no agreement was made by the redevelopment agency. in fact, they stopped a pack committee on bayview hunters point that had been there since the beginning. no fund was given to the packet and the shipyard is still there. here all of a sudden i read in the newspaper about this other area. maybe you are not aware of it but i brought information for you all to read. and not to vote on this item today. what you need to do is find out from the infrastructure committee of the redevelopment agency about the be funding of that area sometime ago. how is it all of a sudden here they are back again. that area is a toxic site super fund site. that was a developer dealing with the executive part when they first got started. they tested that ground over there because they were going there. but it's too toxic. all of a sudden here we come again. not only did the supervisor of the area district 10 start this madness and here we have the land use committee, the city planning committee all being rubber stamped because of something the supervisor of dis

i want to acknowledge we're very aware of the labor of the redevelopment and how key it was in a lot of the moving forward in the development of the city the hunters point and the areas named to through out the baby with the bathwater was not the great thing the successor agency has to manage the funds and bob is an excellent representative of - i do want to remind that you bob is the employee person who was chaired to the labor council in setting the table for the negotiations that have happened with so many of the employees that are here in the city and county of san francisco and hesitate navigation is good to move him forward we're proud to have him as a representative i urge your reappointment to the board >> thank you any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed. a supervisor tang >> all right. well i again really want to thank bob for taking the time to serve it's a complicated issue. and so i know that given our work and local 21 and some of the members that are working were formerly at the redevelopment agency it's important to have our prospective

it has been around a long time and it is seen, fortunately, or unfortunately the passing of the redevelopment agency and the expiration of the plan itself and thus, the actions that you are left with were the merely the conveyance of the parcels to millennium. and historically, or typically this would not have been a big deal, fairly straight forward transaction, except along the way, the redevelopment agency was dissolved and the state put into place a number of procedures that actually required former redevelopment agency to dispose of property but more significantly require scrutiny by the state to be sure that it fulfills the purposes of the dissolution law, and so when you approved the purchase and sale agreement, to the millennium in july, you also approved a parcel property management plan which was sort of the governing document to the state that authorized and indicated that the transfer, or the conveyance was consistent with dissolution law. and subsequently in september, the department of finance approved the purchase and sale agreement, as well as the property management plan afte

i'm sure you're aware of bossing both of those were in redevelopment project areas and therefore the land use jurisdiction tassels falls to what had been the redevelopment agency and now ocii the prong has a my rid approval and i'm going to phone call know if on the ones from the planning commission. on top of the sequa related actions you approved amendments to redevelopment plans with the bayview hunters point and the shipyard plan you made modifications for the plans creating the area plans specifically for candle stick and the hunters point shipyard you approved the approvals then and that could be used or subsequential for approvals we created a special use district that made clear that the jurisdiction fell to the redevelopment agency but perhaps most important for today's discussion you approved the cooperative agreement between ocii and planning that outlined what staffs roll would be as the projects came forward for their final approvals specifically our roll ace staff we review comments on particular stages a major phase application what they're ready to moved on several bl

the key portion of the mission bay south redevelopment area plan.s transaction will allow ucsf to expand their campus in mission bay, but there were negotiations that took place regarding the payment of pilot of ucsf is both the nonprofit that is obligated under this redevelopment area plan to pay fees. so, there's was a negotiation. ken rich is here from mayor's office of economic development and we also do have christine ma her from ocii to present on the item to discuss the negotiation and what will come forward from the proceeds from those funds. >> thank you, supervisor kim. before we proceed on this item, it was just brought to my attention by deputy city attorney apparently on the last item we actually had gotten the numbers wrong. so, if i could ask for deputy city attorney, i think we need to rescind the vote and recast the vote to properly affirm the approval of the mitigated negative declaration. but anything else you want to add to that? >> deputy city attorney jon givner. so, the board voted to affirm the final mitigated negative declar

after several years of analysis the process recently concluded with the adaptation of the redevelopment plan zoning changes a master plan to guide the changes on site, however, with the demise with the agency in 2012 the loss of tens of millions of dollars dollars in tax increments funding that accompanied this project has required us to reaccess and give a fresh look at the community goals. it's been challenging to move forward to say the least especially moving forward without redevelopment funds but we've been able to lean on the advisory committee members it's been flexible and they've rolled up their sleeves to revitalization this project. we've been working with the mayor's office and other agencies that includes sfmta to come up with thoughtful solutions to help us meet the gap we found ourselves in after the dissolution of the redevelopment agency. what we have a simple today, i'm asking for your supporting to commit $2 million for the bay area caltrain project adjacent to the schlage lock project site. the transportation study that was adapted in march of 2013 identified a conn

ett and participated in the planning fight and served as an advisor under the redevelopment agency and advice or to the project after and became a booster for a lessor known neighborhood but a wonderful one doing my

ett and participated in the planning fight and served as an advisor under the redevelopment agency and advice or to the project after and became a booster for a lessor known neighborhood but a wonderful one doing my part and san francisco's borders extend further than they think and we must act collectively. transportation infrastructure changes -- cut me off but i do speak in support of this project thank you very much. >> thank you very much. next speaker. jim. >> good morning committee.

