they didn't want radical islamists running the country. radical islamists hate moderate muslims as much as they do so this lady says she is trying to protect our country because members of congress are not realizing how exposed congress has been. as she says, she's the stepmother, these are very bad people. politico reported that he and his wife are personal friends ith the former d.n.c. chair, ms. wasserman schultz when she was subject to an email hack that was blamed on the russians. and let's see this article is ated march 8 and apparently, amwan wasn't fired even though banned from the house network. but that was circumvented by appointing him as an adviser. and soon after, his two brothers and two of their wives appeared on the consal payroll collecting more than $4 million and that's over this period of time. the brothers had numerous additional sources of income, all of which seemed to disappear. while they were supposedly working for the house, the brothers were running a car dealership full-time that did ot pay its vendors after o

announcer: next, how to counter online radicalization. with extremist groups like isis using to recruit new members. we will hear from technology and security officials, plus remarks from the british minister for internet safety and security. george washington university host of this event. >> good afternoon, everyone. i am the president of the george washington university and i'm delighted to welcome to you does welcome you to this two-year conference -- today conference entitled how to counter online radicalization and online extremism. i would like to welcome members of the department of state, justice and homeland security and the fbi as well as officials from a number of allied governments and guests from the internet, technology and media sectors. this conference was two years in the planning. i discussed this with our minister of internet safety and security for the united kingdom in may of 2015. you will have the privilege of hearing from her in just a few moments. the idea we discussed was to convene a global conference that will

groupss not large-scale of people getting radicalized. host: his latest book is "united states of jihad: investigating america's homegrown terrorists ?"d how do we stop them what mary's you the most when you research this? guest: why would an american citizen sign up for something that at its heart kills american soldiers? that is a puzzle. and ies a philosopher think it is a useful way of thinking, there's no simple answer to the question. ideology,rievances, some kind of opening to these going something maybe not right in this person's life, somebody wanting to be a hero in their own story. each of us is very personal as e would make the decision about killing a stranger. i listed all of these cases and said, this is the evidence we have. at the end of the day, that is a mysterious question. host: peter bergen >> president trump welcomed the german chancellor to the whice for meetings on friday. the leaders also held a joint news conference and discussed relations, trade, and immigration policy. this is about 25 minutes. >> thank you ve

stanton, an ally of the radicals. the house responded by approving articles of impeachment against the president. to me, one of abraham lincoln's worst decisions was to allow the removal of hannibal hamlin as vice presidential candidate in 1864. virtually all republicans by this point consider johnson a failure as president and an obstacle to a lasting reconstruction. but some moderates disliked the prospect of elevating to the presidency benjamin wadee, a radical, who as president pro tem of the senate would succeed johnson if johnson were in fact impeached. wade in some ways was a mayor or -- a mirror image of johnson in terms of personality. the final tally to convict johnson was one vote short of the two thirds necessary to remove him from office. seven republicans had joined the democrats in voting to acquit the president. johnson's acquittal weakened the radicals' position and made the nomination of ulysses s. grant inevitable. appomattox in short grant's -- appomattox, shown here, insured grant's victory as pre

who becomes radicalized? the children become radicalized some 16 years later and how can we intervene? well, they have proposals. there are policy implications for this. that working with religious groups, working with community groups, working with adolescents could prevent the eventual radicalization of those who do become violent years later. but they do not learn this from their parents and they do not arrive this way. nor do their parents. that has important implications. it means as you've pointed out that, "extreme vetting" whatever that is, doesn't work, isn't necessary and second of all that there are things we can do in communities. and i'm thinking back to -- you did an exit interview with jeh johnson. remember the speech he gave, the first speech by a homeland security secretary in chicago to the muslim community gathering? >> that is the approach that bill bratton would tell you in new york. those are things that work, not fictional extreme vetting at the borders. >> and that constructive policy

