throughgap redistribution. you have workers are not able to earn enough, we spend more than $1 trillion a year redistributing money toward lower income households. a tremendous amount of that goes toward health care spending but there is also a large disability program to transfer money to households where folks are on disability so they are not working at all. there is a large food stamp program to transfer resources to spend on food. there is a large housing program. the direction we have been going is to keep doing that. to say the economy is not producing enough wages for lower income households. biggereep creating programs to transfer the money to them to allow them to buy things. i think we are seeing two problems with that. one is that from a consumption perspective, you end up with all of the consumption weighted on the basis of your transfer programs. one way to understand the incredible growth in our health care sector and how that has become such an important part of our economy is because that is th

there is a very large food stamp program to redistribute forces to -- resources to spend on food. the direction we have been going is to keep doing that. if the economy is not producing enough wages for lower income households, let's keep creating more and bigger programs to transfer the money to them to allow them to buy things. i think we are seeing two problems with that. one, from a consumption perspective, you end up with on thetion weighted basis of your transfer program. one way to understand the incredible growth in our health care sector and why that has become such an important part of our economy, is because that is the form we have chosen to do transfers in. even if you are a low income , if you have health care needs there is close to a blank check from the government for health care. on the other hand if what you need is a car to get to work or do renovations to your house, or to consume in other parts of the economy, we say sorry, we have no help for you. we say consumption is going to be more and more about the types of programs we want to offer. is second problem,

i think they are raising money makes sense, both for redistributive reasons. i would much rather have them say, we're going to run this wage subsidy with one chunk of the money and the rest of the money we're going to send back to the states. i would call a flex bond. each state gets its share of the safety net funding. with that, you can figure out how much you want to take care of that who can't work and support themselves. you get to a system where state and down to the local nonprofit level would have a lot more books ability through the actual needs of distinguishing between those who can't work and to adjust the actual needs of those who can't work rather than just trying to create a not working system that starts to look a lot like people can achieve if they do work. >> you adjust the imprecations of the working hypothesis. education to immigration and trade, curious of the potential applications of error other areas. one is fed voluntary policy. in the short-term risks and consequences for the market and for workers about. the second is, in financial b

and redistribution is four times what it was. so from one view, that bright red with all those purple splotches is success, that is in fact exactly what we were promised and what we said we were going for when we said we're going to grow the economic pie and as long as on that we win, we can only compensate the losers. the darker the red, the more compensating of losers is going on. i think at the same time most of us would say intuitively and virtually all the evidence about where we are as a nation could tell us that this is not success,that this is deeply problematic . so i think the right analogy is to kind of movies about, the classic romantic comedy where the trailer in tones about the lead figure. he had it all or so she thought. she had the apartment and the car and a cool job. and yet she's not happy. because these two professional things turn out to be what has notmattered most in life . so what have we gotten wrong? i think it comes all the way back to something adam smith wrote and i'll read the quote because it's qui

what food recovery does is recover and redistribute food that would go wasted and redistributing to peopleommunity. >> the moment that i became really engaged in the cause of fighting food waste was when i had just taken the food from the usf cafeteria and i saw four pans full size full of food perfectly fine to be eaten and made the day before and that would have gone into the trash that night if we didn't recover it the next day. i want to fight food waste because it hurts the economy, it's one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world. if it was a nation, it would be the third largest nation behind china and the united states. america wastes about 40% of the food we create every year, $160 billion worth and that's made up in the higher cost of food for consumers. no matter where you view the line, you should be engaged with the issue of food waste. ♪ ♪ >> access edible food that we have throughout our lunch program in our center, i go ahead and collect it and i'll cool it down and every night i prep it up and the next day i'll heat it and ready for delivery. it's really n

those dollars and redistribute, you don't have to do it dollar for dollar. and you can redistribute to primary care or support nurses and offices, whichever way you want the transformational things to work out. >> i think that you can do it within the models, but i would still argue that the fundamental rebalancing needs to happen. because it does trace through into the aco and managed care. >> i think it also affects people's career choices and things like that so gives you the infrastructure with which to start up from the beginning. but i do think that every solution is going to have its own problems. we all agree, i think, i would bet in this room, agree that all those positive things we want to accomplish, the question is how to get there. and what price will we pay along the way? i think one of the positive things about the aco's is that it brings people together to work more collaborative. that's just collaboratively the people have been working alone for some time so this will improve our communities. furthermore, it also brings hospitals and physici