and it goes back to 1994, when the commissioner actually before that, and i guess, when the redevelopment agency first acquired the property, with what was then called udag funds, and subsequently became the cgb program and acquired most of the project area with these funds including the parcel and it was conveyed in july. a stand alone museum and in 2008 and a new proposal came forward to have millennium build a tower and encorporate the cultural space and in the building and so it has been around a long time and it is seen, fortunately, or unfortunately the passing of the redevelopment agency and the expiration of the plan itself and thus, the actions that you are left with were the merely the conveyance of the parcels to millennium. and historically, or typically this would not have been a big deal, fairly straight forward transaction, except along the way, the redevelopment agency was dissolved and the state put into place a number of procedures that actually required former redevelopment agency to dispose of property

detailed a master plan to help guide change on this particular site however with the demise of the redevelopment agency in early 2012 it's required us to reassess and give a fresh look at the communities goal for this particular site. it's been challenge to move this forward but the community and especially the board members have been flexible and rolled up their sleeves to work with us to reenvision to make this project a reality. what you have before you today includes a grocery store, new infrastructure and transportation improvements new public parks and open space affordable housing restoration of the historic office building payment of development impact fees and a special transportation fee and most importantly a significant investment in the community. this project has had true community support from the beginning and there's only not a day that goes by that i don't hear from neighbors about development projects that have been going on in the district. i've never seen a project in a neighborhood like this one that's come together to shape a project that has not only good for the neighbor

it's been challenging to move forward to say the least especially moving forward without redevelopment funds but we've been able to lean on the advisory committee members it's been flexible and they've rolled up their sleeves to revitalization this project. we've been working with the mayor's office and other agencies that includes sfmta to come up with thoughtful solutions to help us meet the gap we found ourselves in after the dissolution of the redevelopment agency. what we have a simple today, i'm asking for your supporting to commit $2 million for the bay area caltrain project adjacent to the schlage lock project site. the transportation study that was adapted in march of 2013 identified a connection to the bayer station as one of the priority. we've learned throughout the community process that transportation improvements and access continue to be a priority for the members of the southeast. now we have today will help expedite the construction of an interim pedestrian connection through the development site as the overall project is constructed that can save caltrain users more

i served on the advisory committee under redevelopment on this project. i'm a small business owner i know it will be good for the city and paragon has shown to be a good partner. i think the one place with the development agreement it's an imperative world we don't have the same tools or we had to make a lot of compromises but in the end we've arrived at a good place this is a community driven project and the developers agreement there's meetings need to update the community i feel that's an inadequate amount i'd like to see the city and the planning department and the developer to commit to hearing in visitacion valley we have a great library a great place to have those meetings i want to see that happen as part of the process so we can again e keep the community voice in the project. the city and developer is going to want it there's going to be changes but overall i really want to see this project move forward and i am grateful to my community that worked hard so thank you for hearing my comment >> thank you >> thank you public comment? seeing none, pu

i served on the advisory committee under redevelopment on this project. i'm a small business owner i know it will be good for the city and paragon has shown to be a good partner. i think the one place with the development agreement it's an imperative world we don't have the same tools or we had to make a lot of compromises but in the end we've arrived at a good place this is a community driven project and the

expend the period of those that property tax increment is allocated to the project even though redevelopment has dissolved to the plan are will expire in 2050 the property taxs will be collected and we will allocate those from 2050 to 20060 that generates another million dollars and we're going to look at down the road when the d t x is implemented collecting the passenger fees a that's the as far on the tickets for high speed rail that depending on with it begins could generate several hundreds of million dollars and we've got two parcels that are valuable pieces of land in downtown san francisco we can't sell because it's the temporary terminal and the sequa second for construction phasing so that's on the $120 million so adding that you can see a path towards having a considerable amount of phased two that funding lined up and if we look at a different method like a public-private partnership it would be possible to reduce those costs and many of the funding streams i've mentioned do flow over time so could lend themselves to an availability payment so we could use o for a milestone payme

corporation is the master project people for the candle stick point this is for the purpose of redeveloping the shipyard at the candle stick point and now ocii executed the disposition or d da with the development company. lenar have required is minimum of $20,000 for the replacement unit and 70 thousands toward the redevelopment costs at the alice griffith. the ocii is providing a base subsidy to be different among the folks. and it was awarded a hud choice implementation grant or c n i in the amount of thirty point plus million dollars for the developed at alice griffith. the c and i have a one statutory project to be verified for the portion felt funds for phases one and two this laws the mayor's office of housing to make application for the bonds along with the other funding to start the construction to meet the critical hud deadlines those are conduit financing that doesn't law allow the city to replace the bonds this is for the committee in july of this year and if awarded that will return to issue the bonds this year this is slated to begin in january 2015 and completed in july 2016

