. >> dickerson: ramesh, part of matt politically happened is, as they pointed out at 538 there is no better predictor of your position, not gender, not race, than if you own a gun, in terms of whether you are a republican or democrat that this has become cultural beyond the specifics of, you know, bump fire stocks. >> well, it is a polarizing issue but it is also an issue on which all of the intense intensity is on one side of the debate that is there are a lot more people who vote solely on the basis of guns who are pro gun and skeptical of regulation than are on the other se. and one of the reasons you have that lack of intensity on the side of people who want the regulations is that so few of the regulations would plausibly make any difference. so, you know, as jeff was suggesting, the types of things that we can think about doing, like an assault weapons ban won't make much of a difference in the things that, and the things that might make a difference would be really extreme things like gun confiscation that would present tremendous practical problems and tha that leaves us at a