myerstandi it wi reect to thisreport, e civil grd he board oferviso to re toecmeatio5ofi er recmeation 5, and at the we les wat wecoittee asoa wouave to reo specific ite o ollesyestisfo e cil jury? 's doit this way,ere' somee fr thear would like tresenthe dertment's pepecte,a e wec followi tis. >> tt woulee, t you. peorcampos: veuc ood mog,pervisors. i am from the mayor's office. i wanted to actually correct one thing that the grand jury mentioned. we actually did respond to recommendation 5. unfortunately, it was mislabeled in our response. so if you do look at the mayor's response, we did address that particular recommendation. supervisor campos: supervisor farrell. supervisor farrell: committee may be read into the record so people are aware? -- can you may be read into the records of people are aware? >> yes. the recommendation was deficient and the commission should be onerous to hire at least one additional senior analyst and the mayor's response is the recommendation requires further analysis. the determination of appropriate staffing levels required an analysis by the mayor's o