the transbay redevelopment project area was adopted in 2005 with the purpose of redeveloping 10 acres of property that were owned by the state of california to generate funding for the transbay power authority to construct the new transbay transit center and meet the affordable housing requirements. 8812 is an enforceable obligation that requires ocii a successor agency to the san francisco redevelopment to ensure that they're affordable to an occupied by very low, low and moderate fk households. the implementation agreement is an enforceable obligation that requires ocii to sell that state property to [inaudible]. >> a little bit of history, in july 2011, pursuant to that implementation agreement, the former agency issued a request for proposals to design in december of 2011 after a competitive selection process the former agency commission conditionally authorized staff to enter into negotiations for the development of block suks and seven with a development or mercy. on april 16 of 2013 the commission approved a disposition or development agreement or a dda with mercy for block six

middle point and west point roads, bay view hunters point redevelopment project area. an item 5d, authorizing a personal services contract with urban analytic a california limited liability corporation in an amount not to exceed 53,000 dlar related to the propose td issuance of tax allocation revenue bond and preparation of tax allocation bond with provisions for extension through december 31, 2015 for additional disclosure and analytical work in an amount not to exceed 12,000 dlar for a total amount not to exceed 65,000 dlar. action number 672014. >> thank you. do we have any speaker cards? >> no speaker cards. >> okay. no speaker cards. anyone in the audience would like to speak on any one of these items that are on consent? okay. so i'll close public commented. commissioners, we have three i p tells we can take individually. do i hear any comment or motion on approval of minutes of the regular meeting of july a. >> second. >> moved and seconded. >> please announce your vote. mondejar. >> yes. >> sink. >> yes. >> rosales. >> yes. >> the vote is three is. >> the next

the redevelopment plan gives the commission the permission to meet the affordable housing requirement if it results in practical hardship

the redevelopment plan gives the commission the permission to meet the affordable housing requirement if it results in practical hardship enforcement will constitute an unreasonable plan and their unique restraint applicable to the property it gives the commission the authority to approve a variation to secure the goals and the related documents. one 91 fremont street is a mixed neighborhood high i rise project in zone two of the project area designed by the j paul company it's currently under construction and was approved in 2014 it's a 52 story seven hundred foot tall building containing 4 hundred thousand square feet of office and for sale the highest 15 floors of the tower and have 15 thousand feet of retail and 16 thousand square feet of sub terrain parking spaces and in compliance with the on-site requirement the project requires that 11 of the 74 unit be available for low income families. the project developer estimates that hoa fees will exceed 2 hundred $0.34 thousand dollars per month are the are developer has requested the 11 on site variance from the demonstration the 11 o

project years before that i've heard will about the redevelopment in the 60s and the urban renewal split that community and the particular design shown here reflects a little bit of that pattern of redevelopment and maybe some work can be done there but other than that comment i want to stick to the eir and in the eir itself it says that the commission and other approval bodies can consider affordability apart from the eir the only reap i will say it's kind of a reason for us to look at it now i look knowing how it works if you look at affordability beforehand and look at the change it is a thought potentially a comment to add to the board of supervisors again understanding that affordability is not an environmental impact is something we consider part of the environmental impact report or the sequa analysis ii didn't see that the geary brt and other proposed changes that mta and the city has - have developed for the will developments that are included part of this plan that's problematic many of the comments say the number of roivents is going to raise car trips and the amount of car tr

i'm excited to continue the promise to make sure we fulfill that promise to the people in the redevelopment zones and areas and now part of the community on infrastructure and investment so with that, i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> any questions seeing none, thank you very much any public comment on that item? come on up you have two minutes each. >> hello supervisors my name is according to hernandez an organizer for 2 61 on behalf of the members we support this gentleman i have a letter from our business manager ramona asking for our support for miguel he was invested in the creation of thousands of job a long term friend of the community so, please support his candidacy for 9 investment and infrastructure. >> thank you good afternoon with bright line defense i also want to speak in favor and support missing gull gos to see we were still in local hiring before supervisor avalos lead the charge for local hiring i the mayor ed lee make sure we have a successful local hiring law but before that there was only a handful of places and this was redevelopment because comm

here's a map of the area the shatd are the redevelopment area that's an enforceable obligation moving forward with the bonds and those are the parcels off the infrastructure that is currently going through the process of the position and development zone two is part of the redevelopment areas those are privately held parcels. and the red boundary is the planning boundary of the transbay center we've rezoned as part of the plan it's identical to the boundary for the medical rose district the plan it's created significant additional zone capacity in the transit center area rising the heights on the parcels of seven hundred up to one thousand feet for the transit he turn over resulting in about 4 million square feet of development over what was previously there was the zone capacity for. again, the point of this is to one capitalize on the transbay transit center and to raise funds oh, the laptop is not working sorry. sorry i'm just keep talking. the plan had detailed streetscape plan that had a number of different recommendation for complovg the streets it called for 12 acres of open sp

