responses but that's up to you we can come back sooner april 7th if that makes a difference and director rahaim i was going to do say what bill said in front of is a number of issues you've raised a number of issues that the communities has raised it would be our normal practice to not when there are those many issues not to move forward so see the next phase of work this is normally what you'll do nicole certainly take our issues to the board but normally you'll want to see the issues reluctance. >> commissioner antonini. >> i could move for probably three weeks will be february 18th if i'm calendaring that. >> the 18 a cancelled hearing unless you time to reissue it. >> probably a lot of commissioners let's going to the next week february 25th okay. >> i think that will be as quick as we can do it hearing what staff says next week is the fourth i'll change my motion about the seconder to february 25th for final action. >> yeah. i'll second. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further shall i call the question? on the motion to continue. >> sorry i'd like to make a request in that week we'll

. >> hi commissioners sorry about the e-mails you got but i was sending overwhelms for director rahaimand thank you director rahaim for coming to the land use committee on monday taking up his evening we presenter the design issues and especially he knows what he is talking about i want to talk about the process and my colleague handled the rest better to be safe than sorry as we expressed on monday we didn't believe they decide the issues this is peter cohen spoke about the first of 3 developments 21 hundred market and next on market and after that 2201 the industrial site and no one of the developers have been encouraged to talk with us seriously since the designs are getting less interesting and less affordable just to put up our model in the neighborhood 21 hundred market they've engaged and squeezed in 20 percent accountable and turned a profit it's been appointed those are the pipeline for a long time but they've been advocating for affordable housing and no longer than prop k was passed in 2014 asking for 33 percent of all new housing to be affordable and the center of the city

. >> hi commissioners sorry about the e-mails you got but i was sending overwhelms for director rahaimd thank you director rahaim for coming to the land use committee on monday taking up his evening we presenter the design issues and especially he knows what he is talking about i want to talk about the process and my colleague handled the rest better to be safe than sorry as we expressed on monday we didn't believe they decide the issues this is peter cohen spoke about the first of 3 developments 21 hundred market and next on market and after that 2201 the industrial site and no one of the developers have been encouraged to talk with us seriously since the designs are getting less interesting and less affordable just to put up our model in the neighborhood 21 hundred market they've engaged and squeezed in 20 percent accountable and turned a profit it's been appointed those are the pipeline for a long time but they've been advocating for affordable housing and no longer than prop k was passed in 2014 asking for 33 percent of all new housing to be affordable and the center of the city an

. >> director rahaim. >> yes. commissioner, i, certainly make sure we keep you informed on the process any potential changes that might occur was we go forward other point mr. 13450igd when the change to the motion on the issue of maintenance and stewardship bikes a finding rather than a condition was the legal situation by a commitment i understand for a permit maintenance there will be a covenant i understand. >> our intentions so kind of follow the triangle model whereas there will be a declaration of maintenance could have in what capacity recorded against the property but again that will probably happen from the improvement by that sfrument i instrument up to you them how they want to employ it but that's the model we will follow-up. >> that will be the responsibility of public works. >> yes. that's right thank you. >> commissioner hillis. >> i'm supportive i wanted to i think the analog it strategize placed open space i support kind of someone else the coffee and key i know you have a restaurant or cafeteria

week but 6 weeks so a week is not time to deal with the issues with the communication with director rahaim and this was on monday i don't know the project sponsor is president the in one week but note that will happen or continue it for 6 weeks and have the opportunity to really discuss the issue. >> thank you, thank you okay opening it up for public comment i do have one card joe h joell. >> the continuance of april 28th it is a notice was not sent the language of tagalog this is an issue we have a large filipino the outer mission and been informed the spanish transmission says the attached document is in reference of the address for the compassion a requirement to have the planning commission it may our no where in the spanish transmission it states this proposed combsz and the translation says it maybe be schedule for today, the actual words makes it sound like trifle and the notification was brooushths in spanish and english his neighbors only speak spanish it is also alarming the planning department is not required to send out now noticed but it is continued to a new date and isn't it

rahaim was talking about something we talked about and closing the loop and with the threshold i don't know if you took if in k some sort of magnitude with the project with the neighbor so everybody understands what the project is once we get more dr i don't know if everyone else want autopsy seeing nothing further item seeing nothing further itemseeing nothing further ittsm 7 no action is required on your behalf only for your review and comment. >> thank you good afternoon miami director i'm here joined by several members of the senior management team as well as deborah you've met your new finance manager who is been on board a few weeks and nevertheless, has done a lot of work we're here to present our new two-year budget that will coffer fiscal years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 no surprise given our workload we're seeing a humble increase in applications and therefore the budget is proposed to there self million dollars over this year's budget we're therefore proposing the education e addition of staff possessions to address at backlog and the policy issues you've been dealing with and

