>> certainly. >> redactions, how unusual are redactions? this is unique to this case. is that correct? >> no, we do redactions from time to time. >> why? >> really as far as -- people do have privacy interests. anytime we release documents outside of the fbi, if it's another avenue, you have to review those. >> if the chairman will indulge me one more question and then i'll cease and desist -- >> gladly. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. herring, were you told any time before this hearing or at any other time during this process that this is highly political and you should cover up, obfuscate, evade, deceive, or not provide information to protect somebody from our scrutiny? >> no, not at all. >> we have votes on the floor that are ten minutes away. we have members that still haven't asked questions. plus, we need to do a recorded vote. we have to leave it here. i now recognize -- >> i appreciate the chairman's indulgen indulgence. >> the chairman from north carolina, mr. meadows, for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. herring, would you say the fbi's investiga

there's more than that that's been redacted. on page 48, you redact mrs. clinton's birth date. the next sentence, four attorneys of hers are mentioned by name, a fifth one is redacted. that's not personal information. there are hundreds and hundreds of examples like this. >> certainly. a number of folks mentioned in the documents are out there in the public in a form or fashion. there's no reason to -- >> if they are in the public, why didn't we get it? >> the ones that are in the public you did get. the ones that aren't were redacted. >> is the standard what you would give the public? >> no, sir. >> we should receive that and much more information. i see my time is expired, mr. chairman. i look forwards to continuing this. >> we recognize the gentleman from florida. >> thank you, mr. chairman. you said the case involving hillary clinton is closed. did you mean that also includes the perjury referral that the congress has sent to the fbi? is that case been disposed of? >> there have been referrals. i would have to refer to the department of justice. >> you can't say it's been d

so there is really no legal basis for these redactions. the fbi also chose to redact any information the report classified above secret. this also makes no sense. as a member of congress, we routinely receive with the highest level of classification, with the exception of sources, methods, the s.a.p. material. so any redactions have to be based on classification, have to be removed. we have to be able to see that information. we also have questions on what the fbi file contains. oddly enough, the copies of the file provided by the fbi are different. we are very grateful they provided the first set on a tuesday, i believe it was august 16th. the next day, we got a second set. the problem, is the second set had 27 more e-mails than the other one, which we were grateful for. only to have the fbi try to come back and recover them. not because it was s.a.p. material, but because it was embarrassing. that's why. it was embarrassing. we should have had it in the first round. we should have had it in the beginning. this is not the first time, cong

connolly: redactions, how unusual are redactions? this is unique to this case. is that correct? mr. herring: no, we do redactions from time to time. really as far as -- people do have privacy interests. anytime we release documents outside of the fbi, if it's another avenue, you have to review those. rep. connolly: if the chairman will indulge me one more question and then i'll cease and desist -- >> gladly. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. herring, were you told any time before this hearing or at any other time during this process that this is highly political and you should cover up, obfuscate, evade, deceive, or not provide information to protect somebody from our scrutiny? >> no, not at all. >> we have votes on the floor that are ten minutes away. we have members that still haven't asked questions. plus, we need to do a recorded vote. >> i appreciate the chairman's indulgence. >> the chairman from north carolina, mr. meadows, for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. herring, would you say the fbi's investigation and delivery of documents have been very systematic and pri

there's more than that that's been redacted. on page 48, you redact mrs. clinton's birth date. the next sentence, four attorneys of hers are mentioned by name, a fifth one is redacted. that's not personal information. there are hundreds and hundreds of examples like this. >> certainly. a number of folks mentioned in the documents are out there in the public in a form or fashion. there's no reason to -- >> if they are in the public, why didn't we get it? >> the ones that are in the public you did get. the ones that aren't were redacted. >> is the standard what you would give the public? >> no, sir. >> we should receive that and much more information. i see my time is expired, mr. chairman. i look forwards to continuing this. >> we recognize the gentleman from florida. >> thank you, mr. chairman. you said the case involving hillary clinton is closed. did you mean that also includes the perjury referral that the congress has sent to the fbi? is that case been disposed of? >> there have been referrals. i would have to refer to the department of justice. >> you can't say it's been d

