redfield was the head of the cdc. he was supposed to be in charge of the response, frankly, for the u.s. government. he and a guy who has the assistant secretary for the pandemic preparedness at health and human services. both of them disagreed with fauci on the origin issue, just because of the so-called theology. this spread like wildfire from the beginning. it didn't act like a disease that was jumping gradually within nature. the reason -- and we are confident based on our intelligence work with the intelligence community and through our source network at the state department that the wuhan institute was engaged in highly dangerous gain-of-function research involving synthetic biology to make this into a super virus. and they said they were doing it so they could create some sort of super vaccine. well, that didn't work. the guy in charge of the vaccine, also funded by fauci, and major general in the people's liberation army, apparently either jumped or was thrown off the top of the wuhan institute in may of 2020

who is robert redfield? >> the former director of the cdc. >> dr. redfield, right?and he was also on the coronavirus task force, i could. >> was he was a member of the task or. >> is what he said to this committee picky set redfield said fauci and collins left a because redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the chinese lab. if that i could. >> as well, he said that but that's not true. that is incorrect, congressman. >> dr. redfield is lying to the committee? >> when he said i kept them out, that is an incorrect statement. the roster speedy dr. redfield in a covert call on february 1 when you had mr. anderson and dr. gary on the call. >> was he was not. and the conference call was put together by jeremy ferrara. so no one kept him out. he said he was kicked out because speedy the use tax posted to be the answer the question broke i was just what he was on the call. teammate had a cbc part of the coronavirus task force which is for judas by physical would have. >> the call was arranged by jeremy from rpg's ask him. >> okay. did use tax, full theresa may

. >> who is robert redfield? >> the former director of the cdc. >> he was also on the coronavirus task force. is that accurate? >> he was a member of the coronavirus task force. >> "left them out because redfield suspected that coronavirus had leak from the chinese lab." is that accurate? >> he said that, but that's not true. that is incorrect, congressman. >> dr. redfield is lying to the committee and sat right where you said. >> when he said that i kept him out, that is an incorrect statement. the roster -- >> was dr. redfield on that conference call when you had mr. anderson and dr. gary on that call? >> he was not. the conference call was put together by jeremy. knowing kept him out. he said he was kept out because he felt -- >> did u.s. tax dollars? >> do you want me to answer the question? >> part of the coronavirus task force would have been on the call. >> the call was arranged for you should ask him. >> did u.s. tax dollars go through a recipient grant through a lab in china? >> i'm sorry. >> did u.s. ta

robert redfield, thank you again. we'll speak soon. >> dana: thank you. [applause] >> dana: a standing ovation for an nypd officer released from the hospital this morning after being shot overnight in new york city. police say a venezuelan migrant is behind the attack that the mayor calls a senseless act of violence. nate foye has the story. >> crime scene is still active in queens, new york as two nypd officers narrowly escaped with their lives. police have taped off about two city blocks. you see several evidence markers in the middle of the road. one of them on top of a moped that police say the venezuelan migrant was riding. police were investigating a robbery saying the migrant was riding that moped the wrong way down the street and tried pulling him over. he got off the moped and during a chase they ran after him. police say that migrant shot those two officers, one of them in the leg, and the other in a bullet-proof vest that you are about to see momentarily. the good news is from that video you just showed, both officers are okay. they left the ho

was cdc director redfield on that call? >> no. >> you said you had to rely on virologists and biologists regarding origin because you are not an expert. is dr. redfield a virologist? >> i believe he is, yes. >> he is. prior to the pandemic, niaid awarded at least three grants via the new york blood center to dr. -- are you aware of these? >> i'm sorry to -- >> dr. zao. are you aware of those grants? dr. usin, zao. your microphone is not on. >> i'm not familiar with that name. >> well, niaid awarded at least three grants to that scientist. a high ranking official and director of the lab at the chinese academy of military sigh tenses. does it concern you if u.s. taxpayer dollars are funding someone like this? >> grants that are submitted to the niaid go -- >> does it concern you. i'm not talking about the process. does it concern you that u.s. taxpayer dollars would be going to someone who is a high ranking chinese pla official, yes or no? >> i would have to know more about that. i don't even know the person you are talking a

