you don't get to redact things. i'm the judge. i get to make the redactions.e was appointed by president reagan, a tough judge. i hope he holds the line. but if it comes to -- i liked senator sessions. but attorney general sessions is there in name only. he is absolutely worthless, a rudderless department of justice. >> sean: isn't it rod rosenstein -- isn't it he conflicted as it said to he said fire comey? isn't he is one that signed one of the fisa renewal applications? by the way, the judge on friday said oh, isn't he recused? he didn't say that by accident, dan bongino. >> sean, rosenstein not only signed one of the fisa warrants against supposed super spy carter page who goes out on cable every night to talk about whatever he wants. he was also the united states attorney on the iranian one precursor case. this is the most conflicted investigative team i have seen in my life. there are two investigators on the mueller team, lawyers that represented people involved with the clinton foundation and the clinton scandal. >> sean: what about the -- i have to as

all of us could see what they had redacted by reading the rest of the report. but the biggest problem is that when it was then released in a fuller condition, it was clear that those redactions had nothing to do with national security or investigation. lou: iutterly a nonevent, inconsequential. and if i say argue just a bit with you on transparency, i am absolutely for all transparency. i think this administration has an historic opportunity to demand, insist on transparency throughout the executive and sup certainly support -- i think the president's first reflex should be to support devin nunes at every turn. he's has been a man of courage and fully supportive of the constitution at every turn of the trump era, all 16 months of it. i think this is a fight worth having now. we have a corrupt justice department. we have a corrupt fbi. and it is absolutely past time, in my judgment, for this congress to seek out that transparency and for it to be provided by justice and fbi. but we can't, we can't kid ourselves about how important this is, because it's an etiolo

welcome back to a special episode redacted tonight by the way i'll be back next week with a regular redacted a live audience and all will bring them all back again but for right now let's talk with a congressional candidate trying to end the wave rule of corporate queen mansi pelosi in san francisco without further ado here's my interview with shah have been. good to see again good to see you it's always great to be with you thanks so much for being here so you're running for us congress in san francisco i've known you for several years now you've been a long time activist and organizer you've worked with the electronic frontier foundation what made you decide that now's the time to jump into politics and go up against good old nancy pelosi. really at least to the white house seeing an apologetic kleptocracy in the in the white house makes it particularly important for congress to play its constitutional role of check and balance in the executive branch and as an issue out as an immigrant someone who's fought mass surveillance for the last fifteen years to witness the leader of the democrats

and they are slow walking and redact in the name of national security. and they are not cooperating and they are obstructing. and what should be the next step and the president should follow jim jordan and mark meadow's advice. and sessions to hand it over. >> i have no problem with that. and no reason not to hand it over to congress and just like they are intruding in article two with the witch hunt investigation and they are doing that with the congressional power and to have oversight over them. they have no right to be warrant to themselves and that's what they are doing. >> sean: all right, mr. mayor: this is the cross fire edition of hannity. mark levin has been right from the get go. the constitution of the united states is on the president's side. mark levin is next. ♪ ooh, heaven is a place on earth ♪ uhp. i didn't believe it. again. ♪ ooh, baby, do you know what that's worth? ♪ i want to believe it. [ claps hands ] ♪ ooh i'm not hearing the confidence. okay, hold the name your price tool. power of options based on your budget! and! ♪ we'll make

when they get the redactions removed, they see things that shouldn't have been redacted but were redacted to save the author of the document from embarrassment. not to save a national secret. not to save the identity of an intelligence source but to save embarrassment. >> harris: we have been down this memo road and declassification road in the last few months and the president has weighed in on occasion with things. you saw different home -- memo inside house intelligence. he can weigh in. and you say legally he will at some point potentially. >> at some point he says enough is enough. >> harris: is this a tipping point? is this enough to get the president to say you know what d.o.j., heads? i want this declassified. >> i don't know if it's enough but it is a march in the direction. the next step, this is the second to last step to hold either attorney general jeff sessions or deputy -- i'm not suggesting this be done and jim jordan knows they can do this. they have the votes to do it. or deputy attorney general rod rosenstein in contempt for failure to comply with a bona fide, legitimat