radicalization happens both online and off-line. the interaction between the two spaces is what triggers and causes radicalization. what we want to do is provide balance of fact-based analysis conducive to practical bipartisan solutions. that's also the spirit that guided us as we plan for the conference. many controversial issues surround the topic of online radicalization. these are common worldwide. there's a big debate taking place in the united kingdom on the aftermath of the london attacks and the government that seeks access to the conversations of the perpetrator. that ti debate is reminiscent of what we saw in the united states and the aftermath of the san bernadino attacks. all countries have to deal with issues of privacy, encryption, secrecy and censorship. balancing conflicting interests as we do so. all countries are struggling to find counter narratives. another topic we want to cover the conference. the best way to go forward in the common goal is to bring to the same table in a neutral environment the key players in

groupss not large-scale of people getting radicalized. host: his latest book is "united states of jihad: investigating america's homegrown terrorists ?"d how do we stop them what mary's you the most when you research this? guest: why would an american citizen sign up for something that at its heart kills american soldiers? that is a puzzle. and ies a philosopher think it is a useful way of thinking, there's no simple answer to the question. ideology,rievances, some kind of opening to these going something maybe not right in this person's life, somebody wanting to be a hero in their own story. each of us is very personal as e would make the decision about killing a stranger. i listed all of these cases and said, this is the evidence we have. at the end of the day, that is a mysterious question. host: peter bergen, thank you. we appreciate it. the is the headline from bbc -- another troubled spot. north korea conducting a high -- hi-thrusttest engine test, i will say that properly. our phone lines are open. (202)-748-8000 but democrats. for

with radicalized groups.r not, he could have easily been what is called a bedroom jihadi. we have not been able to piece these things together at all. sarah: when we look at radicalization, in your expert opinion, is this primarily a psychological problem or our politics and society more to blame? >> it is a combination of all three. the political context is very important to bear in mind. must of the grievances that have prevailed deal with foreign policy. and there are issues of integration in terms of social ability, feeling a sense of belonging and hope in relation to their roles in society. but there are also psychological triggers that can make people want a and capable. there are many risks in all of these spheres. sarah: how about the attention paid to an attack like this? this is helped to fuel further attacks? mr. abbas: this has been argued and considered over the past few days. terrorism is the deed itself, the act that creates the message. the more we talk about it, it is the oxygen that adds to

now days the internet plays a major role in radicalization processes. we did a study a year and a half ago which we launched here in this very room about isis in america and about the cases of individuals of americans who have radicalized and been arrested for isis related activities. in 115 cases we have counted so far there is not a single case where the internet did not play a role. the internaet plays a role in al of the processes, from the first encounter to when they deeper their knowledge all the way to when they plan attacks. the 60 minutes episode which was showed last night shows a case in which individuals were talking to people as they were about to carry out an attack. the second thing is the importance of the internet should not be exaggerated. it is not just about the internet. some times you hear narratives that make you think if we didn't have facebook or twitter there would be no isis or no terrorism. it is obviously nonsense. it happens in many cases online and offline. and the interaction is what causes it in most cases. what we aim

peter: you talk about the process of radical lace -- radicalization.e said after he had posted his own ballot that the genie will not go back into the bottle. can you describe the genie? is -- many people in the last 20 years felt increasingly uncomfortable about a multicultural society, about the democratic deficit in europe. when we make taboos out of these topics, political, academic this, and capitalizing on sentiment now. wilders has the lead in this agenda so the genie is not back in the bottle anytime soon. peter: is he a dangerous man for europe? alan: no, the real danger for europe now is in france. marine le pen. there is a danger lurking on the sidelines in italy where the far it -- where the five-star movement could come in. gasquet even if he had the biggest party, he would not be the prime minister at the point of the populist movement is that "we are the people of they will not let us govern because they are scared. that is one thing that the netherlands has proved. wilders is not the people, not even 20%. that is good. and now, we have

