the minister of foreign affairs of our, our partner, friendly, fraternal country of poland, radisław sikorskias for such an empirical thing, but it is voiced, if it is voiced by a politician of such a high level, well, surely he has reasons to speak about it, there were obviously some prerequisites, so mr. sekorsky said that he, now for a second, so that i do not lied, and quoted, he stated at the 20th annual meeting of the yalton strategy in kyiv, and that crimea is of key importance if peace terms will be discussed. transfer the peninsula under the mandate of the united nations organization for the preparation of a referendum. this is despite the fact that the president of the republic of turkey recep tayyip erdogan said that crimea should be ukrainian, that is, if we hear from the president of the republic of turkey, who have historical ties with crimea, there are some, frankly, sometimes is an ally of putin, some issues, but even here they say no, i think it's a very strange statement, esp. what is the foreign minister's statement about affairs of poland, for me personally it is particula

yesterday , polish foreign minister radislaw sikorski made a statement about crimea, and our closest neighbor says that crimea is symbolic, important for russia and for putin, and strategically important for ukraine, so he does not see how the two countries can come to an agreement without demilitarization of the peninsula, and he proposes to transfer. crimea under un mandate for 20 years, what does sikorsky say? we could hand over crimea under a un mandate to prepare a fair referendum after checking who are legal residents and so on, and we could delay it for 20 years. in response, the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine declared the inadmissibility of compromises regarding the status of crimea and the territorial integrity of ukraine. crimea is the center of gravity of the european security architecture, its restoration is possible only after the complete de-occupation of the entire territory of ukraine, including the ukrainian peninsula. how do you assess, mr. valery, sikorsky's statement, considering that the un is not a powerful organization now, whose mandate will be respect

particularly strange that this is a statement by the minister of foreign affairs. of poland, radisław sikorski i respected as a person with great diplomatic experience, as a person who understands what russia is, a person who understands what the international legal system is, and it is strange to me that it was this person who proposed this proposal, which essentially destroys this international legal system, because what is the mandate of the un, what are the un troops, what, he cannot but understand that such a proposal, well, puts him under. territorial doubt the integrity of ukraine, nevertheless, he considers it normal, acceptable to announce such things, especially, it is strange, you know, to hear this from a polish politician, as from a representative of this or that country, which also suffered, you know, from that expressed some territorial claims, occupied its territories, the three divisions of poland, the situation with gdańsk, which was also allegedly under some international mandate, let's name it. how it all ended for poland, so there is some kind of, well, if it didn't concer

the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of poland radislaw sikorski said that warsaw is consideringting down russian missiles in ukrainian airspace if they are near the polish border, the bbc reports. simultaneously. as radio svoboda writes, nato secretary general jen stoltenberg noted that the alliance will not be part of this conflict. during a press conference on july 15, president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyy stated that nato's position regarding the downing of russian missiles by poland should be unanimous. but he reminded that on july 8 , a security agreement on bilateral security guarantees was signed between ukraine and poland, which provides for a technical consideration of this issue, but has certain nuances. we started working on a bilateral level, because it is primarily not only the security of poland's nato countries, but simply the security of people in poland, because a missile can hit there, or has already hit. we just have different opinions on this matter. i believe that it is absolutely fair if poland will help us to shoot down missiles that are headed in the d

today, the minister of foreign affairs of poland, radislaw sikorski, said that crimea is symbolically important for russia and for putin, and for ukraine it is strategically important, so he does not see how the two countries can come to an agreement without demilitarizing the peninsula and without the participation of the united nations, to quote sikorsky, we could pass. crimea under the un mandate to prepare an honest referendum after checking who are legal residents and so on, and we could postpone it for 20 years, sikorsky suggested. well, taking into account the actual position of the un and its capabilities of this organization, is such an option even possible in the case of crimea and should it be done? well, you know, with all my respect for mr. sikorsky personally and for poland as one of our main allies and a sincere friend, i think that's a bit overkill here, it seems to me that those advisers or experts of the polish minister have slightly overestimated the capabilities of the un, i must say that it's not even about the mandate of this organization, but the organization is

another topic that came from poland, the minister of foreign affairs of poland, radisław sikorski, calledopean countries to reconsider their approach to helping ukrainian men of military age. to encourage them to return to their homeland. let's listen to what sikorsky said. stop providing assistance to ukrainians subject to mobilization. there should be no financial incentives for those who are hiding from mobilization in ukraine. this does not apply to human rights, to receive money for evading the draft to protect one's homeland. we in poland do not do this, but if we did... who would have a serious political problem in our country? mr. mykola, there is a discussion in poland about the men of draft age who are there, whether to pay them, not to pay them, to form a battalion from them, in poland it is easiest to discuss, the minister for affairs himself said that we do not do this in poland, all these men work there and do not receive help, and those who want to receive help go to germany or some other countries, help is given, in total there are 70 ukrainians works in poland, and 70% ar

european union, but... they can limit generous payments, the minister of foreign affairs of poland, radislaw sikorski, also calls on the european union to take an example from warsaw and not pay social assistance to refugees, so that they, in particular, become to the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine. if they are under eu protection as refugees, they receive €200 per month for each child enrolled in the polish system. in western europe they get others payments it is a financial incentive for young men and women who... to return home to defend their country. we must not subsidize disobedience. radoslav sikorsky, minister of foreign affairs of poland. well, a noble goal, but in order for... them to return to ukraine, conditions must be created for them as well, because many men are there with their families. a number of restrictions have already come into effect. estonia has stopped paying compensation for housing rent to those refugees who are in the country over year. since august, hungary has been paying for housing for residents of only 13 regions of ukraine, which they recognized as affected b

continuation, but if suddenly we hear such a ... position once again officially, from anyone, from radisław sikorskirom the polish government, if it is confirmed that they are calling for such a line, then yes, i would answer correctly, diplomatically, but not everything is even in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs, there can be even clearer accents, this is an unacceptable position, it does not lead to anything good, because it is only pouring water into the mill. the russians in this situation, yes, those who say that in fact crimea remained russian, this is also their position regarding this statement by sikorsky, they also reflected and said that we do not have any need to hold any more referendums there, so well so far we have such a reaction, another important decision that awaits ukraine is the decision to allow our westerners partners to strike with long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation. last week , the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, met with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, and before that, the secretary of s