there are lots of taxes in france, and lots of redistribution. france, and lots of redistribution.haps it could be much more efficiently done. that is for sure. there are lots of taxes in france and lots of people feel impoverished. lots of people feel impoverished. lots of people feel left out from the benefits of globalisation, and president macron is the radiant face of a happy globalisers france. perhaps they do not feel represented by such a young, dishes and ambitious young man. there is a dichotomy at the heart of french society at the moment. this is what this protest shows. we're going to leave it there for now. agnes was speaking to us from paris. we will take you to the streets of paris and you can see the fires and the smoke around the arc de triomphe. notjust prescience that have taken to the streets. these are the french that have travelled from across the country to demonstrate about the rising cost of living. earlier, we also saw people who had made it to the top of the arc de triomphe. those are the pictures that you can see. it has also been reported that 65 peopl

our situation and the french situation if they did it on purpose and what they wanted to do is redistribute the resources of the citizens they wanted to channel some of the resources and address the economic policies they wanted to give the money they would have gotten from this rise and challenge it into the alternative sources such as solar or wind power and they did that deliberately and people have an issue with that because they do not like such a change in the energy policy at their expense what are we seeing in russia? we had a pickup in the gasoline prices because the prices in the world market have been growing that the government wasted no time in taking the measures to prevent the fall of the prices and we managed to secure an agreement where the major refining companies. that is the difference and that the government wanted to rise the prices and we had to fight the rise. of course this is a trend we are seeing and we have secured this agreement which is going to be in place on film arch of next year. an adjustment can be made due to the rise starting from january 1, but it goin

must above all assume all together all our responsibilities, the responsibility to produce and to redistribute the responsibility to learn, to be free, the responsibility to change and take into account and time it changed other challenges and to succeed. we must come together and we must tackle all the key issues together. i want the right questions to be asked about representation of diversity of opinions to be represented and taken into account and who are not members of the political parties and the balance of taxation and efficient and the question of our day-to-day lives to face climate change. housing, traveling, and the right solutions will emerge. i would like to raise the question of the organization of the state, how it is too centralized, for decades it's been too centralized and the question of public services across the whole of our country and i also want us to agree and i want us to reconcile the nation with the deep identity and we must tackle the question of immigration. we have to tackle immigration and these deep changes all for sharing the debate. unprecedented debate and

so we've done stress checks now, looking at this incremental load from the redistribution. we've checked the adjacent members and found that there's no other stressing of those members, and again, those calculations have been submitted to the p.r.p. for their review. so whilst there's no indication of any damage as mr. vecchio said, we're testing the bolting and bolt testing. we want to make sure that there's no physical stress to those elements. so thank you for your time, and i invite my questions. >> questions from board members? no questions? yes. >> so it looks like the cracks that had started at the access holes in the original design, when you showed the repair, it didn't look like it had the same access holes, so are they not shown or are they not necessary -- >> the repair is to actually take a continuance plate and bolt it on so there is no welding in this fix. it's essentially a bolted connection and it bypasses that area. >> okay. and so what was the purpose of the access holes to begin with if we don't need them. >> because the original design is a welded girde

throughgap redistribution.e workers are not able to earn enough, we spend more than $1 trillion a year redistributing money toward lower income households. a tremendous amount of that goes toward health care spending but there is also a large disability program to transfer money to households where folks are on disability so they are not working at all. there is a large food stamp program to transfer resources to spend on food. there is a large housing program. the direction we have been going is to keep doing that. to say the economy is not producing enough wages for lower income households. biggereep creating programs to transfer the money to them to allow them to buy things. i think we are seeing two problems with that. one is that from a consumption perspective, you end up with all of the consumption weighted on the basis of your transfer programs. one way to understand the incredible growth in our health care sector and how that has become such an important part of our economy is because that is the form w

redistributing wealth creating wealth is all we need to do some reforms. to do it you're talking about creating wealth for europe's largest economy creating wealth for the world's biggest hedge fund and fund managers. first of all creating a custom was you should keep this in mind in germany as a discussion of all and. hedge funds and so on is their negative because they should be just many. many people in dolman stage fonts the ordinary people benefit from the work so i think the discussion this net. minutes once said he learned from his parents about giving back something to society if you could afford it well he squirreled away enough money to give up his corporate career possibly become leader of the christian democrats but he'd have to be investing in that surely he'd want to give back. to society by taking charge of europe's largest economy and becoming chancellor. china in portugal sign an agreement to make the portuguese port of scene ish part of china's new growth global trade route portugal has a long tradition of trade with china dating back to

