not exactly our rational, but i think that he is rational. >> stahl: do you think they're rational enoughcapable of backing down from this? >> dagan: no doubt that the iranian regime is maybe not exactly rational, based on what i call "western thinking," but no doubt that they are considering all the implications of their actions. >> stahl: other people think they're not going to really stop till they have this capability. >> dagan: they will have to pay dearly and all the consequences for it. and i think the iranians, in this point in time, are going very careful in the project. they are not running in it. >> stahl: if they're that rational, as you suggest, and that logical, then why can't you-- israel-- and the world live with a nuclear iran? >> dagan: in the israeli case, they have said that they want to destroy israel. >> stahl: he says one sign of iran's logical thinking is how they cunningly stall through diplomacy. >> dagan: i think that the iranians are masters at negotiation. they invented what i call the "bazaar culture" of how we are negotiating. >> stahl: so if there are negot

and a rational. i don't even bother with those terms because i don't want to get into. what i want to do is say that i think we have reason to believe that ayatollah khamenei and ahmadinejad and others who think like them may decide to use nuclear weapons, whether you want to make cultural, how can we say this theology is rational, it doesn't matter to me. the point is there are some people who have fewer inhibitions of that using nuclear weapons. khrushchev and kennedy thought to pull back immediately when khrushchev realized he finally understood the meaning of the word miscalculation. castro did not take that view. and that, we have to worry about that and you're in the middle east where you have famously rough neighborhood where people don't trust each other at all, or you don't have a superpower sponsor who could restrain, as khrushchev did, in 1962, who could restrain a surrogate. a client. so the point is that you do not want to have the stuff spread. ideally you don't want to spread anywhere,

it a rational country.s it nothing rational about saying you want to wipe an entire country off of the map and denyinglet holocaust in which 10 million people six million of them were wiped out. there is nothing rational about murdering yours in the street because they protested the outcome of an election. it is an irerational count reap with irerational goals and benjamin netanyahu is one of the rational people in the planet who sees that we are in a dangerous space and we can't wait and hope think that we would say something so polite and kind and refreshing. and they would back down and you know, you make such good sense when you speak sweet to us. good heavens, it is pime that want to kill us. >> it is september and the school system kick indeed full gear in the country except in chicago. teachers strikes have forced 350,000 students out of their classrooms this week. tichers feel beaten down in the count reap and feel beaten down because was test rather than teacher driven policy and spike in poverty y

>> i think the rational side. >> you think we're more animal than rational? >> i think sometimes we put too much time on rationality. i think there has been a lot of tests that show people are really not logical. >> when one is angry or raging -- >> yes. >> then the animal flight syndrome, i guess you would call. >> flight or fight. >> flight or fight comes into play. >> correct. >> and that produces bodily physiological behavior. >> correct. >> what is it? >> the changes in the heart. the heart rate goes faster. your blood pressure goes up. you breathe faster. sweat more, have an interior feeling of being stressed, as we talked about. >> when we're raging or when we are angry, we're like an animal either getting ready to fight or getting ready to flee? >> that's correct, yeah. >> so that affects -- does it affect endocrinology, too? >> it affects all of that. you have the part of the brain called the frontal cortex to try to inhibit it to say there is nothing to get upset about. our whole day is getting feelings and handling them by the frontal lobe of the b

it is not a tool for rational policy. it is something that is released at least that's the way one could read that. castro has not changed. he still marxist. >> between then and now -- >> but what has changed is his attitude about his own actions within the contest. >> i'd avoid calling him irrational because no way things castro's crazy. i use the term fanatic. the question about was rational and irrational. and he renewed the request as reported by the dead hand in the 1980's. the thing is, even in response to an invasion of the island the idea of unleashing a nuclear holocaust that will bring down -- that would result in more than 100 million people killed to so he could preserve his island would have been obliterated. i would not want to hold that up as a model of rational decision making. if elected the middle east today , the supreme guide, the supreme a foray -- supreme authority at present in the wrong, it's not someone not want to trust with a nuclear decision or for that matter -- >> irrational decision. >> i'm

