what i would encourage, though, is we keep in mind that the federal role if we think about doppler rad darpa is how do we leverage technological innovations and involved in trying to recommend particular models of implementation. so i hope that's helpful. >> very good. very comprehensive. >> i'm sorry. in regard to what is positive about it, i think first of all, in your segment, senator was that no child left behind was ineffective. and i certainly have to agree with that. and i would like to think of this as really not the reauthorization of no child left behind, but the reauthorization of esea. as an at just the connotation of the term "no child left behind," it really is demoralizing to us at this point because there is so much focus on teach -- i mean testing, testing, testing, that we have no time to teach. and it really has become that way within the schools. working with gifted education, i run into this all the time, because things that i want to do with my students, the teachers don't want me to take them out of the classroom because they're addressing a particular standard that is