what is the reason? the basic principle is how the government acquires information matters, not the sensitivity of the information, i have to disagree that medical information is given heightened protection under the fourth amendment. quite the ferguson case that we -- a urine test that the court assumed was given without informed consent so that governments urged by government hospital personnel the required law enforcement purposes, that is the government search -- i think it's also answer the question about acquiring gps forrmation under e 911 handset, the government reaches into the phone, pose at information, that i would concede is a search, what we are doing here is not going to the individual and extracting information from him, we are information from a third party provider, relying on the line of cases that the justice referred to that allow us -- >> that line of cases was developed in a. in which third parties did not have this kind of information. justice stewart one that you are getting incr

then can we go back to reasonable service and answer the question.i understand what you said what the supreme court has said. >> if you go past the fact that the supreme court said rational basis under mccleary the question is whether the objective observer would determine the primary purpose was religious and i would submit that when you have a multiagency review where you've got numerous numerous. >> is classified and that's all we know. there has been one. >> the report you are talking about is not in this record. >> reports on the record. >> we do have in the record statements and notwithstanding how you may press that we can take notice of statements that are made that allows us to do that. we have that is direct purpose. >> again your honor their regional -- reasonable object of observer would look at the proclamation we don't have the underlying report that we did of the proclamation and we don't ignore what it says. >> are you saying that the court for the proclamation is in the report? is the report for the proclamation rational and not a mu

the reason why we see a retre h retrenchment on putting our money where our mouth is.ou toll us the work force in the 21st century looks different. they are more black and brown. to those that says that's why tl there is a retrenchment. that explains to those who connect those dots. do you accept that or reject it? >> look, i think there is a lot of value in that argument. another thing that changed is the nature of work have changed. so we now have a problem not just for young people being educated to get a good job and to lead a good life for a college education, the vast majority of adults in this country needs the same level of talents of young people do. in the recession what we learn is that those people got knocked out of jobs and those jobs are not coming back. let me tell you one statistic. when the recession ended in 2010 between then and the middle of 2016, there were 11.6 million johns created in the u.s. economy and of those 11.6 million jobs created, 11.5 millions got a college degree. that tells you that people who have a college degree and advantages an

there is reason to think they do. there were all these commercials, can you hear me now, our company has lots of towers everywhere, what do they think that is about? a standard metro pcs contract seems to say, i guess we do not have the actual contract in the record, but they seem to advise the customer that we can disclose this information to the government if we get a court order. i do not know whether that will hold up. even if it were to hold up today, what would happen in the future if everybody began to realize this is provided, if you have enough police tv shows with -- shows were this is shown and they will know about it just like they know about csi information. >> three points. in a scholar's brief runs through the result of a survey that shows a strong majority of americans do not understand this information is acceptable to much less retained by the service providers. second, i agree that the metro pcs contract in 2010 and the other companies privacy policies today do disclose the location information. i t

the second reason -- >> before we get to the second reason, you began by saying that this is -- this proclamation continues the practice of a banned proxy by nationality. but this is different in the sense that at least on the face of it, the proclamation began with an assessments not just of muslim majority nations, but all 200 plus nations and then sort of twin -- -- why doesn't that make a difference in the sense it did not begin as a proxy by nationality ban? >> your honor, i think the government actually conceded just now that we should not be surprised that we ended up with five of the six countries that were banned once again banned under the proclamation. that's because even though the president directed this worldwide review of each country, what he did in section 2 e of the eo2 was to say give me the list of your countries. and your honor, in the design of the study -- >> is it your view that he ordained the necessity of a list? he was not going to be satisfied that the department would come back and say you can't find anything? >> that's right, your honor. we know that not

the second reason. >> the second reason is he began by saying this proclamation continues the practiceof habana proxy by nationality but this is different in the sense at least on the face of the proclamation not just of the muslim majority nation but all 200 plus nations that winnowed its way down to the fairly similar result with respect to these other executive orders. why is there no difference in the sense that it not begin the proxy by nationality than? >> your honor i think the government conceded just now but we should not be surprised that we ended up with five of the six countries that were banned under e02 once again banned under the proclamation and that's because your honor even though the president directed this worldwide review of each country what he did in section 2e of the e02 is to say give me the list of your countries and your honor if the design of the study --. >> is the necessity of google is not going to be satisfied? >> that's right your honor and we know that not just through the proclamation itself which is complete with references coming up with a list of c

