dÍas mÁs tarde, salvador rangel pasÓ a disfrutar del retiro. para acompaÑar a esa comunidad que tanto lo ha apoyado. y cuenta que no descarta que, en caso de ser necesario, volverÍa a ponerse la sotana para reunirse con capos de la droga. y lo harÍa para salvar, aunque fuera una vida mÁs. locutor: una familia enfrenta la presiÓn de un padre para casar a la fuerza a su hija menor de edad. >> y entonces mi papÁ se enojÓ con ella, que ella no mandaba en la casa, sino que Él era quien cuida todo porque mi mamÁ no casa, sino que Él era quien cuida todo porque mi mamÁ no trabaja. ¿tu desodorante va contigo? pusimos a prueba dove men con nelson, un voluntario que le pone cuidado a todo lo que hace. realmente protege mi piel. me siento seguro porque va conmigo todo el día. dove men. 48 horas de frescura seca al instante. y va contigo. ♪ (don't stop me now) ♪ ♪♪ ♪ (don't stop me) ♪ ♪ 'cause i'm having a good time ♪ ♪ having a good time ♪ ♪ i'm a shooting star leaping through the sky like a tiger ♪ ♪ defying the laws of gravity ♪ ♪ (don't stop me now) ♪

i wish him said twist. rangel is near 31 to 3. well, reduced in your life is east here. i'm last night. the shop. a bubble up in florida just for boy. he's just so staying as the royal of the queer, to be sufficient to go a score up almost usually usually work always will keep watched in europe. i can week sickening in my little style is then you just keep it going as well. the one of the key for your most, for a speech you usually need, you just gotta meet by each sheet because the when the key, because when you, when you stir lenses didn't go with more during the smarter i was a, would you listen? i dealer secret and you can feel it was for sarah then you can will she? yeah for the for when you thought of me home you thought it was for the elective for both one was only me go back on the door with. no, that's not it's not the check code name associate professor born in the appropriate job, screeching formerly. and as of instructor, a neo nazi ideology, he paid great attention to young recruits who he enrolled and indoctrinated with new ha louis people he spoke with abo

rangel idiota. - [gruÑe] - ...diciendo que querÍa ver mis uÑas.

devastating burden on taxpayers and it is easier to control the narrative when you are not trying to rangel senior members of the royal family that are jet setting with jeffrey epistein, smaller the monarchy is, it is easier to control and that was always prince charles objective and it never included prince harry, he is too far down the line when it comes to succession. prince charles intended to help him financially, but he was never intended to be a face. >> carley: the monarchy is known as the firm, the royal family is in some ways frozen in time, it is also a modden monarchy, i remember when the queen posted her first tweet, a nice news story here, goes from giving radio addresses to tweeting as the queen many years later. how has the monarchy changed over the past 70 years under her reign? >> by evolution, it is actually the crown is not, can't watch the crown and assume you just watched a historic document, there was great exchange when prince philip wants to show her coronation on television and she's a little bit against it because it is supposed to be sacred. that evolution has be

the time when the fish saw materials stock, in this case, i industry rangel exceeds this 25 kilograms your person into here. and just mentioned once that is possible to be produced in a short period of time, then we are in the tipping point. now when we look nuclear material, inventories and it's raining, we need wrong. they are actually substantially higher. she mentioned more than 50 kilos. so 60 percent then this uranium i see from new york near the other there are they have 300 kilogram. so 20 percent the energy radium, and substantial amount or 5 percent going to surrender when you put all this together. so one can say that in 2 or 3 weeks, if you're on or can i see the centrifuges, you know, purple way, they can produce enough material for one nuclear weapon in a hall. so you have time there just enough material to 30 or perhaps an additional $56.00 nuclear bet boss. so we are, you know, tipping point. so how important then is the j c p way? is this an agreement that all parties can come back to, or does it need a sort of serious, overall rewrite and would do you think the party

public speaker: good afternoon, commissioners, my name is nate rangel, the california protector of outdoors. i have attended the drought design workshop and i want to say that i agree with everything that's been said to you so far during this comment period and in particular, i strongly urge you to listen carefully to peter. i also want to say this. for 22 years i have worked for my constituents, my colleagues, representing them in licensing on rivers in california including the last two closer ones which would have been americans. i can assure you that smut and pg & e and california water are just as concerned about running out of water and yet they were able to come to recognize real evidence and being equitable and reasonable in the agreements and the mitigations that they agreed to. i'm going to say that i really hope that you will sit back and reassess the choices you made because the choices that you are making now, i don't believe are reasonable or equitable and rational. i would like you to take a look at the real evidence and not accept what your staff is giving you. thank you. bye