, but it is redacted.thing that is redacted as my experience as a prosecutor, doesn't go very far. connell: fair enough. let me interrupt our own conversation for one moment and go to our washington, d.c. newsroom and bring blake burman into this. he's our digger in chief, i know this is putting out spot, blake, have you been able to dig through any of this yet, what do you know? . >> reporter: reading through the first couple pages, it was released exactly 10 minutes ago, and the first few pages outline the basic steps of their investigation and presumably they go from there on out. what i can point to is the redactions, and i kind of want to walk you through a few different levels here. for example, this is the very first page, i don't know if you can see it, you can notice, heavily redacted, page 1. page 2, no redactions whatever a full report and keeps on going down on down the line. when you dig into it, there are 58 pages of this, let me show you page 36. i think you can see here, completely redacted

the heavily redacted notes -- in fact, i've been going through these, and you can see entire pages redacted -- coming out in a document dump on a friday before, of course, a very big holiday weekend. i'm trish regan, come to "the intelligence report." blake burman has been pouring through all of this, both the synopsis that the fbi gave as well as all of the e-mailed. blake? >> reporter: happy friday afternoon, trish, before the labor day weekend. i'll give you just a few headlines from the fbi's investigation, the second batch of their report about 11 pages long. when traveling domestically, hillary clinton had no ec call support traveling with her -- technical support traveling with her. she could not recall any briefing or training by the state department related to the retention of federal records or handling of classified information. they say clinton could not give an example of how classification of a document was determined. they say clinton never had a concern with how classified information pertaining to a particular p -- drone program was handled. she requested a secure blackberr

some of them are entirely he redacted. many of them have a good portion of those pages redacted.n going through a wide variety of these emails, through it all the campaigns of hillary clinton and donald trump have been putting out statements reacting to it, both doing so quickly this afternoon. the communications directors on both sides have released statements, we'll give you those. we'll start with hillary clinton, comes from brian fallon hillary clinton's communications director. quote, we're pleased with fbi has released materials from hillary clinton's interview as we have requested. her use of single i mail account was a mistake, she has taken responsiblity for it, these materials make it clear why the justice department believed there was no basis to move forward with the case. trump's campaign was first to put out statement, from jason miller, say quoting here, hillary clinton is applying for a job that begins each day with a top secret intelligence briefing and the notes from her fbi interview reinforce her tremendously bad judgment and dishonesty. the statement ends say

know to proactively redact that information. if a parent asks to see, say, the complete record of their student behavior tracker, which is what we call it in dcps, but certainly, ferpa says they have right to the educational records. it depends on what an educational record is. your legal counsel will help you determine what goes into the educational record. there is some federal guidance but also states and the district, because we have our own legislation. we actually have some of that spelled out in our municipal regulations. so there are teacher notes and educational records. our student planning tool that's in our trans policy guidance, our legal counsel calls those teacher notes. if you are talking about what name do you want us to use, he was going to go into your book, what about going to the bathroom, how do you want to change out for sports, how are we going to pace p.e. for you, all sorts of questions that we might want to help a young person think through and help the school think through. that all goes into teacher

why is so much of this stuff redacted? >> as far as 302s go, we provided some. there are a lot of them. it is in the process. can i go back and look at getting you the access that you need. i think the personal identifiable information where individuals do have a privacy interest. and we generally do try to protect that type of information. obviously, one question that obviously we would consider is how does it relate to the oversight interest of the committee at hand? >> but you have to let us do our job. we want you to do your job. but you have to let us do our job. my time is expired. i yield. >> we recognize the gentle woman from wyoming, ms. loomis, for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. when we're home in our districts, we meet with our constituents. while i was home in my state of wyoming over the august work period, among the things people asked me was, have you ever read classified documents in a skiff? and i explained that i had on two occasions. in fact, three. visited a skiff by myself where i had to surrender my electronic devices where i was

trying to read around redactions. didn't they just censor it all. why let it see the light of day? >> they did censor it for a long time. it's such an important subject and so we can only say that i collaborated in the way because today i haven't spoken to him, we are not allow to exchange males or hello greetings through employments, so, you know, i was a collaborator by proxy of working turned broadest instructions, please, do what needs to be done to bring my manuscript to the public. the other thing is that i don't -- that was fine with me because i'm not so much a face-to-face collaborator as the way a journalist is producing news. i have dealt with it in many ways in my life. i love literature that's produced by ordinary people in the course of their lives and findings way. the first book was letter from undocumented immigrant from mÉxico and central america. correspondence that they sent home which was very much like, you know, like great poetry as a great tradition of it. so this was a manuscript that had been