rosemary: so, there are some good reasons to quit, some worthwhile reasons to quit. tracey: absolutely, i have changed careers five times in my life. who knows, with as long as we're living, how long that's going to be with the next ones. but if you, as you're going through your career advancement, you're going to find out other things that you're good at. as you become more self-aware, you're going to develop new talents you didn't know. also, if a better opportunity comes your way, by all means take it. third, if you don't trust your boss, you may not like them, you may not even understand them, that's neither here nor there. but if you don't have a boss that you can trust, and you've talked to them and you suspect they don't have your back, it may be time to start looking elsewhere. and the fourth reason i tell people, if you have really flatlined, and there's no other opportunity for career advancement, and you want to keep growing your experience bag, and climbing up, and raising the bar on life, then, by all means, that is a completely acceptable reason to star

no other rational reason? are you aware that the role of alivia was played by helen not carter and michelle pfeiffer? no other rational reason? [laughter] >> visit so on for a royal -- is it so odd for a royal to fall in love with a foreign actor? [laughter] [applause] prince harry may have an issue about this. >> fair enough. here is what i would say about that. to the point about sebastian not having a different reason for marrying her other than the fact that he needed to claim citizenship, i think that is exactly what was going on. you have a situation where olivia fell in love with someone completely different. someone who wooed her and won her with beautiful words, yada yada yada. the only thing sebastian said to her. the first thing he said was, "i will." this is not the person that she thought. it is very clear what his thought process was. he washes ashore, sees olivia, she proposes marriage to him, and he says i am not throwing away my shot. i am not throwing away my shot. i swam to this country. i'm

i don't read any of these reasons you are giving. you are sort of saying the president can exercise legitimate foreign policy if he does this but he can't exercise legitimate policy if he does this, if he treats the nationals just in the top government, it's okay but if he treats the whole country because the countries antagonistic it's not okay. in other words, you are making judgments about form policy which you personally are making for some other ulterior purpose. >> respectfully, i am not making those limitations. congress is. >> your honor, i'm pointing to congress limitations, duly enacted statutes. >> player not recognizing that while 1182 a provides criteria for admissibility so does 1182f and 1182f, they said the president himself has broad discretion we will give him discretion to act as our representative for the sovereignty of the nation, not as a domestic matter. >> subject to the requirement that he make a finding which is reviewable by the federal court courts. >> where did you get that? >> we get the right to review

with comey and asked him for his loyalty that means the president had reason to know -- reason to believe on that night that the national security adviser had committed a crime. this tweet also suggests that on february 14th when i comey says the president asked him to drop the fbi investigation into flynn the president knew or had reason to believe that flynn had lied to comey's agents committing crime. now we have new cnn reporting that says the president was in fact advised to that effect. how did the white house come to know that flynn had lied? well remember sally yats, the acting attorney general at the time on the 26th january yats made an urgent appointment to bereave don mcgann about what she knew of flynn's kwakt certifyingia are sergei kizlyak. she spoke about it exclusively with me though declined to give specifics. >> when were you first made aware that general flynn was lying aboutis had interactions with the russian ambassador? >> well, first let me say i know that this may seem artificial to folks. i can't really talk about what general flynn's underlying contact was becau

for the reason stated in our appeal responses and statements made at the hearing. the determination complies with the requirements of class 1 categorical exemption is the appropriate environmental review determination. the appellant has not provided substantial evidence to refute the conclusion of the department. therefore i urge you to uphold the department's exemption and deny the appeal. this concludes my presentation and planning and staff will welcome any questions you may have. thank you. >> supervisor breed: seeing no names on the roster we'll have up to ten minutes for the mta to do a presentation about the project. if you would like. if not, that's no problem. >> we can do a short presentation. i'm tallia lang the project manager at the sfmta. just to give you a quick overview of the project this is the hairball area. we're working on different segments. it's being worked on by public works and the subject of the appeal is the portion of gerald avenue between barnville and bayshore and bayshore boulevard between gerald and marrin. this is the project area

for a number of reasons. at exactly the moment when more black women are able to qualify for afdc, agencies are not allowed to take the children of black mothers and put them into foster care. there is a lot of threats to do that. sorry, let me go back. they are not allowed to really punish black women for applying for afdc in the first placec, but what they can do is use afdc funds to take their children and place them in foster care. as a safeguard against that -- i said i was not going to go down into the weeds and now i have too much. one of the things that happens with this federal money for foster care that is linked to afdc is you have to have a court order to place kids in foster care and it is to prevent agencies from punishing black women for even applying for afdc in the first place. it is an end -- a real scaling back of families seeking foster care voluntarily. the only way you can get the federal funds to pay for foster care is if there is a court commitment. it makes the whole system more conte

