i can't remember. no vote more illustrative of what we call the reagan doctrine. we will always unceasingly support our allies in confronting russian aggression. this is the reagan doctrine during this vote. all the democrats stood for, and 117 republicans voted against, only 101 republicans voted for. this is a small advantage that shows that the reagan doctrine has failed within the republican party. we see a new group of republicans pushing in an isolationist direction. that is why i was the only democrat who voted against the resolution on short-term financing of the government, because i believed that this was our last best chance to finance ukraine. we can still do it, but there is a lot of risk because we can see. suv in support, and now, in the middle of this chaos, i am not sure if we will be able to agree on anything before the forty-day deadline expires, and we need to agree on something for ukraine as soon as possible. who can actually be the next speaker? the names we're hearing the most right now are steve scalise and jim jordan, but things can take

i am indeed concerned the reagan doctrine is dead.ck up the pieces and remind ourselves that we are all interdependent. thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. a humanitarian crisis is worsening in a disputed area. almost the entire population of nagorno—karabakh has fled the region since azerbaijan reclaimed the territory last week. that's more than 100,000 ethnic armenians who have navigated the winding, mountainous road to armenia. azerbaijan has said it wants to reintegrate the area and treat its residents as equals, but an armenian spokesman said this wasjust a lie. the un refugee agency has said that many of those fleeing "are hungry, exhausted and need immediate assistance". the mass exodus has prompted the united nations to send its first mission to the territory in about 30 years, to assess the humanitarian situation. nagorno—karabakh had been controlled by armenian separatists for three decades, but is internationally recognised as part of azerbaijan. bbc�*s south caucasus and central asia correspondent rayhan demytrie

i think the reagan doctrine still holds today. of what brought down the soviet union and i believe -- i believe in this moment it is in our national interest to give the ukrainian military, the military support they need to earn a victory there. and i think your other comment is extremely insightful. vladimir putin was in tehran this summer. iran holds the leash on hamas and hezbollah. if you don't see a growing access between iran, russia and north korea, you're just not paying attention and i really do believe this is a moment where america has to stand strong and i'm going to continue to be a voice for that because i believe it's in our national interest and the interest of peace and security in the world. .. .. .. can i still get on that social security deal that you offered? [laughter] give me the option. >> i love that he was paying that much attention.ov >> my question is related to that because we talk about the social security retirement benefit. is there anything we can be doing on the social security disability benefit

the reagan doctrine still holds today and is part of what brought down the soviet union.t is in our national interest to give the ukrainian military support they need to earn a victory there. vladimir putin was into ron this summer and i ran whole salish -- -- i will continue to be a voice because it is the interest of peace in the world. military with our support and when israel does what they need to do to hunt down and crush,, the world is going to be a more peaceful place. failing those two things in any measure, the rest of the 21st century could look a lot more like the first half of the 20th century. thank you for your question. i appreciate it. >> i am 41. can i still get in on that social security deal? >> we will keep you in the old deal. >> give me the option. >> i love that he was paying attention. >> to talk about the social security retirement benefit for reform but is there anything we can do on the social security disability benefit meaning we have a broader support and also medicare, is anything we can do to get at the cost of the care that could save us

ronald reagan in 1985 articulated what became known as the reagan doctrine.t was essentially this, if you are willing to fight the communists in your country with your soldiers we will give you the means to fight them because we don't want to fight them. i think it still holds and is partly what brought down the soviet union and i believe it is in our national interest to give the ukrainian military the military support they need to earn a victory there. i think your other comment is extremely insightful. latimer putin was in to ron dish -- tehran. -- vladimir putin was in tehran. if you don't see a growing axis between russia and china you are not paying attention. i believe this is a moment where america has to stand strong. i am going to continue to be a voice for that because i believe it is in our national interest and peace and security in the world. the ukrainian military with our support and when israel does what they need to do to hunt down and crush,, the world is going to be a more peaceful place. failing those two things in any measure, the rest o

whether you look at the democratic party and believes or you look at the reagan doctrine or what we hearrom our republican friends. if you believe in freedom and democracy. if we believe we should defendant and we should do it together while it is still contained in ukraine. let's listen to what putin says. he has not only talking about getting ukraine occupied he wants to restore the soviet union. he is talking about the baltic states, poland. if he is emboldened by winning in ukraine then it is just a matter of time when he will attack someone else and it will be more difficult for the nato countries. " require the u.s. or other nato troops on the ground. >> is there any scenario where ukraine does not accept the full removal of russian forces from their territory. is is their agreement that would not require full removal of russians from ukrainian territory? ukraine territory including crimea in the east? >> the short answer is no. we will not accept that scenario. in 2014 we agreed and signed the answer into court. it was right after the president fled. our military was destroyed by