redfield virologist?>> i believe he is. >> he is. >> prior to the pandemic niaid awarded at least three grants via the new york blood center to a doctor. are you already. >> fun tor. you aware of those grants? [inaudible] >> doctor use and is now. i've expert mike focus not on, doctor. >> i'm not familiar with that name. >> okay. well niaid awarded at least grants via the new york blood center to that scientist. he was a high-ranking chinese pla facial director of for lack of the chinese academy of military medical science. does it concern you if taxpayer dollars are funding someone like this? >> grants that are submitted to the niaid goes through a very speedy does it concern you? part process. does it concern you that u.s. taxpayer dollars would be going to someone was a high-raing chin facial? yes or no? >> i would to know more about that mr. chairman, because of even know who you talk about. >> are your we ever were that the u.s. state department in 2005 issued warnings that the chinese government was

so redfield and wilton, the political strategy firm who do lots of polling, put out an article aboutoters on wednesday and their number is 9%. so let me tell you how labour gets to this. up to a quarter of voters haven't yet decided completely how they're going to vote. so there are two categories of voters who are basically still swithering. so, one, there is consensus. there are around about five million people who say they don't know. they genuinely haven't made their mind up. so if they're one of the people that a pollster turns up to with a clipboard and says how you're going to vote, they say, i don't know. there's a second category, though, of people who would name a party in that question. so, adam fleming, you tell me you're going to vote for the hypothetically marvellous narnia party. but as the pollster, i then say to you, and how sure are you that you are definitely going to vote for the absolutely marvellous narnia party? and you say, hmm, well, maybe not that sure. and they're known as the uncertain and there may be around about three million or so of them. so if you pu

so redfield and wilton, the political strategy firm who do lots of polling, put out an article abouted voters on wednesday and their number is 9%. so let me tell you how labour gets to this. up to a quarter of voters haven't yet decided completely how they're going to vote. so there are two categories of voters who are basically still swithering. so, one, there is consensus. there are around about five million people who say they don't know. they genuinely haven't made their mind up. so if they're one of the people that a pollster turns up to with a clipboard and says how you're going to vote, they say, i don't know. there's a second category, though, of people who would name a party in that question. so, adam fleming, you tell me you're going to vote for the hypothetically marvellous narnia party. but as the pollster, i then say to you, and how sure are you that you are definitely going to vote for the absolutely marvellous narnia party? and you say, hmm, well, maybe not that sure. and they're known as the uncertain and there may be around about three million or so of them. so if yo

redfield thinks. >> bill: more talk about this.w mirror and seeing amazing things. >> martha: good to see you as always. a slow-speed chase through a neighborhood. police chasing down pickles the piglet. a picture perfect ending. the two officers join us next. hi, i'm william devane. did you know it took our founders 116 days to debate and draft the u.s. constitution? turns out they didn't trust the printing of paper money, but they did trust gold and silver. article 1, section 10. gold and silver. good for the founders, good for me, good for you. rosland capital - is a trusted leader in helping people acquire precious metals. gold bullion, lady liberty gold and silver proofs, and premium coins, can help you preserve your wealth. call rosland capital to receive your free rosland guide to gold, gold & precious metals ira, and silver brochure. with rosland, there are no gimmicks, no hassles... and they have fast, reliable shipping. ask yourself. are you safe? make gold your new standard. call rosland capital today at 800-630-8900, 80

redfield was, others were, but not dr.t suspicious enough. >> harris: he is the most uncurious scientist i've ever seen. he is not curious and representative mccormick from georgia was saying yesterday in that very tough round of questioning about why weren't you seeing any patients? why didn't you go see the people suffering? so that you could better understand what ventilators would do and better understand what could happen to the human body under the conditions of a novel coronavirus? he didn't see patients and wasn't curious enough to do that. you went to a nebraska containment center, both i believe the first time you went is when we had the ebola that broke out in texas and you went again. we know how to contain things. he knew there was a problem. there had to be at least potentially at a lab. we have them here. >> we were working with our labs here with labs there. there was a coordinated effort to manipulate bat coronavirus called gain-of-function research. it was going on with our own scientists and he knew. nih

