[soft orchestration] ♪ >> johnny: hey, rafe? >> rafe: yeah?> johnny: i grew out of the fbi jacket you got me. >> rafe: oh. hmm. well, here's the thing--i don't actually work for the fbi anymore. i'll tell you what. i'll try and find you one. how's that? >> johnny: thanks! >> rafe: so, last night... must have had fun on your sleepover, huh? >> johnny: it was cool. >> rafe: mm-hmm. so mommy had to--had to do something? mm, thank you. >> caroline: you're welcome. oh, you know what? i forgot your vitamins. would you mind running to get them for me, please? >> johnny: okay. >> caroline: ah, thank you. >> johnny: but first, mommy told me a secret that i want to tell rafe. >> caroline: oh. okay. >> johnny: but it's about rafe. mommy said you're gonna be spending a lot more time with us. i can't wait. >> rafe: yeah. >> caroline: ah. >> rafe: that's a great kid. >> caroline: yeah, yeah. [grunts] >> rafe: something on your mind? >> caroline: well, it's just that when sami asked me to take the kids for a sleepover, i thought the reason was you. >> sami:

rafe wood, enoch wood. famous family of potters. those are just the sort of jugs that people were very keen to get their hands on in the late 19th century when there was this great wave of china mania and for that reason, the staffordshire factories, at that time, started producing very good copies of things that then were 100 years old or so. the earliest one i saw that looked like this one was 1785. right. but in view of what i've said about these being essentially copied in the late 19th century are you sure? no, no. now, i'm going to look at it in detail. let's look at this fella. he's... beautifully modeled face. he's got a wart on the cheek. he's got a gap in his teeth. he's holding a foaming jug. and then, he's sitting on this barrel. actually, look at the shirt with those buttons and the creases.

. >> sami: rafe, wait. i think we should talk. reconfiguring the entity to reflect the higher margin of proprietary business. in terms of verification of this value and this market, the $24.4 billion buyout of michael dell is no vanity plate. dell has to borrow a ton of money. he's got backers much bigger than his personal war chest. he's got microsoft on a couple billion. silver lake a very shrewd private equity firm with a record of investing in out of favor but solid technology companies with good cash flow trying as much as $15 billion. i can't think of a better affirmation what that could be worth and what an in-your-face sign that the personal-computer portion of technology has a few innings left in the game. how about companies that already have a problem? what do we do with those? are they being bought? are these valuations stretched as the younger analysts have repeatedly told us? take virgin media, a company when i was looking at the charts, that's a gigantic european cable company. stock trading $21 a little less than a

this crazy -- these are the rafings of a truly addled mind and it ran in the daily caller where the audience it wasn't you and me. the audience for it wasn't new york. it was people out there in the hinterlands who don't know new york but could be made to fear it and then do what he wants, which is buy more guns. buy more products. >> congressman, final question to you. isn't the reason that mr. lapierre attacked new york simply this, that we have very strict gun laws and they work? isn't that the fundamental problem for mr. lapierre. >> i do believe he was taking aim at mayor bloomberg who has been very outspoken on this issue. that will we are the safest big city in america. that things are not, as he described them, and they're certainly not the way which he described them post-sandy either. he's living in a different world. he's not on the same planet as we are. and he's just -- he's flailing out against anyone he thinks is an enemy and i think he certainly believes mayor bloomberg is an enemy. >> thank you for your service to the constituents of this great city. next, north korea's test

but bar rafeli ad i think was -- it's kind of hard to mess up an ad that she's in, but they seem to dom sort of cringing there as i see it. over here, the game was so so late, i didn't catch it myself. and if you watch it on the bbc, you don't see these advertisements. even though a lot of people around the world watched the event, it seems to be a very u.s.-driven market. >> yeah. there's no question, the super bowl is -- ads are very based in u.s. popular culture. we really haven't reached the point where a lot of these ads are based on global campaigns. there's a rare exception. coke had an ad in the first half where the idea for the creative came from latin america. and it was a pretty decent ad. but we don't see too much of that. the super bowl is an american pop culture event. we'll see, that could change over time, but it's not the case now. >> quickly, charles, with the power outage, how did that affect the advertisement? did people get to run ads repeatedly? how did they handle that event from a marketing point of view? >> this is going to be much talked about. cbs did not run