the fbi redacts far too many documents. invest if n the pen company that blacks out things on the fbi files. that's all they do. and the fbi has no right to make that determination unilaterally. we have a system of checks and balances and congress has a right to see anything that can't be either kept from them on good grounds. but there should be a presumption that congress gets it and that presumption should be overcome only by a strong showing. >> the viewers should know you've defended director comey and his decision not to indict hillary clinton, but not the redaction of the information. however, you're not defending hillary clinton and you are not defending donald trump in electile dysfunction. how did you come up with that name? >> when you get to be my age it's hard to get aroused by candidates. we expect more from our candidates. i remember reagan and kennedy and think a lot of americans are saying this is not a choice we're happy with. i'm a support are of hillary clinton, i'm going to vote for her with enthusiasm.

the fbi redacts far too many documents.est if n the pen company that blacks out things on the fbi files. that's all they do. and the fbi has no right to make that determination unilaterally. we have a system of checks and balances and congress has a right to see anything that can't be either kept from them on good grounds. but there should be a presumption that congress gets it and that presumption should be overcome only by a strong showing. >> the viewers should know you've defended director comey and his decision not to indict hillary clinton, but not the redaction of the information. however, you're not defending hillary clinton and you are not defending donald trump in electile dysfunction. how did you come up with that name? >> when you get to be my age it's hard to get aroused by candidates. we expect more from our candidates. i remember reagan and kennedy and think a lot of americans are saying this is not a choice we're happy with. i'm a support are of hillary clinton, i'm going to vote for her with enthusiasm. i'm

. >> reporter: in a heavily redacted document the f.b.i. released its summary notes from their hillary clinton interview about whether she mishandled classified material on her personal e-mail server. the f.b.i. says clinton told them she never deleted, nor her e-mail to avoid complying

there all kinds of redactions. i have gone through all the materials and some of the classified material even though we have the clearance totally redacted. then of course you have witnesses. take this guy paul combetta. he was overseeing the server in march of 2015 when the media broke the story that this server existed. the following day congress issued a subpoena for that server. a couple weeks later he has a meeting with cheryl mills, hillary's chief of staff and hillary's attorney, and a couple days later he uses bleachbit to erase forensically all the emails there, the f.b.i. was not enable to recover many of them because of that. he initially lied to the f.b.i. then the justice department gave him immunity based on what we are seeing. he pled attorney-client privilege on behalf of hillary clinton so he wouldn't answer questions about that meeting with kendall and mills. now he comes before congress and pleads the fifth. the american people would say why would you suddenly delete all this stuff knowing the st

we went through emails, a lot of it redacted but whole pages redacted. that they can't find 13 of her blackberry, she does not seem to have a grasp on what is classified information, that is really coming through in these documents, jessica. >> well, i mean there is some debate within them as to you know, her asking whether something is classified or not, but i mean that is what her staff is there for to confirm whether or not something, what telephone they are at, you know, my understanding of what it is that she was clarifying within them. so we've seen even since all this has come out actually the state department now has changed classifications to make things, you know, i think it is ongoing situation there where you know, a little bit after bureaucracy things do change in that level. cheryl: and, adam, she also somewhat blamed the concussion she suffered. there were times she just doesn't remember. is that a problem for someone who is running for president? >> well, i think she has learned the value of or meaning of the word, cheryl, today, once you

of representatives whether or not they should overturn the president's actions months after the redacted pages from the 9/11 commissions report revealed that some of the 9/11 hijackers were in contact with and received support or assistance from individuals that may be connected to the saudi government while they were here in the u.s. we're going to get to the implications of all of it in just a minute. first, turning to politics, donald trump has been hit with a firestorm of criticism by the clinton campaign for treatment a form miss universe who says trump shamed her over weight gain after winning the crown. alicia machado teamed up with the clinton campaign to take aim at her former employer in a newly released commercial. >> what were the names he called you? >> miss piggy, miss housekeeping, miss eating machine. >> all to your face? >> yes, all the time. >> that was really normal for him. >> you are the new miss universe! [cheers and applause] [speaking spanish] . >> of course you also saw her there on the "today" show talking about how difficult her experience was with donald trump