it's not a tool for rational policy. at something that is -- at least that is the way one could read that. castro has not changed. he is still a marxist. >> well you know first of all between then and now, but what has changed is the attitude about his own actions within the crisis. >> i avoid calling him a rational. no one thinks castor is crazy. i use the term fanatic about what is a question between rational and irrational. he did renew the request in the 1980s. the thing is, that even in the response to the invasion of his island the it idf unleashing a nuclear holocaust that would result in more than 100 million people killed just that he could preserve his island of course would have been obliterated at the same time, that i wouldn't want to hold that up as a model of rational decision-making. if we look at the middle east today the supreme guide who is the supreme authority at present in iran is not someone i would want to trust with a nuclear decision or for that matter -- >> it's not rational decision-making. >>

it's not a tool for rational policy. it's something is released in a climate. at least that's the way one could read that section. castro hasn't changed. he's still a marxist. >> well first of all, what has changed is his attitude about his own actions within the context of the crisis. >> i avoid calling him -- now thinks he is crazy. i use the term fanatic. he did renew the request which was reported in the 1980s. the thing is that even in response to an invasion of this island, the idea of unleashing a huge nuclear holocaust that would bring down, that would result in more than 100 million people killed just so he could preserve his rule, of course this island would have been obliterated the same time, that i would want to hold that up to some rational decision making but if we look at the middle east today, the supreme guy who was the supreme authority of present in iran is not someone i would want to trust with nuclear decision, or for that matter -- [talking over each other] >> i'm not saying -- you are using the word rational and irrational but i don't ev

and it's that rational pursuit of values that is the morality is about. people out to pursue their own rational self-interest don't want paternalistic government on the shoulder telling them of the candy summer, what can the business they can open or what they cannot open, what they should say or should should not say. to those people, what they need to advocate, the morality of self interest income -- rejected the conventional morality. that is at the core of our whole argument, fundamentally the argument between free market and state is an, an argument between morality of self-interest verses and morality of sacrifice, and morality of self sacrifice. if you believe in free market reject south set device of sacrifice. then the question is, well, what kind of government. if we start shrinking? well, ultimately the government we would like to seek is a government that existed at the founding of this country, a government that doesn't redistribution of wealth, that does not regulate business, that says one thing only and does it really, really, really well,

iran is not a country that's rational, despite the joint chairmans some time ago, there's nothing rationalo wipe an entire country off the map and nothing rationality, ko holocaust were wiped out by hitler's reign and nothing rational murdering citizens in the street because they oppose the outcome of an election in your country. that's not a rational country, that's irrational with the goals. and netanyahu is the only one who seems to see that we're in a dangerous sprays and we can't weep asking, hoping that we say something so polite, accommodating refreshing and they'll back down, you know, you make such sense when you talk sweet to us. good heavens, people, this is a dangerous quarrel with people who want to kill us. >> well, it's september and the the school year has kicked into full year throughout much of the country except in chicago where a teachers strike is forced 350,000 students out of their classrooms this week. and here is national president of the american federation of teachers, randy winegarden's reasoning and she says this, teachers still beaten down throughout the count

decision occur basically our brains have two different moral circuits one that says thinking rationally when one coming to a dilemma is the right way to go and another one that says to think emotional. these two responses occur in a part of the brain called the ventral medial prefrontal cortex cortex excuse me which is an area of the brain where different types of values can be weighed against each other to produce a decision but what makes our brain choose to make rational decisions sometimes and emotionally charged decisions the other times is something different after several experiments greene and his colleague eleanor amate discovered that some to live as that humans face produce vivid images in our brains in our minds which cause us to respond emotion for example if you can visualize the consequence of a trainee hitting a person you are less likely to choose to let the train hit that person green and discover the people who think more visually make more emotional moral judgments as well for instance if you can visualize the carnage and horror of a terrorist attack or more likely t

author of, the myth of the rational voter. why democracies choose bat policies. so democracies choose bad policies because voters are not rational? >> exactly. there is a lot of bad policies pass by popular demand. john: but people want to do the right thing. >> that's absolutely right, actually. people do want to do the right thing but doesn't mean they are doing it. in order to do the right thing you have to know something. if you try to do the right thing without knowing what you're doing you can easily mess things up. john: you say voters don't have a real incentive to get informed? >> that's right. so you really need to ask yourself what would happen if you voted at random? the answer is same thing that happens to you otherwise. john: nothing. >> nothing. john: one vote probably doesn't matter? >> you're just one little vote out of millions and millions of people. if you make a terrible decision, the same thing happens to you that happens to everybody else. i had an argument with colleague of mind, the problem, brian we're getting government we deserve. well