we've needed ronald reagan's doctrine of peace and strength. it's time for us to return to overwhelming force as it relates to any conflict that we must be engaged in. >> this attack from hamas is coming against a backdrop of united states, saudi arabia and israel having what sounds like very serious conversations about a potential deal to normalize relationships. that would be historic. it would also isolate iran. if you were president, would you pursue this deal? >> well, the deal has some very good points and, a, the one thing i would not do is provide a commercial nuclear program to saudi arabia. to me, that leads to, b, which is an acceleration of another nuclear state potentially in the middle east. we should learn the lesson through the jcpoa with israel by giving it -- with iran, giving iran an opportunity to have frankly a path forward towards a nuclear weapon is a terrible decision. giving saudi arabia, in my opinion, a commercial nuclear program would also be a terrible decision. but normalizes relationships between saudi arabia and

whether you look at the democratic party and believes or you look at the reagan doctrine or what we hear from our republican friends. if you believe in freedom and democracy. if we believe we should defendant and we should do it together while it is still contained in ukraine. let's listen to what putin says. he has not only talking about getting ukraine occupied he wants to restore the soviet union. he is talking about the baltic states, poland. if he is emboldened by winning in ukraine then it is just a matter of time when he will attack someone else and it will be more difficult for the nato countries. " require the u.s. or other nato troops on the ground. >> is there any scenario where ukraine does not accept the full removal of russian forces from their territory. is is their agreement that would not require full removal of russians from ukrainian territory? ukraine territory including crimea in the east? >> the short answer is no. we will not accept that scenario. in 2014 we agreed and signed the answer into court. it was right after the president fled. our military was destroyed b

i believe the ronald reagan doctrine of peace through strength has been missing getting back to it will not only keep our nation safe, but it will also create peace across the world. >> yeah, but all the top military leadership say they need these promotions. they need them right now. let me ask you one final question, a political question, before i let you go. former republican congressman, will herd, just announced he's suspending his 2024 presidential campaign and is endorsing your fellow south carolinan, nikki haley. what's your reaction? >> cia person and has served his country as a member of congress. thank you for your service, will. i look forward to seeing you sometime soon. i can't comment on his endorsement but i will simply say that making sure that america knows that we can also accomplish the most remarkable things. my goal is to protect the american dream for the next generation and that means starting with reinvesting in our military, protecting our southern border, and standing toe to toe with our adversaries. >> senator tim scott, thanks so much for joining us. >> than

reagan's doctrine, trump doctrine. but peace must also come this strength.t moral clarity. make no mistake there is immoral clarity from the hamas and terrorists a lot of moral equivalence of their apologists in the united states. larry: we literally let iran get away with murder. yellen gets out there last week, oh, we didn't loosen up the sanctions. of course they did. >> one of their priorities. larry: i have cited numbers every day this week. of course they did. why would they lie to us? it is likelying on the economy. likelying on inflation. come on -- >> they hope people because they're not named trump you will believe them. they are so clouded by their der ringment and hatred toward one man who made the region peaceful by extension our nation peaceful they think -- look at jake sullivan right before the attack of october 7th, it hasn't been this peace and quiet in the region. this is what top administration officials, senate confirmed officials who are in charge of our security and prosperity are saying. larry: there was peace and quiet in that region

that's basically reagan's doctrine peace through strength that was 69% of republicans thought that, and even 44% of democrats. and the war in iraq still relatively popular in october of 2003. so little bit before that, 53% of independents said the war in iraq the right decision, along with 85% of republicans so later public opinion has turned against iraq. but it had not done that at that point in time. so a needs to persuade the that democrats are not soft on defense and a party of weakness. i think domestic and the barrier about policies was even more important and. that was the perception that were too liberal and wasteful programs that didn't work very well. pew in 2005 that's the pew research right after the election that 39% of the public labeled themselves as conservative if you may be thinking, well, it's only 39%, only 19% labeled themselves as liberal. so that natural, strongest constituency for democratic party is only about 20% of the public. and one more statistic from the pew research center, nine in ten republicans and 63% of democrat thought, listen to this line. poor pe