this is a major reason why we have cyber attacks. if you don't have an ability to throttle or block it's one of the reasons why we had the major iot where they could take baby monitors and operators over. you can see that on the system where you are in the stack. you might be the isp. now they can see and have to let it wash over them. . . . . a lot of the great things we are seeing with 5g one of the reasons why self-driving cars will work is because the information flow will be seamless. the information flow to be seen seen -- seamlessly may need to prioritize the information that comes from the automobile to the downloading of netflix. it won't interfere with your downloading of video and i think there's a lot of misunderstanding if you put something at first it automatically queues everything less. there've been several papers i can point you to on the item. those are the three bright lines and issues that have a reason for occasionally doing something then blocking. a lot of it is to protect the internet which we haven't heard a

i think that fails for two reasons. one is this court -- that they have not made the findings that this court called for under 1182, and second the findings they do make are not the ones that are detrimental to the united states. let me walk you through that. before doing that, i'll get the last two arguments out. the 1152 violation. that's the third problem. the nondiscrimination, the fourth is the first amendment and religious discrimination. to answer your question posed to my colleague, here's the problem. here's what you said in your hawaii decision at page 773. quote "although the order explains conditions in the six countries lessen their government's ability to share information, the order specifically avoids making any finding that the current screening processes are inadequate as the law stands an applicant bears the burden of showing the applicant is eligible to receive a visa or other document for reentry. the order offers no further review explaining how these individualized adjudications process is flawed

he's an academic that uses academic reasoning. i might disagree with him, but i would want him to be allowed. i'm not sure whether you can articulate a rule. i agree, the impetus traders need discretion. administrators need discretion. i would say something like, if you believe the speaker has nothing of value to say -- you of value tonothing say based on the standards universities use to value education and collegiality. universities make these judgments all the time. they have to. and they should make the same sort of judgments when evaluating speakers. i do agree. the standard should be nothing to do about politics. it should go more to the method the speaker uses. in thee is evidence past. there are procedural standards that could be used to evaluate potential speakers.. >> great. that's an excellent closing argument for your side. you are doing a public universities should be led to restrict speakers if they have nothing of value to say. ladies and gentlemen, it is up to you, having heard this sophisticated and nuanced talk t

nick gillespie editor in chief of reason and reason tv. sorry, editor of reason.com and reason tv. katherine mangu-ward is editor in chief of reason. vivek chibber is professor of sociology at new york university. and a person with a very active fan base, and the editor of catalyst journal of, his latest book is post colonial theory and specter of capital. bhaskar sunkara is the founder editor of publisher of jacobin. [applause] we're going to begin by trying to define our terms. the first question, which is going to start with reason, what is capitalism? >> thank you very much, michelle. thank you very much to jacobin for organizing this debate. that kind of sounds like garbage. i will try to get little more nitty-gritty also in my answer. what that means in practice is that property is largely privately owned. it means that profit provides incentive for production, it means employment is at will. the government role in the economy should be limited and forces of supply and demand in a free market are the most efficient means of providing the for the general well being of human ki

>> it does violate the ina and constitution for similar reaso reasons. >> really catches the? >> were not limited because of the same reason this court we passed through the mandel hurdle in the record shows the proclamation make it easier to is not bona fide. the internal logic and being underinclusive to not having a nationality ban against venezuela and including somalia even though failed the baseline not including countries like belgium or the philippines that have been widely known. >> that goes to judgment rather than authority. >> but. >> on the establishment clause the proclamation suffers from the same fatal flaws we get past the mandel hurdle because on its face and taken in light of the statements the president made that he sticking with his original purpose to use nationality as a proxy for religion, we do not know that is not bona fide. there's also evidence of the proclamation evidence to its four corners the because of the internal logic even the president send the whole premise of this is a nation has a problem that makes anyone from that threat, this is not l