welcome back to a special ops center adak tonight by the way i'll be back next week with a regular redacted to the live audience and all will bring them all back and but for right now let's talk with a congressional candidate trying to end the wave rule of corporate queen nancy pelosi in san francisco without further ado here's my interview with shah have been tossed. good to see again good to see you it's always great to be with you thanks so much for being here so you're running for us congress in san francisco i've known you for several years now you've been a long time activist and organizer you worked with the electronic frontier foundation what made you decide that now's the time to jump into politics and go up against good old nancy pelosi. really at least for the white house seeing an apologetic kleptocracy in the in the white house makes it particularly important for congress to play its constitutional role of check and balance in the executive branch and as an issue out as an immigrant someone who's fought mass surveillance for the last fifteen years to witness the leader of the d

why so much redacting and why such unequal justice and at some

sorry, it's redacted.s there any actual proof that the russian government directed hacking of the dnc and john podesta's gmail account? if it is theirs that's been redacted too. reports say the fbi agents who interviewed mike flynn didn't believe he was lying, but wait, mike flynn pleaded guilty to lying to those agents and his life was destroyed as a result. he sold his house to raise money for his legal defense. so what's going on here? we don't know. that information was redacted. why were all these reactions may? we don't even know that. we asked, no one would tell us. and then there's the fisa application to spy on trump campaign aide carter page that hasn't been released either. we have ample reason to believe the application may have fundamentally illegitimate based heavily on discredited partisan hearsay, the dossier. jim comey denies this of course. he has denied it repeatedly on his book tour. just the other day, he noted, smiling faintly as he said it, that there's no way to check really because

we see the redactions and under redactions and it had zero to do with national security.or a judge, a neutral judge to look at this and say you're not going to redact this because it makes jim comey or andy mccabe look bad. you can only redact it if it will impair the investigation or expose a source, expose a person to danger. >> maria: the president tweeted about it this morning. he said the 13 angry democrats in charge of the russian witch hunt are starting to find out there is a court system in place that actually protects people from injustice and just wait until the courts get to see your unrevealed conflicts of interest. >> i think he's probably talking about the argument in court last week before judge ellis who questioned the nature and extent of mueller's ability to prosecute. >> maria: exactly. >> i think that's a hypothetical argument because if mueller can't prosecute, the federal prosecutors in the eastern district of virginia will prosecute. there's plenty of evidence of bank fraud. the only question is who gets to prosecute it. >> that gets to the scope is

why would that be redacted? >> the power to redacts a corrupt power.n't be in the hands of the people who created the document. it should be in the hands of some neutral entity to decide what is so sensitive that congress can't see it. what would cause the death of a source. what would cause witness to flee a defendant to get out of the way >> that makes them look bad. >> meantime, general flynn is still stuck with this. we don't know where it's going to go. he pleaded guilty under oath. he can't take that back without another charge of perjury. >> we'll leave it there hanging with the next thought. good to see you. thank you so much. >>> four decade after the murder of 15-year-old martha moxley the man convicted of that crime gets that conviction overturned. how does her brother feel about that? we're going to speak exclusively with john moxley in a moment. why is john kerry meeting with the iranians just weeks before president trump decides what he will do about the iran deal. on whether or not the former secretary of state broke the law. >> this is

sorry, it's redacted.s there any actual proof that the russian government directed tagging of the gnc and john podesta's gmail account? that's beenn redacted too. the report says the fbi agents thatat interviewed him didn't believe he was lying, but wait. he pleaded guilty to lying to those agents in his life was destroyed, he sold his house to raise money for his legal defense. what's going on here? we don't know. that information was redacted. why were all of these reductions made? wekn don't know that, we asked,o one would tell us. then there is the pfizer application to spy on trump campaign aide carter page, that hasn't been released either even though we have ample reason to believe the application may have been fundamentally illegitimate based on discredited partisan hearsay. jim comey denies this, he'she denied it repeatedly on his book tour. just the other day he noted there is no way to check because it's classified. the joke is on us except it's not funny. almost nobody trusts the government any

