listen to ralph nader. >> ralph, is hillary clinton a crony capitalist? >> sure when she was a senator, she did not challenge any corporate boondoggle and there are dozens of them. the obama administration hasn't done that. her years in new york have just turned her into a dyed in the wool corporatist and mill tarrist. >> from ralph nader. is he right or is he wrong? welcome to "forbes on fox." our guests. john is back again, yes, back again. austin goals buyol salsgoalsbe, former white house chief economist. rich, you heard ralph nader, has he got a point? >> he has a great point. take these $200,000 speeches. steve forbes and i heard her speak at a corporate event. i must assure you, she's not the worst speaker in the world but she's not a $200,000 speaker. what are people paying for? they're paying for access to a possible future president. pay to play is what hillary clinton and bill clinton have been about their whole careers. >> austin, she did a lot of talking this week. here's basically a nutshell of her. lar word popular words of wisdom. >> there

listen to ralph nader. >> ralph, is hillary clinton a crony capitalist? >> sure when she was a senator, she did not challenge any corporate boondoggle and there are dozens of them. the obama administration hasn't done that. her years in new york have just turned her into a dyed in the wool corporatist and mill tarrist. >> from ralph nader. is he right or is he wrong? welcome to "forbes on

consumer advocate and former presidential nominee ralph nader joins us. good day you to. ed letters to the president," interesting premise here. so mr. nader, tell me this we'll get to the book in a second, but as i was talking about, a third-party candidate, today's "philadelphia enquirer" column saying change the 15% poll rule. you have to get that to be in the debates. is that keeping good third-party candidates from getting traction over time from voters across the country? >> very much so. it's the only way because they're not multibillionaires that they can reach tens of millions of people by being on the same stage as the other candidates. if they qualify to be on the ballot, if enough states have the votes to win, they should be allowed. in canada norway a lot of countries have five six seven eight on the stage. look at the republican primary in 2012. they had eight nine on the stage. >> do you have one name you're watching for 2016, independent candidate? >> well i'd like to say bernie sanders do, it i would like to see jill stine, dr. jill stein, harvard grad on

i talked to ralph nader. he still has a lot of pull with progressives in america and i had him on on monday and i said is hillary clinton a crony capitalist? he said absolutely. she hasn't driven a car in decades. she's getting $100000 speeches all the time. >> $300,000. >> according to ralph nader she didn't do anything to protest during the financial bailouts in 2008. she's the definition for ralph nader and bernie sanders now of a crony capitalist. >> the crony-ism argument, this is an opportunity for republicans to say big government fuels big business. and the cronyism and that is what benefits people at the top. >> the problem for republicans if they put up another mitt romney, it's not as good of a case as someone, say, from skat walker who came from humble backgrounds. >> you have to distinguish the difference between mitt romney and hillary clinton. they're completely different. mitt romney made his money on his own starting from zero in the private sector. >> wouldn't scott walker against hillary lo

ralph nader, long-time critic of crony capitalism, think about hillary clinton?e'll ask him live coming next. jewelry retailer blue nile forming a partnership with one popular designer. we talk to the company and the designer straight ahead. >>> look at the video. a french man climbing one of the tallest skyscrapers in dubai with just chalk and sticky tape on his fingers. we'll tell you how far he made it coming up. so what about that stock? sure thing, right? actually, knowing the kind of risk that you're comfortable with, i'd steer clear. really? really. straight talk. now based on your strategy i do have some other thoughts... multiplied by 13,000 financial advisors it's a big deal. and it's how edward jones makes sense of investing. [announcer:] what if one protect you from cancer? what if one push up could prevent heart disease? [man grunts] one wishful thinking, right? but there is one step you can take to help prevent another serious disease- pneumococcal pneumonia. one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you ... from pneumococcal pneumonia, a

ralph nader did this exposÉ of automobile safety.he nation" was one of the first places to expose the link between cigarette smoking and cancer. it is not accidental that a magazine that had no car advertising in it, had no cigarette advertising in it broke these stories. katrina: ralph nader continues to call me to this day. charlie: with ideas? katrina: berating me for what we are not doing. you have to respect the tenacity. he came on the cruise. when he came on the ship, he wanted to throw them overboard. by the end of that there was great respect. as a younger generation that doesn't remember they did bring us the weekend. he brought a seat belts. they think of him, and "the nation" has an respect for third parties, there were barricades, gore or nader. charlie: so where is "the nation" today as it celebrates 150 years? how does it make its way among a different media landscape? katrina: i think the different media landscape worries me less. we are testing. we have a democratic on the web we have mobile, and digital. charlie: yo

