in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph greenstreet university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a man's. gone all the main risk issues also have to decide ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are working for the producer side and only five percent are really genuinely independent. there is not a lot of science that says train genic business is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if a transgendered fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population to go no.

in one thousand nine hundred two dr ralph greenstreet university of pennsylvania said what if i can take the gene responsible for growth in human beings and put it into a mouse. drawn or the main risk issues which get to decide ninety five percent of all competent scientists in these fields are working for the producer side and only five percent are the genuine the independent. there is not a lot of science that says train genic fish is unhealthy for people to consume which is what the food and drug administration looks at there is a lot of concern about the environmental impacts if a transgenic fish escapes what kind of horrible impact will it have on the rest of the fish population i don't know what this might do to us or our children or our children's children in our congress here in the united states or our legislatures rather will be avoid all these different laws tax laws and corporate laws what could be more important than deciding on the permanent genetic future. of life on earth. while genes go mad there are people suffering. was caused some slick advantage of power that was giv