well, it ’s in decigrams, for 273, the decision has been made, rahamiya’s proposal has been accepted,r colleagues, let’s move on to the draft law with the registration no. 9451, the draft law on amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine, regarding ensuring the observance of the rights and freedoms of convicted citizens of ukraine brought to ukraine to serve a sentence, as well as, regarding which the competent authorities of a foreign state have made a decision to extradite them to extradition to ukraine for prosecution or execution of the sentence, i propose to include this issue in the agenda of the session, for 2000 77, the decision was made, the issue is included in the agenda of the session, it is necessary discussion, i propose to consider this issue according to the shortened procedure, by 243, the decision is made, two for, two against , let's go then, authors, maslov, please, then from the committee and from the authors, denis maslov, please, three minutes, bozhik, please, bozhik, four minutes from the authors of the committee, please, good day, dear colleagues, for your

states, that the text of the treaty that could stop the hostilities, you know, these revelations of rahamiyainly do him credit , i will only add that after april 15, when the preliminary text of the peace treaty was ready, not only boris johnson came to kiev, they immediately flew in and the main owners, as far as i remember, were the head of the us state department, the chief of the pentagon, and also rahamia himself admitted that some kind of group of foreign advisers had been formed, who actually advised zelsky not to sign the peace agreement, thus the chance to end the war was missed, i am deeply convinced that if a peace treaty had been signed then on mutually acceptable terms, it would have thereby saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of its soldiers, what is important here is that the very first negotiations began in belarus almost 25 february, right away, right away, so the narrative, which, by the way, was thwarted by the americans, who said, why negotiate when the gun is at gunpoint? that is , all the time ukraine was not independent, did not make a single decision, but the mai

rahamiya doesn’t feel the strength to decide, that is, what is he preparing, that he is afraid to decideing all the fluctuations now and we see, well, sometimes it is quite difficult to analyze the speeches of our deputies, some, here we hear two mutually exclusive opinions, on the one hand we will choose no, and on the other hand we will choose a referendum. a referendum when after the end of hostilities, no, instead of the end of hostilities, this is the impression , well, he says what will happen after the end of the war, like a complete victory, or a referendum, a referendum to ratify something signed, yes, that is, we are talking about post-war period, in the post-war period holding some kind of referendum, which should legitimize what they during the negotiation process... they may come out, yes , that's what he's talking about, but this is a transfer of responsibility to the citizens, because they have a mandate for negotiations, and they have the power for this, for which in the 19th voted, therefore, to talk about the fact that, let 's put every decision of the negotiation proce

following: we will not do anything with sign with them, let’s just fight, you know, these revelations of rahamiya add that after april 15, when the preliminary text of the peace treaty was ready , not only boris johnson came to kiev, but also the main hosts, as far as i remember, the head of the us state department, the chief of the pentagon, and also rahami, i he himself admitted that some kind of group of foreign advisers had been formed, who actually were his father... i am deeply convinced that if kiev signed a peace treaty then on mutually acceptable conditions, he would have thereby saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of his soldiers, but zelensky chose war. vladimirovich, please tell me, on what conditions is it possible to conclude a peace treaty now? conditions that our president has repeatedly spoken about, with the full implementation of the objectives of the northern military district. at the same time, i will say again that we have never, not once, refused to conduct peace negotiations with ukraine. i’ll add my deep personal conviction that we are one people with the ukrainians,

negotiations were controlled by the british authorities, but not only them, these revelations of rahamiyaertainly do him credit, i will add only that after april 15, when the preliminary text of the peace treaty was ready, not only boris johnson came to kiev, but also the main hosts, as far as i remember, the head of the us state department, the chief of the pentagon, and also rahamia himself admitted, that some kind of group of foreign advisers was formed, who actually advised zelsky not to sign a peace treaty, thus the chance to end the war was missed, i am deeply convinced that if kiev signed a peace treaty then it would be mutually acceptable conditions, he would have thereby saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of his soldiers, but zelensky chose war, and the presidential assistant also explained on what conditions peace is now possible? on the conditions that our president has repeatedly spoken about, with the full fulfillment of the goal of the task, and i will say again that we have never refused. from myself, my deep personal conviction that we are one people with the ukraini