but the prime minister said it may not be radical islamist terrorism. >> i think it wrong to describet as islamist terrorism this -- did is a perversion of a great faith. lou: president trump's deputy national security advisory kt mcfarland among my guests here. and nsa preparing to answer just how many americans were unmasked following bombshell revelation about surveillance of trump transition. judicial washington's christopher el, and colonel tony shafer among our guests tonight. talks to repeal and replace obamacare are continuing at this hour. republicans meeting behind closed-doors after postponing today's vote. decision comes after what was a busy day of talks d meetings between president trump and conservative and moderate republicans all the while trying to reach a deal. fox news chief congressional correspondent mike emanuel has been following all of the action from capitol hill. and has our report tonight. reporter: well, lou, house lawmakers were hoping to repeal and replace obamacare tonight, talks continue this hour. there may be a final vote tomorrow, as tension builds

the issue of radicalization is a complicated one. not everybody who becomes radicalized automatically goes on to commit crimes of violence. what i would say in this particular circumstance, if it is the work of isis, there has been indications that it is, they have a extremely powerful media machine which they have been able to utilize to reach potential supporters. i suspect this individual has been contacted, radicalized in some way via the isis machine. just because as i mentioned earlier someone has been exposed to radicalization it does not follow that they will go on to commit a particular terrorist act. >> given that do you think he would have needed a network of support? do you think other people were necessary? >> yes. absolutely. that is what i was going to mention. the word lone wolf has been mentioned i think incorrectly in context by a number of commentators. strictly a lone wolf terrorist is somebody who acts out side and organization, completely alone. in this circumstance indications are there has been a support netwo

how is the middle east reacting to the president's call to fight radical islamic terror?he valiant taste times of death, but once!! uh, excuse me, waiter. i ordered the soup... of course, ma'am. my apologies. c'mon, caesar. let's go. caesar on a caesar salad? excuse me, pardon me. what's not surprising? how much money matt saved by switching to geico. could i get my parking validated? fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. >>> last night's congressional address was so welleceived the white house is scrapping the travel ban. the new travel ban will be signed next week. and will exclude green hard holders. last night, president trump used language his own national security adviser will not use when it comes to combatting terrorism. >> our obligation is to serve, protect and defend the citizens of the united states. we're also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical islamic terrorism. >> so, how is the president's speech playing in the middle east? i'm joined right now by cnn's jomana karadsheh. over here, he's getting even high marks for s

radical islamic terrorism from the world. at this very moment, our administration, leadership at the department of defense, are developing plans to begin that process by focusing on hunting down an destroy isis at its source, and the recent operation in yemen was a highly successful operation against al qaeda and we'll continue. we'll continue those efforts and with renewed energy to defeat those who would project force against our people, threaten the people of the united states or our u our alleys. >> so many topics. it's a complicated job you have. >> it is. it's a priveg

your thoughts as you listen to the president last night name the enemy radical islamists, radical islamicerror. he had been counselled and advised by some of his national security team not to name the enemy. >> i think that's right. you know what we saw last night, lou? confidence and principled. he went past the negative and fake news stories we've been seeing for week. frankly, i think a lot of the american people were surprised, inundated with the nonsense about disarray and the president's backing away from principles, of course, there's the "new york times" story that general mcmaster says we're not going to use the term radical islamic terrorism. i think that was fake news, i'm not going to believe it until i hear it from mcmaster. the president put that to rest. this is his policy and he's not backing away from it. lou: hope that's not true, we have seen the case with two administrations that have failed in the war against radical islamist terror, in part because they didn't have the principle to name the enemy and use the american people in their view of the people's incapacity to

there's all potential for having them radicalized as they come in.bines what we're talking about between yemen and the fight for homeland security. there's a lot of intelligence professionals in dark little buildings with a little bit of light coming in analyzing these issues saying what are the threats in yemen and the united states and it's very important to pay attention to these people who are doing this pain staking work and so far we have seen not as much attention being paid to these individuals who do this kind of work and do this analysis because it takes months and years to get the right data to protect the nation, both overseas and here at home. >> we have heard that the travel ban, their new and revised burden is going to be announced this week. we don't have a date yet and know when that will be happening. thank you for all the reporting information. thanks to our international viewers, cnn newsroom is next and for our u.s. viewers new day continues right now. >> i did meet one russian officials a couple of times. >> i don't think so at