and we sat through close to 4 hours 3 and a half of public comment i know that director rahaim or gil you have something. >> go ahead. >> just we had a few clarifications to make about fifth story will take a few minutes might resolve some the miss understanding. >> john may touch on this staff are concerned about displacement issues we've talked to you we want to get through the notion of how to preserve the affordable housing this program is the budget of adding to the supply of affordable housing through new construction so that's the big discussion not we're not sympathetic to the people we completely get that on the other hand, there has been a certain amount of misinformation we want to factually correct and continue to have a debate on the merits one thing the mission district is not doesn't apply that is one of the eastern neighborhoods planned areas and that density deregulated by form rather than density this is only program this program is the disabilities in our material for which sdrents is regulated generally speaking by units per lot area and so the density relieve that

the attempts on the southwest corner i think adding to the question what do we do and as director rahaim said not any soot especialhe will way of finding architecture except backward architecture nearby this project tries to rely on the building on clay and van ness but that aside what this project does i think that is a strong voice of neighborhood i've heard over the years it tries to mass in context that is one of the most drescher and is to know feature the way it contributiotrijsz to the lower residential buildings up california i think is an streamli sgre extremely good move and not having the corner portion those are positive thing where i personally have a little bit of a problem is that the lack of variation on the two street facades doesn't give me the feeling that the project of this size it's advocates meets the character of the two streets in a strong enough expression the reason i'm eyeing saying that only one building in san francisco that manages to do an absolutely green wall the east facing what you think broderick that's the school with an environmental program that is

that they participate with equal measures and other accountable 6 what they're doing. >> director rahaim>> want to reconfirm the budget you approved earlier has a position specifically dloefts to the tdm program and actually a second position for next year that will be used for enforcement and monitoring and also research so we can constantly update 40 the idea for the tdm that will be embedded the code you can change it more quickly depending on the results of research the idea that will constantly evolve and grow and change okay. >> if nothing further that concludes this item and commissioner moore we have 5 of us if we take a couple of mini breaks we'll survive so the commission will take a 5 minute break. >> good afternoon and welcome back to the planning commission back to the planning commission regular hearing. thursday, february 11, any kind. proceedings. and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. xhefgs commissioners, we left off under your regular calendar for tome 9 at harrison street that is an impact fee waiver >> game-changer

rahaim was talking about something we talked about and closing the loop and with the threshold i don'tknow if you took if in k some sort of magnitude with the project with the neighbor so everybody understands what the project is once we get more dr i don't know if everyone else want autopsy seeing nothing further item seeing nothing further itemseeing nothing further ittsm 7 no action is required on your behalf only for your review and comment. >> thank you good afternoon miami director i'm here joined by several members of the senior management team as well as deborah you've met your new finance manager who is been on board a few weeks and nevertheless, has done a lot of work we're here to present our new two-year budget that will coffer fiscal years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 no surprise given our workload we're seeing a humble increase in applications and therefore the budget is proposed to there self million dollars over this year's budget we're therefore proposing the education e addition of staff possessions to address at backlog and the policy issues you've been dealing with and s

been aware of and but we have a memorandum of understanding between director reiskin and director rahaim from the planning department that delegated the authority for the can go exemptions to mta staff that is actually running in effect for a number of years but the last fiscal year enhances this memorandum of understanding and really i believe increased our prosperity to the projects i mentioned this but class one exemptions you see this is a flag that show us a public hearing agenda all the items that are under the transportation code able to take effect after the transportation hearing those get signed off by a member the environmental review team. >> and under chapter three 1 the city's administrative code currently when a environmental document is made available to the public there is a pedestrian of public review documents like the environmental impact reports and the negative declarations there are regulatory review periods list and the state code and state law san francisco has provided more clarity on those review periods for any project the city and county that falls under seco

. >> the n s r is go by director rahaim explanation a single-family residences and you can word is betterut there's only one kitchen lout if a single-family residences. >> the motion to limit it will to be loud under the zoning. >> under the zoning classification. >> is that fair. >> it is really the same. >> as what the zoning allows. >> okay there is a motion that has been seconded and to succumb apply with the speed limit on that. >> there is a motion that has been seconded to take dr and require an n s r to state that - on be allowed to, what is allowed under the current zoning. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and mr. brooks so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you in general public comment i have no speaker cards general public comment tonight not seeing any, general public comment is closed. and the meeting is >>> parks and places of communicated and thanks to the mayor and the department of technology and supervisor farrell and google. we had a very very unique partnership t

been aware of and but we have a memorandum of understanding between director reiskin and director rahaim from the planning department that delegated the authority for the can go exemptions to mta staff that is actually running in effect for a number of years but the last fiscal year enhances this memorandum of understanding and really i believe increased our prosperity to the projects i mentioned this but class one exemptions you see this is a flag that show us a public hearing agenda all the items that are under the transportation code able to take effect after the transportation hearing those get signed off by a member the environmental review team. >> and under chapter three 1 the city's administrative code currently when a environmental document is made available to the public there is a pedestrian of public review documents like the environmental impact reports and the negative declarations there are regulatory review periods list and the state code and state law san francisco has provided more clarity on those review periods for any project the city and county that falls under seco