know what the headlines are, we'll bring them to you. >> redacted for what reason?mation might be too sensitive to the share with the public. perhaps trying to protect someone's name or personal information. there are all sorts of reason why is the fbi might want to redact information before actually releasing them to the public. but of course, craig, this is the issue that secretary clinton just can't seem to shake. these headlines about her e-mail, her use of a personal e-mail server and it is one of the issues that continues to fuel voters lack of trust in her. and of course, we're getting new poll numbers out today which showed that 59% of folks say they do not trust her. 61% though say that they don't find donald trump honest and trust worthy. so he's still beating her in that regard, craig. >> small victory for the travel press who follow the secretary. apparently she is going to start allowing you guys to fly with her, is that right? >> we are going start that on monday. craig, and we are anticipating it greatly. the reason because it's going to hopefully giv

posted on mpd's web site it says foott damage turned over in a foyer ia request may be provided in redactedorm. for we requested an interview with t mr. racine today but we were told he was unavailable.vailabl. his office released this t statement when part: >>> the statement goes on tos ot say the ag has done everything h it can to make sure the requested records are in mpd's d glands why do we wander to seeds these videos anyway. >> reporter: well, basically because we want to see how they're presented, how is the te judge in these cases seeing see this driver behind the wheelhe e of a car? are they showing it i because the driver's slurring his or her words? are we seeing the field sobriety test? is it what they have said? it's recording, also. you can hear what's being s beig were these prosecutors using these videos. it's a powerful toole andth wew think the public has a right a g to know and see what they'rehaty doing and how they're usingy'reg it. >> thanks very much paul. >> thank you paul. >> all right. every once in awhile you come ty across a headline that doesn't't quite sound r

some things are redacted. there are proactive steps that can be taken that can minimize that. but largely everything is, you know, is secret. just trying to get at that is difficult. and that is certainly, you know, part on congress and you know responsibility for changing that. >> one follow-up question on that. there's been recent legislation that requires if there are three requests, i think for the same documents that it needs to be put out in the public reading room, put out publicly and not just given to the requesters. do you think that as a general practice when the agency responds to a foia request that they should deliver it to the requester, him or herself or put it out publicly for everyone to see at the same time. >> i get slammed no matter what when i say this. i'm a journalist. what am i going to say. just give it to me. everyone else, give it tomorrow. i think it is a good practice. i think it's important to get it out there. but there's also something to be said for the analysis of the document. and how to read a document. and understand it, and write about it

for a while i kept redacted information i received. there's one i don't have it anymore exactly, there was the one sentence that read something like blank was the most blank sourceses of blank during the period blank to blank. [laughter] >> okay. someone worked hard at this one. nonetheless, i had some triumphs . each of whom had different ideas about 65-year-old secret would imperil nation security were to be revealed. in 1950, nsa review cut out locations of u.s. intercept stations that had been picking up soviet radar signal but left in protect chris they were operating on. in another it cut out frequencies but left locations. there was one historical study from which the declass office had carefully cut out most of the entries from a table showing the numbers of u.s. and british analysts working on russian codes from 1948 to 29 but they left uncensored and it ended up providing two equations and i was happy to put my junior high school algebra solving for the unknown quantities. all right, let me speak about what i was able to find

those sections are heavily redacted but we now know that would have been one of the special access programs that was discussed on hillary clinton's unsecured server. there's also a section where they ask about an american military officer who was killed in afghanistan. we reported on this case because we understood that this was an example of human intelligence reporting that was discussed on the server. we now know that this person had cover and was working for the cia. so they essentially out ted him after his death in the clinton e-mails and explosiosed his fam to great risk, laura. >> thanks for breaking that down for us. >>> chris stirewalt is joining us from dc. you can always count on the fbi to, shall we say, make friday afternoon pretty interesting before a holiday weekend. >> washington does like to take out the trash on friday. the turkey drop, it's sometimes known as. you take the bad stuff and put it on the curb right before everybody leaves town. >> the fbi is supposed to be nonpartisan, supposed to be completely independent investigators. that's the one thing james comey kept

