in 2014 is that right >> it has to be reauthorized correct. we also have in propose 10 we've been award a grant from the federal government down to the california department of ed down to us which is part of the president obama's race to the top grant. we have about $50,000 that are for the cares plus and that's helping providers rise their quality. we also have a planned reserve for $8 million next year and a question. thank you for being here. t the letters reverse so overall did you have that somewhere? thank you. one other question related to supervisor mar said. we've seen a downward trend in revenues >> i think the highest we've got is 11 million i'm sorry. it's been about 9 million and our projections from the treasurer is t will continue to go down. i'll show you our projections. this is a little bit about our expenditures. i'm going to tell you a little bit more detail. last year on propose h. we spent the money 92 percent. the administration costs hoefrz r around this figure. well, i'll tell you for propose 10 it's about 15 percent f

coleman advocates is really committed to the reauthorization of these funds and protecting the investment in children and families. coleman along with margaret broadman decided to work closely with the process laura and maria laid out to engage community in these issues. the issue around in kind services, for instance, is actually concerning in terms of the double counting issue but

coleman advocates is really committed to the reauthorization of these funds and protecting the investment in children and families. coleman along with margaret broadman decided to work closely with the process laura and maria laid out to engage community in these issues. the issue around in kind services, for instance, is actually concerning in terms of the double counting issue but we knee there are going to be dozens of those coming up and looking forward to diving in deep so i wanted to thank you all. >> are there any other members that would like to speak on this item? seeing none, closing public comment. commissioner wynns. >> thanks. for the listening public we should say we interchangiblely use the term piece, the public education fund, and prop h >> thank you for the clarification. >> miss moran >> i wanted to mention we're really excited once we do the design with our stake holder council, which is from all

>> partly in response to commissioner avalos, i too worked on that campaign and that was the reauthorization. the first time, which i also worked on, i think it's important we think a little bit about the nature of both of these funding sources. they are -- and the first time it was, we put it on by collecting signatures for the children's fund, that was the little red wagon brigade here. so these, both of these funds are set asides or constraints on the city budget. and we are incredibly lucky and fortunate now, for which we are very grateful, that we have a mayor and an administration, a board of supervisors and a city that is so supportive of spending city dollars in this way. it's made an enormous difference for the school district and for our students which is, of course, the purpose. but i also think that we have to, as we are thinking about this, just sort of think about the fact that, 1, it can't be dependent on who the mayor is, who the superintendent is, who's on the board of education, who's on the board of supervisors. that's the whole purpose of the citizens to say this is our p

sure that we are, if we are putting this back to the voters that pre-k is a part of the prop h reauthorization that we have a really robust conversation about where is that funding actually gets allocated to. i know there's already been some reorganization and last year supervisor avalos and commissioner mendoza was a part of those conversations in terms of melding, if that's the right verb, hsa the 5 commission and dcyf because you serve our children 0 to 4 and we wanted more coordinated efforts there. so that's going to be really important to me. i don't know if there was going to be any comments on that. the second piece, i'm just going to bring up a number of different issues -- has become a discussion point, particularly here at city hall is in kind services and what that means. are we going to keep that in there, are we going to put in a target and kind of specify what that is? is it just something that really wasn't part, which i'm not going to say what the intention of that was, but i think we have to have a greater conversation about that. because now that we know what some of the kin

and children's fund status and reauthorization also sponsored by you. >> thank you. we do have a number of presenters here today on this item so first we do have chris armentrout about the newly detailed budget and detailing the expenditure and maria from dcyf, i want to thank you all for being here today. i know maria, you have been here for quite some time from another committee to this one. again, thanks to everyone for your patience and persistence. mr. armentrout. >> thank you, supervisor kim. my name is chris armentrout, director of planning of the san francisco school district and it's a pleasure to be here tonight. given our short time tonight i'm going to do a briefer version of this presentation, just get to the core of the matter and then move on to the presentation from warren miran and maria sue. what we wanted to do today, the real focus is talking about the process coming up but prior to that we wanted to be able to present a base line of where we were in terms of the update on the p funding, where the plan was and how it's being presented. want to tal