all stop battle this week when the house of commons reasserted itself and said hang on a minute to reason why you can't just go ahead with this in your way alone we're going to control you to a certain extent i think some of the reaction is a slightly overdone it was always going to be a rocky ride to this was never going to be a celebration this summit in brussels and so it's made to reason that makes life a little bit more difficult but i think what paul meant to this week was ultimately a good thing you think was a good thing i mean we've had people say it's parliamentary democracy at work we've also had people say that it is a prime minister who has been humiliated and put in her place well to a certain extent but the thing is that she knew this was going to be coming this sort of pressure this rebellion has been mounting been mounting for months in palm and she's already put off these votes won so they're meant to take place already back in and about terrible you can use it this is her own fault the one thing so she doesn't she ultimately has to try to keep a fractious party together

therefore, uplifting reason, not passion. refining their opinion as it was a refinement of the people's. this is, i think from the ,erspective of the federalists a republican aware of its own weaknesses, with checks from other regime types, something we have lost in the discussion of the mixed regime. that does not mean that we have a mixed regime. but understanding what comes from those other types. so what is the situation? very different. a series of popular votes with the electoral college rubberstamping those votes. you could argue that the political parties took that role over, the work of julius caesar. the party would choose the two candidates that would be voted on by the electoral college. and by the people. martin van buren, that being his great innovation and contribution lasting , contribution to american politics. this would allow for the same kind of refinement, or at least by the i would say, founders' perspective, inferior. that is not true now. party conventions are beauty pageants. where is it decided? wher

the reason tacoma was picked by the mp, there's a multitude of reasons, but the primary reason is first of all it was an absolutely perfect harbor, especially for sailing vessels. but even today it's an ideal harbor. deep water harbor, tight flats and lots of areas for wharves. you could bring the train right up to the dock and be able to load goodies off and on the ships. so that was part of it. frankly, another reason was that the railroad was built on land grants. the federal government basically divided the whole route into -- into square mile blocks and surveyed it. and the railroad like a checkerboard got every other parcel as payment for building the railroad. in seattle most of seattle had already been staked, claimed and was owned by the residents of seattle. in tacoma a much smaller population, much more vacant ground. they railroad came here because they could literally own the city, and indeed they did when they arrived here. and that's really tacoma's, the first half of its life. the railroad came in and then began to profit off the sale of land within the city. so it went

reason. we are going to separate this from senator mccarthy immediately. on sound reason, we are on the same side. >> owen lattimore, is he a danger as a friend of mao zedong? the army that is fighting our own. for 15 years, he has been mao zedong's friend. don't you think that constitutes a danger to the thinking of our state department? heard of not think he has done, that owen lattimore has done. frank: personalities are very interesting, but senator mccarthy's methods, which are the things you most oppose. it is your position that his methods have not been justified? >> it is. >> a great many americans believe that the one reality of our time is the soviet power and that soviet power is aided in the united states by people who are willing to lend aid to that soviet power. >> the soviet power in russia is one thing. a soviet power in the united states i do not think exists. >> you do admit that there are americans who want to make russia more powerful. there have been such americans in our

all stop battle this week when the house of commons reasserted itself and said hang on a minute to reason why you can't just go ahead with this in your way. we're going to control you to a certain extent i think some of the reaction is a slightly overdone it was always going to be a rocky ride to this was never going to be a celebration this summit in brussels and so it's made to reason that makes life a little bit more difficult but i think what paul meant to this week was ultimately a good thing you think was a good thing i mean we've had people say it's parliamentary democracy at work we've also had people say that it is a prime minister who has been humiliated and put in her place well to a certain extent but the thing is that she knew this was going to be coming this sort of pressure this rebellion has been mounting been mounting for months in palm and she's already put off these votes won so they're meant to take place already back you know and of all terrible you can use it this is her own fault the one thing so she doesn't she ultimately has to try to keep a fractious party togeth

quotas lead to arrests for no reason. that isn't credibly. discussed they would take a person's freedom away to meet a quota. minorities have no one to call if they're wrongly arrested the white person will call their local political committee man a person they'll call the parents perhaps of a teenager will call the local politician you know what's going on here my child was arrested just because he didn't have his license why don't you just tell him to go home and get his license and things like so the white person has more power but people have no connection to the people in.