the work force requirements, of course, has long existed with the redevelopment agency and ocii. it effectively requires implementation of work force hiring on private projects that does not exist with the city. and then also with the prevailing wage policy what was unique in this sentence is that we require our contractors and developers to pay prevailing wages where state law does not require it to do so, but that's a foresight of the prior redevelopment agency. i did want to mention that on june 10, 2014, the board of supervisors did adopt expansion of the local hiring ordinance to effectively also apply local hiring and prevailing wages on effectively ly private projects on public land and i believe that's pending the mayor's approval or enactment. more specifically about the small business program with ocii, since 2004, ocii has adopted a policy that effectively carries forward the minority and women business program that existed with the agency for many years. it's an evolution of their program. the objective of course has always been to ensure that small disadvantaged busi

we've had many years of redevelopment. a lot of market rate development going on in the city, it's great that the mayor's budget accelerates our ability to tap into the housing trust funds. how is mo going to -- mayor's office of housing going to accelerate the production of affordable housing in san francisco? ~ moh >> this proposed budget is consistent with the mayor's goal of producing 10,000 units of affordable housing over the next six years. so, this is clearly critical to the first steps. now this is a two-year period, but clearly we will be coming back to this board in the future for additional funds for future investments in affordable housing development. so, specifically, in terms of this budget, we are currently jump starting four developments that will be initiated and hopefully completed during the next six years. we have also in this process, we spent a lot of time over the last couple years sorting out, one, getting the housing trust fund, creating those programs and initiating those programs. among those p

i believe t i believe the community supports this project there's been redevelopment in the scene and the whole economic downturn a lot of issues that got us to the point but i believe that claudia the planner pointed out we have hopefully, a deadline to get this moving forward and not going away there's a lot of interest just elevating things we don't have the same structure but we are interested in being involved as we moved so hopefully, we'll get approval and one last thing schlage lock was a brand in san francisco le levy straus is a brand so don't forget that. thank you >> (calling names). >> commissioner president wu and planning commissioners i'm rob the director of real estate for union pacific railroad in the bay area. as you saw if the presentation by your staff we have property that's involved in proposed schlage lock for redevelopments 1 point 1 thousand acres between the schlage lock facility and i have a map i hopefully can display here >> yes. >> our property is in the middle so the outline of the red crossing the schlage lock site to the left and the joint powers righ

however, with the demise of the redevelopment agency in early 2000 and the loss of tens of millions of dollars dollars of tax implement funding required us to reaccess and come to the table with a fresh look at the communities goals for this proposal. and for this particular site it's been challenging to move forward without the redevelopment funds but the community especially the advisory committee have been incredibly flexible and rolled up their sleeves so you have before you today accomplishes many of the goals of the original project that cluts includes a grocery store and new public parks and small property owner and affordable housing and the restoration of the historic office building and the payment of the development impact fees including the visitacion valley extra no other fee and a special transportation fee and most importantly a significant investment in the community that has historically lacked attention and t is finally getting the attention it deserves it can be controversial trust me i know about controversy in projects got several on my plate this particular projec

commissioners, as part of your aggressive work program in the transbay redevelopment project area, we are again entering into an exciting time and phase for transbay for these state parcels. in doing so really providing true community benefits in terms of affordable housing as well as mixed use housing, appropriate retail along folsom to create that true whole neighborhood. this is one of the many parcels you will see this year so we're pleased to bring this exclusive negotiation agreement to you before your consideration. with that, i'd like to ask courtney to walk you through the selection process to pick the proposed development team and she'll introduce the members of team and be joined by others from the development team as well as the project architect. >> good afternoon. i'm courtney pash, i'm joined by mike russo and bill, who will introduce the rest of their team after i'm finished with my presentation. as you know, i'm here before you seeking approval of our executive director to execute an exclusive negotiation agreement or ena with related and tndc to develop a mixed incom

it's been challenging to move forward to say the least especially moving forward without redevelopment funds but we've been able to lean on the advisory committee members it's been flexible and they've rolled up their sleeves to revitalization this project. we've been working with the mayor's office and other agencies that includes sfmta to come up with thoughtful solutions to help us meet the gap we found ourselves in after the dissolution of the redevelopment agency. what we have a simple today, i'm asking for your supporting to commit $2 million for the bay area caltrain

. >> that's a resolution budget of the -- operating as the agency to the san francisco redevelopment agency for fiscal year 2014-2015. item number 5 is a resolution approving the budget of office infrastructure operating as an agency to the san francisco redevelopment agency for fiscal year 2014-15. >> thank you, welcome. >> thank you. thank you, mr. chairman, and good afternoon to the supervisors, and the controllers office and the budget's office. oci, the successor agency to redevelopment agencies since they were dissolved two and a half years ago and we've come a long way since then. we have a great deal of certainty in our major approved project years, shift you are candle stick and mission bay and this is good news because of the work we've been doing with you, our city partners over the last two and a half years to really move forward and accelerate that critical infrastructure and affordable housing so i'll move to slide 2 on the power points. in terms of the mild stone, creating that certainty for those three projects. those are completed and done. we've been allowed to keep