i knew it was going to be highly redacted. this tells us so much more. >> he did exactly what you wanted. he released all the notes from that lengthy interview. released all the recommendations to the justice department. why there should be no criminal charges. yes, he said she was negligent, extremely careless in dealing with classified information but broke no laws. do you accept that conclusion from comey? >> i do not. he kept going back to there was no intent here. intent has nothing to do with this. it's the gross negligence. look how she answered the questions in the interview. how many i don't remember, i don't recall. i'm a prosecutor. that's the favorite line for defense attorneys when they try to get their defendants, don't lie. to prevent yourself from getting hung up, say i don't remember. she didn't remember classified information. she didn't remember training. i was a u.s. attorney over six years ago, and i remember the training i got for classified information for secret and top secret information. >> what are y

we did make a decision about how we would affect this and we made a very thoughtful response in redacted only limited pii's two people in the public. mr. cummings: how a lot of you been an agent? mr. herring: 17 years. my perspective, think we have to ofck the integrity of all the investigations. i do not want there to be a chilling affect. mr. cummings: one of the things i asked director comey about the full process when you got to congress, getting more and more information from the fbi and whether it would have a chilling effect. it where if the congress does not make or like a -- like a decision, then they oftenmean how much, how will that happen? in other words they are showing us that, you now and then i peoplewill other somebody in congress if they don't like the decision, do we set more and more precedents for other people coming in behind and director comey said he had an all-star group of agents and they had a unanimous decision. you were talking about the chilling effect, do you think, first of all, who makes the decision with respect to reduction, who makes those decisions. d

any redactions have to be based on classification and have to be removed. we have to be able to see that information. we also have questions on what the f.b.i. file contains. oddly enough the copies of the file provided to us by the f.b.i. are different. we are very grateful that they provided the first set on a tuesday. i believe it was august 16. the next day we got a second set. the problem is the second set had 27 e-mails more than the other one. which we are grateful for. it was an improving file. only to have the f.b.i. try to come back and recover those. not because it was s.a.p. material. because it's embarrassing. that's why. it was embarrassing. but we should have had it in the first round. we should have had it at the very beginning. i also want to put this request in context because it's far from the first time congress or even this committee has requested an investigative file from the f.b.i. or the department of justice. congressional committees are routinely provided investigative materials by the department of justice and the f.b.i.. i ask u

the documents had been redacted. it is still an unsolved killing. authorities last month said they are looking for more than one killer. a $10,000 reward is being offered for more information that leads to arrest and convictions. it has been eight years of traffic headaches around the innerbelt bridge very soon the whole project will at long last be completed. but that opening will not come with at least a traffic change or two. for starters both lanes of the inner belt bridge will be closed this weekend until 11 am on sunday. hilary goldstein is live with the new pair of bridges and hillary, this is odot actually the east and westbound bridge together have made up the largest project that odot has ever done. $572 million it cost and even though it took years to get to where we are now we are hoping by the end of october we will iconic bridges in the twin cities has collapsed. 2007 it was a question everyone was asking. leaving people dead. are our bridges safe? >> i 2011 work had begun on constructing a new innerbelt bridge. odot largest undertakin

even redactions there, redaction for deliberative process, not for classification. this document is unclassified. >> i thank you. i yield back. >> we'll recognize the gentleman from michigan. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you, panel, for being here. when did you first become aware of the extent to which secretary clinton relied on private server, e-mails, to address her conduct, her responsibilities, and state department business? >> sir, i couldn't give you a date and time frame, but i do know that when we started receiving the actual documents, at the state department, that's when i realized she was using another device. >> no, sir, we did not have e-mails, did not have a state gov account, so we just searched records we had, sir. >> so you -- so then you -- because i understand it, did not realize extent to which secretary used her private e mate server? on the basis of that, you're saying you couldn't do anything about it? >> did not know about the server or other e-mail account she was using until received in the department. >> how was, if this request was

there were roughly almost 60 pages of documents, entire pages that were redacted. the files also showed clinton claims she could not recall numerous indictment >> is gop strategist. here we go. what do you make of what came out >> i don't think it will have much political impact. i don't think trump is in a position to really capitalize on it. i don't think we can do much with it. it's kind of like nixon, i think she's beating richard nixon, either she's a liar or crooked. can't, both, that's what they said about tricky dix. >> all along your guy donald trump said this whole thing is rigged. here we are on friday afternoon of a holiday weekend. we get a document dump on a friday of a holiday weekend. what do you think about the timing of this? >> the fbi is collaborating and cooperating with hillary clinton's campaign. i mean, why james wanted to this, i have no idea. he could have easily charged her, he could have been a national hero. >> he did not. he said he didn't find the anything that rose to the level of criminal charges. >> as he defined it. remember, he e