everything redacted is unrelated to the manafort prosecution.t earlier that portion of the document. he seemed to suggest that he thought something was going on. we would like to see it to get the full scope of the investigation. on the manafort point, i covered these guys 30 years ago. they made millions of dollars, manafort, stone, black and gates by representing foreign thugs and dictators. whether it was marcos and the phil philippines that was one of their go-to specialties. the corrupt politician president of ukraine leading to the problems he has today. >> you mention that and you think about the infamous report they got a law firm to write that became a probe to discredit -- i guess we will fit in a break although there is more to discuss. excellent panel and insights, thank you all. >>> the rnc meeting, any guesses where it is going to be held. we are going to go inside of the money. >>> who is falling back tonight, i will tell you with very special guests in ninety-seconds. e-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and

it's not a cleaner version with fewer redactions. key section involves flynn, who pled guilty to one count of making false statements about his conversations with the russian ambassador. the report states that both former fbi director comey and his department director mccabe testified to the house intelligence committee that the fbi agents saw no signs of deception, which was not a great beginning of a false statements case. and comey testified to the committee that there were no physical signs of deception, nothing that indicated to them that they knew he was lying to them. but when pressed last week, comey suggested something else about his testimony. >> did you tell lawmakers that fbi agents didn't believe flynn was lying intentionally to investigators? >> no. maybe someone misunderstood something i said. i didn't believe that and didn't say that. >> we asked a spokesman for a comment tonight. >> unbelievable report. how about redacting the rest of it? that's what i want to see. catherine, great work. fox news contributor investig

it's heavily redacted. i know you hope you will get it. do you believe you will get it on redacted?n: keep us updated on that. congressman, it's always great to see you, thanks for coming in. an incredible expose out of minnesota, is there a day care connection with middle eastern terrorism involving millions of your tax dollars? that investigation, you don't want to miss it, is next. playing a little hide-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, you could be picking up these charges yourself. so get allstate, where agents help keep you protected from mayhem... ...like me. mayhem is everywhere. are you in good hands? same thing with any dent or dings on this truck. they all got a story about what happened to 'em. man 2: it was raining, there was only one way out. i could feel the barb wire was just digging into the paint. man: two bulls were fighting, (thud) bam hit the truck. try explaining that to your insurance company. woman: another ding, another scratch. it'll just be another chapter in the story. every scar tells a sto

this is one of the documents that they sent over a period practically the entire page is redacted.his is ridiculous. so we are going to continue working and doing our job to get this information, and it chairman nunes has been doing a great job at uncovering more. let's think about this. this it shows you where the media wants to go with this. all day, they want to talk about russia and unrelated things. just posted new record numbers. we have the lowest unemployment right now sounds almost 20 years ago. it is always an indicator of what is going to happen in elections. we are at 57% right now. americans think that we are on the right track. >> sean: will you demand or support contempt? >> absolutely. whatever chairman nunes thinks is the right course of action to catch the facts out. i strongly support. we are going to get to the bottom of this one way or another. >> sean: 's congressman, glad you're feeling better. welcome back. and now, the illicit scheme to from donald trump, fox news analyst gregg jarrett also here. joe digenova, full disclosure, he has done legal work for me

there are some 300 redactions in there.congress who i talked to who were engaged in that report say that there's no need for nearly all of them, they go to the question of fbi's actions, the history here, paul, every time the department of justice and fbi has said that we shouldn't release something on the grounds of national security or because of some other reason, it turns out that the only reason they didn't want it relesion because it was embarrassing to the fbi or department of justice. paul: bill, elaborate on that, you have been following this throughout, oh, terrible damage and you see what they have come up with and it's nothing. >> remember the summary that the house intelligence committee was going to release and they put out release -- paul: justice department. >> justice department. paul: in the end it was politically embarrassing in some respects but hardly a threat to any national security. >> remember the questions here involved both the fbi and the justice department itself, it's not just the disinterested

