commissioners deliberation or rebutal? 3 minutes for rebutal for the appellate. >> thank you. it is a fundalmental question that needs to be considered is does the commission want to be involved in the determination in the future. is this something dealt with as a [inaudible] or something the commission should be decide or wants tobe deciding as aimateer of its possible and until that determination is made proceeding on the ad hoc determination is a [inaudible] how future cases are handled and without having consulted the commission in the first place. i think that is a dangerous course for the city to be marching towards and strongly disagree with mr. [inaudible] characterization of what they did in berkeley with the same set of rules. the problem with calling this due process for the owner is there are penalties available under the health and safety codes and tenants claims as a result of us allegely not paying the proper amount and didvent guide ens in the first place of what we are spaunl for. that is due process is understanding the rules. when you buy a piece of property

they normally have 7 minutes so it is 14 minutes and then 6 minutes rebutal >> i think that is probably better in the interest of time. >> in addition we will also be hearing case number 6813 for 9308940 nob hampshire street [inaudible] attorney [inaudible] issuing order of abatement [inaudible] existed before the purchase of property and working to repair condition and waiting approval from dbi. palt argues all work has been performed. for the record each site-side gets 7 minutes for a presentation but now get 14 minutes and. >> thank you members of the board. reez maer [inaudible] chief housing instreckt specter. we are looking at appeal item 6812 and 6813 regarding 938-940 hampshire street. this is a 2 unit building over a basement and this particular-these appeals before you are related to notices of violation issued early january of this year, specifically january 21 and 22 of this year. the first item contained in that is appeal 6812, contained appreciately 20 items that dealt with maintenance throughout the building. in your staff reports you see a series of photo's that show the

is finally moving back into her family home, when her house was destroyed by the storm she tried to rebut -- rebuild but the contractor took her lifesaving. >> they got money and tried to rebuild but the materials were substandard. >> she finally turned to nonprofit st. bernard project for help. >> you have to take your loss and do what you're going to do with it. how you're going to move forward. >> st. bernard project is a labor of love started by liz mccartney and her husband zack. they were living in washington, d.c.,, they went to volunteer and never went home. >> i was unprepared for what i saw, i didn't think it could be that bad. when we got here i was so shocked. >> they have expanded the nonprofit into other states hoping to go nationwide. >>> santa rosa junior college is on edge after a rape on campus. the woman who reported the rape said it was 9:00 at night last thursday in the restroom. students are warned to take precautions. >> you can't predict where an assailant will be a predator. you have to be vigilant be abouting awear. >> i go through the lit areas on campus as long

john sununu kept rebutting these objections and finally john sununu became irritated, began speaking in a controlled voice but want to wait to more impassion jones. every time i say something you bring something up. i don't want to hear from you any more. -sitting between them was shuffling his papers trying to affect how to defend his own aid when kennedy jumped to his feet, his bulky frame crating seismic jolt as they crashed against the table. the hours of negotiation, years of maneuvering to get this bill through congress were taking their toll. harkin remembered i thought kennedy was going to grab john sununu by the court. kennedy pointed at him and said you want the let anybody you yell at me or senator harkin, not the staff, go after the big boys. you got something to say, say it to me. the moment was discussed, he suggested the rim be cleared of all staff and only elected members of congress should stay. kennedy's response, i said fine. he was staff. that seems to quiet things down. kennedy sat back as awkward silence filled the room. john senden u.s. normally robust frame se

but he kept rebutting these kind of objections and he began to get irritated. he spoke to silverstein in silverstein in a controlled voice but worked his way up to the more impassioned tones. every time i see something you bring something up. i don't want to hear from you anymore. harkin, sitting between silverstein and kennedy was shoveling his papers trying to think how to defend his own aid when he jumped to his feet his frame created a seismic jolt as they crashed against the table. the hours of negotiation and the years of maneuvering to get a bill through congress were taking their toll. i thought kennedy was going to grab him by the collar. he pointed his finger at his face is that if you want to yell you yell at me or senator harkin. you don't go after the staff. you go after the big boys. if you have something to say safe to me. in a moment of disgust he then suggested that the room be cleared of their staff and elected members of congress tuesday. his response, i said fine. his face was drained of color in - i was reading this from so many people. tha