. >> and then the property expense plan reauthorization was moved to the next flood committee meeting, which is now on wednesday, april 24 at 4 o'clock so that is going to be moved because supervisor kim and her staff and some others are not going to be in town. and i won't be in town and there's -- we didn't -- and supervisor [inaudible] were not going to be in town so we didn't have quorum so we did a poll on the supervisor end to see what day they were going to be available so april 24, which is a wednesday at 4 o'clock was their availability. we wanted to check with the two of you to see if you could be available at that time as well. and at that meeting we will be covering summer programming so summer jobs, summer programs that will be coming up and the discussion on prop h and the children's fund are going to be part of that conversation as well. thank you. >> okay. we will move on to the report for curriculum and program. >> i would like to report on our march 4 meeting 'cause that's not here at the last school board /phaoetding to report on that. the theme of the meeting was o

. >> it has to be reauthorized - when it is reauthorized. >> the last thing in terms of prop 10 we've also had a reserve. and the commission has approved one year of funding so we'll be using our reserve so we can maintain our long term investment. you see our decline we know that in fiscal 16, 17 or 15, 16 we have a planned one million dollars cut but we're trying to fill in our reserve so we can maintain a level of funding. so we have - here's our participants. we have lots of children we served about 3 hundred thousand kids in preschool and this includes our infants and toddlers. the entertains benefit from our family support - >> mr. chair can i ask a question? >> actually, i really appreciate the strategic approach to the use of the state money and also the pop funds. but i want to ask about the back appealing of the state cuts like how much of that is coming from the prop h funds? that is coming from the prop h funds >> so covering 4 thousand children coming from the prop h fund -- i'm wondering about what i anticipate in the future as we backfill? and i'm wondering. >> i know w

has been been to adopt a conservative stance and require these permits come back to you to be reauthorized by you at a public hearing. what is suggested on your screen now is to get rid of that ambiguity and articulate that practice of hearing to occur. again this is not a change in policy, it is not a change in practice. it is only a clarification and in crease in certainty. the second policy is the stimulus policy which impacts the recessions and amounts of quality an approved by you along with a near certainty that you see from time to time. in a nutshell this policy would allow a policy issuance after a 3 year performance period has run. very importantly this is not an open-ended policy, it's not an open-ended program, we will be sending a 60 day program for project enrollment. in the program is only exist ing in that window and once enrolled the project would have 18 months to obtain the permits. the policy would not apply to project with clear commission mandated or code mandated time frames. and just one quick side to remind you on the numbers that under pineal of this, in the last

it implies at the same time that you have to come back for reauthorization but that you don't. but after a three year, it doesn't. >> you could come back to seek an extension and we could give it to you. >> correct, on a staff level we wouldn't be able to prove it after 5 years. >> could you do it after it says 3 years? >> no. there is no change in practice or policy. just to be blunt because we are often confronted with legal arguments. we think this is a good change. >> okay. i think it would be great to have even a clearer policy. it's 5 years, 3 years is too short. then you have to come back and it's automatically terminated. i guess there might be some legal issue with that. can a project be legally terminate within the five years without coming back that a policy be terminated after 5 years. >> deputy city attorney. there is case los angeles you that requires a due process hearing before a cu is revoked n certain circumstances where the commission makes findings, that for particular reasons a c u is granted for a season -- certain amount of the time that you are not aware

item 2 >> to hear the controls office and unified school district on the expenditure plan and reauthorization. >> when we had scheduled this item we had overlooked this is spring break week so many of the members from the districts are not here for this presentation so we have a request to continue this to the next agenda. are there any comments or questions? >> can we have a motion to continue this to those chair. madam clerk are there any other items? >> no further items. >> the >> there are kids and families ever were. it is really an extraordinary playground. it has got a little something for everyone. it is aesthetically billion. it is completely accessible. you can see how excited people are for this playground. it is very special. >> on opening day in the brand- new helen diller playground at north park, children can be seen swinging, gliding, swinging, exploring, digging, hanging, jumping, and even making drumming sounds. this major renovation was possible with the generous donation of more than $1.5 million from the mercer fund in honor of san francisco bay area philanthropist helen

