rahaim commissioner peskin. >> thank you chair wiener to director rahaim i have a number of questionsirst really as a function of governance and d t x move forward any discussion between the various agencies caltrain this body, the city by and through the planning department or other agency san francisco municipal transportation agency as to who will ultimately lead the d t x projects. >> lead the actual design and construction of it. >> that's correct. >> that's certain been on the table we are and as currently constructed tjpa is responsible for financing and building and maintaining the d t x there the been issues that is correct or not but i think that is certainly part of mix of tdecis that is happening. >> whether the tear down is necessary for the d t x expansion. >> it is likely not depending on - the alignment but given the enormous public investments something on the order of 6 or 7 or $8 billion not including the term we thought that was appropriate to look at it as a better transportation as a whole. >> relative to the street connections we agree are important are those co

rahaim commissioner peskin. >> thank you chair wiener to director rahaim i have a number of questionsst really as a function of governance and d t x move forward any discussion between the various agencies caltrain this body, the city by and through the planning department or other agency san francisco municipal transportation agency as to who will ultimately lead the d t x projects. >> lead the actual design and construction of it. >> that's correct. >> that's certain been on the table we are and as currently constructed tjpa is responsible for financing and building and maintaining the d t x there the been issues that is correct or not but i think that is certainly part of mix of tdecis that is happening. >> whether the tear down is necessary for the d t x expansion. >> it is likely not depending on - the alignment but given the enormous public investments something on the order of 6 or 7 or $8 billion not including the term we thought that was appropriate to look at it as a better transportation as a whole. >> relative to the street connections we agree are important are those cons

. >> off i'm sorry director rahaim. >> no problem. >> thank you for being here i was not looking in this direction. >> thank you being here. >> my player we're pleased to present the third housing balances report the first supervisor after the report the balance was passed and we're on a normal schedule of 6 months we understand that the trailing legislation to update the specification of including the evictions in the housing balance report we've been doing that with the legislation to clarify that as well so i just really here to thank teresa a robust piece of work that happens every 6 months with lawful valuable information and thank you for her to put this together and introduce her to present the details of the report. >> thank you director rahaim and thank you very much for your commitment to supply the research for this report. >> good afternoon supervisors my name is teresa senator planner with the policy section i'm here to talk about the housing balance report this is an annual report mandated by the board to be heard annually representatives of the mayor's office and the rent

. >> off i'm sorry director rahaim. >> no problem. >> thank you for being here i was not looking in this direction. >> thank you being here. >> my player we're pleased to present the third housing balances report the first supervisor after the report the balance was passed and we're on a normal schedule of 6 months we understand that the trailing legislation to update the specification of including the evictions in the housing balance report we've been doing that with the legislation to clarify that as well so i just really here to thank teresa a robust piece of work that happens every 6 months with lawful valuable information and thank you for her to put this together and introduce her to present the details of the report. >> thank you director rahaim and thank you very much for your commitment to supply the research for this report. >> good afternoon supervisors my name is teresa senator planner with the policy section i'm here to talk about the housing balance report this is an annual report mandated by the board to be heard annually representatives of the mayor's office and the rent

rahaim commissioner peskin. >> thank you chair wiener to director rahaim i have a number of questionsst really as a function of governance and d t x move forward any discussion between the various agencies caltrain this body, the city by and through the planning department or other agency san francisco municipal transportation agency as to who will ultimately lead the d t x projects. >> lead the actual design and construction of it. >> that's correct. >> that's certain been on the table we are and as currently constructed tjpa is responsible for financing and building and maintaining the d t x there the been issues that is correct or not but i think that is certainly part of mix of tdecis that is happening. >> whether the tear down is necessary for the d t x expansion. >> it is likely not depending on - the alignment but given the enormous public investments something on the order of 6 or 7 or $8 billion not including the term we thought that was appropriate to look at it as a better transportation as a whole. >> relative to the street connections we agree are important are those cons

