>> reback: they closed the case. correct. >> kroft: the f.t.c.'onduct could be addressed with voluntary improvements to some of its business practices, and that google's decision to move its own products to the top of the search page could plausibly be of benefit to consumers. but reback and others who were directly involved in the investigation have long suspected that the outcome had something to do with google's political muscle in washington, and its close relationship with the obama administration. google spent more money on lobbying last year than any other corporation, employing 25 different firms and helping fund 300 trade associations, think tanks and other groups, many of which influence policy. >> reback: they have a seat at the table in every discussion that, that implicates this issue at all. they know about developments that we never even hear about. so their influence, from my perspective, is very, very difficult to challenge. >> kroft: until now, the only one taking aggressive action against google and big tech is margrethe vestage