version of the agreement, which means that well , on the eve of the very eve of the visit, and rafael grosselo the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, i can say that here he lay this version of the agreement, and without a response, and in tit for more than six months, more than for six months. this is such a frank disregard, which indicates not only the lack of constructivism, but in the approaches of the ukrainian side. but this indicates that and this means that these people did not leave any plans or intentions, and not related to the application of artillery strikes, and not related to the forceful capture of the station. here they are just demonstrating. this is also through ignoring these agreements, therefore, everything that concerns the interaction of the russian federation, in my opinion, is quite a very constructive character and one more question. if i may say some time ago, there were reports of an assassination attempt against the station's management. do you know how the investigation is progressing and whether such threats persist? what do you think, of course, of course, and, uh

you know i would divide by in fact, well, a discussion of everything that rafael grossel voiced, into two components, one meaningful e, and the second technological in terms of content , almost everything is absolutely everything voiced by him, and the proposals they, e, actually coincide with our vision. e. hmm, how to ensure, uh, nuclear safety at the uh, zaporozhye nuclear power plant, but in terms of technology or mechanisms for implementing these proposals. there are big problems here. and i'm not wanting by any means uh offend anyone. uh, hmm, i'll give my opinion that this whole set of proposals might sound rude. but, and this is rather a set of good wishes of the right good wishes, because there is not a single mechanism for implementing those, e, some postulated principles that rafaels voiced, e, and this is the main problem, but in fact the problem of implementation, and here that e, not in the direction of a nuclear power plant of a non-nuclear power plant , nothing can be fired. well , it's not easy to disagree with this. this is a priori and we we are talking about this a

rafael grossel called on the side of the conflict to conclude an agreement to protect it. at the same time, in the newspaper material in your post says that at present the head of the magata is developing an appropriate action plan, but kiev does not want even a shadow. what kind of negotiations is evidenced by the pentagon documents leaked to the network ? . the victim was told that they ordered drugs on the dark web and went according to the coordinates behind the bookmark. at the same time, the hiding place turned out to be empty, and an ambush was waiting for them on the spot, two guys with weapons severely beat the girl, and then cut off her phalanx fingers on her arm . they filmed on mobile phone cameras and sent the report to the employer. for which they received a fee from him according to the established price list, for example, for the cut off finger of a girl by him 700 us dollars were supposed to be in total on the account of the defendants four such orders by victims in a criminal case. called four citizens aged 25 to 30 years after the massacre, the aggressor

determine this, but this is a question, as they say on their conscience, and the message is probably rafael grosseld not convey to zelensky or zelensky and did not listen to him, because the shelling continues and the damage is inflicted and quite dangerous. so the terrorist kind of intimidation continues. eh, here is the staff itself, because people work in a very dangerous industry and a lot depends on their honest millionaires. i'm here all the time. i look at this situation at the zaporozhye station, there are artillerymen. yes there are ukrainian artillerymen who are shooting at her. yes, these are some people. well, we must assume that these people know what the chernobyl nuclear power plant is. well, at least according to their age, even if they are not 22, they should hear, yes, and if artillery shoots somewhere, it means that some kind of fatal hit is possible. that is, it is, as it were, such activity, that is, sooner or later, they will hit somewhere, and here is a man, he shoots, he aims. yes, he is trying to hit well, so that it explodes and there is a release of radiation, but it does