i'll get some information, but it's overly redacted we quickly realized that number one it takes a long time and it's very expensive. when 5 investigates tried getting the same info parents would ask for, some schools sent us bills for as little as $45 ,but others wanted as much as $1$700 and $2$500 should parents have trouble getting their hands on settlement agreements? no no. it's clear our superintendents know what that law says. tom scott is executive director of massachusetts association of school superintendents who says >> well i'm not sure it's keeping it under wraps. i mean i think this has posed a concern for schools for sure. is that in the back of their minds? probably to some extent it is. the concern with all the private settlement agreements becoming public that parents will now know exactly what school districts have agreed to pay this student and that student and expect the same for their child. on top of that five investigates discovered a deep disparity. state and found the vast majority of settlement agreements are happening in the wealthier school districts. do you

david: you talk about redaction, i wonder how difficult it is to get your hands on data like this?ow forthcoming are companies with this kind of data? brexit czar to the question asked that said. for them, none of this was public. data control has been public ever since the beginning. the secret was the sample data in the apple data and tax rulings in question. david: what has the level of dialogue been like between your office and apple? was there a robust dialogue? how would you characterize the conversations with apple ahead of this decision? works asd say the case a relationship between us and the irish government and the cooperation has been constructive and open. we disagree on the results of the decision, but to enable the conversion to take place, they have been accommodating. david: could they face penalties as large as this or larger? if you had a smaller company, it would have been much more of a number even if they could do the same thing. david: you met with treasury secretary jack lew and said it was a frankness that should you have. the treasury department submitted

redacted from the previously released clinton emails. today in paris: the lone surviving suspect from last november's paris terror attacks appears in court. this is the vehicle carrying "salah abdeslam" to the courthouse. the 26-year old has been detained at a french prisons since april, when he was extradited in belgium. talk at a previous hearing because of 24-hour surveillance of his prison cell. the attacks in paris killed 130 people last november. and... the competition has begun ?again in rio de janeiro. the 2016 paralympic games kicked off last night with the opening ceremonies. more than two thousand performers took part in the two hour event. the paralympics feature more than four thousand athletes from 161 nations. the actual games begin today... and they will run through you know your heart loves megared omega-3s... but did you know your eyes, your brain, and your joints really love them too? introducing megared advanced 4in1... just one softgel delivers the omega-3 power of two regular fish oil pills... so give your body mega

just redacted for other reasons.to the bottom of why was that server wiped clean mere weeks after a subpoena was issued to preserve the documents? i would just say if an individual out there was a subject of a subpoena from the congress or from the federal government and then a few weeks later they destroyed the documents that were requested, they would -- you would have a ton of bricks fall on them. >> okay. there is two sides of every story. we did invite your democratic colleagues to come on the show and they declined or they didn't want to appear. so i do want to play or read a sound bite -- excuse me, read a quote from representative elijah cummings, he is one of your colleagues and he released in part just yesterday. this is the first time during my 20 years in congress that i have witnessed the oversight power of this committee used in such a transparently political manner to directly influence a presidential election. the committee has been using taxpayer dollars to target secretary clinton in an effort to da

david: you talk about redaction. i wonder how difficult it is for you to get your hands on data from companies like this. how forthcoming are companies with this kind of data? margrethe: one of the ironies is it started with a question asked in the u.s. senate because before then none of this was public. state aid control has been public ever since the beginning. the secret was the apple data and the two taxes in question. -- tax rulings in question. david: what has the level of dialogue been like between dialogue been like been like ---- your office and apple? margrethe: i would say it was frank. the case works as a relationship between us and the irish government and the cooperation has been constructive and open. we disagree on the result of the decision, but to enable the cooperation to take place i think they have been accommodating. david: are there other companies that could face penalties like this or larger? margrethe: the size of the unpaid taxes is a reflection of the size of apple. if you had smaller comp