we will continue to build more permanently affordable housing, whether it's a part of the redevelopment plans of the office of community investment and instrument, or part of parcels provided to us through land dedication and through public sites. >> mr. lee, we won't hold it against you if you use your backup plan. [laughter ] >> okay, i will keep that in mind. we also need to expand the overall stock of housing. and that means both market-rate, as well as affordable housing. and that through this process the mayor has clearly directed city staff, city departments to talk about streamlining and that is why the report was directed primarily at the mayor's office on housing, but also in coordination of the work that the mayor's office on housing does with the department of building inspection, tom, the director of the department of building inspection is here, as well as your coordination with the planning department, and kate conner from the planning department is here. one of the first things that we want to say is that we agree with the grand jury report globally. i think we are pleas

and infrastructure to the mayor's office of housing and community development pursuant to the redevelopment law, passed by brown in 2012. and the property convey ens is memorialized in the quitclaim deed, it was unanimously approved by the ocii commission, 31-304 four, on may sixth, and approved by the oversight poor per resolution, 5-2104, on june nine, 2014, the copies of which are available in your packet. >> this resolution will also authority the mayor's office of housing and community development as successful housing agency to the redevelopment agency to enter into a long term ground lease with mercy housing california, for the development and operation of 69 units, of affordable housing at 1009 howard street, the term of this lease is 70 years and contemplates an option to extend years of 99 years. and the proposed project will involve the construction of a 9 story 67 unit, multifamily rental comprised of studios one and two and three bedroom units with ground floor courtyard and commercial space, as previously mentioned 52 of these units will be affordable to the households making

the spring of 2013 that brought in many million dollars and then finally you see the transbay redevelopment area by zone one and two. the transbay project is designated to receive a specified portion of property tax of regular property tax revenues from the transbay redevelopment area and we're specified to receive those revenues over the course of 2005 to 2050 we're using the revenues to repay a federal infrastructure lesson that was called a tiff loan for phase one but the amount of property tax revenues we're going to collect over the 45 year period is much more than we're going to need to repay the loan so it will allow us to do a second loan for the a t x. and so in terms of overall cost of the d t x our board approved a $2.6 billion for the 2008 that is a traditional design approach we worked with our financial consultants to revise it estimate for $2,014 and in today's dollars that repeals $3 billion approximately $3 billion to construct the d t x one and a $180 million what was for a fire chief grade for the tracks bringing in caltrain from the south bay it's been a goal of the city

because of this, we seek a positive resolution for the redevelopment of the candlestick point hunters shipyard where we can seek new active development of the parks that are proposed to be put at the candlestick park area. with it we also seek to integrate our designs with linear corporation as linear being the agency to take on the current task at the shipyard and candlestick point. as we see it as a vital asset moving forward at candlestick, we do see it as an punctuate -- opportunity for the community to be act interview this development for the future plan moving forward. because of that i request new opportunity to bring before the commission at a future date to -- >> thank you. that's our time. we know where you are going with that. so thank you very much. >> okay. thank you. >> any other member of the public wish to speak on items not on our agenda? we'll close public comment. commissioners, that places you on department matters, item one, review events at the staff commission reports and announcements. >> planning commission is currently on break, so i don't have a report from

commercial project on block 5 portion of lot 25 and portion of lot 27 on howard street transbay redevelopment project discussion and act 2014 madam director. >> commissioner i'm sure you're aware of our agreement with the transbay joint powers authority requires ocii to dispose of certainty public parcels in the transbay project area you've seen a number of parcels 0 come

bye like south of market and other ores the plans like the eastern neighborhood in blue and the redevelopment mission bay transbay and the shipyard and in red the hope sf the housing authority the areas represent by 80 thousand housing unit and one hundred and 50 thousand jobs that didn't allow us to chief the regional numbers we still have work to do. on the waterfront we have several areas, of course, that we are working with your staff to look at potential development on open space many those areas primarily 7 areas like the hunters point and shipyard and candle stick point by pier 47 and 48 the mission bay waterfront where the warriors are a proposed and immediately south of you 70 the baseline site identified here and the hunters point and candle stick of those 7 major areas 4 of them are controlled by the port and 3 or not well, the other way around 2 are private sites. and so it's the port sites that are subject to the recent proposition regarding the height prospectives to remind you of how it proposition works in addition, we have the opportunity - it show the job growth those areas