it was back in 1985, ronald reagan articulated a policy that came to be known as the reagan doctrine. it was simply this. if you're willing to fight the communists in your country with injure soldiers we'll give you the means to fight them there so we don't have to fight them. i will tell you, the young men and women here and those look on, i believe that if vladimir putin and the russian military overruns ukraine it will not be long before they cross the border of a nato country where our men and women in uniform would be required to go and fight. meg: if i may, getting directly to the assistance you're talking about, and that support. the temporary spending measure passed over the weekend and signed by the president did not include any aid for ukraine. would you have supported that? is that the right way to keep the government operating even on a temporary basis? vice president pence: well -- i think continuing resolutions represent a failure of the congress to do its job. but i'm going to continue to be a strong voice for american support for weapons for ukraine. think about this f

ronald reagan in 1985 articulated what became known as the reagan doctrine.t was essentially this, if you are willing to fight the communists in your country with your soldiers we will give you the means to fight them because we don't want to fight them. i think it still holds and is partly what brought down the soviet union and i believe it is in our national interest to give the ukrainian military the military support they need to earn a victory there. i think your other comment is extremely insightful. latimer putin was in to ron dish -- tehran. -- vladimir putin was in tehran. if you don't see a growing axis between russia and china you are not paying attention. i believe this is a moment where america has to stand strong. i am going to continue to be a voice for that because i believe it is in our national interest and peace and security in the world. the ukrainian military with our support and when israel does what they need to do to hunt down and crush,, the world is going to be a more peaceful place. failing those two things in any measure, the rest o

the perception that we would be there to defend freedom and that's been our role, that's the reagan doctrine. a lot of friends in our pear are becoming more isolationists and i understand the concerns. we can't be dropping money out of helicopters around the world because we also have a $33.5 trillion debt of our own. >> i saw a sign that said 33.6. >> did we go to six? great. >> sean: probably from this afternoon. >> it goes so quick you can't track it. that's the concern. we are deeply concerned about all nations of free people of the world but we have to take care of our own house first so that's also part of this delicate a calculation and the decision. >> sean: i've been to israel during a flare-up in i believe 2014 and at that point i got to see up front and go inside the terror tunnels that are built by hamas. by the way, all of the money and resources, that was given to the palestinian people for infrastructure and schools and hospitals but they have this massive network of terror tunnels and when you go inside it's mind numbing this is how they spend their money and time because the

. >> sean: believe thefrjts all i can tell you is the reagan doctrine of speech through strength workeddical leadership from the far left who's more interested in appeaseing the squad and anti-semites and their party, then they are calling up for the right thing. >> sean: i call it the hamas con sense. all the evidence shows it was not israel responsible for the hospital bombing that killed 500. first of all the hospital barely got any damage, it was in the parking lot. no way 500 people died. how do you react? the media, every single major media organization in this country and around the world, bbc, french press, every american network i could mention, new york times, washington post, abc, nbc, css, msnbc, fake news cnn. >> evil terrorists are believed over the state of israel. unbelievable. >> sean: why wouldn't they check their sources. >> brother from the new york times, i said it yesterday will say it again and will probably say it tomorrow as well. check your facts because at the tend of the day, the falls prop beganeding caused consternation and the mobilization of hezbollah. yo

. >> believe all can tell you is h reagan doctrine of peace through strength worked decade after decadeer decade. ked, >> weak, liberal, radical leadership from the far left who's more interested in appeasing those squad and anti-semites in their party than they are standingti-semit : the right thing? >> the hamas caucus. oh, well, there' is a part of te propaganda machine coming out of hamas in spite of all the that showed that in fact, it was not israel. yes, that wasense.s responsibler the hospital bombing that they say killed 500. >> first of all, the hospital barely got any damage. yes, it was in the parking lot. there's no way 500 people died. and, you know, how doea you react? the media evercty single majorti media organization in this country and around the worldn cy bbc, french press, every american network that i caicann believe. p york times, washington post, abc, nbc, cbost,s, hamas, dnc, e news, cnn, evil terrorists b are believed over the state of israel. >> how is that? unlike over the wouldn't they check brr their sources? >> listen, brother is ap of th e new york. >> i

better with someone who's optimistic and positive, anchored in conservatism, who understands the reagan doctrinength. i would be that president. having someone who has no daylight, someone who's not negotiating with iran for a new nuclear deal, someone who's not talking to putin and saying to him, here's things that we wish you would not do in our country, love, the president. we need strong leadership with a backbone that speaks clearly, consistently, and concisely as it relates to the issues and the topics that will protect the american people and encourage opportunities around the world. >> sounds good. all these things. we'll see whether it starts resonating, senator. we are in crazy times, are we not? >> we are indeed. >> we are. all right, well, good luck. good to have youn aay oaslws, senator. "squawk box" will be right back. but if it's using untrusted data can you trust the results? your business doesn't just need ai, it needs the right ai for your business. introducing watsonx a platform designed to multiply output by tailoring ai to your needs. when you watsonx your business, you can