item 2 >> to hear the controls office and unified school district on the expenditure plan and reauthorization. >> when we had scheduled this item we had overlooked this is spring break week so many of the members from the districts are not here for this presentation so we have a request to continue this to the next agenda. are there any comments or questions? >> can we have a motion to continue this to those chair. madam clerk are there any other items? >> no further items. >> the

item 2 >> to hear the controls office and unified school district on the expenditure plan and reauthorization. >> when we had scheduled this item we had overlooked this is spring break week so many of the members from the districts are not here for this presentation so we have a request to continue this to the next agenda. are there any comments or questions? >> can we have a motion to continue this to those chair. madam clerk are there any other items? >> no further items. >> the >> the renovation of balboa park, the oldest in the city of san francisco, and now it is the newest part in the city of san francisco. through our partnership, and because of public investment from the two thousand eight fund, we are celebrating a renewal and an awakening of this park. we have it safer, happier, more joyous. >> 3, 2, 1, [laughter] =--[applause] >> it is a great resource for families, to have fun in the city, recreation. >> this is an amazing park. we have not revitalized it without public and private investment. the critical piece of the process of this renovation was that it was all about the commu

i know what a personal victory it was to see him to see the violence against women act reauthorized last month. >> there's no woman like hillary clinton. hj hj -- and that's a fact. >> with gun legislation stalled, president obama hits the road today, colorado tries to boost public support, as a new poll shows, one in six americans want stricter gun laws. >>> from the appalachian trail to the comeback trail. in victory former governor mark sanford thanks the woman he ran off with, now his fiancee. >> i thank you, is guess to my fiancee for her long suffering, as she put up with me being on the road for more than just a few months. >>> it is official, 24 hours after a mutual tease on late night, nbc has just announced jimmy fallon will be replacing jay leno after his 22 years in the chair of that iconic program. in addition, the show will move to new york, and will be executive produced by snl's award-winning e.p. >>> i'm live in washington where two titans shared a stage, stirring up a lot of talk last night about that their political futures, hillary clinton and vice president joe biden

so i hope that we can keep that in mind and now that it's a reauthorization not make it too kind of city hall centered. the second question i had was how we would involve members of the board, either board, in that process as well so we can be engaged in that discussion. >> for our board this is something that we will be angendizing on what we call our committee of the whole where we can talk about things, you know, not in a formal board meeting but have more of a dialogue about that and get input. we can also bring things back to this group and maybe you can talk about the city side. >> well, for dcyf, we have a citizen advisory committee and we are engaging them, particularly the may 3rd event. we're hoping some of our cac members would be able to be there so they can also learn about both funds. i would be more than happy to come back to this committee or to meet with supervisors and commissioners individually and find out how we can work together. >> i think it would be good to reach out to members of our board as well to see if any of us are interested in engaging in that conversati

first, we should reauthorize nics so the grassley-cruz amendment reauthorizes nics improvement act, and the grants to states provided therein to provide for the states if they provide mental health records. the amendment codifies one of president obama's executive orders that requires the attorney general to issue guidance to federal agencies about which records they must submit to nics. it improves nics as well by clarifying the definition of -- quote, unquote -- "adjudicated mental incompetent" so that it includes only actual adjudications, not a single psychiatrist's diagnose -- diagnosis. the manchin-toomey amendment does not do that. mental health records would also be improved by requiring the federal courts to make available to nics information concerning such situations as defendants who plead guilty to a crime for the reason of insanity. this approach is consistent with what "the washington post" columnist cortland molloy writes this very day. he says -- quote -- "the national gun control legislation set for debate in congress would rely on a bureaucratic dragnet of background