have overcome the rationalization and the neutralization of the behavior. the need to go to the teacher and said, here is what i did. we have a process of this ad virginia called informed retraction. you can go to the honor committee and say i wish to make an informed retraction. i cheated it and i'm willing to take the consequences. you go to the professor until the professor would you did. that professors punishment sticks, whatever it is. if you go through the honor committee and you are convicted, there's only one sanction, which is expulsion from the university. so we do try to give some benefit to the student who is willing to take responsibility for their own behavior. >> in today's society, what does it mean if you take "responsibility" for some type of an ethical action? >> i think it means, first, that you have to own it and that is hard to do. most of us become skilled at rationalizing our behavior or what they called neutralizing the behavior. admitting it and owning it is something that is the first step in doing it. i am catholic. we have a hi

and a rational approach to this subject once the mind is placed in this context whether it's belongs to a christian or a muslim or a jew then it will take these wild american policies that have been a process in the muslim world for the past at least sixty seventy years mohamad i'll see them at the washington d.c. islamic center thank you very much indeed for joining us live here on r.t. . the feeding on global muslim fury over the film new protests hot spots are appearing cocktails and chanting for death thousands of police in indonesia and afghanistan protesters burned cars and surrounded the u.s. base just a week since it all began unrest and violence has now spread to more than thirty nations around the world. with the details. police and protesters have hatched in the indonesian capital of jakarta and classes took place when hundreds of hard line is in front of the american embassy they took the police by surprise when they stopped to pulling them because until now all the demonstrations that have been taking place across indonesia which is the world's most populous muslim natio

time so where do you see the future of this argument between israel and iran if tel aviv would be rational. i would be happy and think nothing's going to happen because i think military attack on iran could be nearly suicidal for israel. considering that with all the change in egypt in the neighboring countries the tech like this you don't know how the region would react and if netanyahu be rational i would be happy and safe and think no they won't dare to unfortunately i'm not sure that that and you know is that rational i mean he's increasing he's really increasing his tanks israel attacks. and i'm afraid his calculation might be before the us elections i can attack iraq i have to back me after the election he might not want to back so the gives us a really really bad chance that the netanyahu might attack in october as soon as october starts with an attack and the question is how an attack from. tools for a nuclear science in iran how will that develop. i'm not sure it will develop in an all out war but i mean tanks on israel will happen then you don't know how to react there's a street

i use the term "fanatic" to finesse and leave to the doctors what's rational and irrational. he recorded the request in the 1980s. the thing is that even in response to an invasion in the island, the idea of unleashing a nuclear holocaust bringing down, result in more than 100 million people killed just so he could preserve his rule, of course, the island would have been obliterated at the same time that i wouldn't want to hold that up as ad 340 elf rationale decision makes, and looking in the middle east today, the supreme guide who is the supreme authority at present in iran is not someone i i want to trust wh a nuclear decision, or for that matter -- >> [inaudible] rational decision making -- >> i'm not saying -- you use the word "rational and "irrational" burks i don't want to be a doctor. i just say we have reason to believe that people like ahmadinejad and others like them may decide to use nuclear weapons whether if you want to make a cultural comment that this is their theology, and how can we say it's irrational. that doesn't matter to me. the point is there's people

ration is in trying to recruit. a national regime of secrecy and that's the regime of obfuscation and regime where any government employee revealing sensitive information to a media organization can be sentenced to death life imprisonment or espionage now in recent u.s. the classified documents being found that julian the sons and wiki leaks are officially enemies of the state and that anyone who works with them could speak to tension the persecuted and now he spoke not only of his own ongoing battle but also the wider implications for whistleblowers if the u.s. continues along this course. as mentioned we were exclusively broadcasting a song just address a live venue you can watch the full version on our website. breakthrough exclusively. the sun rises over what seems like analyst forest to hear and cry for hundred kilometers north of la. as in much of the world it's disappearing at a catastrophic rate. mortgages both illegal and those finding ways to outsmart the system filing down the forests of the region for th

you can't talk about it rationally. to go into a catholic mass in a beautiful cathedral in new rk in a cause of aids and they start condoms, it sets back the cause. wove got to care. we've got to continue everything we at the federal and local level. barbara, i think, is doing 5 superb job in destroying the myth about aids and all of us are in this fight together. all of us care. do not go to the extreme.

