so from the perspective of maybe a radical perspective here for the guard as committing murder or at least performing an unwarranted action of shooting students on may 4th, there's a stronger sense that in this continuum of conflict resolution that justice must precede reconciliation. here, just a sample from carol mirman, who is pictured here in the filo picture, which i think everyone has probably seen, looking at other people in this picture besides mary veccio and the body down here, carol miriman is here and her testimony, i think, gives us a perspective on this radical end. i'll see if this works for us today. >> but nonetheless, it was really, really, really painful for people to say students should have been shot based on misconceptions and narrow minded views of love it or leave it. people today still say, forget it, get over it. forget this stuff. they were rabble rousers, what does it mean to stand up and say when you're in opposition to the war, when you say we shouldn't be surrounded by tanks and troops, when nobody is really willing to negotiate and talk about things, w

this is radically unfair. and it requires a radical change. we. mr. king.

this is radically unfair. and it requires a radical change. we . mr. king. you. question is the so much. which of course you want to. make up for what critics call america's banking system again the world has witnessed the specter of a major financial institution reporting.

this is radically unfair. and it requires a radical change. we. mind in russia would be so much brighter if you knew all about sun from funds to freshen. up.

radicalism is not a crime. radicalism is not illegal in the united states of america. but when you are not just some free-floating radical with cockamamy ideas that nobody else buys in the world, but rather you are being drafted by the president of the state senate in arizona to help write legislation based on those crazy ideas, and that legislation is becoming law, and that legislation then gets described by the republican candidate for president as a model for the nation, you are at a place where radical has met powerful. and that is a whole different thing. the combination of radical and powerful that is russell pearce and his career ended up freaking out his home city of mesa, arizona. freaked them out enough that they recalled him from office and replaced him not with a democrat, but just a mainstream republican last year. it's the first time any stay senate president in any state was ever recalled from office in american history. it's the first time that any arizona lawmaker has ever been recalled from office in arizona history. but russell pearce did get himself

radicals. the original meaning of the term left is people who want a fundamental transformation of the society. so i trace people who were interested in the transformation from abolitionist to socialist to communist to new leftist and others. the thesis is that this kind of left has failed to build institutions and parties and unions and other groups that can vie for power politically. it's been much more successful i think in changing the sort of moral sense of american society and changing people's attitudes about issues like first slavery and racial equality and gender equalit equality. homosexual equality didn't come out of the left entirely, but certainly people in the left in 1960s were an important part of that gay rights movement. >> you see it as these individuals for racial rights or homosexual rights or any other number of things, you need people on the far left. >> yeah, yeah. you need people to dream big dreams. big dreams that are very much in the american dream. calling for indiv

the free radical quickly combines with an ethylene molecule. the product is also a free radical. it, too, reacts with an ethylene molecule. this is repeated many times, and the chain grows. th sequence is called a free radical chain rction. eventually, we stop the pross or the polymer cin will be too long. the reaction es en tlink imagine a freight trn being assembled one boxcar at a time. each car rolls down the hill and clamps onto the car ahead of it. then along comes another car, and so it goes. many cars become one train. today, polyethylene is the world's most popular synthetic polymer. we manufacture 6 billion kilograms of it a year. it's a clear, stretchy food wrap or an impenetrable protective garment. it's a bowling pin... a fuel tank, a skating rink. polyethylene has many different uses and many different properties. series demonstrator dr. donald showalter. let's examine me of the material around us here. all of this stuff is polyethylene. some of it bounces. some of it breaks. [crash] some of it tears easily. some of it doesn't. why do these common objects have such