but first, judicial watch tonight has announced that robpr rosenstein may release previously redacted portions of the memo outlining the scope of the molar investigation. finally. i also wanted to address the so-called firestorm around the presidents pick to leave. democrats, the media and anyone who generally hates donald trump have been trashing this career cia official, slamming her treatment of terrorists after 9/11, when we lost nearly 3,000 americans, and some alleging that she was way too tough with some of the world's most notorious killers. i have said it before. gina haspell and many people who worked with her and work with her for decades -- guess what, they say she is without a doubt an american hero. she is smart, she's diligent and she's brave. most importantly, our actions in the wake of 9/11 kept this country safe and brought justice to those people, and thoseot terrorists -- look at usama bin laden. he's at the bottom of the sea in part due to the work by people like haspell. jose rodriguez told us right here on this program that the enhanced and terry interrogation p

almost completely redacted. we'll see if they're successful, shep. >> shepard: john roberts, busy day at the white house. thank you. caroline is here, federal and white collar criminal offense attorney. the republican group wants to do something for sure. they want documents. but they want to get in the way of this. let's not beat around the bush. that's what they want to do, right? >> they do want to get in the way. the interesting thing about the tweet, nobody knows what president trump means. some have floated the idea that he's talking about potentially firing rod rosenstein. he's overseeing the entirety of the mueller investigation. i think trump is pointing out that he feels he's throwing his hands up here at everything at this point. he's sick of the whole thing. >> shepard: they put on a very aggressive public face of this. today, rudy guliani, the first trump lawyer, to speak with any specificity about the -- and it sounds like rudy guliani is in charge now. like maybe he's going to set the rules of the

some of the deep state actors in the doj, they'll be able to review, possibly redact, or ultimately released to you, the american people. we'll explain why they might not get away with that. also major developments in the nuclear showdown with kim jong un and north korea, we'll tell you what president trump is saying about the upcoming meeting with kim jong un. all of that, buckle up, glad you are with us, tonight's breaking news opening monologue. ♪ huge developments. president trump's attorney rudy giuliani will be joining us interest a few minutes. he is telling "the washington times" of a special counsel robert mueller is agreeing now, finally, rightly, to limit the scope of potential questions he wants to ask the president. the former new york city mayor is also saying that this could result in a possible july interview. mueller issuing a final report by labor day. of course before the midterm elections. if true, that would be a wooden rack for the president. the original questions were completely ridiculous, and insane. obviously a perjury trap. "what were you thinking"? it doesn't mat

and who gets to decide which documents are redacted?>> so the redaction is done those in charge of protecting national security but that said the fact is congress has subpoena power and also have impeachment power and if exercises that power before now with other officials including the now former director of irs because the point would have been made but the fact is they can hold people in contempt and then follow that up. with the ultimate power. there is always a certain amount of friction with the legislature and the executive. but that is worked out in a commonsense way no reason why it shouldn't be in this case. i don't get that at all. there is a finite number of documents and finite reasons to withhold them. you can list those with national security or executive privilege or simply turn over. and to be on the business end of subpoenas in my time first come i want to add my thanks to your comments from a very high up a few part of what appears to be driving us a heart is based on the information people receive almost all of which

things that don't need to be redacted. we had this with house intelligence committee report, there were redacting things that did not make them look too good, this is frustrating, you conduct oversight to not have agencies be as forth coming as they should be, i spoke at police academy graduation last say day, and talked about how important the rule of law circumstance i said you are subject to rule of law, that is the principle in which this country is founded. >> a lot of fbi agents law enforcement with a rely higher ups. they are often political appointees. he has been looking at it as we speak, scope memo that rod rosenstein wrote for mr. mueller that defines what he is to do, this judge thinks he has gone beyond that scope, when are we going to see scope memo. >> this is an issue a year ago as they launched this investigation, i want curious to what the scope all be, looking at all of russia attempted to interfere or talking with folks affiliated with clinton campaign, we know about steel dossier, but, every week see