. >> director rahaim in our director's report i saw a mention of every tree can you speak to that are speak about that next time your formally a process go it at a different way. >> sure we'll prepare a memo i think the next phase of urban forest master plan the next phase we'll be looking 59 opportunities for new tree planting the city to increase of urban forest we'll get you more tallied. >> i'm saying particularly i'm not the discussion of neighbors in particular they're upset about large numbers of trees taken away and schematics with the landmarking of trees and multiple discussions without knowing where to go and get an answer. >> we'll get you more information. >> appreciate that. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. director rahaim the same report you mentioned microsoft hub workshop wednesday that runs off of van ness it sounds like a great hearing for the benefit of the public an important part of city as be interested to hear. >> thank you, commissioner i should have mentioned that a kickoff and the way it is in affordable housing thank you. >> commissioners, if there's noth

chair we're fortunate to have our director of city director rahaim to present his work on behalf of the city the reason it is relevant to us because this is primarily about transportation and about supporting ripening and statewide transportation that is incredibly important to san francisco and you'll see a director rahaim preservation at the core of this somewhat large and complex body of work to get the rail service into the transbay rail center and director ramos and others from serving on the caltrain. >> you've got those extra cars. >> things are improving on caltrain and the directors have a place (laughter) but to really bring value to caltrain we need to bring it into downtown san francisco i sits on the transbay joint powers authority and we do have a plan to get the trains from figuring out and king to the transbay center that is a decision that we'll on have an opportunity to get right once, once we build the tunnels we have those with us for one hundred years therefore we thought as a city valuable to look at alternatives to make sure we're choosing the best path this is wh

. >> commissioners good afternoon director rahaim is not hey here we know he'll be back next week we have nothing to present but will respond to questions or comments you have. >> okay. thank you. >> seeing no questions on to item 6 review of past events from board of appeals no report from the board of appeals and the historic preservation commission didn't meet yesterday. >> and the board of supervisors didn't meet this week no report there. >> very good commissioners under general public comment for not to exceed a period of 15 minutes i do have two speaker cards. >> georgia skirmishing. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm here to talk about please the mission for patrols which you had on your calendars two weeks ago you had inform speakers hates a good thing i noticed i wrote a memo to the four women that were involved ms. mohan that overlap between the 317 revisions that are supposedlyly going on and what the 3 women ms. rogers and ms. flores are working on with interim controls i noticed it didn't mention the word altercation talks about the conversion and the occasions but no

is there any additional public comment in any order first director rahaim for taking the three-leggedool seriously and to recap that you know it was my suggestion that as an illustration if one of the legs becomes inbalanced shortening of the level of the top part of stool is to the level it is uncomfort i appreciate the portions and think we have the housing adapt as well as the transit just want those data cliepdz will address the planning work that is what we're here trying to do so- yeah. i think it is interesting information you know take into account candle stick point, 5 m growth and mission rock office and mission bay we've got a lot coming online understanding not a crystal ball scenario but i am concerned maybe we've it's been. >> preview six or seven years of construction and maybe we're at a point of over supplying potentially so i want to - use this information to see what the housing and transit piece to the gentleman says one of the stools that a cut short it is difficult we have a larger project coming out next week but will provide a potentially check in fees to help

. >> director rahaim when we took on the reconsideration on harrison and the gentleman was involved and you it is really a powerful discussion anchoring reconsidering the building with the rincon hill plan we shouldn't not omit doing in for openers not take into account this building as a individual solution but a large requirement i have basically all buildings have responded to now this comes as the last seed we are occupying this assembly with a relatively ambiguous history we have to be extra careful we're book ending the san francisco moving on the friday i think that requires a lot of sensitivity and as i say we will be remiss in not pirating u putting that into the discussion. >> just to be clear including the project sponsor none questions the size or bulk or scale it is the design considerations we the access issues. >> except i think that the gentleman said or commissioner vice president richards brought it up for the harrison building we reconsidered the height lines to get the project i'm not sure saying - i hope there will be commissioners participating in the broader works

. >> i'm i think i need clarification on those items and director rahaim looks at puzzle. >> that lastoints that is the first i've heard of the amendment my take that is probably related to the affordable housing fee with the high-rise of the market octavia plan this is a fee on top of the normal inclusionary requirements i'm not sure i thinks by the way, that's what i see. >> as you see she's unavailable this is part of the reason we'll continue this we need more time to chew on that supervisor wiener. >> can i get a restatement on the amendments that was a little bit confusing that supervisor kim couldn't through the chair that i can ask supervisor kim to restate the amendments. >> the first amendment was exactly as i articulated any project before january 1st, the project will maintain the inclusionary requirements and the second amendment for any housing development located in an area with specific housing requirement for special use district or any other section of the code like section 419 with expectation of the zoning district or the south of market family zoning the higher of