a self-proclaimed dna expert in colorado to bond for the district attorneys is a judge redacted his claim after prosecutor got them to admit h experience. they cases like casey anthony's murder trial, also operates a lab has been accredited any failed his basic proficiency test in 2011 in 2012 people in douglas county have a new way to travel on the city. i 25 castle rock parkway open to traffic today. officials are urging drivers to pay extra attention as everyone transportation project ever and it took nearly three years to complete. it's our labor day weekend tradition, taste of colorado kicks off tomorrow at civic center park. the be plenty of food, live music, activities for the whole family organizer say about half half-million people are ecstatic affected to attend. a number of road closures, they arty shut down come along with a stretch of colfax avenue. it's open at 1130 tomorrow morning, the event runs eight monday night, around the park barracks would be to reopen by tuesday morning. dps school leaders talked about the district cma results, talk to students and teachers of palm

the house veterans affairs committee with a 31-page redacted summary which is it barred them from making public. now at the urging of congressman mike kaufman, the committee is voting to subpoena the v.a.'s full report. >> the tax payers have a right to know. veterans have a right to know. and congress has to know! it's constitutional oversight responsibility. we're asked to appropriate this money, and to account to of the united states. there is no explanation. no credible explanation how a billion dollars in taxpayer money was wasted without a single individual being fired. how does that happen? >> reporter: he suspects the investigation uncovered corruption and possible criminal wrongdoing and the v.a. is trying to cover it up. the committee she a member of will vote next week to issue the v.a. to release that full report. i'll keep you posted. >>> the broncos taking on the cards. the final preseason game of the year. even though trevor siemian has been named the starting quarterback, he will not be playing tonight. they're giving paxton lynch a chance. >> the fourth preseason game, u

the bureau said it had redact #d classified information under the freedom of information act. that testimony could fall under that umbrella. there's a great deal of interest have said. as for clinton the fbi says during her teen your under tenure under obama there was no criminal neglect. >>> still talking politics, donald trump meantime received his second national security briefing today before heading to court, african american voters approach. >> reporter: last time a republican presidential candidate was 1988. he feels he can cut into clinton's base in philadelphia he might have a shot. some african americans leaders are in north philadelphia. trump having a round table discussion with people on race and immigration. support among african americans digits. trump met with a family who lost a loved one to an illegal immigrant. >>> hillary clinton has no clue what's going on with illegal immigration and doesn't care. >> he will continue his african american outreach tomorrow in michigan when he meets with >>> thank you john, the battle over ohio's golden week continues today

harris: how about the 28 pages not redacted? that, those classified pages we should see? julie: it is 15 years since the terrorist attack took place. time the government let the american people know exactly what saudi involvement is, and we could talk about a potential lawsuit or not depending what the saudi role was. the problem for me continues to be, the previous administration and this administration in very bipartisan manner shielded very bad behavior of kingdom of saudi arabia. harris: why? >> because they're an ally. but at some point, but at some point you have to acknowledge that your ally is export more terrorism than your enemy, iran or anybody else ever could. saudis are on par with iranians exporting terrorism. harris: this administration decided redacted but you can't see everything. >> this administration has been a lot tougher on the saudis than its last predecessor. president george w. bush, i commend him for had a personal relationship. i traveled with him to the kingdom in 2008. we all saw first-hand with king

much of the message was redacted ahead of its release.esterday john kirby discussed the move by clinton and why information in that e-mail was retroactively classified. >> is it unusual for prior secretaries of state to communicate with current staff, particularly in -- not long after they left, absolutely that's not unusual at all. as we previously explained foreign government information may be protected from public release both the executive foreign affairs manual acknowledge that foreign government information often can be maintained on unclassified systems and yet we have a proscription to in order to order to release a document that contains foreign information it has to be redacted. >> the trump campaign weighed in on the revolution releasing a statement that reads in part, hillary clinton's seekd ret server jeopardized our national security and sensitive and shockingly now appears her reckless conduct continued even after leaving the statement department. >>> still ahead, an arrest at the u.s. open after a spectator jumps on to th

what she wrote had to be redacted and a lot of docuements had to be redacted because it was so sensitiveit was about the 1, 2, 3, deal with the united arab emirates. one, two, three, deal referred to a 2009 agreement with the u.a.e. to share material and technology for nuclear energy. so, general, i thought that hillary clinton didn't send or receive classified information at all? >> and so the fact that it is after she left government and she is still in the process of sharing and receiving classified information, i mean, you know, sort of stepping back, just this incredible perpetuation of fraud, dishonesty, and in everything that is coming out. at a certain point in time the american public has just got to say, when is it going to end? what should we expect to come out next? is there going to be, beyond shoes being dropped, the shoes have been dropped. if there is something has been done to me this, is one of the greatest leaks of national security secrets we have had from the time she started as secretary of state, using unclassified device. now finding out after the fact, she still