georgia's democracy on the fly again it's claimed to tear open rationing that killed church and militants all staged alleged killings emerging between special services in the country and terrorist. france will still tunks its wealthiest difference to the killed president alone than they will be found but critics say this will only be seen money pretty the country. this is coming to you live from moscow hello and welcome to the program took the opportunity to ramp up its war a trick against iran as prime minister netanyahu address the world community and the u.n. general assembly has called for drawing a clear red line on tel rounds nuclear program to stop it from building a bomb iran has always insisted it's only pursuing the peaceful outcome in a fortnight is following developments in new york for. israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu took to the podium to address the international body and presented somewhat of a show wintel why his diplomatic approach this year in his speech was to hold up somewhat of a cartoonish figure of a bomb to indicate what he believes is iran's nuclear pr

safe and think no they won't dare to unfortunately i'm not sure that that and you know it's not rational i mean he's increasing and he's really increasing his tanks israel attacks. and i'm afraid his calculation might be before the us elections i can attack iraq i have to back me after the election he might not want to back so that the gives us really really bad chance that the netanyahu might attack in october as soon as october and starts with an attack and the question is how an attack from. tools free nuclear science in iran how will that develop. i'm not sure it will develop in an all out war but i mean tanks on israel will happen then you don't know how to react with the street almost whether they will close it or not that would definitely start an all out war in terms of germany's role what job is that germany to do germany could really change a lot in that region it was. germany nine years ago to to mediate in the conflict on the program it was germany who moved the three plus three talks at the beginning in two thousand and three when i'm talking now to. the region when i went t

it's a bad rationalization. if you can asallize your behavior you go forward.ou want to look in the mirror and feel like we are good, honest people and benefit from being dishonest. how can you do both? as long as you do just a little bit, you can do both. you can benefit and still think of yourself as a good person. >> give me an example of that. how do you rationalize that, give me a specific. >> first of all very simple. give people a piece of paper with math problems, i'll give you a dollar a question for what you get done in five minutes. stop count your questions that you got correctly shred the paper and come back and tell me. >> honor system. >> they say six i pay them $6 they go home. people in the experiment don't know that the shredder has been fixed, only shredding the sides but the main page remains intact and we can find out for real. we find people had four and reported six. we had a few big cheaters, but they're really, really, really few. we have tons of little cheaters. i report 30,000. different verses. we had 12 big cheaters that together st

aggressively institutes rationing approaches or rations organizations and structures into medicare.e've tried this. and it never works. in europe where, like in england, for example, in the uk, they have aggressive government rationing. the growth in health care spending on an annual basis, on a per annum basis is the same -- actually it's higher. the way to reduce growth in medicare spending is to give seniors control of their own health dollars. you'll be a lot les wasteful and the government will be controlling the same money. >> just to be clear, most of western europe spends half of what we do on health care and they have government-controlled systems. obviously, this is the key to controlling health care costs. >> that's not true. so, again, the rate of growth of spending in europe is the same if not higher. the u.s. is below average in the oecd. we started on a higher base. that's because medicare in the '60s dramatically increased the amount of money we were spending on health care in a way that didn't make a lot of policy sense because it was poorly designed at the outset.

it takes no rational, no foundation. when you try to get to the authority, when you poke into the authority of college sports, you get circular arguments or reflexive arguments, famously in "sports illustrated," michael rosenberg told of interviewing the former president of the n.c.a.a. and having the most circular interview of his whole career. they cannot be paid. why? because they're amateurs. what makes the managers? well, they cannot be paid. why not? because they're amateurs. who decided they were amateurs? we did. why? because we don't pay them. this goes round and round. it is not based on anything except history and privilege. the principle of amateurism, and this is a quote, is an abdication -- advocation, this is in bed rules, student athletes should be protected from exploitation by commercial enterprises. that might roll into your consciousness easily, but surely, it is a little bit odd to say it exploits somebody to pay them rather than not to pay them. this is an alice in wonderland notion that you are exp

this woman says they've been walking for three days and have used up almost all of their rations.he also reports bombing by the north sudan army. the women's husbands have either died or are fighting with the rebels. it will take these people another day to reach yida, where they can register as refugees and will be given ration cards. gladys asks about nemat's parents. she learns there are people named ayub at the camp, but they're not from nemat's village. gladys gives nemat the bad news. nemat's torn between homesickness and the desire to go to school in a safe environment. she tells gladys she wants to become a doctor -- and save as many lives as possible. >> in china waste management largely still means throwing all your rubbish in a skip and dumping it somewhere on a landfill in the countryside. many nations still dispose of some of their waste this way. but with increasing consumerism comes a growing awareness that we will run out of countryside, clean air and clean water unless we find new ways to manage our waste. the chinese government responded by introducing environmen