. >> i'm i think i need clarification on those items and director rahaim looks at puzzle. >> that lastoints that is the first i've heard of the amendment my take that is probably related to the affordable housing fee with the high-rise of the market octavia plan this is a fee on top of the normal inclusionary requirements i'm not sure i thinks by the way, that's what i see. >> as you see she's unavailable this is part of the reason we'll continue this we need more time to chew on that supervisor wiener. >> can i get a restatement on the amendments that was a little bit confusing that supervisor kim couldn't through the chair that i can ask supervisor kim to restate the amendments. >> the first amendment was exactly as i articulated any project before january 1st, the project will maintain the inclusionary requirements and the second amendment for any housing development located in an area with specific housing requirement for special use district or any other section of the code like section 419 with expectation of the zoning district or the south of market family zoning the higher of

example the environmental impact report usually every month it i talked with the director director rahaim he mentioned four or five the number he said is a a substantial job maybe the developer hold on to see what is happening but needed to, you know, think about everything. >> so, i mean that gives them an opportunity to see the backdrops; right? >> (laughter.) . >> yeah, i'm kind of lvns did they give you a percentage how much has dropped. >> to 60 percent. >> that's big because environmental can be the most timely part of the equation. >> i hope i'm not taking our thunderstorm commissioner walker talks about that in planning and time and things sitting there and so on a part of our approach to how we look at how busy we'll be obviously will be planning as well i mean that is important that we be given reports saying their system it down looking at a hiring increase or decrease it is the way we can get that from them or something they can forwarded to you and make that part of our presentation it is slowing down or a number of percentages. >> it is difficult to get the number as there i

example the environmental impact report usually every month it i talked with the director director rahaim he mentioned four or five the number he said is a a substantial job maybe the developer hold on to see what is happening but needed to, you know, think about everything. >> so, i mean that gives them an opportunity to see the backdrops; right? >> (laughter.) . >> yeah, i'm kind of lvns did they give you a percentage how much has dropped. >> to 60 percent. >> that's big because environmental can be the most timely part of the equation. >> i hope i'm not taking our thunderstorm commissioner walker talks about that in planning and time and things sitting there and so on a part of our approach to how we look at how busy we'll be obviously will be planning as well i mean that is important that we be given reports saying their system it down looking at a hiring increase or decrease it is the way we can get that from them or something they can forwarded to you and make that part of our presentation it is slowing down or a number of percentages. >> it is difficult to get the number as there i

. >> director rahaim. >> i was asking if i can clarify the motion i'm not sure i understand to consolidate deck. >> by consolidating did roof for other means meaning they can end up with other roof concepts. >> do you understand that direction okay. >> there is a motion that has been seconded to approve that matter with cannabis as amended and roared by staff for condition number 14 and amend by the commission to minimize the rooftop by consolidating the rooftop or roof assess or other means to provide 3 car share on that monomotion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis sxhks commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and zoning administrator, what say you? >> on the variance, close the public hearing and grants the variances commissions on 1 abc for case mission street oh, excuse me - cu a and v you already for downtown conditional use authorization and the city administrative will consider a request for variance for those persons exiting the exchange do it qu

. >> thank you director rahaim. >> i just want to examine that thank audrey for the report but i object to give ms. hester a copy thoughtful report we have thank you. >> commissioner johnson. >> there was a small - a high quality and looking forward to ones in the future projects particularly eastern neighborhoods but i have a quick question there was a section in the report that metabolizing talked about the impact fees and the project was funded by those fees i didn't see a much clarity in how affordable housing impact fees were spent can you talk about that. >> that specific question how they're actually spent i got i have information how much was collected as part of impact fee okay. thank you. >> i assume that the answer will come from the mayor's office of housing but in the future not directed towards you but in general that would be good to have an information it is lacking in general. >> what. >> off so sorry not speaking brother the mike those of you there is a pretty good explanation how the impact fees are spent transportation and open space improvements that are obvious but

has the requirement to deal with light and exposure to the area spent a lot of time and director rahaimthers remember it to speak about the green wall we work hard work hard to have it built this project needs to engage in a larger dialogue what will they do are there to commissioners who i would be curious to hear i would ask we continue this building i think i support the development on this site the shape and form challenge that i'm not saying to fix it but get closer but this project needs to do a hell of a lot for for approve for any support. >> commissioner hillis. >> just some questions for the project sponsor on assess in this first street change i'm trying to look at on the 45 lansing i think there is entrances to the garage both on first street and lansing? >> 45 harrison. >> just on harrison yeah. >> just on harrison. >> yeah. >> so did consider harrison and or lansing for parking and it is a e what is a your rational. >> this is one of the first issues with all the challenges and, in fact, we worked as early on as the prepta meeting with the staff and pta meeting we looked a