and with good reason it was a classy finish. a short breda and then shall go back at it in the forty seventh minute bergdahl reacted quickest to notice header. sunil to the home side. but after a defensive showing alex book woke up. cut you'd be rising high for his fourth goal of the ses and two one. and outs book one a penalty ten minutes from time. corage stepping up. to two. but shell code words of a tonight curry turning a fell from marvin hits. daniel caligiuri doing the rest. three to the final score shell can now guarantee to go into the winter break with their best points tally in six a zens. and that's your news rep for now to join us at the top of the next hour if you can a rita will be with you then for another full bulletin or you can always check us out on our web site that's at t w dot com find us on twitter too thanks for watching. stories that people the world over information the provide the pennines they want to express g.w. .

it's reasonable for the area. there are a number of houses and apartment buildings that are of similar scale in the neighborhood. it meets zoning. went through design and review. scaled back by planning commission and if we will stop that from existing neighborhoods, we will just cause the lack of housing. if those projects can't get approved, we'll exacerbate the issue. as neighbors and was mentioned about the west side, we have to come together and take our fair share. at the end of the day to demolish a single home to put in three units of family housing, given the conditions that were approved at the planning department and planning commission, to me, this is something that i think we should move forward with. what i would like to do a make a motion to approve items 31 and 35 and table 30, 32, 33, 34, 36 and 37. >> councillor breed: seconded by supervisor tang. seeing no other names on the roster, madam clerk, please call the roll. >> councillor farrell: aye. >> councillor peskin: aye. >> councillor ronen: aye

there when it was removed in bosnia and herzegovina they're already small caliphates existing the reason that they're far from the cities and towns is that allows them to perform any covert activity they need in the fact that they're recruiting members means in the future there will be a big threat to europe the bosun in government try to curb the terrorist threat by making it illegal to fight for a foreign military and more than a dozen of those who have to turn from syria have been jailed well the country is also spending millions of euros and the radicalization projects but is it all working the local a mom says he fears for his life after speaking out till we do this is radical elements are always unpredictable these people prayed with its foreign force shawmut deep in ski i don't hear even the call. to john that he dropped on up there you go clean or can't you just shoot. me and took me home again and that means that you might have made things like what i and it's a bit of an obstacle for carving up the internet. and people with more meat while back that could more space did everybo

keep your majority's reasonable. that requires some mechanical devices. >> i think that concludes our time. thank you to the panel. [applause] >> all this week, washington journal is featuring authors of key books published during the year. join us for conversations with authors about their popular books. coming up this morning, author henry olson. tuesday, ken stern with "republican like me." on wednesday, angela j davis with her book "policing the black man." thursday, cliff stearns with his book, "life in the marble palace." war,iday, digital world islamist extremists, and the fight for cyber supremacy. on saturday, jessica bruder with her book, surviving america in the 21st century. sunday, "the gatekeepers." washington journal's authors series all this week at 8:00 a.m. eastern on c-span, c-span.org, and c-span radio. time at the white house looking at this year's holiday decorations and the lighting of the national christma

for whatever reason, they are sort of c&s targets.e situations which are sort of unfolding and people may see an opportunity to short sell those bonds. >> thank you so much for that. us sovereign issuance sliding at the fastest pace in almost two decades. why is that the case? we will try to find out as we head over to mumbai. that is next. >> indian markets just getting under way. the rupee pretty much unchanged. let's talk about, though, what is going on in india because it is a bumpy road for the government. we have rising inflation, higher oil prices, and this is converging on the indian bond space with a result, the deepest selloff in something like 17 years and the signs point to things getting worse here. .et's get to mumbai how far do investors see these bonds actually falling now? >> yeah, there seems to be no relief for bond traders right now. as you pointed out, there in the longest losing run since 2000, something like 10 out of 15 traders and strategist see bond yields rising from here. some see it rising as high as 7.5%.

i'm running a reasonably conventional portfolio. equities doing reasonably well.ill come under pressure. how am i balancing this worry out of my portfolio? rupert: the outlook for bonds is not good, although for many investors, particularly pension fund investors, they hold bonds for the purpose of protecting the value of the liabilities rather than from what they will return on their own right. the outlook for equities is ok. the global economy is growing strongly. corporate profits are growing strongly. we will begin in the kicker in the u.s. by the tax changes. i think that is likely to be a tail wind for equities this year. obviously, next year. and the year after. i am worried about bonds and a little bit worried about valuations in the u.s. as well. and if bonds were to selloff because of strong growth, but i don't think that matters enormously. a flight withas of higher inflation, and i'm not expecting high inflation, i'm just expecting inflation returns to target. i would expect some kind of wobble at some point next year. guy: if i'm thinking about my pen