trump: we are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical islamic terrorism.ryl: will it be something that can be turned around in short order? sen. ron johnson: well, we certainly witnessed after the carter administration, president ronald reagan coming in and reestablishing america's credibility in the world. that's going to be a challenge for president trump. lois linton: hello! lisa fletcher: lois linton may be the st. louis rams' biggest fan. except, there are no st. louis rams. the rams moved to los angeles last year, even after st. louis promised a brand new stadium. lois linton: it's heart-wrenching, because the city not only loses the team, but they lose all of that out-of-town revenue coming in. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] ♪ sharyl: welcome to "full measure." i'm sharyl attkisson. today, we begin with a possible health risk involving one of the most trusted products. baby powder. a potential link between ovarian cancer and the talc mineral use

we do have radicalized individuals in america, we don't have radicalized communities.e don't because of who we are. brings us back to the first conversation about the travel ban. we need to be careful about the second and third order affects of things even if they are , legitimate self-defense steps. dan: in the region, where a lot of these individuals come from at first in the middle east, parts of sunni middle east, growing cooperation now really a surprise to many of us between the government of israel and the sunni -- someone had a good line that sure enough, president obama did bring the arabs and israelis together. they do a lot of intelligence sharing and strategic cooperation. how important is it? michael: it is real and it is important. the normal rhythm for a cia chief is to name one sequence of another, the emirates, the saudi's, the jordanians, the egyptians. in essence, you are sweeping up the sunnis and israelis. why do you do it that way? because you have the same thing in all the capitals. they all have the same worldview and they all want to talk about

the radical jihadists want to get them to.ident gave an update on his campaign pledge to drain the swamp. it caused one of the biggest reactions from the night from the democrats in the room. the democrat in this room will tell us what he thinks next. the future of business in new york state is already in motion. companies across the state are growing the economy, with the help of the lowest taxes in decades, a talented workforce, and world-class innovations. like in plattsburgh, where the most advanced transportation is already en route. and in corning, where the future is materializing. let us help grow your company's tomorrow - today at esd.ny.gov >> juan: welcome back. most democrats attending last night's speech by president trump sat quietly in their chairs, withholding applause. some did erupt in laughter on a couple occasions. this was one of them. >> president trump: we have begun to drain the swamp of government corruption by proposing a five year ban on lobbying by executive branch officials and a lifetime ban... [a

the muslim partners have important roles to play with other radical islamic terrorist groups to prevent a group did technologies to enable the extremist collaboration we need that global tech industry and rethink those several already responding to this challenge we must capitalize on the data analytics to discover the propaganda and researchers of the united states are already developing tools but they need help to get to their destination faster. later be will hear from the speaker on how to achieve victory in this arena but let me be clear we must fight on-line as aggressively as we do on the ground as messines it is a lot more powerful than we are when we stand together we must sort them as they maintain a presence on the ground and enhance cooperation importer security aviation security and law enforcement counter messaging and intelligence sharing of those liberated areas to help the innocent people rebuild this means continuing to clear explosives to forge partnerships to reject extremism for that open and honest exchange of information the allies dedicated to defeating a common

one of the reasons the syrian revolution has been radicalized is the opposition has been radicalized the saudi's, qataris and turks would not help secularists, but healthy islamists and that's one of the reasons cases came out of 2013. [applause] >> how do we -- there's a lot of discussion working with russia against isis, that we have common goals they appeared at the same time, russia's working side-by-side with their man can the shia militias and hezbollah. had we had one hand hold iran accountable for what i think is the worst diplomatic deal in modern american history in the iran deal and enforce that, but at the same time drive a wedge with russia and separate them from their allies and the assad regime. at the end of the day, do we end up fighting against modern allies against both isis and murderers? >> this is why we need a trump doctrine. as condoleezza rice said in cairo, we have for too long sacrifice security at the expense of the period this mirage of stability and no command or between government has actually made a sketch and met with regimes that are fueling the ideo