katrina: ralph nader continues to call me to this day. charlie: with ideas?atrina: berating me for what we are not doing. and he has ideas. you have to respect the tenacity. he came on the cruise. when he came on the ship, he wanted to throw them overboard. by the end of that there was great respect. what saddens me is that there is a younger generation that doesn't remember, they did bring us the weekend. he brought a seat belts. they think of him, and "the nation" has a respect for third parties, there were barricades gore or nader. but he is a man of integrity you have to respect that tenacity. charlie: so where is "the nation" today as it celebrates 150 years? how does it make its way among a different media landscape? katrina: i think the different media landscape worries me less. we are testing. we have a demographic on the web , we have mobile, and digital. charlie: you also want to use the web for instant access. katrina: that is downloadable. that is the issue. the history of the magazine, we have digitized archives. we don't know where this is headi

[applause] >> so i thank you, ralph neighbor--ralph nader... >> [laughter] >> ralph nader, the consumer advocate in our neighborhood. thank you so much. >> thank you very much. thank you. thank you. [laughs] [applause] [applause] >> i had the chance this afternoon to be with some of the members of "occupy santa rosa," and it was very inspiring to talk about the issues of war and peace in the larger context of what people are doing here, including the campaigns to, uh, try to, uh, counter citizens united and all the money that's been flowing into our electoral system, uh, the work that people are doing on the banks to try to encourage people to move their money to credit unions and small community banks, uh, and to see the work that's being done around the homeless issues, and trying to, uh, legalize sleep, which seems like a--a very important campaign to do, because, uh, people should have a place to sleep. and putting all of that, to me, in the context of these drones, uh, just juxta--juxtaposes the kinds of needs that our community has with what our government and our pentagon is spen

a harvard law student and ralph nader did this eskimo -- es po say -- it's not accidently that a caricing or cigarette advertising boeing these two stories. >> ralph nader continues to call me to this day. every few weeks he begins by berating me for what we're not doing and then he has ideas. and you have to respect that tenacity. he came on the cruise a few years ago when we went to alaska. when he got on the cruise of that ship they wanted to throw him overboard. there's a younger generation who doesn't remember as we say about labor unions they brought us the weekend he brought us the seatbelt, right.kzñ'i but they think of him and the nation has had a long respect for third matters and third party battles in 20 there were barricades inside the office literally, which side were you on, gore, nader. you have to respect that capacity and staying power. he will be with us another 50 years. >> rose: where is the nation today as it celebrates 150 years. where is it going and how does it make its way among a very ditch media landscape. >> i think the different media landscape worries m

ralph nader and the nader raiders and that extent of the public service lawyers are the heroes of there and took not long before he hears from them saying that. so this kicks off a 10 year legal battle between them and parker brothers. and he starts to find out that the roots go back far back. he finds an overly man living in pasadena and he holds a finance board. and a lot of them passed away after he was putting together chase. and so he makes this point that he did not live in atlantic city. charles todd lived in philadelphia. and one thing they are trying to look at when you're trying to prove something like plagiarism is what are the odds are the same person needs to stay there twice. and ralph in his case tried to find a copy of the board that has a word notley in it, most people had testified that they called it the monopoly game that that is definitely what it's called through parker brothers. then i got this from a reader who said oh, we have one in the attic. and there is actually a surviving one and so the story is starting to get a lot of tracked on the anti-monopoly case

ralph nader comes up public service lawyer they are the heroes of the game. not long before he hears from parker brothers attorneys you can't make anti- monopoly. that kicks off this ten year long legal battle between ralph and his family and parker brothers. they report they report all these different aspects of trademark patent and copyright law and all that is much more detailed in the book. but as part of his lawsuit like everyone else he thought -- he starts to find out that the roots go back far far far far far back. he he finds dan layman, now an elderly man living in pasadena. he finds charles todd. he has done the quicker players. i know i know this looks like organic chemistry notes but it is actually trying to find these photos of monopoly players to find out who went to school with who who knew who who was married to him and reverse engineering a monopoly story and trying to find the thread between the 1935 game of the 1904 patent. these these are some of the quakers. a lot of them passed away. they did ultimately testify. so charles todd tells th

now ralph nader says a billionaire should make a run for the white house. who? tell us why as well as which billionaires actually make his list. don't go away. we're coming right up with after the bell. the largest enterprises in the world, are the largest targets in the world, for every hacker, crook and nuisance in the world. but systems policed by hp's cyber security team are constantly monitored for threats. outside and in. that's why hp reports and helps neutralize more intrusions than anyone. in the world. if hp security solutions can help keep the world's largest organizations safe, they can keep yours safe, too. make it matter. liz: little bit of a crazy monday. one minute we're up 70 points for the dow. now we're down 71. david: hard to remember, but we started the day in the positive territory. all the indices. russell 2000 was holdup. i believe they have gone negative. >> they're up one point. david: nicole petallides, actually lauren simonetti at new york stock exchange. there is my lauren. >> very good, guys. david: talk about the vix first of all.