was cdc director redfield on that call?>> no, he was not. >> reporter: you said you had toiologists regarding origins because you are not an expert just doctor redfield, a virologist? >> prior to the pandemic, naid awarded at least three grants via the new york blood center to doctor sal you sober son. are you aware of those grants? doctor youson xoa. >> i'm not familiar with that name. the bl scientist.ese pla official and director of a lab at the chinese academy of military medical sciences. does it concern you if us texture dollars are funding someone like this? >> grants that are submitted to the naid go through -- >> does it concern you. process. does it taxpayer dollars would be going to someone who is a high-ranking chinese pla official, yes or no? >> i would have to know more about that. i don't even know the person you're talking about. >> were you aware the us state department in 2005 issued warnings that the chinese government was working on the creation of bio weapons? >> i was not aware of that. >> did you ever

when it comes to 6 feet apart, you blame james redfield, can't be critical of the cdc, you spend yourorry about the cdc. stuart: what do you want to do? some congressman think fauci could be arrested. want to go that far? brian: i don't care what happens to anthony fauci. i would love to see some humility and transparency. i would like to get to his emails. how about the fact the advisory for 20 years, came out and we have text messages showing he talked a back channel. keep this free from the freedom of information act. when asked about it yesterday, don't know what he's talking about. he was your advisor. that was his title but he never advised me. senator menendez throwing his wife under the bus was pretty bad. probably the worst. this might be the second-worst. my good friend and advisor for 20 years, don't know what he does or what he was talking about talking about back channel to me, got to be kidding. stuart: you know stephen smith, he spoke out about the hard powell on caitlin clark, waste may be involved. >> there are girls, young ladies in the wnba who are jealous of caitli

robert redfield. >> here's a great point. you just made a great point and here's another one.1918 flu and it was studied again on the flu, a complete different virus. we were studying this virus, the coronavirus, and nebraska in february of 2020, and they were finding it all over the room. so we already knew that distancing and masking wasn't going to be enough, and ventilation, it turned out in retrospect, was the way to go, and cleaning rooms. but we knew it then. so it's disingenuous to say, i don't know where that came from. it came from the 1918 flu, and he knew it. of course he was very vocal in every other regard, hydroxychloroquine, everything. he had opinions. he definitely knew that this was a misappropriation of science here. spew >> sandra: he was also aquestiod protocols we all lived through, whether or not these were justified. listen. >> i'm going to go through a list of covid mitigation measures you supported over the course of the pandemic and i will ask you to give me a "yes" or "no" as to whether you believe these measures were justified. business closures?

have indicated as other officials that have come before us including the former cdc director doctor redfield came before us and set everything they have seen shows it emerge from a lab. dr. fauci did go out of his way to suppress the lab leak theory early on. they were scientists that i got together on a conference call said they thought it was eight a lableak dr. fauci suppress tht theory and the site to pick paper emerged it was a natural occurrence so what happened there within three days everyone change their mind? we want to know what is going on that is the bottom line for the american people deserve to know how the virus is started. we are truly going to print the next pandemic we need to know the origins. >> could this end up in charges against dr. fauci? >> it could. i'm not prejudging anyone i am simply singly to follow the facts to where they lead if ththere's something that was doe that hid from the american people use tax dollars inappropriately then yes, potentially could be criminal charges certainly a perjury we have seen a number of officials say it one thing in closed-door

cdc director redfield testified he wasn't invited on the call because he believed the lab leak theory was possible. three days later on february 4th, 2020, four participants on the conference call authored a paper proximal origin sent to you for editing. proximal origin pushed the natural origin theory. april 16, 2020, dr. collins emailed you expressing dismay that the nature medicine article which was based on proximal origin didn't suppress the lab leak theory and asked you for more public pressure to suppress the lab leak theory. the very next day in response to dr. collins' request to do that you cited the nature medicine article that discounted the lab leak theory from the white house podium. my question to you, sir, did you cite this article at the white house because the nih director asked you to suppress the lab leak theory? >> i did not do that in response to anybody's suggestion to suppress anything. it was in response to a question that someone asked at the podium. and i did not edit any paper as shown in my official testimony. so you said about four or five things, congres

ask redfield. is that responsible leadership? >> in those days there wasn't a lot of information.ars we have asked our public health officials to kind of round out the edges. say everyone should get a polio vaccine. right now that's what they were trying to do and they didn't all the clinical data and this is what happens. >> brian: jammed it down our throat. >> yeah. >> brian: jamie metzl thanks so much. when we come back what is goingg on with our military.a- peteda hegseth wrote a book abou itp .se he wilr.l be with us. ♪ 's not another drop. tyrvaya. it's not another drop. it's the first and only nasal spray for dry eye. tyrvaya treats the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease fast by helping your body produce its own real tears. common side effects include sneezing, cough, and throat and nose irritation. relying only on drops? not me. my own real tears are my relief. ask your eye doctor about tyrvaya. [ applause ] the day you get your clearchoice dental implants changes your struggle with missing teeth forever. it changes how you eat, how you feel, and how you enjoy life. it