state your point of view as forcefully as you can and that i'm going to have my turn in trying to rebut it. but you will have your say and i think i've been able to build up that trust to get that people to come on camera. host: why spend the first 20 pages on solomon sees. guest: i think he's a very influential person, at the time it looks like he was it turns out he was the strategic mastermind of what could be called the new strategy of matter and is him and the democratic party. he happens to have been the mentor of the current pres. barack obama and also hillary clinton. here's what i mean, obama comes to america he starts making it in a sense his home in chicago, this is after his growing up years in hawaii and indonesia. why chicago? he he has no roots in chicago but the linsky organizing was based in chicago and he was the go to man a community organization. you have the remarkable irony that this man a linsky almost a generation after his death could be the guiding influence on two successive presidents of the united states. host: and and that your views that dangerous. guest:

those famous white house aides, interestingly, he installed those tapes to rebut kissinger. the reason why put the states and left another record so that he could rebut kissinger's history of -- version of history. nixon wanted the record on things like going to china. going to china was not kissinger's idea. it was nixon's idea. in fact, when alderman told kissinger and nixon won to go to china, kissinger's response in 1969 was quote fat chance. now, the tapes are terrible. a lot of you have heard excerpts of them. they don't live. nixon said terrible, vile things. racist things. but i've listened a lot of the states, hundreds of hours of these tapes. my strong impression is a lot of this was posturing on nixon's part. this kind of awful big macho men think there is that kind of unusual for the. and that type of certain mail mastership what a man he is by swearing a lot. the swearing was no more swearing that happens today at the "washington post" why work. but there was an arrogance there. and yet it contrasts with his coolness at other times. when he's talking to world le

he's got to hire a team of lawyers to try to rebut this. his son also had some legal issues a year ago almost to the day, has been charged with federal tax evasion and lying about a student loan that apparently is embroiled in a repayment by his dad, allegedly. so is it a father/son issue here, renee? what is the backstory here? >> the backstory, first, is very sad. let me be very clear about that. fattah has done something for his community. and they have some mixed messages and feelings, also, about this whole thing. but that's gonna override, you know, because of this whole piece. and the father and son have done some negative things, and people are not happy about it, and it's very damaging to who they are and what they're about. and so this is gonna be an ongoing thing. and to me, it's an uphill battle. and you're absolutely right, larry. i hate to agree with you, but, you know, you're innocent until proven guilty, you know, and so we have to wait and see. but he's gonna have a real difficult time, 'cause these things are very serious.

candidates called out by name gets 30 seconds to rebut. will be questions submitted through facebook. about 100 questions have been prepared. half of which will be asked. that's going to be tough with so many candidates. for candidates who run over time, fox news is considering replacing the desk bell ding sound with the cavaliers shot clock buzzer. >> they should do the three point thing as well. >>> some clinton/trump intrigue. word of a private conversation with donald trump and bill clinton just before trump announced he is running for president. the aide confirmed that the former returned the trump call in late may. said the race was not discussed, but an ally told the post that the mogul discussed an interest in the run for the white house and clinton responded. trump's team declined to comment. his opponents are starting to make hay that trump has ties to the clintons. the clintons went to trump's third wedding. he has donated to many causes. >> didn't he say the economy does better. >> he did. taxing those who make more than $10 mi

. >> reporter: sharrie and monica, officials say they still expect to find more teb rebut for now based on that one piece recovered so far they are finding out more than ever before about that doomed flight. 515 days after malaysia airlines flight 370 vanished one of the biggest aviation mysteries is partially solved. >> i must say that the debris found on reunion island is indeed from mh 370. >>al asian officials confirming that the plane missing since may of last year went down in the indian ocean, after analyzing this boeing 777 part discovered on reunion island last week. >> it's my hope this confirmation however tragic and mainful will at least bring certainty not famliz and loved ones of the 239 people on board but no cause on what caused the plane to go down. investigators in toulouse, france, will continue to scour that wing for chemical and other residue. >> was there puncture marks. >> and they are looking at barnacles to see where the mh 370 went down in the indian ocean. >> and officials are not going as far as to confirm that that part was definitely from the missing plane,