the european union it britain is leaving the european union in two thousand and nineteen but the reason may just lost a key vote in her parliament so will the brakes that negotiations end up being just a rehearsal. brix it at some point in the future may need to be refilled. again. or we begin the day with the biggest trump over trump that the world have seen voters in the u.s. state of alabama last night elected a democrat as their new u.s. senator his name is doug jones now this was a political earthquake alabama is a republican stronghold and it hasn't sent a democrat to the u.s. senate in twenty five years voters rejected the republican candidate roy moore who was accused of sexually molesting teenage girls decades ago most republicans in congress had joined democrats in denouncing moore's candidacy but not us president donald trump he gave a full throated endorsement of moore and his advisors steve bannon went to alabama and declared the election another clash of the people against the establishment it didn't work the stunning loss plus trump's recent double entendre tweet attackin

we have a reasonably rapidly growing economy. we have a tightening regime from the fed. we have balance sheet normalization by the fed i don't know that we need the additional fiscal stimulus injected to the economy. >> by dangerous what do you mean, what could the fallout be? >> a rapid escalation in interest rates which the market is not prepared for. >> are we considering this question as much as we should be >> well. >> that seems intent on tightening rates. >> yeah. >> for the string of 2018. at the same time you've got a massive fiscal stimulus plan at the same time the fed is rolling down its balance sheet. >> right. >> while one could offset the other, it would be the optimistic way to look at it the good news for people who have the same concern that lee cooperman does it's not going to boost the economy. it will boost stock market, and it will be great for, you know, a lot of big corporations. we'll see if tends up being great for everyone else but probably no. we've got a couple of test cased where we can definitivelily point to and it didn't spell over the wa

as long as no tenants were displaced, it seem dos totally reasonable. we have a severe eviction crisis as the dr knows, so we're desperately in need of housing which is affordable. thanks. >> good evening, commissioners. -- thank you. my name is pat buskovitch. i'm a neighbor. i live at diamond and 23rd. i speak here on behalf of my family who lives at 22nd eureka and jersey and diamond. we live all around this. my family has been in this neighborhood for 30 years. this project is truly a creative request to develop four units on one lot with a second unit building in the back. they're going to take that two unit building and eadd an adu n an illegal office that's been there for years. they're going to take the front building and demolish it and building a mansion resulting in 6,000 square feet on one lot. i worry about allowing demolition of rental housing, that they refuse to acknowledge. housing that i looked at. this mcmansion will have negative impacted on the neighborhood, way out of the neighborhood scale. i drive down castro driving to my favori

of practical and theoretical reason. in other words, politics is in the realm of practical reason and prudence. science establishes how to practice politics. the end of philosophy, the end of politics is the beginning of rational rule. that is clear already in some places. ok, john and i have a difference. we agreed that a substantial part of the american population is dissatisfied with the current order. what i would add to that is that i think it is growing. there is a lot of anecdotal evidence out there that the very young people in their teens and 20's are turning against the contemporary consensus. i keep running across pieces of evidence on this on the internet and an interesting study by hispanic heritage on this. it is quite contrary about the views of young people. what's happening is, the elites have become more a more aggressive talking about how white people are worthless and need to go way and vanish. younger people, younger white people are saying i don't want to die. i'm going to stick up for myself and my

that is a perfectly reasonable thing to say. that they would have been -- in fact, the tacit types of support, irish people, like -- who were able to join up, he could not have -- the deal wasn't a bad deal, but lots of irish workers went to england and played a major role in war time production. it's perfectly reasonable to say it's the best thing that could happen, and given the divisions of irish society which britain is partly responsible for, you can't do better than that. but there is equally no doubt that thousands of british sailors died because the decision was made in 1938 to actually rewrite churchill's deal with collins, and give back the treaty port and naval facilities that britain had in ireland. and there's no question -- and churchill bitterly, bitterly denounced them. everything he says about that deal was justified. by the way, chamberlain, what's he motivated by, i want to send a signal to the germans. my signal is, we want to -- europeans used to say the british have an 800-year-old quarrel with ireland. let

