david fix, michelle hornes-cohen, tom radulovich, man did kirschner. >> i'm janine new, director of the san francisco apartment association. a couple of the speaker cards of folks that supervisor chu read have left. they had other things. the prior hearing went a little late. we are asking for your support on this important piece of legislation. we would like to thank mr. wiener for taking a role on this. we are trying to clean up archaic law trying to punish small homeowners trying to rent spots and not in compliance with the law that we are aware of. we think the passage of this legislation and amnesty program will encourage people to come forward, comply with this law that's been on the books for quite sometime and end up in an increase in revenue going in to the general fund or mta fund. we would like to encourage the treasurer, as supervisor wiener recommended that we make this a payment yearly than currently asking someone to come down to the tax collector's office and pay this. if we could simply annually bill them i think there will be a net gain in revenue and people receive a

. >> good afternoon, tom radulovich, director of lable city. we were part of the conversation that created that quarter mile rule. we knew a lot were renting to folks to nearby residents. we thought that was okay but wanted to regularize it and talk to stakeholders like livable city. we want to create a market for residential parking but don't want to open the neighborhoods up to commuters. that is a real change in policy. the residential spaces would no longer be residential, we are changing the use entirely. we think there's a lot of great things in this. we love the simplification and amnesty but we don't think the planning code change was vetted with anybody. i did wrote a note to commission, i wasn't able to go, a disadvantage, a lot of neighborhoods will be affected. five units or fewer is pretty much every residential parcel in this city. we are a city of one, two, lee-unit buildings, a city of small apartments. virtually every residential unit or building in district 11 or in district four would be open to commuters coming in from outsi

radulovich * sent out an e-mail. i can think of very few people who follow agendas and introduce lists and pending 30-day hold lists more than tom. so this has been very public and transparent and open. i think that now is the time for a decision. that is my view. >> i actually read this letter. this came in about 10:00. i think he made a number of very important points. we not only see it with respect to issue of reduced parking, which is a constant discussion in this group but with respect to increased movement if you open up where parking is being allowed to occur, given that somebody might live in the sunset and wants to park on orange beach because there is a place that would be convenient to them. i'm concerned about transportation impacts relative to congestion. i'm also a little concerned living in a building where indeed people are respecting parking spaces but this is not because -- they own the parking space and they rent the space but an element of tenant security when the building does not have the super

i want to concur with director radulovich that this is not ready for primetime. the member organizations that i represent several months ago wrote you a two-page document by multitudeness problems with this. the only thing that we got was term limits for the oversight board members. that is not good enough. this needs to be much stronger. the board needs to be the controlling agency on this stuff, not some oversight board with a bunch of city hall insiders who have been working in favor of wall street developers their entire careers. as other people said we need citizen representatives from mission bay, bay view hunters-point and also the new transbay terminal area. we need those neighborhoods on this board represented and i would say that we need the supervisors in those districts to be voting members to this board. finally i would say in light of what is happening on treasure island and in light of the fact in the bayview hunters point we have the same and probably more radiologickal and toxic materials. two years ago this board voted to have hears on what is g