they have 30 seconds to rebut roughly speaking and this is our telecast and we'll do with our telecastat's necessary. i'm not worried about donald trump now. i'm not concerned that he's going to do something reckless. i take him at his word. >> maybe you want it pause it will be better for ratings and the whole buzz thing. >> the great thing about being a nerd i don't have to worry about all that other stuff and it turns out fox news is a pretty profitable enterprise whatever donald trump does. >> there's been enormous attention and some criticism to fox using national polling averages to limit the primetime debate not the first one, to the top ten, but isn't even having ten people on a stage going to be somewhat unwielding for a debate that's a television show in terms of how much time everyone can get? >> sen is more than eight, eight is more than four and four is up with two and you end up with two next year next fall as the people choose between the candidates of two parties. >> is it more of a challenge? is it it's more of a challenge to deal with ten than eight. we're heard a lot

as somebody who does not make comments that can be easily reb rebutted, as somebody who can responsibilitily take on hillary clinton. and, look, he is the beneficiary of this. right now, donald trump is silencing almost all the opposition to the leading republican -- the real leading republican candidate, which is jeb bush. so i don't think he wants to get him out of the race. i disagree fundamentally about asking him whether he would run as a third party. he might very well answer that question in a way that might lock him in and create a terrible problem for the republican party as a democrat, i would be very happy with that. but as a strategist, i would not ask him that question. i would, essentially, not ignore him, but i would try to show myself by comparison to be much more of a statesman. >> what if he's the only guy throwing zingers up there. aren't the other candidates going to look pretty wimpy? >> you can't look for tomorrow's headlines. the first primaries don't occur for mons. you have to think about what's going to happen in the months to come. everyone if you lose the headline

now, we didn't know they were saying this because they did this in secret, so we couldn't rebut it.nd you only learn about it if you go into the documents and you see the documents and you see what they were prepared to say to the grand jury and what they did say to the house committee staff. when the people went to prove it, remember nixon is not on trial. he's already resigned. this was the only effort to get him so they sought to prove the theory and as you get in the book, the watergate scandal, it documents how their own witnesses wouldn't go that way, and the words out of the witness' mouths unproved the allegation. you didn't know about the allegations because it was rendered in secret. they successfully driven him from office and we're none the wiser. that's what they did to our president. what did they do to the staff? remember, the president has resigned. the trial start in october after the august resignation. this week is the anniversary of the resignation. the cover-up trial start in october, but the prosecutors know they need convictions because if somebody gets acquit

they won't even get to rebut unless someone specifically asks -- calls out their name. >> every debate your cnn debate coming up next months a different rules and regulations and that's part of the process. you go about each one looking at how you use your time wisely and you take your win to answer the question and you have a concise answer that addresses the issues and when you have the opportunity to rebut, you jump in there and do so. but all the debates are different. every candidate up there is more than anything they're thankful for the opportunity to get their message out. they have been campaigning across the country in iowa and new hampshire and south carolina talking about voters and talking with people about what's important to them. they will share it on the stage. it will be a much much larger audience. >> in governor huckabee's mind who is the person to beat on that stage tonight? >> it's about him. he's up there for himself to get his message out there. he doesn't look at any of the other candidates. that's not a factor in how he prepares -- >> really? >> absolutely. an

candidates called out by name get 30 seconds to rebut. the american public will ask questions submitted through facebook. the new york times reports 100 questions have been prepared. half of which will get asked. for candidates who run over time fox news is considering replacing the desk bell ding sound with the cavaliers shot clock buzzer. >> if you get a slam dunk, the crowd does an standing ovation. >>> and clinton/trump intrigue. a clinton aide confirmed to cnn that the former president returned a trump call in may. he said the 2016 race was not discussed, but an ally told the washington post that the mogul discussed the interest in the white house run and clinton stopped responded. >> he loves to talk about politics and policy. >> you talk about running for anything with anyone. you want to run for school board or dog catcher, clinton would tell you how. this shows trump has had a relationship with the clintons many times. this could come up tonight. >>> a break through in the search for flight 370. according to the prime minister of

