claims are has the former head of the trump administration and also the clerk teamed up with raman martinez the solicitor general and clerk at latham together with walmart on this motion to dismiss is a lot of big names i would think the case is going to move forward, the claim is trying to distinguish humphrey's executor completely from the modern ftc and say that humphrey's executor does not cover the current ftc because what the ftc is doing now is much more executive according to the court's recent decision of law and free enterprise fund and therefore the preservation of removal protection requires the quasijudicial action in the 1930s era ftc no longer can be reconciled with what the agency is doing. will see the ftc's approach has been to oppose the support in the case and i don't know how much firepower the case will have in the district court which obviously bound by precedent. i think in the years to come in these areas in the executive branch we will see a lot more play even though as of the last term the court has shownou more hesitance and reevaluating the balance of power betw