tv.on katherine mangu-ward is editor of reason. ofek chibber is professor yorklogy at new university. activeson with a very fan base, and the editor of journal of, his latest and is post colonial theory capital.f bhaskar sunkara is the founder jacobin. publisher of [applause] we're going to begin by trying to define our terms. the first question, which is going to start with reason, what capitalism? >> thank you very much michelle. jacobin jayb debate.nizing this let's get it out the way. capitalism is a system that doesn't have any answers. it does not seek to impose answers to the question which should we produce, how should we produce it, who gets the stuff we produce. that kind of sounds like garbage. i will try to get little more nitty-gritty also in my answer. what that means in practice is that property is largely privately owned. means that profit provides incentive for production, it will.employment is at the government role in the economy should be limited and forces of supply and demand in a free market are the most effi

it was reasonable to say island is so divided politically. that's a reasonable thing to say. the deal wasn't a bad deal. really given the divisions of irish society which britain is partly responsible for, you can't do bert than that. there's no doubt that thousands of british sailors died because the decision was made by in the 1938 to actually rewrite churchills deal with collins. and give back troetty ports. the naval ports britain ha in ireland. no question churchill bitterly denounced it. everything he says about that deal was justified. chamberlain was motivated by. i want to send the signal sot germans. let's not have a war. that's a big part of chamberlains calculation. which churchill can see as bonus and not likely to work. this is the key thing even with who was the irish leader. he hated the most. because he regards him as having undone churchills deal. quite accurately. in 1953. and lady williams is here. kind enough to come she was there. when churchill our friendly meeting in 1953. in downing street. there was a certain type of low key reconciliation. so always

the reason i chose it is that's the word they used.n the 19th century -- i ignored it and ignored it and ignored it, and i realized if they were using this word over and over again, they meant something by it. it's not that the family didn't exist, but it was the home. home sweet home, the ang citi of the -- sanctity of the home. that's their word, not mind. that's why i used it so much. >> hi. during that time there was, like, at least one major financial panic. i think it was 1893. and how did that weave in with the gilded age, and do you see any parallels to today? >> there are three of them. there's 1873, 1883 and the big one is the one you got,1893. what the government will do is subsidize an economy, but there's very little regulation of that economy. so all of the economy, all of the depressions are, in a sense, going to be railroad depressions. not because it's all just the railroads, but because the railroads are big corporations. and the short version of this is it's much like the recent housing panic. credit is extended. the

in bosnia and herzegovina they're already small caliphates existing the reason that they're far from the cities and towns is that it allows them to perform any covert activity they need to in the fact that they're recruiting members means in the future there will be a big threat to europe the bosnian government try to curb the terror threat by making it illegal to fight for a foreign military and more than a dozen of those who have returned from syria have been jailed where the country is also spending millions of euros on the radicalization projects but is it all working the local a mom says he fears for his life after speaking out against those who joined eisel really with these radical elements are always unpredictable these people prayed with me the aid at the same table as me and they want to shoot me i saw defeat in syria and iraq will most likely drive its foreign fighters back home for many of them as we've just learned home means here a sleepy village in a reclusive area in the heart of europe works dream ism has already taken roots charlotte deep in ski r.t. bosnia and herz

yes a big win indeed it's not very often in this break that process that reason may and e.u. leaders get to celebrate something but that is exactly what has happened today the twenty seven heads of states have decided that they can rubber stamp a deal that was struck between negotiators what that basically says is that there's been sufficient progress on three key issues three issues that need to be decided in the so-called phase one of tools and those things are the divorce bill as it's called how much money the u.k. the e.u. on citizens rights is actually what happens to u.k. citizens living in europe in european citizens citizens living in the u.k. and on the northern ireland border what's going to happen after breaks it between northern ireland and its neighbor island which is still going to be in the in the e.u. so very complex issues it's been a very difficult road several attempts to reach an agreement on this failed in fact they were meant to reach an agreement here at the last summit in october and failed so big sighs of relief here today that finally they've done it

liberalism is of course the most important reason reigning corruption and could not cure it because she thinks that liberalism is to cure liberalism is the poison. in some american cities the police built themselves cling to refutation of people who walk on the streets of the united states who are at risk from the very people who are supposed to protect that poor people are no more afraid of police than of criminals. who can see something happening and this is like i don't want to call the cops let that happen rather than call the cops in those young black men lose their lives chasing the same goods on the trigger you never know better safe than sorry i don't know that someone else is going to pull a gun so. unfortunately around around here we end up killing our guns are stolen from such precautions true. spiritual people have been saying about redacted a night with the fact that it's full on awesome the only show i go out of my way to launch you know what it is that really packs a punch. yeah mr john oliver of harvey america is doing the same thing we are apparently better than two