal court. if we are successful in obtaining the injunction which i'm quite confident that we will be, and he'll have

rachel pointed out, make sure there's accountability down the road. i think it's very important to emphasize that not only did these lies damage brave people like shea moss and ruby freeman or the dominion voting company, but they damaged the whole country. they damage our faith in the integrity of our election system. and there has to be some accountability for that and these defamation cases at least stand for the proposition, eventually these falsehoods will come home to roost and you'll be held accountable for what you say. >> do you believe that beyond the business side of things, and i think businesses are perhaps different than the individual, and i want to ask rachel about this in a minute. rod, i want to start with you. the idea that people less than they're scared to have to pay a lot of money, that they actually recognize the damage that this caused. you have rudy giuliani coming out of court afterwards saying he didn't actually get a chance to present his case and he has no regrets and nothing he did was wrong. what do you think about that? >> well, i think it's not entitled to any respect whatsoever. he had every chance in the world to prese