we do have radicalized individuals in america. we don't have radicalized communities. and we don't because of who we are. it brings us all the way back to the first conversation about the ban. you need to be careful about the second and third order affects of things, even if they are legitimate self-defense steps. >> senor: over in the region where a lot of these individuals come from, at first, middle east, parts of the sunni middle east, growing cooperation now really is the last few years between the government of israel and the sunni arab-- someone had a very good line that sure enough, president obama actually did bring the arab and the israelis together. >> yes, he did. >> senor: so you know, in terms, they do a lot of intelligence sharing from what i understand, strategic cooperation. how important is it, how legal is it? >> it is real. and it is important. the normal rhythm for a cia chief going to that part of the world is in one sequence or another, do the emirates, to the saudis, the jordan ans, do the israelis and dot egyptians so in essence you are sweepin

paul, you've been studying and tracking radicalization for years. when you see this dhs assessment, does this square with trend you're seeing? >> absolutely. there's a vast amount of academic research on this, suggesting that right now, the biggest threat in the united states is coming from people who are born in the united states. the majority of isis-related cases in the united states right now are people who are born over here. what this dhs assessment is saying is even with those coming from overseas into the united states, the majority of those are being radicalized several years after they're coming to the united states. and this is not surprising, because isis and al qaeda and all these other jihadi groups are able to reach an audience of radicals here in the united states with their propaganda and able to persuade some of them to try to plff attacks in their name. you have this assessment from dhs that they've pulled from open sources, and you're looking at more sources than anything else, what are you seeing that's happening once folks get

it is hard to detect someone on the fringes of radicalization.ve to look for some sort of psychological trigger that caused him to pursue this path. host: in terms of identifying the radical sites, how hard is the diven the ability of ark web? clint: if you don't have a connection with the operatives in the group, it is like trying to pick a needle out of a haystack. people are on the internet overtime -- all of the time for a number of different causes. how can you take one person's musings and separate it from someone willing to rent a car and killed citizens? it is nearly impossible to do. we can look for those triggers. often aar companies are pattern in this suspicious activity moving forward. host: thank you for joining us. one of the victims was correct cochran from utah, on the westminster bridge with his wife melissa. what has his family been saying? james: we are just outside the house of kurt cochran, where this news came as a terrible blow. kurt and melissa were celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary, and visiting their parents wo

that could radicalize them if they don't have welfare. what these migrants say -- they come to countries, they sexually assault women, they're having a very difficult time learning not to rape women. what other immigrant group could not stop themselves from raping women? it's right in front of our eyes can you imagine, what angela merkel has done is spreading throughout europe. just in germany alone, combining military discipline with islamic ideology? it is terrifying what we are up against. why would you do that in this country? we keep trying to be distracted with russia, russia. russia is probably one of our better allies in the fight against islam. they've been dealing with these islamic terrorists for centuries now. the rumor, they are the ones who warned us about the brothers that bombed the boston marathon. let's just worry about russia -- how long ago did reagan win the cold war? >> it's a conspiracy live. it has been nonstop. i know you will touch this hard question, if you grow up under sharia law and you are a man and you thin

of radical islam. don't know that they signed up to, " let's go find the radical islam fight." the president said during the campaign that russia's fighting isis. that's not true. the more orhting less moderate opposition that we thought might have offered an alternative to the assad regime. all they want to do is keep the alawites, the own form of shia iticals, in power because suits their naked russian geopolitical ambitions to have a foothold in the middle east. dan: to your point, russia is helping syria bomb aleppo, not raqqa, where isis is headquartered. they are contributing to the human suffering. if you are going to solve the broader question of radical islam the pettis, -- presence of that alawite regime is the engine that continually fuels sunni opposition, which the love it goes is more and more captured by the sunnis were not just willing to kill, but willing to die. dan: let's talk about this book, "playing to the edge," which is a fantastic, if not at times unnerving read. not bedtime re

