there was really an opportunity for a much more balanced reporting and jackson mentioned the muck rakers, too. i think to my mind, golden age journalism is when the press was as popular as it ever was probably which is roughly from the 1880s to the 1920s, i think, in the sense that i think readership went up by a factor of 10 times or 15 times. three or four dailies in every major or minor city. what's important about that period, there's no objectivity. there was great popularity. and there is tremendous diversity in all these papers. and you often find people sitting down to read the papers. not just their paper, but they realize that if they were going to read the paper called the republican or the one called the democrat, and perhaps one called the socialist, that they were going to get different points of views on the same stories. and that was what it meant in part to be an educated citizen. in my mind, i'm not saying we were true to that now. obviously people look at huffington "post" just to see the pin ups are not getting some of the richness that is there. but i do think in som

there was really an opportunity for a much more balanced reporting and jackson mentioned the muck rakers, too. i think to my mind, golden age journalism is when the press was as popular as it ever was probably which is roughly from the 1880s to the 1920s, i think, in the sense that i think readership went up by a factor of 10 times or 15 times. what the gain of the population was. there were a lot of ethnic papers. there were eight or nine dailies in new york city and others in major and minor cities as well. what was important about that period, i think, is there was, as alan said, there was no objectivity. there was great popularity. and there is tremendous diversity of opinion in all these papers. and you often find people sitting down to read the papers. not just their paper, but they realize that if they were going to read the paper called the "republican" or another one called the "democrat," perhaps one called the "socialist" they they were going to get different points of view on the same stories. and that was what it meant in part to be an educated citizen. a real participant. i

i know there were more, because as i said before, when raker went to tackle sirhan, i looked to my right i heard all these other gunshots. and he had already been subdued. and then i saw senator kennedy disappear from view. and i screamed, oh, my god. and i passed out. >> all right. nina rhodes-hughes, thank you for joining us and telling us your story. >> i want to thank you so much for pursuing this. >> sure. you got it. >> thank you. >>> big corporations, they may soon be buying space on your favorite nba player's jersey. the controversy coming up next. >>> and here's the reason fredricka whitfield is not here today. she's talking to the stars taking the stage of jazzfest.n , like in a special ops mission? you'd spot movement, gather intelligence with minimal collateral damage. but rather than neutralizing enemies in their sleep, you'd be targeting stocks to trade. well, that's what trade architect's heat maps do. they make you a trading assassin. trade architect. td ameritrade's empowering, web-based trading platform. trade commission-free for 60 days, and we'll throw in up to $600 w

moss-crawlers, rakers. a demographics unit. and we set about trying to unravel what those term meant. >> brown: what did you find? tell us a also bit about the scope of this surveillance program by the nypd. >> we found that the nypd had systematically infiltrated entire ethnic communities in new york city. and our investigation led us to believe that they weren't doing this based on needs but merely based on the fact that these people were muslim. >> brown: and they were looking at mosques, schools? tell us. what did that mean to infiltrate. >> basically how you would live. they looked at where muslims shopped or where arab shopped. where they prayed. where they ate. and they catalogued these daily acts of life. >> brown: what surprised you as you starred to peel back layers here. >> what surprised us was the extent of the infiltration. the other thing that surprised us was the changing... the evolution of the nypd's narrative. at first mayor bloomberg had said that we don't do this by religion. and ray kelly, the police chief

dipasquale, his first big raker was in 1992 when one of madoff's early pick can do is, to account so i called up for contract of the story he could not make characters i've played this were fiction if they tell you, but these two characters have been sending money to madoff for years and then they got caught in 1992. this is one of his first big crises. and they supposedly at $440 million at the sec told them to hand it back to investors. well, madoff stole the money from another account, give it back to these investors. they'll promptly wanted to invest with madoff again. that these were the only people of god none of this ponzi scheme with all their profits and locked away safely, but the sec made madoff give the money back. all the earnings, all the prophets, if they just locked away. but they didn't. they wanted to come back and invest with bernie. but these two accountants only had six accounts. and through the six accounts, 3500 people roughly were investing. one outcome of ernie has 3500 people who want to invest. 3500 accounts. what does he do? feed is a new ibm computer. dee

dipasquale, his first big raker was in 1992 when one of madoff's early pick can do is, to account so i called up for contract of the story he could not make characters i've played this were fiction if they tell you, but these two characters have been sending money to madoff for years and then they got caught in 1992. this is one of his first big crises. and they supposedly at $440 million at the sec told them to hand it back to investors. well, madoff stole the money from another account, give it back to these investors. they'll promptly wanted to invest with madoff again. that these were the only people of god none of this ponzi scheme with all their profits and locked away safely, but the sec made madoff give the money back. all the earnings, all the prophets, if they just locked away. but they didn't. they wanted to come back and invest with bernie. but these two accountants only had six accounts. and through the six accounts, 3500 people roughly were investing. one outcome of ernie has 3500 people who want to invest. 3500 accounts. what does he do? feed is a new ibm computer. dee

dipasquale, his first big raker was in 1992 when one of madoff's early pick can do is, to account so i called up for contract of the story he could not make characters i've played this were fiction if they tell you, but these two characters have been sending money to madoff for years and then they got caught in 1992. this is one of his first big crises. and they supposedly at $440 million at the sec told them to hand it back to investors. well, madoff stole the money from another account, give it back to these investors. they'll promptly wanted to invest with madoff again. that these were the only people of god none of this ponzi scheme with all their profits and locked away safely, but the sec made madoff give the money back. all the earnings, all the prophets, if they just locked away. but they didn't. they wanted to come back and invest with bernie. but these two accountants only had six accounts. and through the six accounts, 3500 people roughly were investing. one outcome of ernie has 3500 people who want to invest. 3500 accounts. what does he do? feed is a new ibm computer. dee

i don't believe we will see any dramatic rakers but what we are looking for is to manage the situation. nobody's going to solve the iranian conundrum overnight. the idea is to cap the program in some way and do some limits, introduce some greater transparencies that will contain the israelis. i think the problem is to contain israel, not so much to contain iran right now that will provide confidence that iran is not rushing towards a nuclear weapon. it will also help contain the u.s. congress, which insist on passing more and more revolutions -- resolutions that would attempt to tie the hands of the obama administration in negotiating a solution. there is a resolution that would forbid containment, that was making its way through congress until rand paul stood up and said, you know, this is a kind of backdoor authorization for war and we can't have it. it was remarkable actually that we have to live -- rely on the rand paul to prevent congress from passing ridiculous legislation but there you have it. there a number of good proposals you have out there to provide this management of the