city clerk: item 12, ordinance deappropriating and reappropriating $23 million in wastewater revenue bonds for the wastewater enterprises northshore. >> your approval will provide us with a continue gency fund. this project will provide a redundancy force main, a pressurized pipe so it provides a red dante pipe to carry flow in south particularly in the northeastern quadrant of the city. this has failed multiple times. we have had a number of emergency room repairs in the past and this project will provide for redundancy for us to be able to transport the sewage to this portion of the city. i also am requesting for a correction in page 4 of the ordinance. on page 4, item, there is a bullet item no. 2 which states the puc and board of supervisors discretionary adoption of ceqa findings for the project following review of consideration of completed project related environmental analysis were required pursuant to ceqa state guidelines and administrative code. the project has received ceqa approval through the board. so we request that for that bullet item to be stride out # -- striked o

ate the dollars now or you may cut them now and reappropriate them during your ad back process. >> i am okay with that process, and i would like to move on here. >> so supervisor mar, and mr. rose. >> i want to clarify, are you accepting the temporary salary cut on page 36? >> supervisor mar? >> i think that i am okay with that cut, given the money that is going on reserve for the use for the move in the furniture. >> okay, there is a motion to accept the temporary salary reduction, and to take half of the budget analyst recommendation on the move and the half on reserve. >> supervisor mar, could i have a second for that >> could we take that without objection. >> so moved. >> thank you. >> okay. dph. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, greg with the department of public health, we are happy to report that we are in agreement with the budget and legislative analyst on the recommendations. >> no ff&e, discussions in >> i hope not. >> if you could talk about, how we, the budget analyst recommendations changed from last month to this week, regarding the nurses at sfgeneral. >>

it to the arts commission. >> i think that it is cleaner to deappropriate and reappropriate. 191,711 for this year and whatever surplus for next year. >> it is the same amount. >> for both years? >> okay. >> and so that is my motion. >> second >> we have a second. supervisor avalos? could we take ta without objection? >> okay, so moved. >> okay, thank you. >> thank you. >> supervisor mar, and then, with that,... >> i do have a request about animal care and control, since we have you here. i apologize. this came up because i received a significant number of e-mails lobbying me for support for animal care and control. and what i am trying to understand is that you know, as a department, you have the ability to make these requests to the mayor's office directly and the add back is no place to try to effectively serve a department, especially one like animal care and control and i guess that i am trying to understand why am i being lobbied and what did your department do to get the mayor office to support your budget so that you have sufficient resources for that department? >> thank you

. >> item 26 is the ordinance to reappropriate 23 million if waste water revenue bonds placing 8.47 million on reserve and to maintain [inaudible]. >> can we do same house same call? without objection this ordinance is passed on first reading. item 27. >> item 27 is ordinance to retroactively appropriate approximately 653,000 in the fire department surplus expenditures in fiscal year 2013 through 14 #14. >> same house same call. this ordinance is passed on if first reading. next item. >> [inaudible] approximately 76,000 in the department of emergency management surplus expenditure to support increase expenditures in fiscal year 2013 through 14. >> same house same call. this ordinance is passed first reading. >> number 29 is a resolution to amend 265-13 to revise the scope of work for an emergency contract from six to five digesters at southeast water control plant and i crease the contract not to exceed amount to approximately 14.45 million. >> same house, same call. resolution is adopted. >> item 30 is resolution to [inaudible] execute amendment number 4 to an agreement with urs corporatio

projected deappropriation and reappropriation of this request of $23 million for the northshore main project. we have recommendation on page 6 and recommend that you amend the proposed resolution back to the board of supervisors on status with efforts regarding from korj of pg coverage for pg & e facilities and that you approve the proposed resolution as amended. just as a little background pg & e, the puc had anticipated that pg & e would pay for these cost. that has not happened. now the city attorney is working on this matter. that is why we made that recommendation. >> okay. thank you very much. colleagues, any questions for our budget analyst. seeing none, we'll open to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on this item. seeing none, public comment is closed. we are going to have to do an amendment. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i want to clarify. the $8 million was going to be on reserve pending the earlier of either ceqa or controller certification. i think the board would be -- i guess my question is would the board be placed on reserve for elimination of funds or

unaccompanied minors to get here are then placed with guardians or families around the country and reappropriate $1.8 billion to do so than the message that is sent is exactly opposite of what the president is saying so i think that is what we are all here today to say, is we have to not just say the right thing. we have to do the right thing and the right thing here is to change the law that allows the loophole for people to stay here indefinitely and send a message by actually sending children as we do with on accompanied minors from mexico and canada back because that will send the message clear than anything, any words we can say to those tightknit communities to hear word-of-mouth and nobody can tell you is going to pay another 5000 or 6000 or 7000 to send a child to that dangerous condition to the border and say you will be returned home. >> could i just finally add, this proposal for $3.8 billion i can only speak for myself but unless there are provisions in that legislation which would bring an end to this humanitarian crisis, and i cannot support it. i cannot vote for a provision which

. >> when you come to reappropriate $10 billion when it's gone, reup, what are you looking for from an oversight perspective from the v.a.? >> i don't want to see anymore waiting lines for veterans. i think that is probably the most important metric and i think what you're going to see is over a two-year period whether or not there's going to be this rush to leave the v.a. system, which i don't believe is going to happen. there's a fear by some of my colleagues everybody will leave the v.a. i believe there will be a certain portion of people that will leave the v.a. and many will stay inside the system because they're very comfortable with it. so it's my hope as senator sanders said on the floor when they passed their bill that this two-year pilot program will be deemed a success and it will be ade longer than two years so veterans, if they choose, can seek care outside of the v.a. >> what do you say to the fact the regular appropriations process has pretty much been broken for a little while here? >> in the senate it has. >> in the congress overall -- >> no, in the senate it has. hous