ironically reagan fulfilled the carter doctrines pledge. the states would prevent a hostile power from seizing control of the gulf now by targeting targeting the soviet union. but authorizing air and naval strikes against the nation's former gulf ally. thank you. thank you to the library and to the ronald reagan presidential foundation and institute and all the other partners. one, i'm affiliated with pepperdine university's school of public policy. it is fitting we meet to discuss and analyze all things reagan, especially during the ongoing anniversary of his. i'm one of the participants here focused on the meaning and significance of president ronald reagan's key speeches and, how they help us understand his strategic and moral thinking. my questions how did reagan get to 1983, especially march 1983? what made reagan reagan? and what did he bring to the white house with him? what was the end? his cold war strategy of peace through strength expressed, pursued as president, especially in two central speeches. at a moment, reagan both saw an

ironically reagan fulfilled the carter doctrines pledge. the states would prevent a hostile power from seizing control of the gulf now by targeting targeting the soviet union. but authorizing air and naval strikes against the nation's former gulf ally. thank you. thank you to the library and to the ronald reagan presidential foundation and institute and all the other partners. one, i'm affiliated with pepperdine university's school of public policy. it is fitting we meet to discuss and analyze all things reagan, especially during the ongoing anniversary of his. i'm one of the participants here focused on the meaning and significance of president ronald reagan's key speeches and, how they help us understand his strategic and moral thinking. my questions how did reagan get to 1983, especially march 1983? what made reagan reagan? and what did he bring to the white house with him? what was the end? his cold war strategy of peace through strength expressed, pursued as president, especially in two central speeches. at a moment, reagan both saw an

should have.e we think we should reinstate what ronald reagan took away which was the fairness doctrine so somebody says something the opposite you is allowed to go there as well. it was the telecommunications actni. clinton in 1996, actually. it led to the corporate conglomerate or a station about these media companies. it's not about nationalizing media but reinstating the guardrails that protected the information in the freedom of information in ways that were true in the 1970s. [laughter] i like to say to everyone around my age whoever thought we would be nostalgic of the 70s. [laughter] you know. we would not have thought it. it was a boring time in many ways. [inaudible] >> yes. i'm sorry. i did not hear the end of your sentence. [inaudible] >> yes. once again, i'd love to hear about how the government is. they are working on behalf of joe biden. i don'tth want the government making that decision. i just want ethical people. there has to be an ethical revolution in this country. martin luther king says we need quantitative changes in our circumstances and quantitative shift in our

reagan. the reason it was profound, the first time a communist country was rolled back. they had the so-called brezhnev doctrinewe have something it is ours forever. everything else is up for grabs once we have things like cuba it is our stays ours. powerful message the u.s. building forward again, rebuilding the military, as reagan said we're out to win the cold war this is the first example of it. larry: reagan did a radio gig every saturday at least in the first term. he may have continued second term. i wasn't there. but in the first term he did this radio gig, one time it started, testing testing, we will bomb moscow in 15 seconds. that went all around the world. it was a joke, just kidding. reagan had a hollywood sense of humor, maybe, maybe. sent a message, sending a message is very important. rich lowery in your new wonderful discovery of donald trump's foreign policy, i say right now deterrents, not appeasement is crucial in the iran story but they're not doing it. >> absolutely. larry: i keep saying i know it is sim simplistic, stop one shi, stop one ship. it will be heard 'round the world. i'm not as

doctrine because they actually see that as really important as a way to get other different voices. this is that both liberals and conservatives could agree on. but that legislation ultimately vetoed by ronald reagan he says, again, the marketplace can deliver this diversity of perspectives and then people can choose in there. and so i think part of the decline of the fairness is this reliance on the marketplace to deliver a democratic debate discourse and and in the end, it does not it generates it. it allows what sells. it allows what's a higher rating to dominate the conversation rather than here is an informed analysis of the different issues and the different angles. and so i think that's one of the things that's at the heart of my book is that what happens when we have this deregulated media environment and what i call a privatized public sphere, a public sphere in which there are there are none of these rules regulating civic or m&a, eating civic contributions. rather, it's just a reliance on the marketplace to deliver democracy. and i think ultimately that can in theory. but the profits have ultimately undermined having an informed citizenry. well, i've been out of the gerald r ford presid