randi. >>> let's talk about the day care murder in atlanta. a judge sentencing hemmi newmanife in prison without the possibility of parole and mentally ill. now, police describe newman as cold and calculated. he claims that he killed snyderman after having dilutions of an angel and a demon, one in the form of singer olivia nut yop john. is this the right verdict, guilty but mentally ill? >> i think it is. first of all, mentally ill, when you use that as an affirmative defense, it typically does not work. works in less than 1% of the cases it's used in and it's used in such a small percentage of cases. so if this jury listened to the expert, heard every single word that the state's experts and the defense's experts testified to and them said, yes, we do think he's mentally ill, that tells me a lot, randi. juries are common sense people. they don't want to hear that, oh, now that you're in trouble, you're crazy, right? >> so did the insanity defense work? >> it did work. it worked as it was supposed to. they could have gone not guilty by reason of insanity, but again, you have