is it radical? >> yeah, radical means goes to the root. and the root is that we have an oligarchy that has taken over our politics. when you have one man can plunk $10 million into a political campaign just in the primaries, this is crazy. >> but barack obama was somebody nobody heard of eight years ago with student loan debt. he pam president of the united states. >> yeah. >> is he part of the oligarchy? >> no. but the oligarchy can stop. >> newt gingrich would not have been running for a year without one person. >> you can't organize a political campaign without money. but you cannot actually arrest the power of the oligarchy by doing business as usual. >> it's just an impossible debate to have. >> no, it's not. it's a great debate. go ahead. >> it is when you can't speak. it's why it's impossible to have with occupy because you can change the purpose, you can change the movement every time i speak. if it's about capitalism, no, it's about money and politics. let me ask you this, in the end there's one common theme and it's almost autocr

when these radical groups met, often they would assemble in the dean of women's office. mind you this is a few feet down the hall from the chancellor's office. the combination of more radical and mainstream liberal feminisms in taylor's office was clear in the library house there. she had this large room on women's resources which was rare to find various texts regarding women in the late '60s. her text ranged from career and graduate school guides to the now statement of purpose. she had pat manardy's politics of housework, and beverly jones and judith brown's tour of female liberation movement in the actual library. the thing i thought was so interesting was it was not uncommon to find in the campus mail such publications as the bitch manifesto and foundations for social change. 201 strong hall. the point i want to emphasize here is that this administrator extended her umbrella of programming to include radical feminists and their agenda and the students involved in those areas. now that we've considered the growth of feminism at ku, i'd like to share a few stories reg

there were very concerned about the radical anti-government movement. there were very concerned fit in particular about a community in a, which will talk about more a little bit, in part because some of the people who had been active in the 1980's were gravitating back to that place. information was starting to come out that other dangerous criminals to will later prosecuted for other crimes or other living there are passing through. much has happened in the run-up to september 11th. people who were shot in the loudest and issuing warnings say you have to do something about this or ignored. not only were the ignored, but the different federal agencies in particular in this case the fbi and atf have pieces of information or not pulling that information, sharing a when they get evidence of something alarming. instead they went to each other and the u.s. attorney's office and said we really think something needs to be done here. they took the opposite. why did they do that? the fbi had been afraid for many years of being too proactive in terms of going aft

many republicans found lovejoy's radical abolitionist position too risky. some of them even considered voting for an alternate candidate. but over that summer, lincoln became convinced that lovejoy's popularity within his part of the state would make it unwise for the party not to back him, and they did decide to fully back him. and when the general election was held, lovejoy was overwhelmingly elected. he defeated democratic candidate barry osgood. lovejoy, now 46, was as radical as any anti-slavery man ever elected to congress. slaveholders considered his name anathema. in 1856, although democrat james buchanan had won the white house and the democrats controlled congress, as the majority party, they still had to deal with a formidable group of political rivals. lovejoy made his first lengthy speech in the house chamber on february 7th, 1858, "let the mason-dixon line disappear, let the country be one united whole," he said, "the rights of all equally respected." he attacked the dred scott decision and supreme court justice roger tawny's interpretation of

increasingly, we see those individuals are radicalize, self-radicalized as being a huge problem for us. in the united states, there are a variety of ways that people become radicalized. particularly after september 11, for the four or five years after that. it really is, to a large extent, the muslim american community itself, if you are talking about international terrorism, who has alerted us to persons who we need to look further at and has understood that the worst thing that could happen to the muslim american community in the united states is another terrorist attack. yes, we have our reach. every one of our field officers has substantial out reach with and has since september 11 with the muslim communities. but in addition to the relationships that we establish, the education that we do jointly, it is in large part attributable to the muslim community itself that local radicalization is somewhat diminished and, really, it is on the internet where we face our biggest challenge now. >> director, several government officials have raised questions about the relationship between cont