and this was very difficult testimony to rebut. >> as jensen cross-examined the state's blood expert,ent through the testimony and made a key discovery. evidence lists showed elmore's pants had passed through eight different people before the trial. >> i jumped out of my chair. i start whispering to chris jensen, ask him what this means and who these people are and what that is supposed to represent. >> one name on the list jumped out at diana. thomas henderson was a state police agent who grew up across the street from dorothy edwards and james holloway and was friendly with both. >> tom henderson had nothing to do with forensic investigation at all. nothing. he wasn't supposed to be involved in the case anyway because these were people he knew his whole life long. >> there was really no reason for him to have removed these things from the laboratory. we were arguing that this evidence had in all likelihood been tampered with and quite conceivably that mrs. edwards' blood had been put on the garments. >> it would now be up to judge kinard to rule whether or not elmore deserved a new

. >> clinton's camp rebutted the attack.ior adviser telling reporters, this is a pretty bold attempt to rewrite history and reassign responsibility. they cannot be allowed to escape responsibility for the real mistake here. they might hope we'll all forget, but the american people remember. jeb bush has stumbled on the question of iraq and whether he would have invaded the country knowing what we now know, he said he wouldn't, but politico reports of jeb bush's 21 named foreign policy advisers, 17 worksed in his brother's white house. and jeb has said his brother is a top adviser. so why is he going after hillary on such a risky topic? jamelle bouie, a staff writer for slate. eliana johnson, for the national review. zeke, you know he's got to address it in some way at some point in this campaign. iraq looms so big over the debate. the name bush is always going to be attached to the iraq war. jeb has to say something. but this strategy of saying the key moment in time everyone should remember is u.s. troops leaving at the end

they have 30 seconds to rebut roughly speaking.cast so we will do what is necessary. i am not worried about donald trump now. i am not concerned he is going to do something reckless. i --. >> maybe you want him do be on the debate because it is better for ratings? >> i don't wore about that stuff and fox news is a profitable enterprise whatever donald trump does. >> this is enormous attention and criticism too tore follow using national polling averages to limit the prime time debate, not the first one, to the top ten. isn't having continue people on a stage going to be somewhat difficult for a debate that is a division show in terms of how much time? >> obviously sure, ten is more than eight. eight is more than four, four is more than two and you have two next year. you have two next fall as people choose between the candidates of two parties. >> is it more of a challenge? >> of course more to do ten than eight. we have heard a lot of complaints and suggestions some of them offered constructively, you audit to do these polls state

how does he rebut those kinds of climbs in light of what mr. christie has just indicated?ms very odd for jeb to focus on the withdrawal from iraq, the beginning of the withdrawal from iraq which was a date set by his brother. it was even odder for him to make this the focal point of his campaign right now. he floundered in the debate, he hasn't been able to recover from missteps about american workers needing to work harder. turning to foreign policy, i think most americans remember the bush doctrine very well. they remember the years that we had under bush. they remember the cowboy diplomacy, and they're not looking at all for a return back to that. so i'm curious to see where, if at any place, jeb distances himself from his brother's policies. the last time he was asked about it, he said even know -- even if he knew then what we know now, he still would have invaded iraq which is no position that anyone in the republican holds right now. this is a curious place for him to be going if he's trying to draw support and attention. >> given the analysis that jess has just offe

they will also have 30 second time limit to rebut anybody who says anything specific about them by namethat's why it's going to be difficult with all those people on the stage, even though it will be two hours. is. >> jeff, you have next to donald trump in this debate jeb bush. this is a big night for him. even though he isn't the front-runner and he's trailing donald trump considerably, how much pressure is he under to have a strong performance? >> i think he's around fair bit of pressure. he needs to show that he is the leading alternative, the mature republican, perhaps, in the room. that he's the person who is -- you know, he's so familiar with the white house, of course, having a father and brother in the white house but he has to show he has fire in his belly. he's very good in the town hall format. dana's seen him out there. we all three have. he answers questions after question. but this is a different format. this is a quick format and he's not always as succinct as his rivals so this is a big moment for him. he won't change who he is. he's a substantive candidate and that's wh