robert redfield says that if the virus infects humans on a large scale, there could be a significanthool board will begin weighing criteria for which of the 121 public schools may close or merge in the face of declining enrollment. the district says enrollment has dropped by more than 4,000 students since the 2017, 2018 school year and expect to lose an additional 4,600 students by 2032. the district is also having staffing shortages. fact that the start of this past school year, at least 15% of classrooms, we're staffed by substitute teachers for teachers on special assignment. the school board will be presented with recommendations at a june 25th meeting. social media sites could one day have a warning label like what you see on tobacco or alcohol products? us surgeon general doctor vivek murthy wants to advise parents that using social media might damage their children's mental health. they pointed to a study that teens who spent more than 3 hours a day on social media face significant higher risk of mental health issues and have lower self-esteem. a warning label would require ap

i think people were if you look at what people said about bob redfield and how they disparaged him asause he wanted to bring forward the lab leak potential. and i think the reason he felt he needed to bring it forward to push was to push against this. it had to be this way because we didn't know and we knew we would never know. i mean, we knew as stars that china was not transparent. we knew with the second stars china was not transparent, so we were not going to get an answer, but that shouldn't have held us back 4.5 years later from both ensuring that we protect against lab leaks and we protect that public. >> people got infected with hiv in the lab. >> it happens it definitely happens. and so we have to put different rules and regulations and guidelines in place to protect the public. we can do that. we've done that before. >> i realize hindsight is 2020 and you and everyone in our government who worked hard to keep americans safe, deserve all of the, all of the thanks in the world for taking that on on behalf of all of us. but with hindsight being 2020, is there anything you think

that being said, another poll from redfield and wilton yesterday had reform in second place at 19, onef the conservatives. so a mixed picture. but the question is, have mr farage's comments made a difference to reform's momentum? well, joining me now is my panel well, joining me now is my panel, former labour adviser stella santos. and of course kelvin mackenzie as well. stella it seems odd that nigel's been talking about for ukraine so long, when he could have been talking about the issue that he wants this election to be about. is it a tactical error on his part? >> massive, massive strategic error on his part. >> massive, massive strategic error on his part . and the error on his part. and the reason why he did that, of course, is because genuinely, he is suspicious of the eu. he's suspicious of the american intention. she obviously has sympathies with donald trump, who doesn't recognise the very important role that the west plays when it comes to challenging putin. he made a massive error in the language that he used. he said that the west provoked vladimir putin and now he's nigel

i mean, rishi sunak leadership ratings this week, according to redfield and wilton, a reputable pollsterto put that in context, that's the lowest , in context, that's the lowest, rating he has ever had. as prime minister or chancellor. >> how does that relate to boris johnson and liz truss, it makes rishi sunak more unpopular than than both of those predecessors. it also leaves him not far off what i would call prince andrew territory . what prince andrew territory. what prince andrew being —50 rishi sunak being close to —30. but here's a here's the issue right ? close to —30. but here's a here's the issue right? i mean, look, rishi sunak's lost the country , right. he's not in the country, right. he's not in the conversation anymore. let's be honest. the conservative party, they're not even competitive . they're not even competitive. the question now is can they minimise losses. and who is going to replace rishi sunak after the election. yes, those are the questions that are going to bubble to the surface for nigel farage and the reform party. big opportunity. they are winning over some

and i believe redfield and wilton has also had a slight crossover, it's clear that the reform surge isnow, there's no denying it. you're getting a situation where they're either within the margin of error or they are just narrowly ahead . and this looks narrowly ahead. and this looks set to go down to the wire, when we had this market up, i had to believe, honestly, i had to say i didn't really believe they'd actually do it, but it's gotten closer and closer. nigel farage stood the campaign's momentum in a lot of attention, and they're just 9 to 4 to win a bigger percentage of the vote. >> interesting stuff. well, nigel, of course this is all fun and games, but there's a very serious point at the heart of this. what's been going on with these two conservative candidates? of course, allegedly, allegedly . allegedly, allegedly. >> and i wish i wish they'd tell us. and that would seem to clear things up. we don't know. i mean, they are under under suspicion of the betting equivalent of insider trading, basically. now, we don't we don't know that they won't tell us what actually happened.