it is a rational thing.i cannot be rational. >> well, the game is tough enough to beat. you have to beat the bookmakers vigorous. with that being said, if there is a bad call that cost you the game, you have to be overcome, you have to overcome two different deficits. i understand if you are on the wrong side of that game the other night, you have a bad taste in your mouth right now. stuart: you do think there could be some loss of business for you guys? >> there is some chatter out there, stuart. i have heard the customers, to the counter and say that that call will put them on the sidelines for a wild. now, of course, if you are on the right side of that, you are ready to be an action for the coming week. stuart: [laughter] i guess so. give me the odds that the regular refs will come back very soon. >> they are a 129 favorite to be back. maybe not this sunday, but certainly the next. they will come together. they will meet somewhere in the middle. i do not know if they will make it by this sunday, but by n

and the rationalization for this increase is the tattersol report that is being represented as indicative of market value and it's flawed, biased report that shouldn't be used to determine market value. there are other reports that indicate that lower rates are more appropriate to market value. for example, the east harbor operated by parks and recreation is more typically of market rates and it's consistent with our current rates. and i want to urge you to direct the staff to reconsider the tattersol report as an establishment of market rates for the revised conditions for the south beach harbor tenants. the possessery interest tax has been taken away from our harbor and pledged by contract to be used for debt service and interest on the loans and as justification for the increase in our harbor rates the explanation has been given that we're underwater. we're losing money because we have to pay the principal and interest on these loans. and on the bonds. if we were to have the possessery interest tax and other taxes pledged to be used for principal and interest on the loans, we would not

should be filmed connected with the establishment of processing facilities on the church for the ration i think it is fair. enough excellent. almost to run out of time i suggest we just heard from several concluding questions consumers could provide a newspaper. to come across in the six hundred gram of problems that people have a question that has nothing to do with their back i'd like to ask you about. cranes . to crane those birds to which you show all the way to warmer habitat areas so what is your view all the large number of for other sarcastic comments that have been made a lot of things have been said and written and many jokes have been me while you talk about this just let them fly themselves your consistent opponents in your subject projected the entire situation to being a electoral statistic i'm not sure whether you know that but sixty three percent of cranes followed putin as it turned out and the arrest preferred to go southwards there is only a small number of words. on the boulevards and in squares of the serious but i think a certain degree of truth. there is a certain

indeed, it would become the pre-eminent means of portraying order, rationality, harmony, and power, whethern dictatorships, despotisms, or democracies. ironically, though, the lesson which the greeks understood and which their artists expressed in these works and in the parthenon sculptures-- namely that the disruptive and frightening forces of the irrational will always threaten to burst out in human history-- that lesson would have to be learned again and again. rome began here, a cluster of little villages strung over these hills above the marshy valley of the river tiber. founded, according to legend, in the eighth century b.c., at its heyday in the second century a.d., it ruled an empire whose soldiers stood guard from the windy hills of hadrian's wall in scotland to the persian gulf, and whose merchants traveled as far afield as india and china-- the culmination and the unifying of the old cultures of the mediterranean world and western europe. from that day to this, rome would be the greatest single influence on the western cultural tradition. indeed, it could be said that rome is th

there will be opportunity for public comment and obviously we will have glib ration at that time. i want it mention to the public that the clerk of the board has already notified the parties and provided the parties with opportunity to submit written response to the ethics commission recommendations and we expect those sponsz by september 25. with that, madam clerk, could you call the consent agenda. >> clerk calvillo: 1 through 10 com comprise the consent age. >> president chiu: colleagues, would anyone like to separate any of those? take a roll call vote on the consent agenda. >> clerk calvillo: items 1 through 10, president chiu, aye. supervisor chu, aye. supervisor cohen, aye. supervisor elsbernd, aye. supervisor farrell, aye. supervisor kim, aye. supervisor mar, aye. supervisor olague, aye. supervisor wiener, aye. supervisor avalos, aye. supervisor campos, aye. >> there are 11 ayes. >> president chiu: those resolutions are adopted and ordinances passed on the first reading. next item. >> clerk calvillo: item 11 is an ordinance amending the police code to modify and eliminate