as you know the committee if the committee wants to accept the recommendations and, reappropriate funds whatever is priorities are on the board >> okay. thank you. >> okay. any questions for mr. rose further questions for department? >> okay. thank you. colleagues can i have a motion for the department of technology >> so move forward. >> okay movie right along we have the department of public works up next and a. >> good morning supervisors at our last meeting we did reach agreement with the budget analysts i think the outstanding question was the work that was provided the housing authority. can you refresh everyone's memory can you talk about your position and - >> it's a service that we provided the housing authority. it is a number of 6 apprentices who are being trained as laborers. they are just completed they're first year with a year and a half to go. in addition there is a service that is department appraise the big 4 and the rest of the housing departments we help clean up e keep the vments clean on the weekend >> mr. rose. >> good morning. i'm from the budget analysts office.

save money over the course of the year, 75% of it ends up in this fund which is historically reappropriated in next year's but for one-time expenditures like equipment and capital and programs. >> just to clarify supervisor breed, on that item i believe the board of supervisors approved file 130552 the other day. our report -- for the item that supervisor avalos has introduced, we do state on page six of that report that this resolution would suspend deposits to the budget stabilization reserve for 13-14 and 14-15 so the remaining projected balance with continued at the 12-13 ending balance of 102.5 but in dollars and in addition the resolution if it is approved to suspend the 13-14 and 14-15 budget the 13-14 we continue allocated - and the 14-15 would contain 14,377 million. >> and the idea is not to pull money out of the budget stabilization reserve but to not put as much -- or what was scheduled to go in the deposit. >> supervisor farrell: perhaps we should hear from mayor's budget director on this item also? >> thank you supervisor. briefly in response to one of supervisor breed's quest

the balance is the children's fund reduction available for reappropriation, of the children fund's program. >> supervisor farrell: -- supervisor breed?

the balance is the children's fund reduction available for reappropriation, of the children fund's program. >> supervisor farrell: -- supervisor breed? >> supervisor breed: for clarity, so the city grant program, is that the children fund's reduction here? hone for 250,000 another for 150,000? >> that's the general fund reduction. >> supervisor farrell: mr. rose would you like to give us more specificity? >> those are general fund recommendations, the 350,000 but we are referring to which the department agrees with. >> supervisor farrell: any questions or comments? to have a motion to approve the budget analyst recommendations? okay. supervisor breed, can we do that without opposition? so moved. (gavel) thank you. we have the department of public health here, barbara garcia, greg wagne and team. >> good morning. chair farrell and supervisors. -- garcia supervisor of health. after we worked with the budget analyst's office we are ready to say we are in agreement today. >> supervisor farrell: thank you ms. garcia. mr. rose wonder we go to the updated dp report. >> on page 83, for 13-14 recom

it has to be reappropriated. >> except for the 1/8 of a cent senator domenici go you. >> you were one of the principals in the early days with the lwcf. i want to make a point, it's not a tax on the american people, it's a revenue source from the outer continental shelf oil and goes into the treasury and needs to be reappropriated. i also want to make a pitch for the historic preservation fund that is another component that comes from that same source. the concept behind this was you were taking a public asset and you wanted to give something back to the american people for that. that's the fundamental concept behind the lwcf and h.p.f. i think this would have to be well debated if you're going to switch that concept that this funding that has been traditionally used for historic preservation funding or land acquisition to suddenly go to maintenance. >> fair point. i do think, mr. chairman, and senator murkowski, there is something there we can discuss , senator -- i think there is something there that we -- the land, water conservation fund and national park maintenance have never re

pro choice people would say her we're theory protect women's heal and the pro life people are reappropriatingage saying we are going to regulate abortion clinics out of existence and this is for the protection of women's health. the pro choice people don't know how to respond to that exactly. i think that is what is going on right now. >> texas senator wendy davis wrote about this to your point in wp. these partisans have depicted their bill as an effort to improve the quality of care available to women in local clinics. however the filibuster exposed their real intent to close clinics all over the state of texas and deny health care services to thousands of texas women. she is talking about that specifically but we are seeing this on a broader level all across the country? >> that's right. lots of states are working on this right now. we are seeing it in north carolina and mississippi and virginia, a major clinic actually the busiest in the state had to close its doors because of a trap law. these laws are working and they are going to work in texas and only six abortion clinics left if this