know, i was one of the individuals, or many individuals who not only wrote prop b, but help to reauthorize prop k which is what you are working with now and what i told you last year before you went on, before you went on your summer recess, and i am going to tell you again. i suggest that all of you read the final report of the geary transit traffic force report that was published back in 1990. and also, you read, you also get a copy of the final, the final, findings that were made in 1995. and on a right rail transit system on geary boulevard. as far as the brt is concerned, i attended the workshops and started thinking that a lot of people are asking, what about light rail? we want light rail. and that is what the people voted for back in 1989. that was grandfathered into prop k and as far as the transit report, and as far as the transit i am on the chair for the subcommittee as well to figure out what to do in the future, i told them last week at the subcommittee that you should look into see what prop b was in prop b. and what was completed, and what was left to be done. and was grand

and i think the time should come, especially since we're looking forward to a reauthorization, when the board should have a discussion at some time about the priorities so we had a big discussion about what student support means. there's a lot of presumption and earlier during the time that it was passed and our discussion over the years, that it means social and emotional support services that are not academic. and now the question of support for academic initiatives is before us and i am inclined to say that i'm supportive of the budget we have now and i think that means i'm saying okay, i think we should see what this looks like. see if we can kick start some of these things, but i don't think we have had a discussion about what we need. about academic support and if we think this is the right money to do that. as i said last week, and i will reiterate that in part because, just like we have youth money from the third third, which is thankfully in a time of horrible crisis. i think over time in resent years what i've seen is that this seems to be kind of automatic pilot process where

i know what a personal victory it was for him to see the violence against women act reauthorized last month. >> there is no woman like hillary clinton. hillary clinton, that's a fact. >> biden knew this as well. it was clear this was a clinton crowd. >> we have shared struggles and successes and even fox holes over the years. it's a little bit like a family reunion. >> clinton clearly aware of her legacy and talked about her time as secretary of state and appointing the first ambassador for global women's rights. >> our unwavering faith in the potential, the untapped potential of women and girls is at the heart of the work we have done together. when i became secretary of state i was determined to weave this perspective into the fabric of american foreign policies. we did put women on the agenda and made it a centerpiece of all that we did. >> meanwhile biden presented an award to three brothers who founded an organization to fight human trafficking in india was well-received and feeling like the underdog in the room, perhaps by an overcompensated a bit. he ad libbed a joke about his

violence and i know what a personal victory it was for him to see the violence against women act reauthorizedmonth. >> and then the vice president returned the favor. >> there's no woman like hillary clinton. hillary clinton, that's a fact. >> it has everyone talking in 2016. here we go. joining me now, patricia murphy of citizen jane politics and thanks to you both for being here tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> my pleasure. >> patricia, let me start with you. let the hillary speculation begin. what do you make of her reaction last night? >> i think the reaction in that room was exactly the reaction of democrats across the court and democrats in washington. i talked to a number of different democrats today to ask them what they thought if you sort of put hillary against uncle joe, who do you want to see in there. democrats i talked to, their top three choices are hillary, hillary, and hillary. they want her to run and she will freeze the field staffers that don't want to join another campaign, donors that want to give another dollar until they know if she's going to get in it. this is he

in 2008 explicitly legalized much of the surveillance going on and president obama who recently reauthorized law agreed. that makes drake as worried as ever. he believers president obama has used that power even more aggressively than the man democrats accused of shredding the constitution, george w. bush. >> i have had private conversations with people who used to work in the bush administration the reaction is whoa we wouldn't have gotten away with half of what the obama administration is doing. >> the regime has expanded. >> far less transparent than the bush administration? >> yes. >> that's another reason why pen benny and drake have been critics of the data certainty. >> the question is what are they doing with it, what are the controls, what are the over sites? >> one man hopes to answer it the current director of the national security agency, general keith alexander. when he declined request to sit down with us for an interview we sat down with the a washington think tank where he was speaking at a cyber security event. >> will the utah data center hold the data of american citizens?