who is doing the redaction? what is the criteria? what was it? what is it now? we can't even get that information. >> laura: how do you your oversight? it's not supposed to be that it is this taffy pull. i know there is always historic tension among the branches of government. people don't like to show everything. i don't ever remember it being this bad. i don't. >> what surprised me is we haven't had f.b.i. agents come forward to the committee. they will go to the press -- >> laura: they want to testify on what, senator? >> well, we heard that when comey exonerated clinton that they actually wanted to, they were going to blow a gasket basically. why didn't they come forward? come forward to my committee. we will protect you. >> laura: you should bring the russian billionaire in, get him on video. get the russian lawyer. get veselnitskaya. they didn't talk to her. >> it would nice to have more evidence before doing the interviews but we may do the interviews to get the evidence. >> laura: they will tell you a lot. thank you for coming in. >> thank you. >> laura:

right as t we're looking at this report that has he's redactions that are so ridiculous that even the justice department can't just them. that's why they put them out. you have to wonder everything else they're withholding. consider are they withholding it. they're attack nunez. you think they would attack the people holding back the documents. the oneum fair criticism they make. ultimately the president is in charge of the executive branch and he's got to do, to my mind he's got to do a lot more than tweet he's ing gry there's not enough cooperation. i think he needs to give people orders tope cooperate. >> laura: the judge ellis the district of columbia. a no-nonsense judge. reagan appointee. he put. he was pretty adamant on friday with the special council's office. it seemsou like. they don't really care about man for. they want to usese him to get trump. your reaction to that factbaing and forth. saying people are exaggerating the importance of what happened one friday. >> they may bee exaggerating the importance, in the sense i don't think the case against manforewill disappear,

what we have seen from redactions in the past is that they were nothing. they were there to protect the doj. >> laura: they were exculpatory, snonot for the doj. >> they were trying to hide something. >> laura: there is always a war between congress and the executive branch. but this does take it to a new level. kim has an interesting analysis. tonight in the wall street journal, she says it's about the fbibo source. we know mr. nunes' request deals with a top secret intel source of the fbi and cia who is a u.s. citizen and involved in the russia collusion probe. we might say the cia had a person on the payroll who used his or her credentials to interact with the trump campaign. she has incredible sources, i know that. she seems to be indicating there could haveom been someone inside the trump campaign from the fbi spying on the trump campaign.hi we'll see if any of this pans out. >> we had information that there was a counter intelligence committee. >> laura: how does that play out, wire taps? >> what did the program entail. this justice takes the approac

skepticism of them filtering the information they provide congress, we have cut them redacting information. there was not redacting of a national security concern or methods, but because it was personally embarrassing to them that there are talking about their relationship with a judge. the department of justice has lost their credibility to itself filter based on their own conduct. counsel solvesl back against that concern. if a second special counsel is you have independent eyes that can collect the evidence, make a review and bring in action forward. you could in essence divorce those concerns from a process that had more integrity. we think that he has laid out that correct process. >> i would just add that, all the concerns about not providing information for national security concerns, then you provide the information and see that there is nothing at risk happens time and time again. after you end up reading the documents, the real reason is that it would cause embarrassment to people who did the wrong thing. made it clearl that you are pursuing this information because the american

to slow walk, obstruct, lie about national security as a reason for redactions. clapper comments blow me away. that means the rule of law does not exist. what they did here is they think they have unfettered power to do anything they want if they don't like a candidate. >> that is true. going to the investigation they were going all out against president trump. with the spy operation. they recall from the last i.g. report which confirmed that the obama justice department at the same time was telling the f.b.i. to stand down on any investigation in the clinton foundation. which we know that the f.b.i. and the d.o.j. knew full well was recipient of the money from russia to influence the positive outcome on the investigation. >> sean: quickly. >> let's get to the heart of this. this is a counterintelligence investigation that began in 2016 that is continuing now by mr. mueller. >> sean: give a preview of what is coming next week. sara carter, what is coming next week? >> yeah. well, i think we will have a lot more information on the inspector general report. we'll h

the russia investigation heavily redacted. is an ongoing criminal investigation, a federal judge gave two weeks to cough it up. >> there is article 3, the judiciary, a judge stepped in and said you don't determine the scope, i do. the judiciary, why do they see the redacted documents when congress's oversight by the executive doesn't. we are coequal branches and congress is number one because we represent people's interest in the people interest is being dismissed. dagen: agreeing to disagree between the house gop and the doj but let's talk about immigration. the atty. gen. tough on this today including this message about those who try to bring amateurs to the us. >> if you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, we will prosecute you. if you are smuggling a child, we will prosecute you and that child may be separated from you as required by law. >> new york times picking up on that. they said more than 700 children have been taken from adults claiming to be their parents and quote someone saying the idea of punishing parent