now, here at home, we've seen an increase in radical islamist attacks. top officials have repeatedly warned that isis can, in fact, infiltrate the refugee population. according to the f.b.i., there are 1,000 active isis-related cases right now in all 50 states and earlier this month, the attorney general, jeff sessions, revealed this shocking statistic about these ongoing investigations. take a look. >> today, more than 300 people according to the f.b.i. who came here as refugees are under an f.b.i. investigation today for potential terrorism-related activities. >> sean: in europe, it's become far worse and more violent. the continent has become the epicenter of terrorist attacks against the west. now, since 2014, europe has taken in over three million referees and asylum seekers. germany has led the way in western europe by accepting 900,000 refugees in 2015 alone. last month, germany's domestic security and intelligence agency the bfb says the number of radical islamists in the country has grown considerably rising from just 100 in 2013 to almost 1,600

hardly a radical position if justice kagan and judge gorsuch agree with originalism. it's certainly not a methodology of interpreting law that should stir any concern. yesterday some of our democratic colleagues continued to reinforce my view that they don't really have any legitimate objection and reason to filibuster judge neil gorsuch. this is about judge gorsuch. this is not about president trump. this is not about merrick garland. this is not about anything else. we will have a chance to vote on the nomination of judge neil gorsuch for the united states supreme court. that is the question that will be presented to the senate for an up-or-down vote. and any fair-minded person would have to conclude that he is an independent legal mind and that he won't legislate from the bench. he has the intelligence, experience, and character to be a good judge, as he has been for ten years on the tenth circuit court of appeals out of denver. and he has an unflinching commitment to upholding a faithful interpretation of the constitution and our laws. so i look forward to confirm

what it means to be a muslim in the 21st century and how to of avoid the allure of radicalism.ere it is. >> tucker: thanks for joining us, i think the most interesting part of your book is the fact that your own children have been exposed to islamic extremism, you seem like not the candidate for that, not the family for that, very international. t you live outside the east. even your children have been exposed, what do you tell them. >> the first thing we have to be aware of is it's simply part of the internet and its exposed and presents itself in so many different ways through globalization and the technologies that we use. i worried that if my children weren't immune to these ideas, it really all of us are exposed to them. i had to take a stand of my own. i put those ideas into the book that i've written. >> tucker: it seems like most of the spokesman for modern islam at that we see at least on american television are apostates. they are no longer affiliated with the religion. but you are a muslim, a practicing muslim. do you think the criticism is fair that moderate muslims

radical islamic terrorism. this. >> our obligation is to serve, protect and defend the citizens of the united states. we are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical islamic terrorism. [applause] we have seen the attacks at in france, in belgium, in germany, and all over the world. it is not compassion but reckless to allow uncontrolled entry from places where proper vetting cannot occur. [applause] those given the high honor of admittance to the united states, we cannot allow our nation to become a sanctuary for extremists. >> sean: joining us now with reaction as the deputy assistant to the president, dr. sebastian gorka. protecting the homeland, that is tied to extreme vetting come up the ball and border security, and the president laid down a marker in the campaign. tonight, this job is getting done. how quickly questioning >> you heard tonight, he said, we are going to build a great, great f. you can expect some news about the immigration executive order. >> sean: so they have read on

they become radicalized after that.prevent that if you agree with that? >> i mean i don't know what polls or statistics dhs is using, but in my academic work on radicalization, yes, it is true that radicalization happens through a long, long period of disaffection, through a crisis of identity within, you know, the individuals themselves. that's how it's happened in europe. that's how it's happened in the united states. >> what i find fascinating is you broach these issues in your new series, "believer." it airs at 10:00 p.m. on sunday. but you examine smaller religions so that you can find out about how people become radicalized, how they help extremism, and they promote it. what did you find out? >> well, look, i think if you start with the notion that religion is first and foremost a matter of identity and only after that a matter of beliefs and practices, that when someone says, i'm hindu or buddhist or muslim or jewish, they're making a statement about who they are as human being. who they are as human beings is de

