when i recertify, you know, i have some concerns as other people in my community because a lot of the contractors were dee-certified sometime ago. and we are mostly concerned about the local hiring aspect that the city approved. but the one problem that i have with the city and county of san francisco is that we have compliance officers, mostly all of the departments. but we don't have state certified compliance officers or federal. and what happens is, i mentioned to director harrison in the hallway 2001 day, i said, you don't have anyone that can go out on these job sites to see whether or not the people that are on these jobs are from the city and city and county of san francisco. he says to me, well, espinola, all i do is put on my hard hat and i go on a job site. * i said, yes, look who you are. you're the money man. so, you can do what you please. but you don't write reports to the state about the contractors and whether or not they are abiding by the law. and he looked at me. he said, i never thought about that. and, you know, it hurts me for the last 50 years dealing with huma

if there is an appeal of the c-e-q-a action to the board, then they have to be either affirmed, recertify, if you will, that's not technically legally what it is. but the matter is before them in their consideration. so, it's only in the case of a c-e-q-a appeal that they are acting to certify. in the case of something that isn't appealed but is a legislative action by the board, like any body that uses a c-e-q-a document, they have to adopt the c-e-q-a document, the findings, the mitigation measures, whatever else applies. so, that's really unchanged as we discussed earlier, this whole concept. >> but there is a way the legislation is presented at least the way i've understood it, is there is no appeal to the board of supervisors on a certification. it just automatically goes to them. isn't that correct? >> elaine warren, deputy city attorney. you're referring to actions where the board has to act to approve the projerk anyway. >> yes. >> and the way the ordinance is written, in those cases as bill explained earlier, the c-e-q-a process -- let's say there is an e-i-r that requires certif

when i recertify, you know, i have some concerns as other people in my community because a lot of the contractors were dee-certified sometime ago. and we are mostly concerned about the local hiring aspect that the city approved. but the one problem that i have with the city and county of san francisco is that we have compliance officers, mostly all of the departments. but we don't have state certified compliance officers or federal. and what happens is, i mentioned to director harrison

the dog subsequently was recertified. our position is that the fourth amendment doesn't impose an annual certification requirement. some states have it, some states don't. i think, more important in this case was the fact that the dog was continuously trained, continuously evaluated and trained. >> well, what do you -- what do you have to show to establish that the dog was well trained. >> well, your honor, i think the most important thing is successful completion of proficiency testing. i mean, what -- what our friends would like, and what the florida supreme court would like, was really for the courts to delve into all aspects of the training, what types of distracters were used, what type of smell and printing was used and the like. >> well, if it were just that -- you have the show that the program was reputable. >> well, certainly that it was authentic, your honor. and here, the programs were -- were conducted by actual police departments in -- in alabama and florida. and this court ordinarily would presume regularit

to wait five hours for the recertifiation .rs on the ground expected help to come and holding out and fighting for their lives while the bureaucracy didn't act to save them. it is heart breaking. >> brian: they were calling send something in right now and give us a hand. >> steve: who do you want to hear from? >> they need to bring the rso and region security officer from benghazi back. not nordstrom, but the current rso back and closed hear bring the senior cia officer back and have them in a closed hearing. don't ask the people in washington d.c. because they will be writ yen rewritten before they are brought to them. bring the guys back and said tell us the truth with what happened. >> brian: i hope it will be. your take on david petraeus. >> heart break a terrible way for him to go out. bad decision making on his part. they had to have known and for them to say they were intercepting e-mails and reading the sy director emaims and not reporting that it the white house is bull. >> steve: you have a problem with the f.b.i. loo

the dog subsequently was recertified. our position is that the fourth amendment doesn't impose an annual certification requirement. some states have it, some states don't. i think more important in this case was the fact that the dog was continuously trained, continuously evaluated and trained. >> what do you have to show to establish that the dog was well trained? >> well, your honor, i think the most important thing is successful completion of proficiency testing. i mean, what our friends would like and what the florida supreme court would like really for the courts to delve into all aspects of the training, what types of distractors were used, what type of -- >> well, if it were just that you have to show that the program was reputable. >> well, it's certainly that it was authentic, your honor. and here that the programs were conducted by actual police departments in alabama and florida, and this court ordinarily would presume regularity in those sorts of training settings, and there's no reason to approach the trainin

. >> why didn't get the dog recertified? at time of the search it had expired. >> the dog was recertified and the fourth amendment doesn't impose manual certification requirements. some states have it, some states don't. more important is the fact that the dog was continuously trained. >> what do you have to show to establish if the dog was well-trained? >> i think the most important thing is successful completion of proficiency testing. with the florida supreme court would like all aspects of the training and the types of destructors, what type of small printing. >> is certainly was authentic. here the programs were conducted by actual police departments and alabama and they ordinarily would pursue regularity and those sorts of training settings and there is no reason to approach the trend of the dog. >> the training facilities for private entities that contacted the police department. >> the certification usually is done by private entities that are operated by former law enforcement officers but the training itself was us

we don't know whether the dog was ever recertified. the court can affirmed the florida supreme court simply on the failure to produce adequate documentation of certification and initial training. and on the fact that this dog was never certified with his trainer, with his handler. it did not initially work with his handler. you have a doctor who was reliable enough to demonstrate trouble caused. the florida supreme court concluded, the conclusion was correct unless there are additional questions. >> be alert here could have been to residual odor or it could have been toy trucks inside the pickup truck. because the alert was in front of the front door handle. is equally likely that it was residual other war it was inside the pickup truck. can the police establish probable cause when what the dog alerted to may well have been a residual of iran nothing in sight? the dog did not alert any place other. >> it can constitute probable cause. we testified in this case, believe that the seller was to residual other. >> did you say can eric can'