its, more radical alternatis. what does that mean?n i foy irregular heartbeat put me at 5 times greater risk of a stroke, my first thoughts were about my wife, and my family. i have the most common type of atrial fibrillation,r afib. it's not caused by a heart valve problem. i s taking warfarin, but my doctor put me on pradaxa instead to reduce my risk of stroke. in a clinical trial, pradaxa® (dabigatran etexilate mesylate) reduced stroke risk 35% better than warfarin. and unlike warfarin, with pradaxa, there's no need for regular blood tests. that's really important to me. pradaxa can cause serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding. don't take prada if you have abnormal bleeding and seek immediate medical care for unexpected signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. pradaxa may increase your bleeding risk if you're 75 or older, have a bleedincondition like stomach ulcers, or take aspirin, nsaids, or blood thinners, or if you have kidney problems, especially if you take tell your doctor about all dicines you take, any planned medical or denl

and the thesis is that this kind of left, the radical left, has failed to build institutions, parties, unions, other groups which really can vie for power politically. but it's been much more successful, i think n. changing the moral sense of american society, changing the attitudes about first slavery, gender equality, the idea of homosexual quality which is something that didn't come out of the left completely, entirely, but certainly people in the left in the 1960s was a very important part of that gay rights movement. >> so you see it as these individuals, whether it's for racial rights or for homosexual rights, you need people on sort of the far left? >> yeah. you need people to dream big dreams, which is calling for individual freedom to be respected and extended to everybody regardless of race and national origin, sexual preference, gender, and also for calling for, you know, we have a responsibility, taking care of one another. well, radicals argue this means you need to have much more social leveling, certain redistribution of resources, too. so i trace how people on the left

radical islamists say they carried out a deadly bombing in the syrian capital in response to the actions of government troops confirming fears the terror groups of fighting on the rebel side. austerity protests continue in spain after hundreds of thousands demanded an end to cuts on saturday while fresh turmoil in greece puts a question mark over the fate of the euro. and russian rescue teams join the search for answers in indonesia at the site of the su hoy's super jet crash which killed all forty five on board and. ten pm sunday night here in moscow welcome if you just joined us here watching the weekly here on r t with me kevin owen is a roundup of the top stories of the last seven days and first a new president but a familiar face with him a putin was sworn into office this last week in a lavish culmination of russia's tumultuous election period with opposition activism earth and the story of high the focus is no one how putin will deal with the huge challenges faced at home and abroad. reports. for the third time vladimir putin took the thirty three word oath to become russia's pres

we expect some people to be really radical. we also expect some people to unexpectedly gain power in politics. but there is nobody who approaches your combination of maximum power and maximum radicalism. it is astonishing that somebody as radical as you got to be as powerful as you did in our country. if i sound fired up about this, i am. i fascinated by you. you know that book i wrote this year, "drift," it is dedicated to dick cheney in the hopes that he will let me interview him about these things some day. i have a lot to ask him. but now in today's politics, we are still trying to figure out what it does to ourselves as a country, and specifically what it does to the republican party, to have had somebody that radical in the vice presidency for eight years. how the does that affect the party in an ongoing way, particularly as the party is still trying to find itself? when george w. bush left office, his approval rating was 22%, but dick cheney's was 13%. herpes was more popular than cheney when he left office. dick cheney

so now this invasion is radicalize to number deutsch individuals. they are getting the fighters coming through places like syria into iraq and the radicalizing people across the multiple continent, and also the century in iraq. savitt got a foothold in multiple regions. so this really gets us to the peak of the second wave. >> host: we have attacks overseas, not in the united states, plus a series of bombings that go on and on and iraq led zarqawi where his leadership explained as part of the reason that the second wave started. can you explain how that works? and i know that also goes into the hole a weakening phenomenon and i have to say in the book you say counter insurgency was the reason for the turnaround. >> guest: sure. >> host: so the weakening the counterinsurgency. >> guest: zarqawi is interesting because the classified documents between al qaeda show a very tense relationship through 2005 to 2006 and as zarqawi continues to use brutal attacks like the hitting and killing large numbers of civilians through these big improvised devices lik