like the nice truck boomer, he was radicalized in 20 minutes.that long-term -- >> neil: but that definition, they don't know how to handle this. we might -- we have the problem here in our midst, if they're already here, some seem fine now but in months or years that might not be so fine. none of this would address in any approach that the president takes or others try to take. >> no, no. we're in basically broadway -- as they say on broadway, nobody knows nothing. all we can say, which is a crude correlation, the less islam you have, the less terrorists you. have you don't hear about attacks in japan or poland because they have few muslims. but we have a problem with second and third generation -- i don't like the term "radicalization." they mean it like it's the west nile mosquito. you just perfectly normal and suddenly bitten by the radicalization bug. the guy, for example, the orlando nightclub killer that slaughtered all those people in that gay nightclub, he was raised by somebody who himself shouldn't have been let in the country. it's wh

we are also taking strong measures to protect our nation from radical islamic terrorism.ther: and president trump taking a hard line stance against radical islamic terrorism and social media can't get enough. don't miscarley shimkus with what is trending i'm always on call. an insulin that fits my schedule is key. ♪ tresiba® ready ♪ (announcer) tresiba® is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which may cause dizziness, swtiting, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar. low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening. injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. g

they may have been radicalized by them. we cannot come from nation's security by allowing visitors entry when their own governments are not able or willing to provide the information we need to bet them responsibly. this executive order, essentially provide a needed pause. how wecarefully review scrutinize people coming from these countries. second, the department of justice leaves that this executive order -- believes that this executive order is a lawful and proper exercise of presidential authority. this department of justice will depend and enforce lawful orders of the president consistent with the corporate doubles of our constitution. the executive is in power. congress, to make national security judgments and enforce our immigration policies in order to safeguard the american public. terrorism is clearly a danger for america and our people. the president gets briefings on these dangers and emerging threats on a regular basis. federal investigative agencies, the intelligence community, the department of homeland secur

. >> is there war between the west and radical islam? >> it's radical but it's hard to separate because you don't know who is who. >> the judgment also citing statements from some of mr. trump's top advisers. >> when he first announced it he said muslim ban and he called my up and said put a commission together and show me the right way to do it legally. and policy adviser steven miller that argued the new ban would have the same impact as the old one that was blocked by the courts. >> mostly minor technical differences. fundamentally you'll still have the same basic policy outcome for the country but you're getting responses to technical issues brought up by the court. >> the commander and chief arguing that the constitution grants him the power to suspend immigration when national security is concerned. >> i think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way. >> the set back comes as president trump unveils his first budge proposal. calling for a $54 billion increase in defense spending offset by massive cuts to the epa, sta

not all jihadis, but extremists, radicals -- paul: people who are under suspicion. >> exactly.ave east london, and you have a suburb of london. these are areas where there are pockets of muslim communities, vast majority of them perfectly law-abiding, but it's where these radical mosques, radical imams operate and where most of the foreign fighters, for example, who go off to syria and iraq may originate from these types of neighborhoods. and you see these patterns all across europe. specific neighborhoods around brussels, specific suburbs of paris where you have muslim communities. doesn't mean all of them are ticking time boils, but they're these ecoms that breed jihaddism. paul: this is the first big attack in britain since, i think, the subway bombings in 2005, so british intelligence services have a pretty good record here. and yet they've been warning now for some weeks that there could be a hot more attacks. is there any particularren reason they've been saying that? is this partly syrian related, for example? >> paul, i think this has been something that we should have

world, please understand, this order is part of our ongoing efforts to eliminate vulnerabilities, radical islamist terrorist. the state department will coordinate with other federal agencies and diplomat these temporary restrictions in an orderly manner. our embassies and consulates around the world will play an important role in making sure that our nation is secure as it can be. the state department will implement the provisions in this order that allow for the emissions of refugees when it is determined that they don't pose a risk to the security or welfare of the united states. upon the president's initial executive order issued on january 27, the state department consular affairs hand diplomatic security office immediately undertook a review in coordination with the department of homeland security to identify additional measures that would strengthen our vetting of those seeking entry to the united states from those seven named countries. these early efforts were concentrated on iraq. iraq is an important ally in the fight against isis. with their brave soldiers fighting in close coo