that was not attacked by a bolt-ribentrope and wants it both negative characters but at least uh, rebbentropepresentative of the party that independently made the decision about the violation of the fact, uh, in this case, lukashenko is not even an independent person . that is, if it were a matter of some kind, then the decision about his violation would have been made in the kremlin, and uh lukashenko cannot influence this in any way, so he is really discussing it, but he is concerned with a certain fate with skepticism, since you understand very well that lukashenko himself cannot give any guarantees in this case, eh , we heard from lukashenko himself such and such the statement that the russian federation is at war in ukraine with 50 countries of the world and actually resists there for the sake of its own security. now we are talking about the fact that there are some facts about the attack from ukraine. is this narrative different from the russian one? belarus is expecting an attack from ukraine or a nato attack on belarus. here, too , an interesting moment is absolutely no different, a

who was rebbentrop there? in the stands , no one is going to save me, the current fourth reich, as correctly written by margarit, the son of simonyan, will now put tanks, and by summer, chokers, gas chambers, he is confusing something because ribbentrop just fraternized with the soviet union and signed joint agreements on what to divide the whole world with poland in general. so it is very, very much not about that, well, in relation to the gas chambers, the russians actually already had plans and, in principle, they planned to filter 2 million ukrainians from the beginning in the camps and then destroy them there to send somewhere to plant and all these plans were announced well, you see, somehow everything went wrong if you think that of course there were non- nuclear threats . once upon a time, it’s not very much. well, it’s just like that. well, in passing, it can be said more like a statement of some such fact. so, look at the leopard 2a 6, then serious tanks for consumption, i’m serving in the internet v

this is how rebbentrop did it. it has now done. she's all out now and try somehow. be called , she will find it as an excuse. don't worry, today's program will be reflected in the nearest yellowish yellow sheets everywhere. and now the question of aircraft. what to do with planes? and schultz, as it were, declared that there would be no planes of any kind, she said, maybe there will be a distraction man who loves him very much. i don’t know how vitali’s friend treats her, but she said categorically categorically. no, we will not supply any aircraft. well, too, they, too, they are given distractions. before that, she also waged war with russia, this is a woman. the same fear. she wants to like it at a time when they are all talking about the fact that there will be no planes today , they will publish ntv information by accident, apparently, let it slip, and our defense industry should do very well. make money because ukraine will need hundreds of tanks, hundreds of tanks, for the first time it sounded today, when ntv writes this, they rely on something. i don't think