great for the country given the fixin's the past thirteen years the governments are focused on redistributing wealth and other creating wealth is all we need to do some reforms might be popular but now it's my peers who i want to do it you're talking about creating wealth for europe's largest economy not creating wealth for the world's biggest hedge fund and fund managers. first of all creating wealth for the customers you should keep this in mind and especially in germany the discussion of all and no costs and hedge funds and so on is very negative a crop is actually just minnie's and everyday monotony for many people and dolman station fonts it's all divine of the ordinary people benefit from the work so i think the discussion here is a little bit misled. matts once said he learned from his parents about giving back something to society if you can afford it well he squirreled away enough money to give up his corporate career possibly become leader of the christian democrats but he'd have to be investing in more than that surely he'd want to give back to society by taking charge of europe's

they have elections coming up in may, britain's seats have already been redistributed. there is a lot of work for the to do to change. so the fact that they are willing to offer theresa may a delay, i think is very significant and, you know, if she had any sense, she would say yes, you know what, this is a mass, we could do would be extra time. and maybe to stick a little humiliation oi'i maybe to stick a little humiliation on the chin for the greater good of the country. but the fundamentals would not change. because labour would not change. because labour would say, we would like to vote this down even though the custom unions. it's really all the mps. they would say that, that is one reason it does not hit their six tasks, and which he is offering is a temporary measure of the backstop. apartment taking control of the situation parliament taking control of the situation, during things and that direction. but when a delay have to be approved by parliament? and that could be pretty difficult, commit? they can throw their weight around and. throw their weight around? ot

is that church members give a contribution of their income to the general tax and that's then redistributed to the church communities the idea with the muslim but the a mosque task is not that similar it could be that some of the problem is that the mosques in germany are not structured nationwide so they're structured more in associations coming from the original where these sort of association is from and also they would be structured by the federal level would give an extra layer of complication so this is a general idea that could be modeled after the church tax but it could have some more complications what's behind this drive now that we're seeing we heard a number of politicians discussing the so-called mosque is this all about achieving equality or is it something else well in general this would of course help equality in the sense that it would help the mosques here in germany to have a more equal footing here in the german society and it would help them to have a more equal standing combine compared to churches in germany but of course the question is what the idea behind it is al

those dollars and redistribution -- you don't have to do it dollar for dollar. but it is very, you know, and you can recontribute to primary care or support nurses in offices, whichever way, you know, the sort of the transformation things that you were talking about. so i think you can do it within the models, but i would still argue that fundamental rebalancing needs to happen because it does trace through into the aco and the manages care in the way that you're saying. >> and i think it also affects people's career choices and ore things like that. it sort of gives you the infrastructure with which to start out right from the beginning. but i do think -- first of all, i think every solution is going to have its own problems. so we all agree, i think -- i would bet, in this room agree that all the positive things we want to accomplish, the question is how to get there and what will be the price that you have to pay along the way. i think one of the positive things about the acos is that it brings people together to work collaboratively. and people have been wor

the powers, you don't have to do it dollar for dollar that you can redistribute to primary care or support whichever transformational things you are using. you can do it within the models but i would still use the fundamental rebalancing, it needs to happen because it does trace through into the aco and manage care. i think it also affects people 's career choices, it gives you the infrastructure to start out from the beginning so, this is going to get people to solve problems for our community. furthermore, it also brings hospitals and physicians together more effectively when they have a shared incentive to do better and you can redistribute things in some places have done a good job of popping up primary care and more importantly doing a good job but that you are not part of an organization that is larger. there's a infrastructure that has to pay to make sure you have the data processing to look more like an insurance company. these are really popular things and i think they will take some of the waste out of our system, but these are steps they have to take along the way and one has to