the report on the 8 victims from the rhoden family is heavily redacted. >> all the victims were shot multiple time two babies were left alive. so far no rays. >>> rangers say sofia barr was texting and driving when losing control of her car. sofia and her sister were seriously injured. three other teenagers were also hurt. >> no one was wearing a seat belt. no charges at this time. >>> we are asking questions now that cleveland teachers did not approve a contract. that big question is what's next. dan deroos is in the answer center to tell us. dan? >> a lot of people scrambling last night when teachers voted spending so many hours hammering out. >> we have two factions. the cleveland teachers union and cleveland metropolitan school district. what's next. the teachers have given the union the power to strike and they voted they as a group would strike and that was supposed to happen september 1. they didn't think they would need to. >> we have to ask, do teachers we were told no. the vote can stand up. what they have to do is the union would have to give the school district a 10 day n

at stake is classification and redaction in fbi's investigative file of clinton. a consumer alert for drivers this afternoon-- general motors is recalling more than 4 million vehicles... because the airbags are fe the specific vehicles affected are on your screen right now. they're all model years 20-14 to 20-17. g-m says a software problem could prevent the airbag from deploying during a crash... and it can also affect seat belts. the defect is now linked to at least one death and three injuries. we'll put a link to the full list on ktnv.com. an engineer from volkswagen is pleading guilty in connection to that emissions cheating scandal-- and now he will have workers. the man pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the government through wire fraud. he is the first person to enter a plea in the case and his cooperation is a major breakthrough in the justice department's investigation. a 6 year old boy in brooklyn is recovering... after a recalled samsung galaxy note explodes in his hands! the boy's grandmother says he was watching videos when the batter

i support the amendment with the redaction. i do want to protect whistle blowers. but i just don't want to lose the moment here that what are we, 60 days out from an election? suddenly, we're all worried about these documents. why haven't we been working with these documents the entire time, and isn't that the role of the oversight and investigation subcommittee? that's just my comment. >> any other members wish to spout off? >> i want to spout off. >> dr. roe. >> i concur with what you said. inquestion is why in the world didn't the v.a. bring these documents up here. why are we having to do this? i have been here now almost eight years, and you hear this over and over and over again from these people. i mean, they should be up here bringing them. we shouldn't even have to ask for them. they should be saying, how do we make this better? we messed this up royally. the fact we're having to do this annoying me to no end, and it's time for this to stop. >> but senator, with all due respect, i agree. i'm saying if the oversight and investigation subcommittee went to au

it took 14 years for the united states government to release 28 pages, 28 redacted pages. how confident are you that the united states government will release thousands of more pages of investigatoriry material when it took 14 years to get 28 pages? >> well get a test tomorrow how much news comes out of this press conference, that point out 28 pages were not the end as the foreign minister of saudi arabia has said but just a opening to massive amounts of additional information. to give you one example, going back to that sarasota case, after the fbi had released that statement, that there were no connections, the investigation was complete, they turned over information about this, then there were a series of freedom of information act initiated. incidentally i learned one thing throughout this. if you have, any of you been involved in a freedom of information act? well, i think the law should be amended and the amendment should be to require that at the time you file your freedom of information, you also have to file a certified statement from an actuary as to what your li

the information has shown us should not be redacted. so we want to know about that. and then i want to get at the i.t. geeks. they are the ones who really know what's happening. according to the fbi reports, some of these people evidently pled the fifth. and the time line really doesn't look request for what clinton did with these federal records. >> the majority leader, he got into a lot of trouble when he said the entire thing, benghazi, all of these investigations, in effect he said they're political. look at hillary clinton. look how her numbers have gone down as a result of this. the accusation against you, you're doing this now for political reasons. >> no. hillary clinton chose this time line. she came one this convenient relationship with herself. she's the one who delayed the release of these for so long. even to this day, the state department has still not turned over to congress all the information and we just got the fbi report a couple weeks ago. no matter the election, i'm the chairman of the oversight committee. of course we're going to do this investi