ralph nader, who represents, is an old guy, but has a lot of sway in the progressive movement.sked him about this crony capitalists charge. here is what he said yesterday. is hillary clinton a crony capitalist? >> for sure. when she was a senator she didn't challenge any corporate welfare boondoggle. there are dozens of them. as far as the obama administration, certainly hasn't done that. and, her years in new york have just turned her into a dyed-in-the-wool corporatist and mill at thattist. >> is that a problem she will have to overcome, dan? >> you see it already. she has been in this race for three days. everything she is talking about is the opposite of that charge as a way to overcome that liability. she is going to love raising money from people at goldman sachs and wall street community. at the same sometime she has to -- time she has to win over the elizabeth warren part of the party. hillary will look very uncomfortable trying to straddle the both sides of the democratic party. republicans have a lot of democrats and they're divided. there is big issue over the democr

and people like ralph nader think that actually is big business that is the major problem right now. and also regarding his assertion that we don't have a foreign-policy, i think we have one. we had a worse one under bush and a lot of the aei scholars were supporters of the invasion of iraq and i think they owe the people of iraq and apology for devastating the country and i was wondering if you had a response to that. >> guest: i appreciate your view. there's a lot for me to disagree with. i'm glad you your point of view deeply however. on the question of iraq apology is due to the citizens trying to bring their lives that have been since devastated by the lack of foreign-policy and the invasion of isis. that was an unforced error on the part of a non- foreign-policy from the united states. so i think all of the data support, but what i'm saying here you can -- anybody can legitimately go back and forth. it had to be finished and it wasn't in a rush to get out and what i think was the lack of the foreign-policy. the the people or something trying to get on with their lives and their

people like ralph nader were on one side and john kasich who was the head of the house budget committeethe other. he is now the governor of ohio. they got together to try to find common ground on eliminating some of these programs. in the end, they didn't have much success because as much criticism as there is, they also have supporters. often deep-pocketed supporters who manage to keep them alive. host: supporters in terms of senators and congressmen. guest: and corporations. host: our caller from arkansas mentioned general electric. here are the figures. in terms of the top 100 federal contractors with the most federal subsidies, there is the rank of general electric. they get a hundred $36 million -- they get $836 million. boeing is at the top most because of the export import bank. our caller mentioned these are unfunded. is that true? guest: not entirely. and live the grants are funded because they are appropriated money. the loans and loan guarantees are concentrated, especially the ones awarded by the federal reserve bank. host: because it would be paid back? guest: because it wa

. >> in the past i can think of a lot of people that are still mad at ralph nader because gore would the damage that newt gingrich suffered with members of his, or that romney suffered at the hands of guys like newt gingrich, which brought up all the sort of gave the democrats exactly what to say about private equity and the one percent and everything else. i don't know whether that was productive to try to move romney to the right in the general election. and i'm wondering whether you're hearing that. that she's going to be the perspective nominee, people think. this can come to no good. pushing her to the left and criticizing her before she's the candidate in the general election. >> well, first of all, the prime minister chief is going to be the nominee. i dispute that. i would argue that between what's happening internationally in her tenure as secretary of state, no real accomplishments and now these new allegations coming out about the clinton foundation and the book coming out next week. these are real. this is all about judgment calls and credibility. and, so i'm not convince

he was not able to parlay that into having a third-party in this country, and ralph nader did not haveny success. all he did was inflame the left by helping out gore lose, but i think when you have a two-party system and you have the choice between jeb bush and hillary clinton, which is what it looks like it will be based on donors arranging ahead of time that those are going to be the candidates, i think you have a lot of people feeling shut out of the process and a lot of people looking around saying well, who other people making this decision? it seems like there are a few rich guys in japanese cars sitting around in some kind of hotel ballroom in anaheim picking the candidates and they don't want that. they want people who are out there in the field come out there in the street talking to them. i think this will be a very interesting primary, especially for the republican party. i think this is similar to 1964 with a party sort of has to be reborn and this primary process is going to be very historic in terms of the republican party to direction in the future. host: let's go to any