the arguments don't work absent someone to rebut them on some give and take, so that just sounded like lesson that was, i hate to say it, but it was boring. >> robert costa, the audience was forbidden from actually having demonstrative actions, clapping or anything like that. so we don't know how that comment played with the audience. but is that something that works or will work in this republican primary for lindsey dwram to go back 20 years to bill clinton's scandal material? >> perhaps. i mean, you look at senator graham, carly fiorina, some of the candidates in the lower tier of the polling. they keep testing out these lines about secretary clinton because threy think that's the way to the stop. i was more struck by the planned parent hood comments. this is a party that wants to avoid the culture war, yet they are in lock step in opposition to planned parenthood. you see the revive on the social conservative issues. and most interesting is that donald trump, he says he is pro life, but he used to be pro choice, and he's not becoming a cultural warrior in the way many of his counte

much of it from the stated defense rule where if a candidate gets mentioned he gets 30 seconds to rebut any accusations. another candidate got the most questions. jeb bush got eight by my count. he got a few tough questions. here are some of the snippets from three of his answers. >> i'm going to have to earn this. maybe the barrier -- the bar is even higher for me. that's fine. i've got a record in florida. i'm proud of my dad and i'm certainly proud of my brother. knowing what we know now with faulty intelligence and not having security be the first priority when we invaded, it was a mistake. i don't believe the federal government should be involved in the creation of standards directly or indirectly. the creation of curriculum or content. that is clearly a state responsibility. >> how did he do? >> i think he locked down his common core answer even the conservatives said okay that was a pretty good answer. if that's where jeb bush says he is on local standards but at least make those standards high and here's the reason why because we need to be able to compete i think he locked down

tomorrow the timer is on and they're limited to a minute a piece and 30 seconds to rebut if somebody calls them out. for donald trump, it's a huge deal. as the frontrunners. they're always the big target and have the most to lose since they're at the front of the pack. trump has to show he can be credible and respect the office and have the kind of demeanor that's worthy of somebody who will have their finger on the button. in second place is jeb bush. the father and son of the last two republican presidents. he has to prove he's his own man something he's been saying over and over. he has to show there's a fire in that belly. a lot of republicans see him as tame compared to trump as well as the rest of the field. another guy to watch is scott walker. he's been polling in third place. sometimes tied with bush for second. the wisconsin governor is very popular in the leadoff caucus state of iowa and will need to show across the country that his appeal can extend past the heartland and get to some of those yankees in new hampshire and the south in south carolina. a long way to go. they

>> the context in which he used it, anchor babies as they are sometimes described, basically it rebutting what donald trump has talked about, which is denying citizenship to these people, something that jeb bush has rejected. no disrespect to mrs. clinton, but she's got problems of her own. i can understand why she would want to distract people to some invented problem. but nobody has a bet errored on the issue of immigration than governor bush does, he's laid out plans for comprehensive reform for a long time and he has really pushed back against this trend that trump is leading in the republican party, trying to very restrictive immigration policy. >> it can't be good for him that he has to deal with donald trump putting the party much further to the right than they wanted to be after the 2012 autopsy when they got started? >> look, i think bush is right where he needs to be on the immigration issue. i'm very proud of that. i would agree with you, i'm a little concerned about what trump is doing to the whole republican party as i listen to how other republican candidates, not governor b

>> i'm going to go continue the conversation i rebutted tim with his facebook. i went to utilities. and it's southern. sl. i used to be in it. i'm not in it currently. but it yields over 5%. the stock has been up over the last month and a half or so, 10%. obviously it got pummeled with the rest of the market but on a relative basis when the s&p was sideways to down 2% this one was up 10%. that to me sounds safe. >> karen? >> if you want to go something safe and boring something like a pfizer, which we do own, this is not going to knock your socks off like a biotech to the up side or the down side. not so expensive. fantastic balance sheet. nice dividend yield. 3.7%. it's a place to hide out. >> seaburg. >> i think there's a lot of fear obviously through this turmoil about people at home with volatility. i look at it and say splv is a way for you to invest in the s&p 500 lowest volatility names. the performance there is a little bit lower than what you see in the overall s&p. but the lowest volatility names if you can sleep well at night by allocating a certain percentage of your por