providing members of congress with heavily redacted members of some documents demand and offering members limited viewing of these documents is in adequate as a response to repeated requests of -- after months of delay. as i prepare to interviews my colleagues, i would like to point out that while many in the media have been trying to bring down the president without evidence, that president trump colluded with russia, there is a ton of evidence of real misconduct that those same people have been attempting to completely sweep under the rug. i believe in equal scales of justice, that no one is above the law. that includes anyone regardless of last name and people at the highest levels of the doj and fbi, especially when misconduct is committed while trying to take down elected officials and candidates. no official at the justice department can allow their own bias to overwhelm their objectivity and responsible performance of their duties. a second special counsel must be appointed. transparency is demanded from these historic agencies. we are confident these agencies will be able to move

and may burlington vermont and other cities go to redacted tor dot com to get tickets or vote for your city to be added well there i back. up twenty eight team coverage we've signed one of the greatest bill peoples of all time but there was one more question and by the way it's going to be our coach. guys i know you on the us he's a huge star and the huge amount of pressure you have to be the center of the shuttle with you and do a great. get you out of the rock at the back nobody gets past you we need you to get let's go. alone. and i'm really happy to join the team for the two thousand and three in the world cup in russia meet this special one it was also cliche to me to just say the review p.r.t. teams the latest edition to make up the figure so i need to just look. forty five years ago companies go public as a way to expand their would be a viable corporation you have to meet certain criteria for being a viable corporation and then you're allowed to go public that there are no such criteria so if you're essentially burning through cash and going bankrupt or using the public marketp

reporter from the department of education that only mcgill redacted tonight. there are your headlines from the future two months from now you'll learn thirty thousand elderly from living in new orleans wal-mart home and garden oil. coming up on wednesday all of congress found to be actors hired by oil and gas companies. thanks to july. texas governor announces medicaid to be replaced with ten dollars cobalts this is learned. ministry's police forces and city administrations of many countries depend on one corporation and another one mike was hoping to avoid doesn't come from the muslim god i'm stumped this is how the guns. would say as the fee that he got into this it's a must also apply been proprietary software you don't know this whole cult isn't that such a security risk when you have a black box operating in the public eye to microsoft's dependency puts governments on the cyber threat not only that she thinks office can put more on. the softness of the system this is still being played one of the most vocal to most of these two boardrooms of the us the st

reporting from washington this week air money redacted. there are your headlines from the future two weeks from now you'll learn w h o reveals planet's atmosphere now thirteen percent plastic seventeen percent sharply new. to law. man with life savings in snap job stock heard saying big corn is a real because it's not backed by anything that started out by forget prefer. i had eyes for a while i thought i was quite a. palm oil is one of the most controversial products about signed fit to solve a vegetable found that's very cheap about twenty seventeen production grew to sixty three million tons that rapid growth in international demand for cheap oil has led to the massive expansion of palm oil plantations which is the destruction of rain forest. get into the zero a lot more than ten million takedowns of unique rain forest has been destroyed but it's a process that just keeps going. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. let it be an arms race. dramatic look at the only move. i don't see how that strategy will be succ

reporting from the department of education natalie mcgill redact that tonight. there are your headlines from the future two months from now you'll learn thirty thousand elderly from living in new orleans wal-mart home and garden oil. coming up on wednesday all of congress found to be actors hired by oil and gas companies. oh. and in july. texas governor announces medicaid to be replaced with ten dollar coupons this is worth. the walk sell you on the idea that dropping bombs brings police to the chicken pox forcing you to fight the battle. to stop spreading tell you what the gossip the family's lifestyle. i was telling you i'm pulling out by. the aisle we've already got one. it is like. milton's i would say i'm not american but americans helped out really. world war two cures the depression farce united states is concerned prosperity of course the store. for the for us the whole world what it what and. historical rewrite ever since world war two to foment the cold war against russia against communism and. socialists nish bush. it was so you call me out. to strike