lovejoy, now 46, was as radical as any anti-slavery man ever elected to congress. slaveholders considered his name anathema. in 1856, although democrat james buchanan had won the white house and the democrats controlled congress, as the majority party, they still had to deal with a formidable group of political rivals. lovejoy made his first lengthy speech in the house chamber on february 7th, 1858, "let the mason-dixon line disappear, let the country be one united whole," he said, "the rights of all equally respected." he attacked the dred scott decision and supreme court justice roger tawny's interpretation of the constitution. if human beings are property, lovejoy pointed out, why had the federal government declared the slave trade as piracy? "the new york times" made the speech the lead story called "human beings not property." the speech became the basis of lovejoy's re-election campaign. on april 5th, 1860, lovejoy delivered his most controversial speech about slavery in congress. it resulted in a tumultuous fray on the house floor. he was barely finished wit

pro-choice, radically against abortion. you can feel the way would you like to feel. you can speak your mind, but there comes a point in time when the rest of us have to defend ourselves and our way of life. and what i hope we'll do in this discussion is not ignore the threats that do exist. there is a lurking, looming threat against this country. and against our way of life. and i hope we will not get so sensitive to this dilemma that we will basically unilaterally disarm ourselves. and when it comes to basically the immigration issue, if there was ever a reason to fix our immigration system, this hearing highlights it. you've got millions of people here undocumented, illegal, and i would just be greatly offended if i were a corporal coming back from afghanistan who happened to have an hispanic last name and got stopped because somebody thinks i'm here illegally. i could be greatly offended. but the fact of the matter is there's a downside of illegal immigration in terms of crime and the way to solve that for me is a compr

so now, this invasion has radicalize a number of individuals.they are getting foreign fighters coming to places like syria into iraq and volunteering to serve. they are radicalizing people across multiple continents, and also a sanctuary in iraq so they have got a foothold in multiple regions. this really gets us to the peak of that decade. >> host: so we have attacks overseas, not in the united states, plus we have a series of almonds that go on and on in iraq led by zarqawi, so his leadership you explain is part this part of the reason that the second wave started an epidemic. can you explain how that worked and that also goes into the whole anwr awakening phenomenon, and i have got to say, in your book you seem to say counterinsurgency was the reason for the turnaround. zarqawi awakening insurgency. .. >> you have got to stop killing so many civilians, especially muslims, including shia. it is undermining your support. you also need to back off on targeting civilians in other countries because he had been involved in attacks in jordan, and th

the radical left coalition finished second. it refuses to join any government that will implement the spending cuts. >>> the focus of the fresh vote will be whether the country should adopt austerity measures. the latest opinion poll shows the radical left coalition will win the most votes. they oosed teaming up with any party that supports austerity measures. the european union may decide not to implement its aid package. some eu leaders are saying member countries which cannot follow the rules should leave the eurozone. if the next government rejects austerity measures they will decide whether greece should stay in the bloc. >>> i'm catherine kobayashi in tokyo. do stay with us. xxxx

the radicalizing people across different continents. they also have a sanctuary now in iraq, so they have a foothold in multiple regions. this gets us to the peak of the second wave. >> so we have the attacks overseas, not in the united states, plus we have a series of bombings that go on and on in iraq. these were led by [inaudible name]. this -- can you explain how this work. worked. that also goes into the awakening phenomenon. i have to say that nowhere in your book you seem to say counterinsurgency was the reason for the turnaround. >> zarqawi is interesting. the documents show a very tense relationship through 2005 and 2006. as zarqawi continues to use brutal tactics like beheadings and killing large numbers of civilians through these big, improvised explosion devices, car rides untrimmed bombs and etc., we see letters from the number two, [inaudible name] and also [inaudible name] that was serving as the deputy manager of al qaeda. they sent a series of letters through zarqawi thing you have to stop killing so many civilians, esp