. >> thank you director rahaim. >> i just want to examine that thank audrey for the report but i object to give ms. hester a copy thoughtful report we have thank you. >> commissioner johnson. >> there was a small - a high quality and looking forward to ones in the future projects particularly eastern neighborhoods but i have a quick question there was a section in the report that metabolizing talked about the impact fees and the project was funded by those fees i didn't see a much clarity in how affordable housing impact fees were spent can you talk about that. >> that specific question how they're actually spent i got i have information how much was collected as part of impact fee okay. thank you. >> i assume that the answer will come from the mayor's office of housing but in the future not directed towards you but in general that would be good to have an information it is lacking in general. >> what. >> off so sorry not speaking brother the mike those of you there is a pretty good explanation how the impact fees are spent transportation and open space improvements that are obvious but

. >> commissioners good afternoon director rahaim is not hey here we know he'll be back next week we have nothing to present but will respond to questions or comments you have. >> okay. thank you. >> seeing no questions on to item 6 review of past events from board of appeals no report from the board of appeals and the historic preservation commission didn't meet yesterday. >> and the board of supervisors didn't meet this week no report there. >> very good commissioners under general public comment for not to exceed a period of 15 minutes i do have two speaker cards. >> georgia skirmishing. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm here to talk about please the mission for patrols which you had on your calendars two weeks ago you had inform speakers hates a good thing i noticed i wrote a memo to the four women that were involved ms. mohan that overlap between the 317 revisions that are supposedlyly going on and what the 3 women ms. rogers and ms. flores are working on with interim controls i noticed it didn't mention the word altercation talks about the conversion and the occasions but no

think those are all sorts of places where we could do a lot of growth and then i'm not sure director rahaimaid we looked at option 3 and wonder why the transportation cost we could get the money but in a dense urban area per mile is expensive to build transportation but you're not going as many miles and also getting more desirable results because people are living close to what they're working and using their cars less and have the advantage and skills we've not done in almost a century you can make a tlunl u tunnel through a hill and cut the cost of construction not ripping up the streets and coyote on the other side, however, automatically got a line to the richmond district so i think we have to think outside the box i think that you're also better off to yield scrawl and having growing up in livermore valley how it was a castro area the one speaker talked about the water problem i see that area is turned into homes and when i grew up that was a truck farm and dairies and a lot of uses not have the water demand and as we continue to build sprawl we're sucking up for water by their natur

. >> thank you director rahaim. >> i just want to examine that thank audrey for the report but i object to give ms. hester a copy thoughtful report we have thank you. >> commissioner johnson. >> there was a small - a high quality and looking forward to ones in the future projects particularly eastern neighborhoods but i have a quick question there was a section in the report that metabolizing talked about the impact fees and the project was funded by those fees i didn't see a much clarity in how affordable housing impact fees were spent can you talk about that. >> that specific question how they're actually spent i got i have information how much was collected as part of impact fee okay. thank you. >> i assume that the answer will come from the mayor's office of housing but in the future not directed towards you but in general that would be good to have an information it is lacking in general. >> what. >> off so sorry not speaking brother the mike those of you there is a pretty good explanation how the impact fees are spent transportation and open space improvements that are obvious but

. >> thank you director rahaim. >> i just want to examine that thank audrey for the report but i object to give ms. hester a copy thoughtful report we have thank you. >> commissioner johnson. >> there was a small - a high quality and looking forward to ones in the future projects particularly eastern neighborhoods but i have a quick question there was a section in the report that metabolizing talked about the impact fees and the project was funded by those fees i didn't see a much clarity in how affordable housing impact fees were spent can you talk about that. >> that specific question how they're actually spent i got i have information how much was collected as part of impact fee okay. thank you. >> i assume that the answer will come from the mayor's office of housing but in the future not directed towards you but in general that would be good to have an information it is lacking in general. >> what. >> off so sorry not speaking brother the mike those of you there is a pretty good explanation how the impact fees are spent transportation and open space improvements that are obvious but