smooth and that ramp will be closed for 6 months to create a more usually partly to support the redevelopment program the bay area i want to congratulate cindy and kim who you who supported the astronomical vehicles to the car flooethd fleet the transportation authority helped with the fleet policy several years ago we received a very climate initiative from m t c and caltrain for this initiative project and this promotion adaptation of clean technology finally cindy fong our intrepid deputy for the administration has launched our enterprise system this is a major management system financial and computer systems that allow us to have streamlined

smooth and that ramp will be closed for 6 months to create a more usually partly to support the redevelopment program the bay area i want to congratulate cindy and kim who you who supported the astronomical vehicles to the car flooethd fleet the transportation authority helped with the fleet policy several years ago we received a very climate initiative from m t c and caltrain for this initiative project and this promotion adaptation of clean technology finally cindy fong our intrepid deputy for the administration has launched our enterprise system this is a major management system financial and computer systems that allow us to have streamlined access to processes and accounts that will allow us to do business with our partners and partners thank you very much to cynthia and many members of the team that implemented that prong in a quick and efficient manner thank you for your generation al improvements in our efficiency finally, i would like to close with a thank you to elizabeth she's our analysis person that will be heading to the seattle area to join her partner as we start a new life el

on the roster is the first 3 payments of a loan amount borrowed from the low and merry-go-round redevelopment days some of you may remembered a supplemental payment needed to be made the development borrowed money from the housing fund in dissolution the state that debt could be paid back at a measurement rate. and so, now that the city has become the housing successor agency paying back that is the property tax to the city we're proposing to pay $3 million back to the city towards that $16 million borrowing that took place in the past and finally one and a half million dollars that are consistent with the full year's budget we talked about $3 million for the year this follows through on that planned budget we had before. so as i mentioned there's likely to be a deficiency based on current estimates maybe 8 to $9 million after the pass through to the tax amenities and the pass there is no 2 wouldn't be up to $109 million what do we do the dissolution law allows us to declare a deficiency we have two strategies we can follow the one we previous is something we've calling the treasurer loan req

we would like to point out when the redevelopment agency planned the tower separation it was set at 2 hundred feet between buildings to provide open space please don't take a moment to consider a project that pits the tower separation at 17 foot. the current city tower separation limit is one hundred and 15 feet again many times more than the 17 feet minimum tower separation between the developers proposed project and the preferable alternative look at one hundred and 15 feet between towers we're concerned this proposed project asks for spot zoning it asks for lack to ignore the cumulative impact of the developments in the area. please look at alternative d and flush it out further. thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. i'm sue i'm the chair of the sierra club this comments represent my own opinion i'm let you which know when i speak only on behalf of the sierra i find this flawed i know that changes in parking supply don't impact this that's ridiculous the parking spaces will generate 3 thousand 1 one hundred and 82 new car trips this is the opposite direction the number of par

i think the planning commission has a bigger responsibility now the redevelopment agency it no more there's no one left to have a hearing on the area around the heart of the mucus center it was really needed i speak as someone that's been watching the conferenceers coming down irving and fourth a big intersection it's one of the main impediments to circulation in that area the traffic is helter-sketler and the pedestrians are out i have control and a lot of the people going through the intersection are going to the convention you see the badges on their chests i was disappointed in the eir the eir basically said it was foreign territory when our talking about fourth of market they only deal with fulsome and howard. the reality is people live the convention center and head to their hotel down eric street and market street. there's really insignificant traffic control pedestrian control we need desperately widened sidewalks every time a convention is in the blocks howard street the traffic the muni is ridiculous. because it is an obstruction of the main thoroughfare we have the world's most t

tool to make sure we get that without redevelopment and we also want to make sure we're considering land use in the selma carefully and not want to be approving proemgz and there's a lot of pressure in the neighborhood as real estate it look at in the area to fast pace some of their projects so what does this moratorium do the ordinances prevents the planning department to issue an approval to replace pdr by a non-pdr in the selma area it exempts the zoning district and proposed projects that comprise one hundred percent of the housing 415.1 and properties containing any of the pdr uses gas stations mrartsz are self-storage and properties subject to a development code under chapter 6 and the california government code and projects that have submitted an environmental plan where pdr conversions is allowed or in or green before september it's a moratorium will only be in place for 45 days as required by law our intent so 0 reduce the controls and extend it until the plan is adapted i want to recognize the mayor and his office in his commitment to make that a reality awhile on recess t