so we have got a motion to amend the appropriation down and the reappropriation to $6,672,963, and we will do that without objection. ok, to the items. item number nine, we're hoping to continue this item. do we have a motion to continue for a week? motion to continue item number 94 a week. without objection item 6, 7,

so we have got a motion to amend the appropriation down and the reappropriation to $6,672,963, and we will do that without objection. ok, to the items. item number nine, we're hoping to continue this item. do we have a motion to continue for a week? motion to continue item number 94 a week. without objection item 6, 7, and eight were not recommended for amendments. can we send these items forward with recommendations as is? ok, we have got a motion to send items 7 and 8 forward as is. without objection. items six -- 5 and 6, we requested reducing the appropriation amount down and made amendments. can we entertain a motion to send that for to the full board as amended? ok, we have a motion to send items 5 and 6 forward. without objection. thank you. we have one more item before us. item number two. >> item number two, resolution authorizing the director of public works to execute an amendment to the executive structural engineering and consulting services for the war memorial executives -- veterans building seismic upgrade and improvements project to increase the not to exceed amount f

we know how much reappropriate. we have no formal measures of effectiveness as to what the programs are. please don't misunderstand. i think we have accomplished a great deal with roads, with water and individual aid projects. wove spent since there war began the highest domestic gdp over the same ten-year period. as that goes down, we risk a recession or depression of major proportions. and we do not have the most basic data on the afghan population, the afghan economy or exactly what we've been doing with aid money and exactly who it's going to. >> thank you. >> i'm going to focus my comments on the risks. the military piece of what we're doing is going better. the problem for me is that the military piece of it never has meshed with other elements is essential to us being capitalized on the gains the military is making. we have never had that right in afghanistan. and now with the clock ticking down to 2014, some of the essential bargains that we made in afghanistan, i think need to be revisited in order for the

to reach appropriate funds available in permanent salaries and -- board of supervisors and to reappropriatevailable in permanent salaries. it provides information regarding the status of caps on individual use of overtime in city departments. as you may recall, the city has an admin code provision that limits the use of overtime hours for any individual to know more than 25% of that individual's earned hours. at the six-month mark, we have 252 employees with in the city's work force that have exceeded that cap, and many have been granted exemptions which are allowed under the ordinance by the department of human resources. additionally, we would anticipate, based on use of overtime hours there the first six months, if those rates of individual use continue for the remainder of the fiscal year, we anticipate that that number would grow to more likely 850. halfway mark of the year, we have 250 employees who had exceeded the cap. if individual use grades continue, that number will increase in the belief in the second half of the year. that is outlined in the report on pages three and four. tha

in salaries and $3.5 million in fringe benefits and the fire department operating budget and reappropriatingn to overtime in order to support the department projected increases in overtime. item six, de-appropriating $3 million in fringe benefits and the police department's operating budget and re this is a breeding $3 million to over time. item seven, ordinance de- appropriating $320,000 consisting of two hundred $50,000 in salaries and the public utilities commission clean water department operating budget and rea breeding to under $50,000 to over time. hetch hetchy power department. item number 8, recognizing revenue losses above $31,477,332 i need to permit a public health and appropriating $67,629,934 of senate bill 1128 reimbursement revenues2. revenues5,620,000 of surplus to our hospital revenues. $6,555,007 of general fund reserves for losses to support additional expenditures in the department of public health. $13,090,000 at laguna honda hospital. dollars in -- a $27,077,609 for a debt service reserve in fiscal year 2011-2012. number nine, ordinance appropriating the money for nurs

new york 2005, safe lew, the house put out -- safetea-lu, the how house put out a request, he's reappropriated that project to a $45 million project near the las vegas airport. now, it's nice that the senate wants to make promises but actions speak a lot louder than words. when the actions of the bill state clearly that $45 million of house money authorized in 2005 is being transfered to a project in las vegas in a bill and it's 2012, something inappropriate about that promise seems to occur. i really appreciate the chairman putting language in our original bill on environmental streamlining. i think he kid a great job on there. but when i read the bill, the language, it was clear what we were trying to do. in 2005, there was language that said if a state has environmental process that meets or exceeds federal law, they don't have to go through a duplicative process. it awe lo -- allowed five states to do that, one state took advantage of that, california. it's saving 30 months of delivery time. what we try to do in the house bill was the same thing. we're say, allow environmentalist -- enviro