like captain raymond miller would never dream to be getting back into his favorite airplane. was a course of our largest passenger plane, is going back into the service after 3 years of cobit hibernation. lucas and talk were well prepared to take. the weather here is warm and sunny. just like and boston paused. what more could you want? most of the sudden, passengers booked the trip to boston, especially because of the a $380.00. i think it's a fabulous aircraft. i don't know really if any of us carriers have yet, but i'll tell you the munich airport is spectacular. so if we had something like this in the us, i'd be very proud. i feel special. it seems like it's a very big deal here. so i am excited to be part of it. just how big a deal the joint air bus really is, becomes apparent at the crew briefings 23 flight attendants needed to take care of the passengers on the upper on main decks. long before passengers are allowed on board, the cabin crew head out to the plain. they have plenty to do. but there's still time for a quick sophie with the plain before they all start gett

many take sophie's and videos to and then the the moment. meanwhile, up front and the cockpit. raymond miller and mounting who's preparing for take off is convinced that the $83.00 eight's will be post the fleet for the longer term. even if critics claim it can seems to much fuel due to its full engines as an again, this is so for now we're assuming for years then we'll have to see if we can extend it again because it's still a new plane. this one, the mike kilo, when it to service in 2014, that's not old. you must be disabled. it's still very economical. today we use $3.00 to $3.00 leaders of kerosene per passenger per 100 kilometers. for a bigger aircraft, that's extremely good value. i think this plan has a bright future, particularly for airports that are slight critical where you have to meet a fixed arrival time, or when you can only fly there once a day. you're happy when you can take 500 passengers cars within 2 weeks earlier, the 380 landed lights, the color airport, frushell trainings don't full 20 recon. sabina bulk nice waited for more than an hour to be able to capture the action

miller of the u.s. army. general john nickelson jr., of the u.s. army. general david rodriguez of the u.s. army. general curtis skeparati of the u.s. army. general raymond thomas iii of the u.s. army. general joseph votell of the u.s. army, and general mark welch of the u.s. air force. i read the complete list last night and i do it again. that just gives you a sense of the kind of people that i think we should be listening to. it's worth my colleagues a minute of their time to sit back and look at the people who are supporting this bill who lead our military or have led our military. they have been resolute in their support for the afghan adjustment act. and the letter they sent to congressional leadership makes that clear. in their words -- this is their words, not mine. if congress fails to enact the afghan adjustment act, the united states will be less secure. let's read that again. if congress fails to enact the afghan adjustment act, the united states will be less secure. my colleague senator moran outlined why. it's about the fact that there's no vetting in place and this puts the vetting in place. and most importantly, it is about the fact that

miller of the u.s. army. general john nickelson jr., of the u.s. army. general david rodriguez of the u.s. army. general curtis skeparati of the u.s. army. general raymond thomas iii of the u.s. army. general joseph votell of the u.s. army, and general mark welch of the u.s. air force. i read the complete list last night and i do it again. that just gives you a sense of the kind of people that i think we should be listening to. it's worth my colleagues a minute of their time to sit back and look at the people who are supporting this bill who lead our military or have led our military. they have been resolute in their support for the afghan adjustment act. and the letter they sent to congressional leadership makes that clear. in their words -- this is their words, not mine. if congress fails to enact the afghan adjustment act, the united states will be less secure. let's read that again. if congress fails to enact the afghan adjustment act, the united states will be less secure. my colleague senator moran outlined why. it's about the fact that there's no vetting in place and this puts the vetting in place. and most importantly, it is about the fact that