what they wanted to do is it to redistribute the resources of the citizens. they wanted to channel some of these resources and to addressing the issues they have in economic policies. they wanted to use the money that they would have got from this rise and to channel it into developing alternatives and energy sources such as solar or wind power, and they did that deliberately and people had an issue with that. because they do not like such a change in the energy policy at their expense. what are we seeing in russia? we have a pick up in the gasoline prices because the oil prices in the world markets have been growing. but the government wasted no time and taking the measures to prevent this call of the prices to-- in increase and we managed to secure an agreement with a major oil refining companies. that is the difference. and in france, the government wanted to rise these prices itself and we had to fight this rise which was happening of its own. of course, this is a trend we are seeing and we have secured this agreement which is going to be in place until m

so we've done stress checks now, looking at this incremental load from the redistribution. we've checked the adjacent members and found that there's no other stressing of those members, and again, those

has been fighting for land redistribution and at times members have resorted to land occupations and violence but legal experts argue the current penal code is sufficient to punish those who break the law. to give the government now and in the future the power to declare any type of demonstration by political opponents as terrorism is very dangerous. back at the roadside david jolley shows us some vegetables they've grown. heavy. on the zebra we go hungry a lot we trade things with our neighbors and that's how we survive by using the patches of land by the side of the road imagine if we had our arms actually. but instead of land you're expecting a confrontation with a new president who's declared the estimated one point five million members of the movement a threat to brazil you see in human al-jazeera mato grosso brazil the growing pains gap between executives and the average worker is the target of new regulations come into force in britain from january the first u.k. listed companies will have to moments that reveal and justify the difference in salaries between the boardroom and

has been fighting for land redistribution and at times members have resorted to land occupations and violence but legal experts argue the current penal code is sufficient to punish those who break the law. to give the government now and in the future the power to declare any type of demonstration by political opponents as terrorism is very dangerous. back at the roadside shows of some vegetables they've grown. for every. member we go hungry a lot we trade things with our neighbors and that's how we survive by using the patches of land by the side of the road imagine if we had our arms. ok. but instead of land here expecting a confrontation with a new president who's declared the estimated one point five million members of the movement threat to brazil you see in yemen al jazeera. brazil britain's immigration minister has defended the government's handling of the rise in migrants and refugees crossing the english channel well in two hundred twenty people have attended the crossing since november well look at the view from the british side of the channel in just a moment but first bern

content from his channel will be repackaged and redistributed on hulu and amazon.e's also launched his own toy and clothing collection. >> a 7-year-old millionaire. that's not good for anybody, especially him. you know his parents can't even punish him like a normal kid anymore. they will be, like, you're in big trouble, young man. go to your house! his teacher is, like, where is your math homework? he says, here's some math for yaw, $100, $200, $300 -- ( laughter ) the internet no longer has an infinite number of porn sites. it has infinity minus one. >> tumbler will ban all adult platform on december 17, all nudity is banned except for nude classical statutes, breast feeding and nude political protees ease. >> i like it they make an exception for nude protests. i bet person is about to become really political just so they can stay online. after every money shot, the actress will turn to the camera and be, like, register to vote! ( laughter ) moving overseas, the president of nigeria is having an identity crisis. >> the president of nigeria is denying rumors he's

the plan is to then check up the building on the new pilings which would redistribute the weight of thelding. >> the most challenging part of the design was trying to understand the nature of the soil beneath the building and why it was settling and tilting the way it was. once we figure that out, the fix was relatively straightforward. >> the latest report shows the tower has sunk 1.5 feet and have tilted 14 inches. as for who will pay for the fix, that is being sorted out in court. >>> to sonoma county boys and girls clubs are facing a lawsuit that they covered up reports of sexual abuse. as it was filed today on behalf of four victims. it names the boys and girls club of sonoma valley and central sonoma valley. the allegations involve a former employee named paul kilgore. he has been sentenced to 150 years in prison after being convicted of sex abuse that spanned more than 10 years. the suit claims that staff at the boys and girls club received numerous complaints and warnings. that failed to take action. victims ranged in age from 6-10 years ol >>> california's arrest rate is on the

we redistributed it to all of our staff equally.nd so every year we hope british airways will launch a dirty tricks campaign against us. david: people like the fact that you were against the establishment airline. one time i read that what is now called the eye, the big ferris wheel in london, british airways was supporting it and they could not get it assembled and the cannot get it to work. and you rented a -- was it a blimp? richard: we actually had a small blimp company, and we scrambled the blimp and we flew over the eye as it was still on the ground and all the world's press were there to watch this be erected. and all they said, ba cannot get it up. and we we got the headlines, they didn't. david: it turned out well and in you began building other companies. did you always think your creativity could get it off the ground? richard: well again, the only reason we would go into a new sector is if we felt it was being badly run by other people. so the reason we went into trains was the government were running trains, british rai