this is one i can't rebut. the excuse is, "well, i have the time. i know what to do, and i don't care about being controversial. but i can do it and nothing will happen because the big boys will decide." now, that's the prescription of dropping out of democracy. that's the ultimate surrender. and we should try to avoid that with our friends and our neighbors. because in so many ways, if we don't do it for ourselves, we have to do it for our children. and in so many ways, this concept of fair play, where people live and work, and the concept of the golden rule, which is trans-cultural, bring people who are divided at abstract ideological levels together in the pursuit of what senator daniel webster many decades ago called "justice, which is the great work of human beings on earth." i'll leave it at that for a discussion. thank you very much. [applause] >> good evening. and i'm just delighted to have this conversation with you, mr. nader. and welcome to all of you this evening. we are gonna have a conversation. and then we're gonna open up to question

at new muppet show rebutted coming to and other network. so here in this city, it is cool, a summer tradition, seeing movies in the public parks. i did this last summer in queens. dr. strangelove lucy the sea boat -- rosanna: all over that city. guardians of the galaxy played in corona park. rosanna: when harry met sally in queens, pretty in pink. bring a share or a blanket. keep you off the grass until 5:00 and sago and everybody runs for a spot. greg: the opera in central park. it is not that bad. rosanna: head to myfoxny.com where you will find the information. greg: take a look at the 15s instagram in new york. they have been so decreed by readers of the new york post. that story over the weekend. rosanna: the one you would have rated rosanna: christina, thanks for saying nice things on our myfoxny.com facebook page. we appreciate it. what do you have? greg: bobblehead form, tonight what time are we playing on coney island? rosanna: at the cyclones home. greg: it is under the brooklyn eiffel tower. rosanna: raising money for human servi

it would have been foolish for the administration to rebut his interest merely because the has widely known for years i've related to the iraq war in 2003 that we are going to engage and in pursuit of an opportunity that we might be able to succeeded in persuading him to support the deal. ultimately it didn't turn out that way. i think that would account for the disappointment you've heard me express. [inaudible] [inaudible] >> well, i was little slip into and answering jeff's question earlier. that was my indication -- it was my intent to convey to you there would not be much time spent making phone calls but i wouldn't rule out that he might make some calls. that would have been true regardless of the timing of ultimate conclusion reached by senator schumer. >> there's no wrapping up what he meant. >> note. >> obviously president obama's not on the ballot but his policy is certainly under attack. what the republicans seem to say is what you're saying is the reason the middle east is such a mess now is because we bid going into word 2003. they are saying because we gave up the lawyer

i think jeb bush is the guy who's been the strongest in rebutting that.nd rubio has, too. rubio made a great point last night. you know, a lot of our immigration problems are not from mexico. they're coming from the rest of central america, okay? now the whole immigration system is screwed up. it has to be completely reformed. i get that. jeb bush is right though. if you reform it in the right way, it can be pro growth. marco rubio is also right. it's not the mexican government. it's no the a conspiracy against the united states. we have to have a talent based, skills based approach to immigration. we can do this. if we go into identity politics, it's a disaster. and i mean across the board. whether it's asians, millennials, john kasich i thought gave a brilliant answer to gay marriage where he said, look, i'm a traditionalist. the law is the law and i, you know, am faithful to my friends. i've just gone to a gay wedding. that's the big tent jack kemp and ronald reagan republican party that i belong to. i hope people take a leap from what john kasich said

so, but sununu -- you know, silverstein kept rebutting these kinds of objections. and finally sununu became irritated. he started speaking to silverstein in a controlled voice. every time i say something, you're always bring being something up. i don't want to hear anything from you anymore. harkin was just shuffling his papers trying to think how to defend his own aide when kennedy jumped to his feet, his bulky frame creating seismic jolts. the hours of negotiation, indeed, the years of maneuvering to get this bill through congress were taking their toll. harkin remembers: i thought kennedy was going to grab sununu by the collar. kennedy said if you want to yell at anybody, you yell at me or senator harkin. you don't go after the staff. you go after the big boys. you got something to say? say it to me. in a moment of disgust with silverstein, sununu then suggested that the room be cleared of all staff and only elected members of congress should stay. kennedy's response? i said, fine. then sununu should leave because he was staff. [laughter] that seemed to quiet th