we were able to pass the reauthorization of the violence against women act. it's ok. you can clap. biden is on the board of a service that provides services to victims of violence and helps with everything from getting protection orders to divorce and child custody. 800 lawyers in d.c. volunteered to do this. it is an amazing project. it brought to home how important the laws are but they will only be as good as the reporting mechanisms and the poor systems women have. women is a victim. this is not someone else's problem is ours. >> another question. jill. >> jill lawrence from national journal. one of the priorities is implementing the national care act. there have been articles about business is having problems -- that are small and would grow and are waiting to see what happens but may not decide to grow because it may be too onerous . do they have legitimate complaints? what does the white house plan for dealing with the glitches that will happen as this is implemented? >> there is a piece of legislation. there will be glitches at the white house and through kathleen sebelius'

this is a reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act. -- no child left behind act. this does raise questions and problems in numerous educators of notes. culture ofated a conversation, which meant we were now all talking about this issue. you have all children being successful. i think the problem has come in with the rules and regulations around it. the stress on test scores. the pressure they put on teachers to bring up the touch scores. >> how you're going to do in school based on the way you look or which group you belong to, and we know because of our predictions that it will come true. then we're doing it wrong. >> many schools face a lack of materials. numerous glasses have been cut and teachers laid off. >> all you have to do is work into -- walk into one school district around the country and see around the country it thousand educators have lost their jobs. art and music and physical education. the courses kids need for science and math. she has been teaching for 17 years as a school administrator. is assistant principal teaching as an english teacher in t

violence and i know what a personal victory it was for him to see the violence against women act reauthorizedast month. >> there is no woman like hillary clinton. [applause] [cheers and applause] >> hillary clinton -- that's a fact -- whose declaration in china some decades ago that women's rights are human rights still echos so forcefully around the world nearly two decades later. >> shepard: campaign carl cameron live in the d.c. newsroom. man, they are good buddies for future potential rivals. they go way back. >> they do. they have known each other and worked with nun another as joe biden said literally for decades. hillary clinton will turn 69 right before the 2016 election and joe biden would turn 74, a couple of weeks afterwards. clinton is already beginning to fill her calendar. she will start getting paid speeches later this month in texas. then in june she is going to give a big economic speech in the battleground industrial state of michigan. last night at this event demonstrators were outside. including some from a new super pac called ready for hillary which boasts 100,000 member

i know what a personal victory it was for him to see the violence against women act reauthorized. >>here's no woman like hillary clinton. [ applause ] hillary clinton. that's a fact. ♪ fall in love, why shouldn't we fall in love ♪ [ engine sputters ] [ dennis ] allstate wants everyone to be protected on the road. whether you're an allstate customer or not. all you have to do is call. [ female announcer ] call and sign up for good hands roadside assistance today. [ dennis ] are you in good hands? olay ultra moisture body wash can with more moisturizers than seven bottles of the leading body wash. with ultra moisture your body wash is anything but basic. soft, smooth skin with olay. diarrhea, gas, bloating? yes! one phillips' colon health probiotic cap each day helps defend against these digestive issues... with three strains of good bacteria. [ phillips' lady ] live the regular life. phillips'. >>> stay with us. the day's top lines are coming up. p in mind. unbiased. some brokerage firms are. but way too many aren't. why? because selling their funds makes them more money. which makes

issues and i know what a personal victory it was for him to see the violence against women act reauthorizedthere's no woman like hillary clinton. hillary clinton -- and that's a fact -- >> they shared the stage at the kennedy center. will they be sharing a debate stage in just a couple of years? we'll get into that just a little bit. let me welcome back our roundtable, george will again, greta van susteren from fox news, ariana huffington of the huffington post. david stockman, former reagan budget director. and paul krugman. of the "new york times." paul, let me begin with you on these economic numbers. the jobs numbers that came out on friday, only 88,000 jobs created last month. 500,000 people left the work force, is this a sign of one of these another spring swoon? >> it could be. one month's numbers doesn't mean much. it might be revised up. yeah, i mean, what people forget, is two things. one, we say we avoided the fiscal cliff. but to a larger extent we did not. payroll taxes went up. we had a pretty big hit to working people's incomes starting in january. the other thing is sequeste