as you all our duties together the duty to produce so that we can redistribute the duty to learn to bea free citizen the duty to change to understand. our deficit and also our own walk on the concerns of the climate but together we will talk together about these essential questions to do with representation to listen to opinions more diverse a fairer electoral system. even citizens who do not belong to a political party the fairness and balance of our tax system which allows for justice been also a good idea also our daily life how we live to deal with the challenge of climate climate change we need to find good solutions that will come out of our discussion how we organize the state and how it is governed and administered from paris without a doubt to centralized in paris and also public services in the whole of the country . i want us to agree with the nation and we agree on what is our profound identity together questions of migration and that we deal with the most of these fundamental changes that require deep thought and shared thought means we have to data to a level which has to

the world's most modern sheet recovery ventilation system it reduces heat from drain water and redistribute it to the households above and also below. that way most heat is recycled. swimming pool attendant tuckey on a valid shift is over finally she's getting some natural light and fresh air which she misses most. maybe at the guy can utilize it even if it can get up to thirty eight degrees celsius down there and it's very humid it can be a bit much exhausting like in a sauna in cement that would cease at that but as it was an insult. even so work in helsinki is vast underground city is going ahead as planned the future it seems the subterranean. now if you've ever been to prague you'll have seen the stunning churches and museums the classical and baroque architecture and of probably the beer it is everywhere in fact the czech republic drinks more beer per capita than any other country in the world it is also the birthplace of the famous pilsner beer is a national drink easily accessible and very affordable and the government wants to keep it that way. it's a cliche to say checks like to d

don't believe that a simple distribution of people who have come in from whichever parts can be redistributedand that this is the magic bullet, the silver bullet solution — that we say. in britain, the politics of identity played into a uniquely protracted and divisive argument over brexit. the uk has been on course to leave the eu since the referendum of 2016, but tortuous negotiations over the exact shape of an exit deal have so far delivered only chaos and uncertainty. well, i wanted the pm to bring back a great deal that was in the national interest, and i suspended disbelief for the last two and a half years that she might do so. theresa may said this in the commons, she said no—one, "no—one knows what will happen if this deal doesn't pass, but it will open the door to more division, more uncertainty and all of the risk that that will entail." you surely agree with that? no, i think proceeding on this basis, with a flawed, botched brexit that leaves us in the worst of all worlds will leave everybody unhappy. the conservative party will be blamed for bungling brexit, for saddling the coun

contribute possibly to the one fifty thousand to two hundred thousand barrels and the balance will be redistributed over other. members of. we'll leave it there international oil economist dr solomon franks very much for your time thank you. has named the state department's heather now as his nominee for u.s. ambassador to the united nations the president said she's smart she's nice she's all other things which make a good candidate. heather nauert will be nominated. go work with nikki haley to. replace vicki at united age and she'll be ambassador to the united nations very talented very hard very quick and i think she's going to be respected by all so that they're now or will be nominated for the bigger says the united nations. more details we cross to caleb more pain is this a surprising and choice do you think. well it's one of two announcements we heard recently from donald trump about filling cabinet positions so we've got heather nauert slated to replace nikki haley nikki haley trump's ambassador to the united nations is stepping down now heather nauert has been at the state department and it

monopolizing markets and often broke up the biggest culprits no longer it's a hidden oak were redistribution of money and power for the majority of americans to corporate executives and well be shareholders you see antitrust law has fall in by the wayside and it's a shame because america was born by rebelling against monopoly also there was genocide whole lotta genocide well let's focus on the monopoly thing for nearly two hundred years we did a somewhat decent job of using local state and federal law to prevent the concentration of economic power so what have been this guy have been. there's a new report out by the anti-monopoly think tank the open markets institute called america's concentration crisis and it's not about our inability to focus. found out after wasting half an hour watching you tube videos about turning your own into drinking water so there goes the. one hundred percent usa made a year and. i am way too easily distracted by nonsense anyway when i finally got to it i realized this new report provides crucial information about a broad range of thirty two different industries