reporter from the department of education that only mcgill redacted tonight. there are your headlines from the future two months from now you'll learn thirty thousand elderly from living in new orleans wal-mart home and garden oil. coming up on wednesday all of congress found to be actors hired by oil and gas companies. to help thank you for the july. texas governor announces medicaid to be replaced with ten dollar coupons this is learned. by the. deep seated. milton's i would say i'm not american but americans helped out really . world war two cures the depression cars i'd say she's concerned prosperity of course from store. for the for us the whole world what it what and. historical rewrite ever since world war two to foment the cold war against russia against communism and. socialists mishmosh you it was so you call me out to all close to a swath of the earth so use could call them go. away i think world war two has been distorted credibly by the anglo-american media and that's because they want to minish the role of russia. and stalin who actually defeated

i'm headed to boston new wave in rochester portland may burlington vermont and other cities go to redacted tor dot com to get tickets or vote for years said he would be added we'll be right back . twenty eight team coverage we've signed one of the greatest goalkeepers of all time but there was one more question by the way who's going to be our coach. guys i know you on the us he's a huge star among us and the huge amount of fresh cameramen you have to go meet the center of the beach will tell you and the great game the greatest good you are the rock at the back nobody gets past you we need to get the ball going let's go. along as i want you and i'm really happy to join us today and for the thousand into the world cup in russia meet this special one it was also appreciated. just read the review theology team's latest edition to go up as we go. look. at it i will not be here. much as you. give it up he loves little. you. hate. it does. on them and. by then i got a session on the nod that in. by then is a shift the balance. all of a sudden the mccain audience at a loss is going to learn more.

i'm headed to boston new wave in rochester portland may burlington vermont and other cities go to redacted tor dot com to get tickets or vote for years said he would be added well here i am back. in july twenty second take on the attempt to freelance journalist working with a. militant shelling of syria. so his sacrifice has established a memorial day to the reporters who often risk that the sake of the truth comes through that. you can submit to your published works in a video or written form until june the twenty. to. twenty five years ago companies go public as a way to expand their would be a viable corporation you have to meet certain criteria to for being a bible corporation and then you are allowed to go public there are no such criteria so if you're essentially burning through cash and going. bank robbers are using the public marketplace to bail out a losing position. she's in a side genetically modified organisms in the system and in the food industry in the one nine hundred ninety s. . the islam is taking that in lives and what does not have to do with g.m. . that. was just somet

>> in the first instance, the redaction gets done by the people in charge of protecting national security within the bureau. but that said, the fact is that congress has subpoena power. it also has impeachment power, and if it exercises that power before now with other officials who, including the now former director of the irs and one of his employees, i don't think we would be facing this problem from the justice department because the point would have been made. but the fact is that they can hold people in contempt, and there's been a move to do that, and then follow it up if necessary with the ultimate power. i don't think, obviously is always a certain amount of friction between the legislature and executive. that's way the constitution was designed it but it usually gets worked out and the common sense way. there's no reason why it shouldn't be in this case. as far as taking a long time, i don't get that at all. there was a finite number of documents that are called for and a finite set of documents and are finite reasons for withholding them. you could list those, including either

headed to boston new wave in rochester portland maine burlington vermont and other cities go to redacted tor dot com to get tickets or vote for your city would be added we'll be right back. twenty five years ago companies go public as a way to expand their would be a viable corporation you have to meet certain criteria for being a bible corporation and then you are allowed to go public now there are no such criteria so if you're essentially burning through cash and going bankrupt you're using the public marketplace to bail out a losing position. g.m.a. sign genetically modified organisms the system needs in the food industry in the one nine hundred ninety s. . dr tom is taking that i am not upset and what does that have to do with g.m. . almost two months. is a chemical plant least killed we. believe this is the worldwide legal service like it is. the pricing and the runs are possible damnation. the kind of her future scientists proof that she in context really awful on the human race to surface two wells free of g.m.'s in crisis eight which would even be able to cost the points of never