she was the one who was representing, or is representing rachel uchitel. she has not commented. she has not either denied nor confirmed any sort of payout to uchitel. and kim serafin, what exactly do we know about rachel uchitel and other aled mistresses? >> well, as you know, this press conference is what got a lot of coverage. because gloria allred knows how to do a press conference. when rachel hired gloria, it made people speculate what might happen. the press conference was scheduled wednesday night, it was supposed to be thursday morning. it was canceled because of unforeseen circumstances i believe is what they said. now, there were some rumors swirling that it might have been -- there might have been some conversations between rachel and tiger. there was talk of, was there a payout. then now it's come out, no, there is not a payout. tmz is reporting that rachel is keeping silent because she's scared. so it's very interesting all of these details that are kind of leaking out, but so much of it is rumor, so much of it is speculation. we really don't know at this point. >> a

she was the one who was, or is representing rachel uchitel. she has not commented or denied any payment out to uchitel. kim serafin what do we know about rachel uchitel and other alleged mistresses. >> you mentioned, this press conference got a lot of coverage. gloria allred know house to do a press conference. when rachel hired gloria allred it made people speculate about what may happen. the press conference was scheduled wednesday night. supposed to be thursday morning. it was canceled. you mentioned also because of unforeseen circumstances is what i believe they said. now there were some rumors swirling that it might have been, there might have been some conversations between rachel and tiger. there was talk of was there a payout. then it came out. no there is not a payout. tmz is reporteding, that rachel is keeping silent because she is scared. it is very interesting all of these details that are kind of liking out. so much is rumor. so much is speculation. we really don't know at this point. >> well, also take a look at these photos. the

case dismissed, citing numerous news reports that claimed tiger woods paid alleged mistress, rachel uchitel as much as $5 for her silence. but halderman's lawyer points out that prosecutors didn't file charges against uchitel or any charges against her lawyer. why not? according to halderman's lawyer, because their behavior was capitalist, not criminal. he adds, the reality is that evidence of celebrity misdeeds has a significant fair market value. saying his client's offer was just a business transaction. and that no crime was committed here. letterman's lawyer fired back, telling nbc news, this was not a sale of anything legitimate. this was classic extortion. legal experts say halderman's strategy sounds like a stretch. >> it's almost not a legal argument, it's almost a water cooler argument. it's like getting a loan if a bank to holding up a bank and saying, hey, in both cases, we ended up with the money. >> reporter: investigative reporter, jarmd posner agrees, his reporting is cited several times in the new halderman court filing. >> they're trying to fit it into the tiger woods analo