. >> john rahaim. ken epstein. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our

been aware of and but we have a memorandum of understanding between director reiskin and director rahaim from the planning department that delegated the authority for the can go exemptions to mta staff that is actually running in effect for a number of years but the last fiscal year enhances this memorandum of understanding and really i believe increased our prosperity to the projects i mentioned this but class one exemptions you see this is a flag that show us a public hearing agenda all the items that are under the transportation code able to take effect after the transportation hearing those get signed off by a member the environmental review team. >> and under chapter three 1 the city's administrative code currently when a environmental document is made available to the public there is a pedestrian of public review documents like the environmental impact reports and the negative declarations there are regulatory review periods list and the state code and state law san francisco has provided more clarity on those review periods for any project the city and county that falls under seco

. >> john rahaim.in. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our current po

. >> john rahaim. ken epstein. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our

. >> john rahaim. ken epstein. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our

. >> a couple of questions director rahaim first of all, do we have team efforts or redundancy maternity leave or project do they wait or assigned someone can pick up the relieve. >> they're typicallyy assigned it is i will say that reassignment slows down the work the new planner has to get up to speed but typically reassigned e assigned when an extended leave. >> one suggestion might not at the beginning of every project so have co-assignments you may not have enough staff to do that but two people are brought up to speed with every project in the case of an absence someone can pickup and not have to be retrained on another efficiency item i assume we simultaneously salute i i know that environmental has to proceed other things in order of approval you can't really approve something for many of the aspects of the project until the environmental has been completed but it would seem as though the project could be evaluated even though the environmental has to be completed before any approvals i hope it is sort of what we are doing. >> the goal is that the environmental review precedes no

. >> john rahaim. ken epstein. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our

been aware of and but we have a memorandum of understanding between director reiskin and director rahaim from the planning department that delegated the authority for the can go exemptions to mta staff that is actually running in effect for a number of years but the last fiscal year enhances this memorandum of understanding and really i believe increased our prosperity to the projects i mentioned this but class one exemptions you see this is a flag that show us a public hearing agenda all the items that are under the transportation code able to take effect after the transportation hearing those get signed off by a member the environmental review team. >> and under chapter three 1 the city's administrative code currently when a environmental document is made available to the public there is a pedestrian of public review documents like the environmental impact reports and the negative declarations there are regulatory review periods list and the state code and state law san francisco has provided more clarity on those review periods for any project the city and county that falls under seco

. >> john rahaim.en epstein. >> present. >> kentaro iwasaki. >> here. >> [inaudible] >> landon dickey. >> here. >> laura moran. >> here. >> president les wong. >> here. >> lo i guess herrera. >> here. >> decost. >> here. >> (calling roll). olson lee. phil ginsburg. >> here. >> halperin. >> present. >> doctor ritu khanna. >> here. >> todd rufo. >> here. >> and trent rhorer. >> here. >> great thank you. >> thank you doctor. so a few comments as we start this process this evening. as i thought about the adoption of goals and measures that hundreds of departments and cbos will work to accomplish together with a laser focus on those with the greatest needs, our equity lens. i couldn't help but make a comparison to the change -- our adoption of an outcomes framework seems a simple task in comparison. now pardon the comparison. i know it's very different. it's still not simple but think about it in those terms. we have the opportunity in the city to create a framework that will live beyond all of us in our cu

. >> the n s r is go by director rahaim explanation a single-family residences and you can word is betterut there's only one kitchen lout if a single-family residences. >> the motion to limit it will to be loud under the zoning. >> under the zoning classification. >> is that fair. >> it is really the same. >> as what the zoning allows. >> okay there is a motion that has been seconded and to succumb apply with the speed limit on that. >> there is a motion that has been seconded to take dr and require an n s r to state that - on be allowed to, what is allowed under the current zoning. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and mr. brooks so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you in general public comment i have no speaker cards general public comment tonight not seeing any, general public comment is closed. and the meeting is , >> >> can you please rise for the pledge of allegiance. >> i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, on