the latest poll from redfield and wilson today puts yes for independence 46 and no 48.et's hear now from someone who would like to raise the issue of independence, how do you feel about it? y , independence, how do you feel about it? , ., independence, how do you feel about in , ., ., it? just now, i would say the momentum _ it? just now, i would say the momentum has _ it? just now, i would say the momentum has gone - it? just now, i would say the momentum has gone sort i it? just now, i would say the momentum has gone sort ofi it? just now, i would say the - momentum has gone sort of down a touch, in the sense that people up and down the country now, their priorities are the cost—of—living, getting the services that they need from the nhs, and just basically surviving, when they can't heat their houses, they need, financially, it is such a higher priority now, rather than solving the independence question. with regards to independence, there is a couple of questions that has never been answered. one is the currency, are we still going to retain the pound or are we goin

fauci burke redfield, they are no heroes. their lack of initial response failed us.he continuing lack of leadership and distribution and misinformation killed us. scientific america published an announcement of the coronavirus to the global community way back in march of 2018 on page 22 and the need for a vaccine. that was completely ignored. and all published online in the journal of american medical association on january 23 2020, about the need for prompt action and effective response. naid that fauci was in charge of, the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases, they had oversight -- he had oversight of the diagnostic testing. that failed. he was in charge and failed in his primary mission. finall none of these career bureaucrats spoke up when the prev p house -- that people inject themselves with bleach, a fish tank cleaner chemical. that is all most criminal homicide -- almost criminal homicide. host: don notes that dr. anthony e agency that led the response to covid-19. from the wall street journal this morning, fauci pushes back. sand infectious

the latest poll from redfield and wilson today puts yes for independence 46 and no 48.

redfield virologist?at least three grants via the new york blood center to a doctor. are you already. >> funds are, to doctor. >> are you aware of those grants? [inaudible] >> doctor use and is now. i've expert mike focus not on, doctor. >> i'm not familiar with that name. >> okay. well, niaid awarded at least three grants via the new york blood center to that scientist. high-ranking chinese pla facial director of for lf the chinese academy of military medical science. does it concern you if you taxpayer dollars are funding someone like this? >> grants that are submitted to the niaid goes through a very speedy does it concern you? on the part process. does it concern you that u.s. taxpayer dollars would be going to someone was a high-ranking chinese pla facial? yes or no? >> i would to know more about that, mr. chairman, because of even know who you talk about. >> are your we ever were that the u.s. state department in 2005 issued warnings that the chinese government was working on the creation of bioweap

reform a high score and, and the tories a lower score , such as tories a lower score, such as yougov, redfieldd people polling who do, polling for gb news, those three pollsters are likely to show the conservatives being pushed into third place, either consistently or occasionally, but it reflects something that is really happening, which is that that reform is, is advancing and the tories are retreating. >> now, john, very interesting, nigel farage or the reform party are managing to spike the interest of, the gen zers, so the tories for 18 to 24 year olds, they're on about 7. it's double that for reform, 15% in the latest polling. that's very interesting, isn't it? >> it is. i mean, the whole point is that something is happening in the election campaign. i mean, until until nigel farage announced that he was coming back as, as leader and he's going to stand, the polls were static, the labour lead was fixed at about 20 points, and it didn't seem as if anything , points, and it didn't seem as if anything, you points, and it didn't seem as if anything , you know, it seemed as anything, you know

story in the independent is actually very, very interesting because it's actually prompted by a redfield prime minister, but who is going to be the next leader of the opposition, because what they're saying is the tories aren't even going to get that potentially. it is going to be nigel farage leading, perhaps either reform or maybe coming back as tory leader . or maybe coming back as tory leader. that's what this story is all about. so they're kind of taking it as a given that we've got a new prime minister in starmer. that's what they're thinking here. and it's actually very interesting. they're saying that farage could well be the man end up who ends up leading the official opposition . but the the official opposition. but the question isn't that it will be him. it will be just how he will do that, because of course, he's not actually an mp at the moment. and he does stand for reform. he's not. but with how how, how do they reckon that would happen then? well, i how they think everything happens now that nothing would surprise you in this in this world of politics. and actually it sou