i wish those on the radical left has moved from protest to politics and that those were those radicals would be as vocal and as powerful as those conservatives on the right. we have a major imbalance, even to the extent that people in the democratic party runaway from the label of being a liberal. much less a radical, right? i think what we see is partly a failure to heed transports voice. i will stop there. and i will see if you would like to add anything there >> the other thing that i see in the message that he sends to us today is the one of coalition politics, regardless of the strength of any of the members of the coalition we are talking about the decline in the labor movement. what i see now is i completely agree with you about the lack of move to embrace power, but also the intensity of the fragmentation on the left, which represents the complete departure from his direction and the strength and push for coalition politics in the way he invited that himself. that comes through so clearly in his voice, in the way that he thought on so many fronts and saw them all connected. i t

most americans were the faces of the radicals were. they weren't just imgrants they were -- people who sproak strange languages with unpronounceable last names who lived together in big cities. joined clubs that no one else could join and were used senior sufficiently. all of this in june 1919 when there was a waive of bombings around the country. nine of them in one night included one that was portrayed in the movie at the home of mitchell palmer in nearby washington, d.c. him and his wife, and daughter had gone upstairs to bed. it was a little after 11 p.m. the bomb went in front of the door. if they would have stayed downstairs, they would have been killed. later that night when they started investigating, they found a pile of pink pam fetes. pamphlets written on pink paper written by up until the bomb went off in the house-a leading progressive in america. he had been a champion as a member of congress of women's suffer ranch of laws against child labor, labor unions, he was a quaker pacifist. when wood row wilson asked him to be s

and they suggested some very, very radical things before they were even on the plate.was that everyone should sing their proest ises. they are things that are now sort of taken for granted but you know, be realistic and demanding as possible. >> i understand the poetry, i understand the power, the inspiration of what you do. but this is a very divided country. and as we speak, the wealthy, powerful interests are pouring money into wisconsin to try to prevent the recall of governor walker in a few weeks. >> yes. >> and unions are pouring money in, too. >> that's correct. >> so, how do you -- are you going to be there for the recall? >> of course. of course i'll be there for the recall it's going to be a very, a watershed moment in the boomeranging back around for fortunes of unions in this country. i mean if we allow in the, one of the most pro-union states in the united states, wisconsin, them to strip public service workers' union rights away, that's a domino that's going to have things fall in the wrong direction. if, on the other hand, we hold that governor and some

and imposing radical change, i'm going to be against a conservative imposing radical change. >> richard wolffe, it is kind of a miracle and that was against the front-runner of the candidacy that for a while, the republican party really didn't want to see make it all the way. >> right. because if there's one thing more weird and creepy than newt gingrich, it's actually the multiple personality disorder of the republican party. how could someone so wrong be so right? his critique of the ryan plan was spot on but his critique of the president, he called it the in the american history and it's barely 24 hours after president obama says we're going to be in afghanistan after 2024, not a very good radical leftist. failure at being a social radical and he had moments of lucidity and completely you're going to have to be selective about these quotes if you use them from chicago, by the way. some of them go right off the rails. >> i assume the mitt romney campaign doesn't care what newt gingrich says at this point. doesn't care if he endorses. he will at some point endorse but they don't care.

our real enemy is extremism and radicalism. this is the common enemy. the battleground is not between muslims and americans. the battle is between the moderates of all faiths against the extremists of all faightses? >> here's where i run into a problem. how could you have gone on "60 minutes" after the slaughter of 3,000 americans and say, the united states and their policies were an accessory to what happened? i have the tape -- i can show the tape. let's roll it. >> i wouldn't say that the united states deserved what happened. but the united states' policies were an accessory to the crime that happened. >> you can say we are an accessory? >> yes. >> how? because we have been accessory to a lot of innocent lives... dying in the world. in fact, in the most direct sense, osama bin laden is made in the usa. >> sean: osama bin laden -- you are blaming us?! with that statement? you are blaming america! for the 3,000 dead americans. >> sean, i regret saying that. you know, we need to -- i offer forgiveness and ask to be forgiven. >> sean: why have you never